Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is the second most common type of laryngeal cancer with a poor prognosis. Current population-based estimates of the early death rate and associated factors for early death of supraglottic LSCC are lacking. The purpose of this study was to assess the early death rate and related factors for early death in patients with supraglottic LSCC.

Methods

We identified 3733 adult patients diagnosed with supraglottic LSCC between 2010 and 2017 for whom the vital status at 3 months was known from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were staged according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. The early death (survival time ≤ 3 months) rate was calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors associated with the early death rate.

Results

313 (8.38%) of the 3733 patients died within 3 months of diagnosis of supraglottic LSCC. Of these, 225 patients died from cancer-specific causes. Multivariate logistic regression analyses confirmed that advanced age, male sex, advanced T stage, advanced N stage, advanced M stage, and not undergoing treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) had significant correlations with all-cause early death in supraglottic LSCC. In addition, advanced age, advanced T stage, advanced N stage, advanced M stage, and not undergoing treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) were significantly correlated with cancer specificity in supraglottic LSCC.

Conclusion

When a tumor is newly diagnosed, we should pay close attention to sex, age, unmarried status and AJCC TNM staging to quickly detect supraglottic LSCC patients with a tendency toward early death. These findings have implications for precise prognosis prediction and individualized and personalized patient counseling and therapy.

Keywords

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma early death surveillance,epidemiology,and end results database risk factors

Background

Laryngeal cancer is a malignant tumor that originates from the epithelium or connective tissue of the larynx, which can be divided into the supraglottic larynx, glottic, and subglottic regions. It is the most prevalent type of human head and neck tumors in many countries, accounting for 1% to 2.5% of all human neoplasms, with 177,422 new cases and 94,771 deaths worldwide in 2018.¹ Histopathologically, the majority of laryngeal malignancies (approximately 95%) are squamous cell carcinoma,² and more than 95% of laryngeal cancer cases are identified as laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Supraglottic LSCC is the second most common type of laryngeal cancer, accounting for 30% to 40% of cases of laryngeal cancer.³ Although surgical removal or adjuvant therapy, such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy at the early stage of LSCC, can often be curative, the prognosis for LSCC has not shown any improvement in the last 30 years.⁴ Compared with other laryngeal cancer subsites, supraglottic LSCC presents many distinct clinical and biological features, such as its atypical clinical symptoms in the early stage and being more likely to recur and metastasize.^5,6

The incidence and mortality rates of laryngeal cancer have not remarkably decreased in recent decades. Related reports on laryngeal cancer mortality are abundant. Between 10 September 1991 and 10 September 2021, more than 1500 articles with abstracts could be identified when searching PubMed for “laryngeal neoplasms [Mesh]” and “mortality [Mesh].” However, available information on early laryngeal cancer mortality is limited, especially for supraglottic LSCC. To improve the outcome of supraglottic LSCC patients, it is of great importance to identify patients at high risk of early death based on prognostic factors and to develop treatment strategies for these patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the early death rate and associated risk factors in patients with supraglottic LSCC.

Materials and methods

Study design and study population

The present research using the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was conducted for all patients with supraglottic LSCC diagnosed from 2010 to 2017. All supraglottic LSCC patients were diagnosed by histopathology, and cancer staging information for each dataset was determined using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual, seventh edition. The year of diagnosis, age, sex, race, marital status, clinical stage, survival time, outcome, cause of death, total number of in situ/malignant tumors, distant metastatic sites, and treatment information, including whether the patients underwent surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or systemic therapy, were collected from the SEER 18 Registries Research Plus Date, Nov 2020 Sub (2000-2018). The SEER research data were available using SEER*Stat 8.3.9.1 (http://seer.cancer.gov//seerstat/). Patients with the following features were excluded: (1) Supraglottic LSCC was not the primary malignancy; (2) lacking information about distant metastatic sites such as bone metastasis, brain metastasis, hepatic metastasis, and pulmonary metastasis; and (3) information on age, sex, race, marital status, clinical stage, survival time, outcome, cause of death, and treatment information was unavailable. According to the latest age classification criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO),⁷ age at the time of diagnosis was divided into 3 groups: (1) youths: ≤ 44 years, (2) middle-aged people: 45-59 years; and (3) elderly people: ≥ 60 years. Based on previous literature, early death was defined as an overall survival time ≤ 3 months after initial diagnosis.⁸ The original SEER database contains data for 8178 supraglottic LSCC patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2017. We excluded 4445 patients and finally obtained data for 3733 supraglottic LSCC patients for this study.

Statistical analysis

A descriptive analysis was performed. Frequencies and percentages were reported for categorical variables. Comparisons of demographic and clinical characteristics were conducted using Pearson chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine potential risk factors for early death in supraglottic LSCC patients. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. All factors with a P value < .1 detected in the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate analyses, and a P value < .05 was considered statistically significant in the multivariate analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 16.0 (Stata Corp, TX, USA) and GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad, CA, USA).

Results

Mortality rates within 3 months following diagnosis

3-month life status and survival time of 3733 patients with supraglottic LSCC were gained from SEER database, and 313 (8.38%) died within 3 months after diagnosis.

The cause of early death for supraglottic LSCC patients

During the study, 313 early deaths were documented: 225 (71.88%) deaths from cancer-specific causes; 33 (10.54%) from heart diseases; 11 (3.51%) from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; 5 (1.60%) from cerebrovascular diseases; 5 (1.60%) from septicemia; 3 (.96%) from pneumonia and influenza; 3 (.96%) from other infectious and parasitic diseases, including HIV; and 28 (8.95%) from all other causes (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

The cause of death in the patients with supraglottic LSCC. (A) Distribution of the incidence of early death. (B) Distribution of the incidence of non-cancer-specific early death. Abbreviation: Supraglottic LSCC, supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of all supraglottic LSCC patients

The average age of the patients was 61.94 years (range, 30–94 years). There were 2572 (68.90%) male patients and 1161 (31.10%) female patients. Among these patients, the mean age of the male patients was 61.95 years, and the mean age of the female patients was 61.94 years. In addition, 225 (71.88%) of 313 supraglottic LSCC patients in our cohort died from cancer-specific causes, 41 (18.22%) of 225 patients had distant metastasis at diagnosis, and 87 (38.67%) of 225 patients received treatment, surgery was performed in 33 of 225 patients (14.67%). The main characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

			No early death	Cancer-specific early death	Noncancer-specific early death	P
	n	%	n	n	n
Gender
Male	2572	68.90	2333	169	70	.009
Female	1161	31.10	1087	56	18	.009
Age
≤ 44	107	2.87	105	1	1	.000
45-59	1495	40.05	1419	56	20
≥ 60	2131	57.08	1896	168	67
Marital status
Married	1566	41.95	1458	73	35	.010
DSSW	2167	58.05	1962	152	53
Race
Black	646	17.31	579	43	24	.084
White	2972	79.61	2731	178	63
Other	115	3.08	110	4	1
Grade
I	290	7.77	272	12	6	.865
II	2198	58.88	2012	134	52
III	1213	32.49	1106	77	30
IV	32	.86	30	2	0
T classification
T1	555	14.87	525	16	14	.000
T2	1147	30.73	1070	57	20
T3	1341	35.92	1227	78	36
T4	690	18.48	598	74	18
N classification
N0	1623	43.48	1509	70	44	.001
N1	597	15.99	551	38	8
N2	1421	38.07	1282	106	33
N3	92	2.46	78	11	3
M classification
M0	3562	95.42	3293	184	85	.000
M1	171	4.58	127	41	3
Surgery therapy
Yes	1097	29.39	1055	33	9	.000
No	2636	70.61	2365	192	79
Radiotherapy
Yes	933	24.99	916	13	4	.000
No	2800	75.01	2504	212	84	.000
Chemotherapy
Yes	2145	57.46	2064	59	22	.000
No	1588	42.54	1356	166	66	.000
Systemic therapy
Yes	657	17.60	643	13	1	.000
No	3076	82.40	2777	212	87	.000
Bone metastasis
No	3707	99.30	3401	218	88	.002
Yes	26	.70	19	7	0	.002
Brain metastasis
No	3732	99.97	3419	225	88	1.000
Yes	1	.03	1	0	0	1.000
Hepatic metastasis
No	3713	99.46	3404	221	88	.059
Yes	20	.54	16	4	0	.059
Pulmonary metastasis
No	3613	96.79	3330	197	86	.000
Yes	120	3.21	90	28	2	.000

Abbreviation: Supraglottic LSCC, supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma; DSSW, divorced/single/separated/widowed; Other, American Indian/AK Native, Asian/Pacific Islander.

Independent risk factors for early death

The detailed results of the univariate logistic regression analyses are described in Table 2. Univariate logistic regression analyses confirmed that sex, age, marital status, race, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, not undergoing treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and systemic therapy), and distant metastasis (bone, hepatic, and pulmonary metastasis) were candidate risk factors for all-cause early death, and sex, age, marital status, T stage, N stage, M stage, not undergoing treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and systemic therapy), and distant metastasis (bone, hepatic, and pulmonary metastasis) were candidate risk factors for cancer-specific early death.

Table 2.

Univariate logistic regression analyses of risk factors for early death.

Prognostic factor	All-cause early death				Cancer-specific early death
Prognostic factor	P	OR	Lower95% CI	Higher95% CI	P	OR	Lower95% CI	Higher95% C
Gender	.003				.039
Male		1				1
Female		.665	.507	.871		.721	.528	.983
Age	.000				.000
≤ 44		1				1
45-59		2.812	.681	11.609		4.125	.565	30.093
≥ 60		6.507	1.596	26.536		9.072	1.258	65.409
Marital status	.005				.003
Married		1				1
DSSW		1.411	1.107	1.798		1.543	1.158	2.056
Race	.052				.419
Black		1				1
White		.763	.573	1.014		.893	.633	1.261
Other		.393	.155	.997		.505	.178	1.436
Grade	.517				.564
I		1				1
II		1.397	.847	2.303		1.504	.822	2.751
III		1.462	.872	2.451		1.570	.843	2.926
IV		1.007	.223	4.555		1.544	.330	7.230
T classification	.000				.000
T1		1				1
T2		1.259	.815	1.945		1.762	1.002	3.097
T3		1.626	1.074	2.462		2.080	1.204	3.596
T4		2.692	1.754	4.132		4.047	2.329	7.033
N classification	.004				.000
N0		1				1
N1		1.105	.774	1.578		1.508	1.004	2.265
N2		1.435	1.108	1.859		1.788	1.311	2.440
N3		2.376	1.304	4.329		3.013	1.536	5.910
M classification	.000				.000
M0		1				1
M1		4.241	2.945	6.108		5.790	3.955	8.476
Surgery therapy	.000				.000
Yes		1				1
No		2.878	2.063	4.016		2.533	1.739	3.690
Radiotherapy	.000				.000
Yes		1				1
No		6.369	3.884	10.445		5.797	3.295	10.200
Chemotherapy	.000				.000
Yes		1				1
No		4.360	3.355	5.666		4.127	3.044	5.597
Systemic therapy	.000				.000
Yes		1				1
No		4.945	2.874	8.509		3.667	2.081	6.462
Bone metastasis	.002				.000
No		1				1
Yes		4.095	1.708	9.817		5.896	2.452	14.178
Brain metastasis	1.000				1.000
No
Yes
Hepatic metastasis	.072				.015
No		1				1
Yes		2.754	.915	8.289		3.950	1.310	11.915
Pulmonary metastasis	.000				.000
No		1				1
Yes		3.922	2.550	6.033		5.277	3.376	8.250

Abbreviation: DSSW, divorced/single/separated/widowed; Other, American Indian/AK Native, Asian/Pacific Islander; ORs, odds ratios; CIs, confidence intervals.

The detailed results of the multivariate logistic regression analyses are described in Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analyses confirmed that advanced age, advanced T stage, advanced N stage, advanced M stage, and not undergoing treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) were independent risk factors for all-cause premature death, and female sex was an independent protective factor for all-cause premature death. In addition, the multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that advanced age, advanced T stage, advanced N stage, advanced M stage, and not undergoing treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) were independent risk factors for tumor-specific death.

Table 3.

Multivariate logistic regression analyses of risk factors for early death.

Prognostic factor	All-cause early death				Cancer-specific early death
Prognostic factor	P	ORs	Lower95% CI	Higher95% CI	P	ORs	Lower95% CI	Higher95% C
Gender	.022				.295
Male		1				1
Female		.708	.527	.947		.836	.597	1.169
Age	.000				.001
≤ 44		1				1
45-59		2.670	.624	11.421		3.905	.520	29.316
≥ 60		5.057	1.195	21.394		2.836	1.584	5.077
Marital status	.125				.117
Married		1				1
DSSW		1.235	.943	1.619		1911	1.062	3.440
Race	.359
Black		1
White		1.015	.735	1.401
Other		.510	.192	1.354
T classification	.000				.000
T1		1				1
T2		1.359	.860	2.146		1.911	1.062	3.440
T3		2.369	1.510	3.717		2.836	1.584	5.077
T4		3.635	2.241	5.896		4.979	2.717	9.122
N classification	.000				.000
N0		1				1
N1		1.486	1.005	2.197		1.952	1.258	3.028
N2		1.849	1.359	2.517		2.061	1.438	2.955
N3		4.039	2.010	8.117		4.508	2.088	9.735
M classification	.001				.000
M0		1				1
M1		4.261	1.799	10.092		5.468	2.283	13.097
Surgery therapy	.000				.000
Yes		1				1
No		2.900	1.955	4.303		2.452	1.574	3.821
Radiotherapy	.000				.000
Yes		1				1
No		5.426	2.833	10.393		6.110	2.916	12.802
Chemotherapy	.000				.000
Yes		1				1
No		7.422	5.465	10.081		7.179	5.037	10.231
Systemic therapy	.030				.009
Yes		1				1
No		.442	.211	.924		.350	.158	.772
Bone metastasis	.996				.806
No		1				1
Yes		1.003	.319	3.159		1.153	.370	3.592
Hepatic metastasis	.394				.474
No		1				1
Yes		.552	.141	2.162		.610	.158	2.359
Pulmonary metastasis	.244				.246
No		1				1
Yes		.577	.229	1.455		.576	.227	1.462

Abbreviation: DSSW, divorced/single/separated/widowed; Other, American Indian/AK Native, Asian/Pacific Islander; ORs, odds ratios; CIs, confidence intervals.

Discussion

Unfortunately, even though the overall incidence of laryngeal cancer is declining, it is one of the few oncological diseases whose 5-year survival rate has dropped from 66% to 63% over the past 40 years.² Supraglottic LSCC is the second most common type of laryngeal cancer, whose oncological behavior is different from that of the glottic and subglottic types, and the 5-year survival rate of patients with supraglottic LSCC is 54%, which is lower than the survival rate of glottic type.^2,6 This highlights the need for further action and further research in this important area.

In this study, the 3-month mortality rates among patients with newly diagnosed supraglottic LSCC were calculated. We found that 8.38% of the supraglottic LSCC patients died within 3 months following diagnosis. Premature death is a critical and intractable problem in cancer treatment.^9,10 Early death was defined as 30 days or 3 months after a new diagnosis in previous reports.^9,11 Therefore, we defined early death as 3 months after newly diagnosed supraglottic LSCC in our study. To provide personalized treatment plans for patients, understanding the relationship between risk factors and premature death is critical. Therefore, based on the data of supraglottic LSCC patients in the SEER database, we analyzed the factors associated with early death and directed personalized screening for early death risk.

In this study, we found that the leading causes of early death among patients with supraglottic LSCC were cancer-specific causes, followed by heart disease, which accounted for 71.88% and 10.54% of early deaths, respectively. The AJCC TNM staging system is a widely used cancer staging system to predict prognosis and survival.^12,13 However, the TNM staging system continuously lacks accuracy for the prognostic prediction of patients, as external confounding factors such as age, sex, ethnicity, marital status, and other socioeconomic factors are ignored.¹⁴

Prior studies have reported that the smoke habit is an independent risk factor for worse specific survival in LSCC,¹⁵ and advanced age indicates a poorer prognosis in patients with LSCC.^16,17 The SEER database does not provide environmental exposure data, including smoking, so we were unable to assess smoke habit in our analyses, and our results tend to suggest that age at diagnosis is a risk factor for early death from all causes and that cancer-specific early death may also be a warning factor. There was a positive relationship between age at diagnosis of supraglottic LSCC patients and early death. The reason behind this phenomenon may likely be due to the heterogeneity of the tumors, immune status, nutritional status, and physiology of various organs. It is well known that poorer nutritional quality and immune responsiveness among elderly individuals results in increased susceptibility and severity of cancer-related complications.¹⁸ Furthermore, the mortality of cardiac and cerebrovascular diseases likewise increased with age.¹⁹

There is a clear consensus that laryngeal cancer occurs more commonly in men than in women.^20,21 In our study, the multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the difference was statistically significant in terms of sex (P < .05) in all-cause early death; contrary results occurred for cancer-specific early death. We argue, however, that male sex was an independent risk factor in patients with supraglottic LSCC. The possible reason for this aspect might be that male patients more commonly smoked or drank in comparison with females (smoking, 26% vs 0%; drinking, 23% vs 4%).²²

Marital status, as one of the social or psychological factors, has long been recognized as an important prognostic factor for nearly all cancers, including colorectal cancer,²³ breast cancer,²⁴ non-small-cell lung cancer,²⁵ glioblastoma multiforme,²⁶ chondrosarcoma,²⁷ and laryngeal cancer.²⁸ That is, the prognosis of married patients is remarkably better than that of unmarried patients in cancer patients. Is marital status at the time of diagnosis of supraglottic LSCC patients relevant to early death? In our study, the univariate logistic regression analyses indicated being divorced/single/separated/widowed (DSSW) as a risk factor for supraglottic LSCC, but the multivariate logistic regression analyses showed no statistical significance. Nevertheless, we believe that the reason why the different results were observed might be because some patients’ marital status may change during follow-up and being DSSW can be an independent risk factor for all-cause early death and cancer-specific early death in supraglottic LSCC patients. Some underlying reasons may be that marriage could improve cardiovascular, endocrine, and immune functions.²⁹ Moreover, romantic partnerships and marriage might enhance therapeutic interventions in patients with supraglottic LSCC within a biopsychosocial framework.

In this study, tumor characteristics, including advanced T, advanced N, and advanced M stages, were associated with a higher chance of all-cause and cancer-specific early death. Distant metastases almost invariably herald a poor prognosis with a very short overall survival, especially for head and neck cancer.³⁰ Possible causes include damage to vital organs and increased tumor load to lethal levels. Furthermore, when adjusted for potential confounders in multivariate logistic regression analyses of risk factors for all-cause early death, patients who underwent surgical therapy had a significant survival benefit compared to those without the surgical approach, with odds ratio (OR) = 2.900 (95% CI: 1.955-4.303); radiation therapy and chemotherapy have similar survival benefits, with OR = 5.426 (95% CI: 2.833–10.393) and OR = 7.422 (95% CI: 5.465–10.081), respectively. And, results remained similar when we analyzed several risk factors for cancer-specific early death. In short, treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, might improve the long-term prognosis of supraglottic LSCC. This view is currently considered as a consensus. Our analysis showed that aggressive treatment targeted to tumors could reduce the early death rate. In summary, early diagnosis and effective treatment of supraglottic LSCC is the key to improving the survival rate of patients and reducing the early death rate.

Several potential limitations exist in our research. First, due to the data limitations of the SEER database, the applicability of our results is limited to America; the results may differ in other areas with different health care systems. Second, there was a lack of data, such as for comorbidities, performance status, and recent weight loss, which are potential predictors of early death. Additionally, because our data were retrospectively reviewed, future prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Conclusion

Our results showed that a total of 8.38% of supraglottic LSCC patients had an early death. Advanced age, male sex, unmarried status, advanced T stage, advanced N stage, distant metastasis, and not undergoing treatment are important predictors of early death in supraglottic LSCC patients. When a tumor is newly diagnosed, we should pay close attention to sex, age, unmarried status, and AJCC TNM staging to quickly detect supraglottic LSCC patients with a tendency to die early, and give patients a chance to receive systemic treatment to reduce early death, and/or give patients and their families time to plan for the future.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The present study was supported by the Discipline Leader Training Program of Health Commission (WD2019-13, Qingpu District, Shanghai, P.R. China) and the Project of Health Commission (W2021-03, Qingpu District, Shanghai, P.R. China).

Data availability

The dataset analyzed in this study is available in the SEER database.

ORCID iD

Zhiqiang Guo

References

Bray

Ferlay

Soerjomataram

Siegel

Torre

Jemal

. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424.

Nocini

Molteni

Mattiuzzi

Lippi

. Updates on larynx cancer epidemiology. Chin J Cancer Res. 2020;32(1):18-25.

Pfister

Spencer

Brizel

, et al. Head and neck cancers, Version 2.2014. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014;12(10):1454-1487.

Bussu

Ranelletti

Gessi

, et al. Immunohistochemical expression patterns of the HER4 receptors in normal mucosa and in laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas: antioncogenic significance of the HER4 protein in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(8):1724-1733.

Elegbede

Rybicki

Adelstein

, et al. Oncologic and functional outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(12):1111-1117.

Patel

Echanique

Yip

, et al. Supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based study of 22,675 Cases. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(8):1822-1827.

Dyussenbayev

. Age periods of human life. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal. 2017;4(6).

Penel

Glabbeke

Mathoulin-Pelissier

, et al. Performance status is the most powerful risk factor for early death among patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: The European organisation for research and treatment of cancer-soft tissue and bone sarcoma group (STBSG) and French Sarcoma Group (FSG) study. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(10):1544-1550.

Wang

Mao

, et al. The incidence, associated factors, and predictive nomogram for early death in stage IV colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34(7):1189-1201.

10.

Feng

Guo

Jin

Xiang

Zhang

Ruan

. A predictive nomogram for early mortality in stage IV gastric cancer. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e923931.

11.

Myrdal

Gustafsson

Lambe

Horte

Stahle

. Outcome after lung cancer surgery. Factors predicting early mortality and major morbidity. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2001;20(4):694-699.

12.

Compton

Byrd

Garcia-Aguilar

Kurtzman

Washington

. AJCC Cancer Staging Atlas : A Companion to the Seventh Editions of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and Handbook. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2012.

13.

Amin

Greene

Edge

, et al. The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93-99.

14.

Ficarra

Galfano

Mancini

Martignoni

Artibani

. TNM staging system for renal-cell carcinoma: current status and future perspectives. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(6):554-558.

15.

Allegra

Bianco

Ralli

Greco

Angeletti

de Vincentiis

. Role of clinical-demographic data in survival rates of advanced laryngeal cancer. Medicina. 2021;57(3):267.

16.

Xun

Wang

Sun

Shi

Guan

. Prognostic analysis of preoperative inflammatory biomarkers in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020;99(6):371-378.

17.

Nachalon

Reicher

Alkan

Levi

Bachar

Popovtzer

. Prognostic factors for survival and nonfunctional larynx in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(5):1202-1205.

18.

Cossart

Isbel

Scuderi

Campbell

Staatz

. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in relation to calcineurin usage in elderly kidney transplant recipients. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:635165.

19.

Clerencia-Sierra

Ioakeim-Skoufa

Poblador-Plou

, et al. Do centenarians die healthier than younger elders? A comparative epidemiological study in Spain. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5).

20.

Torre

Bray

Siegel

Ferlay

Lortet-Tieulent

Jemal

. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87-108.

21.

Haapaniemi

Koivunen

Saarilahti

, et al. Laryngeal cancer in Finland: A 5-year follow-up study of 366 patients. Head Neck. 2016;38(1):36-43.

22.

Wen

Zou

, et al. Site-specific variation in familial cancer as suggested by family history, multiple primary cancer, age at onset, and sex ratio associated with upper, middle, and lower third esophageal and gastric cardia carcinoma. Frontiers in oncology. 2020;10:579379.

23.

Alyabsi

Ramadan

Algarni

Alshammari

Jazieh

. The effect of marital status on stage at diagnosis and survival in Saudis diagnosed with colorectal cancer: Cancer registry analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8603.

24.

Ding

Ruan

Lin

Zhu

. Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: A population-based study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5421.

25.

Chen

Yin

Zheng

, et al. Marital status independently predicts non-small cell lung cancer survival: A propensity-adjusted SEER database analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020;146(1):67-74.

26.

Xie

Yang

Liu

Zhao

. Effect of marital status on survival in glioblastoma multiforme by demographics, education, economic factors, and insurance status. Cancer Med. 2018;7(8):3722-3742.

27.

Gao

Ren

Song

, et al. Marital status and survival of patients with chondrosarcoma: A population-based analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:6638-6648.

28.

Ding

. Effects of marital status on overall and cancer-specific survival in laryngeal cancer patients: a population-based study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):723.

29.

Gallo

Troxel

Matthews

Kuller

. Marital status and quality in middle-aged women: Associations with levels and trajectories of cardiovascular risk factors. Health Psychol. 2003;22(5):453-463.

30.

Ferlito

Rinaldo

Buckley

Mondin

. General considerations on distant metastases from head and neck cancer. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2001;63(4):189-191.

Early death in supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Background

Materials and methods

Study design and study population

Statistical analysis

Results

Mortality rates within 3 months following diagnosis

The cause of early death for supraglottic LSCC patients

Demographic and clinical characteristics of all supraglottic LSCC patients

Independent risk factors for early death

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

Data availability

ORCID iD

References