Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

The impact of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on subsequent cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains inconclusive.

Aim:

Our aim was to systematically assess the relationship between preexisting OSA and adverse cardiovascular events in patients with newly diagnosed ACS by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods:

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies published up to May 1, 2020, that reported any association between OSA and cardiovascular events in patients with newly diagnosed ACS. The main outcomes were a composite of all-cause or cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, or heart failure. We conducted a pooled analysis using the random-effects model. We also performed subgroup, sensitivity, heterogeneity analysis, and the assessment of publication bias.

Results:

We identified 10 studies encompassing 3350 participants. The presence of OSA was associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events in newly prognosed ACS (risk ratio [RR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-3.26, P < .001, I² = 64%). Between-study heterogeneity was partially explained by a multicenter study (9 single-center studies, RR 2.33 95% CI 1.69-3.19, I² =18%), and I² remarkably decreased from 64% to 18%. Moreover, OSA significantly increased the incidence of repeat revascularization (8 studies) and heart failure (6 studies) in patients with newly diagnosed ACS.

Conclusion:

Patients with preexisting OSA are at greater risk of subsequent cardiovascular events after onset of ACS. Further studies should investigate the treatment of OSA in patient with ACS.

Keywords

acute coronary syndrome meta-analysis obstructive sleep apnea

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an increasingly widespread public health problem worldwide that affects nearly 1 in 5 adults.¹ Emerging evidence indicates that OSA can cause initiation and deterioration of atherosclerosis through activation of oxidative stress, inflammation, and sympathetic system and metabolic abnormalities, eventually leading to high morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular disease.^2
-4 Although there has been a large improvement in medication and device therapy, with a slight decline in risk of mortality, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is one of the leading causes of morbidity in Europe.⁵

The relationship between ACS with OSA is complex. On the one hand, a study by Mohananey et al⁶ of 1.85 million patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) showed that OSA patients had more risk factors, such as hypertension, male sex, smoking, renal failure, chronic respiratory disease, obesity, dyslipidemia, compared to non-OSA patients. However, interestingly, OSA patients have statistically lower in-hospital mortality and longer hospital stays, which may exhibit a protective effect on the heart due to ischemic preconditioning by intermittent hypoxemia. Inversely, most other observational studies have found a worse prognostic impact of OSA in patients with ACS.^7,8 Notably, a multicenter, high-quality trial published in 2019 concluded that the prevalence of cardiovascular events is not related to OSA in patients with ACS.⁹

Therefore, to date, the impact of preexisting OSA on cardiovascular events in newly diagnosed ACS seems to be controversial. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, meta-analysis assessing the association of preexisting OSA with long-term cardiovascular outcomes in newly diagnosed ACS has not yet been reported. Obstructive sleep apnea has been recommended as an emerging risk factor for coronary artery disease by American expert consensus and Europe clinical guidelines,^10,11 and its treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can significantly lower life-threatening cardiovascular events in observational studies,¹² including some patients with ACS. Consequently, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of preexisting OSA on subsequent cardiovascular events in newly diagnosed patients with ACS.

Methods

Search Strategies

We conducted this meta-analysis according to the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines.¹³ We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies up to May 1, 2020, for articles evaluating the impact of OSA on any prognostic outcomes in patients with ACS, without restrictions to language of publication. We used Medical Subject Heading terms relating to “Acute Coronary Syndrome” and “Obstructive Sleep Apnea,” as well as related text words. The references of all included studies and relevant review articles were manually searched for potential full-text citations, and only conference abstracts were excluded due to a lack of peer review. Details of each search strategy are listed in Supplemental Table 1.

Study Selection and Eligibility Criteria

Two authors (Z.W. and Y. L. both cardiologists) independently judged the eligibility of articles by reviewing their titles and abstracts. Studies that described the prognostic outcomes of OSA and non-OSA (control group) in patients with ACS were included. Details of inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) study participants consisted of adults (aged ≥ 18 years) clearly diagnosed with ACS (unstable angina, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction); (2) diagnosis of OSA was based on Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) extracted from overnight sleep study, such as polysomnography (PSG) or portable diagnostic device, within 1 month of ACS; (3) detailed clinical outcomes longer than 3 months were clearly recorded; and (4) included a comparison between OSA and non-OSA patients. Some studies comparing treated OSA with untreated OSA and to those without OSA were included in this study, only data on untreated OSA and no OSA (control) were extracted.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) OSA diagnosis was not based on AHI; (2) studies that did not specify exclusion of predominantly central sleep apnea; (3) editorials, letters to the editor, conference abstracts, reviews, case reports, and animal experimental studies.

Each full-text article was assessed by 2 authors, respectively. In case of disagreement between 2 reviewers, full discussion was conducted by inviting a third reviewer to reach a consensus.

Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Two authors independently extracted relevant data on the basis of a prespecified electronic form. Individual items consisted of the author, year of publication, design type, geographical location, method of diagnosis, the time of diagnosis after ACS onset, sample size, type of ACS, adjusted confounders, as well as mean age, gender, and numbers of each group from each included study. Discrepancy between 2 reviewers was settled either through a consensus or by consulting a third reviewer. We also contacted corresponding authors for any missing data or full-text if related information is not available by search. Quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies in the meta-analysis.¹⁴ The elements of NOS checklist were divided into 3 domains and included selection of included subjects, comparability of cohort on the basis of the design, and ascertainment of either the exposure or the outcomes of participants. The scale extended from 0 to 9 points. Low-quality studies were defined as ≤5 points, moderate-quality studies as 6 to 7 points, and high-quality studies as 8 to 9 points.

The primary end point of concern was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which was defined as a composite of all-cause or cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, repeat revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary end points consisted of individual cardiovascular events. Definitions of each end point event were in accordance with guidelines during each study period. The quality of each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.¹⁵

Table 1.

Study Design, Patient Demographics, and Procedural Characteristics.

Study	Study design and location	Number of participants	Type of ACS	Age, mean, SD	Men, %	BMI, mean, SD	OSA assessment	Timing of sleep study
Fan et al, 2019¹⁵	Prospective cohort, China	804	ACS	57.5 (10.2)	82.60	26.7 (3.6)	Simplified PSG	Within 2 w after admission
Garcia-Rio et al, 2013¹⁶	Retrospective, Spain	115	AMI	58.55 (10.48)	88.70	27.02 (3.16)	PSG	1-3 d after admission
Jia et al, 2018⁶	Prospective cohort, China	529	ACS	59 (10)	76	27.60 (3.63)	PSG	48-72 h after admission
Lee et al, 2011¹⁷	Prospective cohort, Singapore	105	STEMI	52.7 (9.8)	98	24.9 (3.3)	Portable diagnostic device	2-5 d after PCI
Loo et al, 2014¹⁸	Prospective cohort, Singapore	68	ACS	54.2 (8.8)	86.80	25.5 (3.8)	Home-based	14 d (median) after PCI
Meng et al, 2009¹⁹	Prospective cohort, China	123	ACS	66.7 (10.9)	69.10	23.67 (0.66)	simplified PSG	7 d after PCI
Nakashima et al, 2014²⁰	Prospective cohort, Japan	216	ACS	67.54 (13.60)	75	NR	PSG	14-21 d
Sánchez-de-la-Torre et al, 2019⁸	Prospective cohort, multicenter, Europe	1203	ACS	59.41 (10.70)	0.83	4.23312	Portable diagnostic system	24-72 h after admission
Xie et al, 2016²¹	Prospective cohort, China	98	AMI	61.30 (14.6)	0.78	29.22 (5.15)	PSG	7 d after AMI
Yumino et al, 2007⁷	Prospective cohort, Japan	89	ACS	66 (11)	77.50	24.13 (3.53)	Simplified	7-14 d after PCI

Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; BMI, body mass index; NR, no report; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PSG, polysomnography; SD, standard deviation; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Data Synthesis and Statistical Analysis

Our objective focused on the prognostic impact of preexisting OSA on adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed ACS. Standard meta-analysis methods were conducted. In general, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio or risk ratio (RR) from original studies was the preferred effect estimate. Otherwise, the unadjusted RR of the outcomes of interest using crude data was calculated. Pooled RR with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for both the primary and secondary outcomes by random-effects model (DerSimonian–Laird method¹⁶). Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated with Cochran’s Q test (reported as χ² and P < .10) and the I² statistic. Definition of significant heterogeneity was referred to as I² > 50% or P < .10. The publication bias was investigated by a funnel plot, Egger test, and the trim-and-fill method. All data analyses were performed using the Cochrane Review Manager software (version 5.3) and Stata version 11.2 (StataCorp LP). A 2-sided P < .05 was deemed significant.

Results

Study Selection and Characteristics

Our investigation for studies among the electronic databases yielded 1583 publications. After removing duplicates and screening the titles and abstracts, 36 studies remained. Subsequently, 25 studies were excluded by further full-text assessment, among which 2 studies included patients with stable coronary artery disease, 2 included patients with central sleep apnea, 2 were excluded as the diagnosis of OSA was based on non-AHI methods, and 6 were excluded as they did not report cardiovascular events or a sufficient follow-up period (>3 months). Additional exclusion criteria are presented in Figure 1. Overall, a total of 3350 subjects in 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis.^{7
-9,17

-23} Detailed characteristics of each study are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The publication date of the studies extended from 2007 to 2019. The number of participants ranged from 68 to 1203. All studies included 9 prospective cohorts as well as 1 retrospective cohort.¹⁸ The average age of each cohort ranged from 52 to 67 years, and more males than females (81.1% vs 18.9%) were included in the studies. Participants from 7 studies had patients with ACS,^{8,9,17,20
-22} whereas the other 3 studies included acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients (2 STEMI and 1 AMI).^18,19,23 Seven studies were from Asia, 2 from Europe, and 1 from the United States.

Figure 1.

Flow chart of the study selection process for meta-analysis. OSA indicates obstructive sleep apnea.

Diagnosis of OSA is based on PSG across 4 studies and on portable sleep study across other 6 studies. Among these studies, the classification of OSA is based on standardized assessment of AHI in 5 studies, with AHI ≥ 15 as the cutoff value, 2 with AHI ≥ 30, 3 with AHI ≥ 5, and 1 with AHI ≥ 10. There were 4 studies that compared treatment of OSA with CPAP, untreated OSA and non-OSA group (control). Only untreated OSA and control groups were included in this meta-analysis.^9,18,22,23 Quality assessment using NOS score showed all included studies were moderate-high quality, with scores ranging from 6 to 9 points (Supplemental material: Table 2). The follow-up period for participants ranged from 7.5 to 78 months. The time of sleep study was 1 to 14 days after percutaneous coronary intervention or hospital admission.

Table 2.

Study Groups, Outcomes, Results, and Risk of Bias.

Study	Exposure	Control	Follow-up, m	Definitions of primary outcome (MACCE)	Results	Confounders included in adjusted analysis	Newcastle–Ottawa Scale Score
Fan et al, 2019¹⁵	AHI ≥ 15	<15	12	Cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, ischemia-driven revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure	Adjusted RR 1.55	Age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, clinical presentation, PCI procedure, and minimum arterial oxygen saturation	9
Garcia-Rio et al, 2013¹⁶	AHI ≥ 5	<5	78	Recurrent myocardial infarction and revascularization	Adjusted RR 3.24	Sex, age, BMI, smoker (packs × year) and diabetes mellitus	8
Jia et al, 2018⁶	AHI > 15	≥15	28	Cardiac death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, or heart failure requiring hospitalization	Adjusted RR 1.618	Age, sex, BMI, cTN I, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and SYNTAX score	9
Lee et al, 2011¹⁷	AHI ≥ 30	<30	18	Death, reinfarction, stroke, unplanned target vessel revascularization, and heart failure requiring hospitalization	Adjusted RR 5.361	Age, BMI	9
Loo et al, 2014¹⁸	AHI ≥ 15	≥15	20	Cardiac death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, stroke, and hospital admission for congestive heart failure	Adjusted RR 6.95	Age, gender, STEMI presentations, hypertension, smoking, and BMI	6
Meng et al, 2009¹⁹	AHI ≥ 5	<5	12	Cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, heart failure, stroke	Unadjusted RR 1.664	NR	9
Nakashima et al, 2014²⁰	AHI ≥ 15	<15	48	Cardiac death, ACS recurrence and readmission for heart failure	Adjusted RR 2.2	Hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, BMI ≥25 kg/m², age ≥75 y, and male gender	9
Sánchez-de-la-Torre et al, 2019⁸	AHI≥15	<15	40	cardiovascular death or nonfatal events (AMI, nonfatal stroke, hospital admission for heart failure, and new hospitalizations for unstable angina or transient ischemic attack)	Adjusted RR 1.01	NR	9
Xie et al, 2016²¹	AHI ≥ 15	<15	48	All-cause mortality, readmission for recurrent nonfatal MI, hospitalized unstable angina leading to revascularization or not, hospitalized heart failure, stroke, and significant arrhythmic events (sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or asystole)	Adjusted RR 2.43	Age, LVEF, diabetes mellitus, ODI, and AI	7
Yumino et al, 2007⁷	AHI ≥ 10	<10	7	Cardiac death, reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization	Adjusted RR 11.61	Age, BMI, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, ejection fraction, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale	8

Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; AHI, apnea hyponea index; AI, arousal index; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; BMI, body mass index; cTN I, cardiac troponin-I; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MACCE, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; NR, no report; ODI, oxygen desaturation index; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RR, risk ratio; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea and MACCE in Patients With ACS

Overall, OSA significantly increased the risk of MACCE in patients with ACS (RR 2.18, 95% CI 1.45-3.26, P < .001; Figure 2). Evidence of significant heterogeneity across studies was observed for our primary outcome (Q statistic P = .003; I² = 64%). Subgroup analysis according to sample size showed that the pooled RR of 3 studies with ≤100 patients (RR 4.66, 95% CI 1.74-12.53, I² = 31%) was greater than that of 7 studies with >100 patients (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.22-2.66, I² = 61%). The heterogeneity did not remarkably vary across both subgroups (Supplemental Figure 1). The risk of MACCE increased in 9 studies with adjusted results (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.46-3.54, I² = 68%), with the exception of one study without adjustment (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.63-4.37; Supplemental Figure 2). The pooled RR in participants based on a diagnostic method with PSG (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.02-2.30, I² = 75%) was greater than that of the portable sleep study (RR 2.33, 95% CI 1.17-4.60, I² = 71%), with no significant difference in heterogeneity (Supplemental Figure 3). Interestingly, there was discrepancy in the relationship of MACCE with OSA between a large-scale, multicenter ISAACC study (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.76-1.35) and all single-center studies (RR 2.33 95% CI 1.69-3.19). However, the risk of estimate with addition of the ISAACC study decreased (2.33-2.18), and the 95% CI became wider (1.69-3.19 to 1.45-3.26; Supplemental Figure 4).

Figure 2.

Risk estimates for MACCE. Forest plot displays the hazard ratio with 95% CI for MACCE in patients with OSA compared to control. The diamond indicates the point estimate, and the left and right end of the line indicate the 95% CI. CI indicates confidence interval, IV, inverse variance, MACCE, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, OSA, obstructive sleep apnea.

Sensitivity analyses were further conducted to identify the effect of variation on the quality and potential sources of heterogeneity (Table 3). We excluded a multicenter ISAACC study and found no changes in significance of effect size, while across-study heterogeneity decreased statistically (I² from 64% to 18%). Therefore, the ISAACC trial may be the main source of across-study heterogeneity. We also evaluated the effect of excluding studies that were conducted retrospectively, with unadjusted values, cutoff value of more than AHI ≥ 15, sample size <100, follow-up duration <1 year, and 3 studies that only included AMI participants. None of the pooled results significantly influenced the size and direction of the effect of primary end point nor did they change the extent of heterogeneity. Notably, the pooled results of primary outcome should be interpreted with caution due to the low quality of included studies in the GRADE system (Supplemental Table 3).

Table 3.

Sensitivity Analysis for MACCE.

Included studies	No. of studies	No. of participants	RR (95% CI)	P	I², %	P value for heterogeneity
Overall	10	3350	2.18 (1.45-3.26)	.0002	64	.003
Prospective cohort	9	3325	2.04 (1.35-3.10)	.0008	62	.008
Adjusted for confounders	9	3227	2.27 (1.46-3.54)	.0003	68	.002
Sample size >100	7	3095	1.81 (1.22-2.66)	.003	61	.02
Duration of follow up >1 y	9	3261	1.96 (1.35-2.85)	.0004	58	.01
OSA defined as AHI ≥15	7	3023	1.84 (1.22-2.79)	.004	59	.02
Single-center studies	9	2147	2.33 (1.69-3.19)	.00001	18	.28
Definition of OSA by PSG	4	958	2.37 (1.64-3.42)	.00001	0	.81
Studies except for only AMI	7	3032	1.89 (1.21-2.96)	.006	65	.009
High-quality study^a	8	3138	2.02 (1.34-3.05)	.0008	63	.008
Time of sleep study <7 d after admission	6	2173	1.97 (1.17-3.31)	.01	66	.01

Abbreviations: AHI, apnea hyponea index; CI, confidence interval; MACCE, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PSG, polysomnography; RR, risk ratio.

^a Defined as Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score ≥8 (median value of all studies).

There is a possibility of publication bias for outcomes of MACCE according to the asymmetry of the funnel plot (Supplemental Figure 4), which was further verified by the Egger test (P = .002). The trim-and-fill analysis was used to determine the potential size of small-study bias, the addition of hypothetical missing studies decreased the pooled RR to 1.42 (95% CI 1.07-1.88, P = .01) by the random-effects model, but still exhibited significant relationship between OSA and MACCE (Supplemental Figure 4).

Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Individual Cardiovascular Events in Patients With ACS

In studies that report outcomes of patients with repeat revascularization, OSA was found to be associated with an increased risk (8 studies with 3036 participants; RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.23-3.02, I² = 42%; Figure 3A)^{7
-9,17

-21} in the pooled analysis, with no evidence of statistical heterogeneity. Pooled analysis including 6 studies (2519 participants) showed that OSA increased the risk of hospitalization for heart failure patients with ACS (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.20-3.54, I² = 0%)^9,17,19

-22 (Figure 3B). However, there were no significant differences for outcomes of recurrent MI, all-cause death and stroke between OSA and patients without OSA (Figure 4A-C). The quality of each individual outcome is shown in Supplemental Table 3.

Figure 3.

Risk estimates for repeat revascularization and hospitalization for heart failure. Forest plot displays the hazard ratio with 95% CI for repeat revascularization (A), hospitalization for heart failure (B) in patients with OSA compared to control. The diamond indicates the point estimate, and the left and right end of the line indicate the 95% CI. CI indicates confidence interval; IV, inverse variance; MACCE, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea.

Figure 4.

Risk estimates for recurrent myocardial infarction, all cause death and stroke. Forest plot displays the hazard ratio with 95% CI for recurrent myocardial infarction (A), all cause death (B), stroke (C) in patients with OSA compared to control. The diamond indicates the point estimate, and the left and right end of the line indicate the 95% CI. CI indicates confidence interval; IV, inverse variance; MACCE, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea.

Discussion

Results from our meta-analysis indicate that preexisting OSA is associated with a pooled 2-fold risk of recurrent MACCE in patients with newly diagnosed ACS. This finding was true despite the addition of a new large-scale ISAACC study with null findings, which demonstrates no association of OSA with increased prevalence of cardiovascular events among ACS patients without daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [EES] score ≤10). Between-study heterogeneity was largely explained by the ISAACC study, elimination of which reduced the heterogeneity from 64% to 18%. Therefore, the conclusion of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution. Our analysis results remain robust due to a variety of sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, OSA is significantly associated with an increased risk of repeat revascularization and hospitalization for heart failure among patients with newly diagnosed ACS.

The association of OSA with increased prevalence of cardiovascular events in patients with known stable cardiovascular disease, as well as the general population, has been confirmed in a longitudinal observational study²¹ and meta-analysis.²² However, data on patients with newly diagnosed ACS is scarce. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first meta-analysis evaluating the risk of OSA on adverse cardiovascular events in patients with newly diagnosed ACS. Most prior studies^{6,7,16
-18,20} have shown that the presence of OSA is associated with a greater risk of cardiovascular events in patients with ACS. Nevertheless, a single newly published ISAACC study⁸ in 2019, which was a large-scale, multicenter, high-quality study, contradicted this, and also found that treatment with CPAP did not significantly reduce this risk. However, it is probably premature to draw a conclusion of neutral outcomes due to the following reasons: First, the ISAACC trial only included nonsleepy OSA patients (EES ≤ 10) with a better prognosis compared to patients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EES >10), which inevitably underestimates the risk of OSA on cardiovascular outcomes. Second, period interval with 48 and 72 hours between admission to the start of the sleep study is relatively short, compared with other similar studies. Schiza et al²⁴ found that the high prevalence of OSA within 72 hour of ACS did not persist 6 months later, and OSA may be transient and related with the acute phase of the serious disease. So, early detection may mistakenly categorize non-OSA patients into OSA patients and underestimate the effect of OSA. Third, the definition of non-OSA is based on AHI (ie, AHI <15/h), which causes the reference group to actually include mild OSA (ie, AHI with 5-15/h). Hence, the influence of OSA on cardiovascular outcomes may be devalued in patients with ACS. Currently, all large-scale randomized clinical trials^25,26 related to CPAP treatment in nonsleepy OSA patients do not achieve the desired result. Future investigation needs to be conducted in which subsets among nonsleepy OSA patients have a worse prognosis and can benefit from CPAP treatment.

The potential mechanisms that cause OSA to increase the prevalence of cardiovascular events in patients with ACS remain complicated. Obstructive sleep apnea, which results in nocturnal intermittent hypoxic-reoxygenation cycle, can trigger endothelial dysfunction, sympathetic activation, and oxidative stress, subsequently leading to the formation and development of atherosclerotic plaques.²⁷ ApoE(^−/−) mice exposed to intermittent hypoxic environment exhibit structural vascular remodeling of the aorta that is characterized by increased intima-media thickness.²⁸ Similarly, patients with OSA show a larger total atheroma volume compared to non-OSA patients through intravascular ultrasound equipment.²⁹ In addition, the presence of OSA increased the incidence of in-stent restenosis in patients with ACS,⁸ which is similar to our meta-analysis, indicating the relationship of OSA with increased risk of repeat revascularization.

This study has several limitations that should be noted. First, we observed significant evidence of heterogeneity that is mainly derived from a large-scale, multicenter ISAACC study that recruits patients without daytime sleepiness and may underestimate the effect of OSA on cardiovascular events in patients with ACS. Second, the pooled results represent available data from observational studies that are able to describe the relationship of OSA with cardiovascular outcomes. However, they are still relatively small sample size and few events have been reported, which may influence the efficacy of this conclusion. Third, we have observed some evidence of publication bias for the primary outcome. Nevertheless, the estimate size and direction do not significantly change after performing the trim-and-fill analysis. Fourth, there are relatively few recorded individual cardiovascular events among included studies, and more data may reveal positive outcomes in secondary outcome including all-cause death and stroke. Fifth, the definition of OSA and cardiovascular events is inconsistent across studies, which is in line with most meta-analyses related to OSA, and has been resolved, at least to a certain degree, by conducting a sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis shows that preexisting OSA is associated with increased risk of subsequent MACCE, repeat revascularization, and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with newly diagnosed ACS. Our results should be interpreted with caution, given potential heterogeneity across studies and potential publication bias. Further studies should focus on elucidating specific subgroup and severity of OSA, which can achieve benefit from CPAP treatment.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-ear-10.1177_0145561321989450 - Association of Obstructive Sleep Apnea With the Risk of Repeat Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-ear-10.1177_0145561321989450 for Association of Obstructive Sleep Apnea With the Risk of Repeat Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Shu-Han Yang, Yong-Sheng Xing, Zeng-Xia Wang, Yan-Bin Liu, Hong-Wei Chen, Yan-Feng Ren, Jing-Ling Chen, Sheng-Bo Li and Zhi-Fang Wang in Ear, Nose & Throat Journal

Footnotes

Authors’ Note

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. Study concept and design: Shu-han Yang, Hong-wei Cheng.

Acquisitions and analysis of data: Zeng-xia Wang, Yan-bin Liu. Statistical analysis: Yan-feng Ren, Sheng-bo Li, Jing-ling Chen. Methodology: Shu-han Yang.

Original draft of manuscript: Shu-han Yang, Zeng-xia Wang. Review and revision: Yong-sheng Xing. Supervision: Zhi-fang Wang. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Shu-Han Yang

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Young

Palta

Dempsey

Skatrud

Weber

Badr

. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(17):1230–1235.

Javaheri

Barbe

Campos-Rodriguez

, et al. Sleep apnea. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(7):841–858.

Cowie

. Sleep apnea: state of the art. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017;27(4):280–289.

Alonso-Fernandez

Garcia-Rio

Arias

, et al. Effects of CPAP on oxidative stress and nitrate efficiency in sleep apnoea: a randomised trial. Thorax. 2009;64(7):581–586.

Mozaffarian

Benjamin

, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):e38–e360.

Mohananey

Villablanca

Gupta

, et al. Recognized obstructive sleep apnea is associated with improved in-hospital outcomes after ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(7):e006133.

Jia

Zhou

, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with severity and long-term prognosis of acute coronary syndrome. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018;15(2):146–152.

Yumino

Tsurumi

Takagi

Suzuki

Kasanuki

. Impact of obstructive sleep apnea on clinical and angiographic outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(1):26–30.

Sanchez-de-la-Torre

Bertran

, et al. Effect of obstructive sleep apnoea and its treatment with continuous positive airway pressure on the prevalence of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ISAACC study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8(4):359–367.

10.

Somers

White

Amin

, et al. Sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease: an American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council for high blood pressure research professional education committee, council on clinical cardiology, stroke council, and council on cardiovascular nursing. In collaboration with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Center on sleep disorders research (National Institutes of Health). Circulation. 2008;118(10):1080–1111.

11.

Perk

De Backer

Gohlke

, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J. 2012;33(13):1635–1701.

12.

Marin

Carrizo

Vicente

Agusti

. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1046–1053.

13.

Stroup

Berlin

Morton

, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–2012.

14.

Wells

Shea

O’Connell

, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Accessed May 1, 2020. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

15.

Atkins

Best

Briss

, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.

16.

DerSimonian

Laird

. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188.

17.

Fan

Wang

Somers

Nie

Wei

. Association of obstructive sleep apnea with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(2):e010826.

18.

Garcia-Rio

Alonso-Fernández

Armada

, et al. CPAP effect on recurrent episodes in patients with sleep apnea and myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):1328–1335.

19.

Lee

C-H

Khoo

S-M

Chan

, et al. Severe obstructive sleep apnea and outcomes following myocardial infarction. J Clin Sleep Med. 2011;7(6):616–621.

20.

Loo

Tan

Koo

, et al. Prognostic implication of obstructive sleep apnea diagnosed by post-discharge sleep study in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Sleep Med. 2014;15(6):631–636.

21.

Meng

Fang

Wang

Chen

Huang

. Impact of obstructive sleep apnoea on clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome following percutaneous coronary intervention. J Int Med Res. 2009;37(5):1343–1353.

22.

Nakashima

Kurobe

Minami

, et al. Effects of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea on the clinical manifestations of plaque vulnerability and the progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015;4(1):75–84.

23.

Xie

Sert Kuniyoshi

Covassin

, et al. Nocturnal hypoxemia due to obstructive sleep apnea is an independent predictor of poor prognosis after myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(8):e003162.

24.

Schiza

Simantirakis

Bouloukaki

, et al. Sleep disordered breathing in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012;8(1):21–26.

25.

Peker

Glantz

Eulenburg

Wegscheider

Herlitz

Thunström

Effect of positive airway pressure on cardiovascular outcomes in coronary artery disease patients with non-sleepy obstructive sleep apnea. The RICCADSA randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(5):613–620.

26.

McEvoy

Antic

Heeley

, et al. CPAP for prevention of cardiovascular events in obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(10):919–931.

27.

Randerath

Bonsignore

Herkenrath

. Obstructive sleep apnoea in acute coronary syndrome. Eur Respir Rev. 2019;28(153):180114.

28.

Arnaud

Beguin

Lantuejoul

, et al. The inflammatory preatherosclerotic remodeling induced by intermittent hypoxia is attenuated by RANTES/CCL5 inhibition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(6):724–731.

29.

Tan

Hau

, et al. OSA and coronary plaque characteristics. Chest. 2014;145(2):322–330.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.27 MB