Online instructional tools are quickly being introduced, often before accessibility is incorporated into their design. This article defends the use of a popular, but highly graphic, web-based platform called Padlet in a writing course, using strategies that allow students who are visually impaired (i.e., those who are blind or have low vision) to participate in collaborative class activities, promoting equity and inclusion. It also highlights student feedback from an institutionally approved study that identifies accessibility concerns with Padlet, as well as other common educational technology used in all disciplines.
BunnM. (2013). Motivation and connection: Teaching reading (and writing) in the composition classroom. College Composition and Communication, 64(3), 496–516. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43490768
3.
Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST). (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Gill-SimmenL. (2021). Using Padlet in instructional design to promote cognitive engagement: A case study of undergraduate marketing students. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 20, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi20.575
6.
HarisM.YunusM. M.BadusahJ. H. (2017). The effectiveness of using Padlet in ESL classroom. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(2), 783–788. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3214
7.
HromalikC. D.WyhillW. N.CarrN. R. (2020). “All faculty should take this”: A universal design for learning training for community college faculty. TechTrends, 64(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00439-6
8.
JongB.TanK. H. (2021). Using Padlet as a technological tool for assessment of students’ writing skills in online classroom settings. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.411.423
9.
KutscherE.TuckwillerE. D. (2019). Persistence in higher education for students with disabilities: A mixed systematic review. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000088
MadausJ. W.GelbarN.DukesL. L.TaconetA.Faggella-LubyM. (2021). Are there predictors of success for students with disabilities pursuing postsecondary education?Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(4), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420976526
12.
MardiF.Walsh-RockE.BalcerzakP. (2021). Designing virtual collaborations in case-based science learning: Using google slides, padlet, and FlipGrid. In M. L. Niess & H. Gillow-Wiles. (Eds.), Handbook of research on transforming teachers’ online pedagogical reasoning for engaging K-12 students in virtual learning pp. 379–401. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7222-1.ch019
13.
MehtaK. J.MiletichI.DetynaM. (2021). Content-specific differences in padlet perception for collaborative learning amongst undergraduate students. Research in Learning Technology, 29, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2551
PeñaE. V. (2014). Marginalization of published scholarship on students with disabilities in higher education journals. Journal of College Student Development, 55(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0006
18.
SailerM.HenseJ.MandlH.KleversM. (2013). Psychological perspectives on motivation through gamification. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 19, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-019-002
19.
ScheefA.CanigliaC.BarrioB. L. (2020). Disability as diversity: Perspectives of institutions of higher education in the U.S. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 33(1), 49–61.
20.
SchlesR. A. (2021). Population data for students with visual impairments in the United States. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 115(3), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X211016124
21.
ShaheenN. L. (2022). Technology accessibility: How U.S. K-12 schools are enacting policy and addressing the equity imperative. Computers and Education, 179, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104414
