Evaluation of an Accessible,Real-Time,and Infrastructure-Free Indoor Navigation System by Users Who Are Blind in the Mall of America

Abstract

Introduction:

This article describes an evaluation of MagNav, a speech-based, infrastructure-free indoor navigation system. The research was conducted in the Mall of America, the largest shopping mall in the United States, to empirically investigate the impact of memory load on route-guidance performance.

Method:

Twelve participants who are blind and 12 age-matched sighted controls participated in the study. Comparisons are made for route-guidance performance between use of updated, real-time route instructions (system-aided condition) and a system-unaided (memory-based condition) where the same instructions were only provided in advance of route travel. The sighted controls (who navigated under typical visual perception but used the system for route guidance) represent a best case comparison benchmark with the blind participants who used the system.

Results:

Results across all three test measures provide compelling behavioral evidence that blind navigators receiving real-time verbal information from the MagNav system performed route travel faster (navigation time), more accurately (fewer errors in reaching the destination), and more confidently (fewer requests for bystander assistance) compared to conditions where the same route information was only available to them in advance of travel. In addition, no statistically reliable differences were observed for any measure in the system-aided conditions between the blind and sighted participants. Posttest survey results corroborate the empirical findings, further supporting the efficacy of the MagNav system.

Discussion:

This research provides compelling quantitative and qualitative evidence showing the utility of an infrastructure-free, low-memory demand navigation system for supporting route guidance through complex indoor environments and supports the theory that functionally equivalent navigation performance is possible when access to real-time environmental information is available, irrespective of visual status.

Implications for designers and practitioners:

Findings provide insight for the importance of developers of accessible navigation systems to employ interfaces that minimize memory demands.

Keywords

indoor navigation system blind travel nonvisual navigation speech-based interfaces

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apostolopoulos

Fallah

Folmer

Bekris

(2014). Integrated online localization and navigation for people with visual impairments using smart phones. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 3.

Cheraghi

S. A.

Namboodiri

Walker

(2017). GuideBeacon: Beacon-based indoor wayfinding for the blind, visually impaired, and disoriented. IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), pp. 121–130.

Chua

Mitchell

(2004). Consequences of amblyopia on education, occupation, and long-term vision loss. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 88, 1119–1121.

Clark-Carter

D. D.

Heyes

A. D.

Howarth

C. I.

(1986). The efficiency and walking speed of visually impaired pedestrians. Ergonomics, 29, 779–789.

Coleman

D. J.

Rajabifard

Kolodziej

C. W.

(2016). Expanding the SDI environment: Comparing current spatial data infrastructure with emerging indoor location-based services. International Journal of Digital Earth, 9, 629–647.

Coughlan

Manduchi

(2009). Functional assessment of a camera phone-based wayfinding system operated by blind and visually impaired users. International Journal Artificial Intelligence Tools, 18, 379–397.

Crandall

Brabyn

Bentzen

B. L.

Myers

(1999). Remote infrared signage evaluation for transit stations and intersections. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36, 341–355.

Erickson

Lee

von Schrader

(2012). Disability Statistics from the 2010 American Community Survey (ACS). Cornell University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Demographics and Statistics (StatsRRTC). Ithaca, NY. Retrieved from www.disabilitystatistics.org

Ganz

Schafer

Gandhi

Puleo

Wilson

Robertson

(2012). PERCEPT indoor navigation system for the blind and visually impaired: Architecture and experimentation. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, 9.

10.

Giudice

N. A.

(2004). Navigating novel environments: A comparison of verbal and visual learning (Unpublished dissertation). University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN.

11.

Giudice

N. A.

(2018). Navigating without Vision: Principles of Blind Spatial Cognition. In Montello

D. R.

(Ed.), Handbook of behavioral and cognitive geography. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

12.

Giudice

N. A.

Bakdash

J. Z.

Legge

G. E.

(2007). Wayfinding with words: Spatial learning and navigation using dynamically-updated verbal descriptions. Psychological Research, 71, 347–358. doi:10.1007/s00426-006-0089-8.123

13.

Golledge

R. G.

Klatsky

R. L.

Loomis

J. M.

Speigle

J. M.

Tietz

J. D.

(1998). A geographical information system for a GPS based personal guidance system. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12, 727–749.

14.

Niemegeers

(2009). A survey of indoor positioning systems for wireless personal networks. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 11, 13–32.

15.

Guerrero

L. A.

Vasquez

Ochoa

S. F.

(2012). An indoor navigation system for the visually impaired. Sensors, 12, 8236–8258.

16.

Hightower

Borriello

(2001). Location systems for ubiquitous computing. Computer, 34, 57–66.

17.

Hub

Schmitz

(2009, March 16). Addition of RFID-based initialization and object recognition to the navigation system TANIA. Proceedings of the Annual CSUN International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 16–21.

18.

Kaye

H. S.

Kang

LaPlante

M. P.

(2000). Mobility device use in the United States. Disability statistics report, Department of Education, NIDRR. 14, pp. 1–60.

19.

Legge

G. E.

Beckmann

P. J.

Tjan

B. S.

Havey

Kramer

(2013). Indoor Navigation by People with Visual Impairment Using a Digital Sign System. PLoS One, 8, e76783.

20.

Legge

G. E.

Downey

Giudice

N. A.

Tjan

B. S.

(2016). Indoor airport wayfinding for blind and visually impaired travelers (Report to the Federal Aviation Administration, No. DOT/Faa/TC-TN16/54). Retrieved from http://www.airporttech.tc.faa.gov/Download/Airport-Safety-Papers-Publications-Detail/dt/Detail/ItemID/572/Indoor-Airport-Wayfinding-for-Blind-and-Visually-Impaired-Travelers.

21.

Long

R. G.

Giudice

N. A.

(2010). Establishing and maintaining orientation for mobility. In Blasch

B. B.

Wiener

W. R.

Welch

R. W.

(Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (3rd ed., Vol. 1: History and Theory, pp. 45–62). New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind.

22.

Loomis

J. M.

Klatzky

R. L.

Giudice

N. A.

(2013). Representing 3D space in working memory: Spatial images from vision, touch, hearing, and language. In Lacey

Lawson

(Eds.), Multisensory imagery: Theory & applications (pp. 131–156). New York, NY: Springer.

23.

Loomis

J. M.

Marston

J. R.

Golledge

R. G.

Klatzky

R. L.

(2005). Personal guidance system for people with visual impairment: A comparison of spatial displays for route guidance. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99, 219–232.

24.

Mall of America. (2017). Retrieved May 2017 from https://www.mallofamerica.com/about/moa/facts

25.

Mani

Johnson-Laird

P. N.

(1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions. Memory & Cognition, 10, 181–187.

26.

Marston

J. R.

Golledge

R. G.

(2003). The hidden demand for participation in activities and travel by persons who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 475–488.

27.

Marston

J. R.

Loomis

J. M.

Klatzky

R. L.

Golledge

R. G.

(2007). Nonvisual route following with guidance from a simple haptic or auditory display. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101, 203–211.

28.

Martinez-Sala

A. S.

Losilla

Sánchez-Aarnoutse

J. C.

García-Haro

(2015). Design, implementation and evaluation of an indoor navigation system. Sensors, 15, 32168–32187.

29.

Nyman

S. R.

Gosney

M. A.

Victor

C. R.

(2010). Psychosocial impact of visual impairment in working-age adults. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 94, 1427–1431.

30.

Riehle

T. H.

Anderson

S. M.

Lichter

P. A.

Giudice

N. A.

Sheikh

S. I.

Knuesel

R. J.

Kollmann

D. T.

(2012). Indoor magnetic navigation for the blind. Proceedings of the 34th Annual IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference (EMBC’12), pp. 1972–1975.

31.

Riehle

T. H.

Anderson

S. M.

Lichter

P. A.

Whalen

W. E.

Giudice

N. A.

(2013). Indoor inertial waypoint navigation for the blind. Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference (EMBC’13).

32.

Riehle

T. H.

Lichter

Giudice

N. A.

(2008). An indoor navigation system to support the visually impaired. Proceedings of the 30th Annual IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference (EMBC), Vancouver, BC, pp. 4435–4438.

33.

Shneiderman

Plaisant

C. M. C.

Jacobs

(2009). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.

34.

Talmy

(1983). How language structures space. In Pick

Acredolo

(Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application (pp. 225–282). Boston, MA: Springer.