The efficacy of the Good Behavior Game was examined in a multiethnic New York City public high school. Classroom rules were posted and students were divided into two teams. A reinforcement preference questionnaire was used to select daily and weekly prizes. The classroom teacher indicated that he was going to place a check on the board after every rule infraction as he named rule violators and their infractions. Students were also told that the team with the fewest marks at the end of each day would become the daily winners and receive prizes. They were also told that the team with the fewest marks for the week would be recognized as the weekly winners and receive additional prizes. The rate of disruptive behavior was charted across four treatment phases using a reversal design. The game phases were associated with marked reductions in the rate of seat leaving, talking without permission, and aggression. Teacher and student feedback supported the social validity of the procedure.
Arnett, J. ( 1999). Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. American Psychologist, 54, 317-326.
2.
Baily, S., Wolf, M., & Phillips, E. ( 1970). Home-based reinforcement and the modification of pre-delinquents’ classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 223-233.
3.
Barrish, H.H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. ( 1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119-124.
4.
Bostow, D., & Geiger, O.G. ( 1976). Good Behavior Game: A replication and systematic analysis with a second grade class. SALT: School Applications of Learning Theory, 8, 18-27.
5.
Cautela, J. ( 1977). Behavior analysis for clinical intervention. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
6.
Darveaux, D.X. ( 1984).The good behavior game plus merit: Controlling disruptive behavior and improving student motivation. School Psychology Review, 13, 510-514.
7.
Embry, D.D. ( 2002). The good behavior game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 273-297.
8.
Fishbein, J.E., & Wasik, B.H. ( 1981). Effect of the good behavior game on disruptive library behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 89-93.
9.
Grandy, G.S., Madsen, C.H., & De Mersseman, L.M. (1973). The effects of individual and interdependent contingencies on inappropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 10, 488-493.
10.
Gresham, F., & Gresham, G. ( 1982). Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behavior. Journal of Special Education , 16, 101-110.
11.
Hall, R.V., Lund, D., & Jackson, D. ( 1968). Effects of teacher attention on study behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 1-12.
12.
Harris, V.W., & Sherman, J.A. ( 1973). Use and analysis of the "good behavior game" to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 405-417.
13.
Hayes, L. ( 1976). The use of group contingencies for behavioral control: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 628-648.
14.
Maloney, K.B., & Hopkins, B.L. ( 1973). The modification of sentence structure and its relationship to subjective judgments of creativity in writing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 425-433.
15.
Mischel, W., & Metzner, R. ( 1962). Preference for delayed reward as a function of age, intelligence, and length of delay interval. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 425-431.
16.
Patterson, K.B. ( 2003). The effects of a group oriented contingency-the good behavior game-on the disruptive behavior of children with developmental disabilities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Kent State University , Kent, Ohio.
17.
Phillips, G.R., & Christie, F. ( 1986). Behaviour management in a secondary school classroom: Playing the game. Maladjustment and Therapeutic Education , 4, 47-53.
18.
Reyna, V., & Farley, F. ( 2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision-making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science and the Public Interest, 7, 1-44.
19.
Saigh, P.A. ( 1987). The effects of an academic good behavior game on the spelling achievement of limited English proficiency students. British Columbia Journal of Special Education, 11, 73-80.
20.
Saigh, P.A., & Umar, A. ( 1983). The effects of the good behavior game on the disruptive behavior of Sudanese elementary school students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 339-344.
21.
Salend, S., Reynolds, C., & Coyle, E. ( 1989). Individualizing the good behavior game across type and frequency of behavior with emotionally disturbed adolescents. Behavior Modification, 13, 108-126.
22.
Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. ( 2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83-110.
23.
Tingstrom, D., Turner, H., & Wilczynski, S. (2006). The good behavior game: 1969-2002. Behavior Modification, 30, 225-253. doi: 10.1177/0145445503261165
24.
Wolf, M.M. ( 1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
