Political polarization affects the daily work of public administrators. Despite its global prevalence, the public administration teaching literature has given little attention to how students can be prepared to work in polarized environments. We describe how we teach key components of polarization including theories of political polarization, the role of narratives in deepening polarization, the impact of social media, and the influence of cognitive biases on the power of political narratives. Next, we introduce four tools designed to help students confront polarization in their professional roles followed by a class-tested case study that demonstrates how students can apply course concepts in practice. We conclude with twelve key lessons learned from teaching the course.
BrysonJM (2004) What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public management review6(1): 21–53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722
5.
Careaga-TagüeñaMSanabria-PulidoP (2022) Use of active learning strategies in public affairs education: Advances and lessons from the scholarship and the practice. Teaching Public Administration40(1): 95–119.
6.
CarothersTO’DonohueA (2019) Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Brookings Institution Press.
7.
CarverCSScheierMF (2002) Optimism. In: SnyderCRLopezSJ (eds) Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press.
8.
CasseseEC (2021) Partisan dehumanization in American politics. Political Behavior43(1): 29–50.
9.
ClemonsRSMcBethMK (2020) Public Policy Praxis: A Case Approach to Policy and Analysis. 4th edition. Routledge.
10.
CooperCA (2020) Politicization of the bureaucracy across and within administrative traditions. International Journal of Public Administration44(7): 564–577.
11.
DuckworthA (2016) Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. Scribner.
12.
DunkelmanMJ (2014) The Vanishing Neighbor: The Transformation of American Community. WW Norton & Company.
13.
EbingerFVeitSFrommN (2019) The partisan–professional dichotomy revisited: politicization and decision-making of senior civil servants. Public Administration97(4): 861–876.
14.
EtzioniA (2004) The Common Good. Polity Press.
15.
EylerJR (2018) How Humans Learn: The Science and Stories Behind Effective College Teaching. West Virginia University Press.
16.
FeinbergMWillerR (2015) From gulf to bridge: when do moral arguments facilitate political influence?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin41(12): 1665–1681.
17.
FestingerLRieckenHWSchachterS (2008) When Prophecy Fails. Pinter & Martin Publishers.
18.
FiorinaMPAbramsSJPopeJ (2004) Culture War? the Myth of a Polarized America. Longman.
19.
FishkinJS (2003) Consulting the public through deliberative polling. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management22(1): 128–133.
20.
GrahamJHaidtJNosekBA (2009) Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(5): 1029–1046.
21.
HaighY (2019) Increasing complexities: teaching public policy in the age of discontent. Teaching Public Administration38(1): 24–45.
22.
HetheringtonMWeilerJ (2018) Prius or Pickup? How the Answers to Four Simple Questions Explain America's Great Divide. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
23.
HuddyL (2001) From social to political identity: a critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology22(1): 127–156.
24.
HunterLYMearesWLGinnMH, et al. (2025) Public administration, local and regional governance, and domestic terrorism. Public Administration Review85: 1804–1839. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13938
25.
JonesMDSmith-WalterAMcBethMK, et al. (2023) The narrative policy framework. In: WeibleCM (ed) Theories of the Policy Process. Routledge, 161–195.
26.
KahnemanD (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
27.
KemmisD (1990) Community and the Politics of Place. University of Oklahoma Press.
28.
KettlDF (2018) Earning trust in government. Journal of Public Affairs Education24(3): 295–299.
29.
KettlDF (2022) The Divided States of America: Why Federalism Doesn’t Work. Princeton University Press.
30.
LybeckerDLMcBethMKKuskoE (2013) Trash or treasure: recycling narratives and reducing political polarisation. Environmental Politics22(2): 312–332.
31.
MaierSFSeligmanME (1976) Learned helplessness: theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General105(1): 3–46.
32.
MasonL (2018) Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became our Identity. University of Chicago Press.
33.
McBethMKBrewerAMSmithMN (2020) Teaching social media and public administration: applying four approaches to an emerging issue. Teaching Public Administration38(2): 168–186.
34.
McCoyJRahmanTSomerM (2018) Polarization and the global crisis of democracy. American Academy of Political and Social Science681(1): 11–27.
35.
MichaelsenLKKnightABFinkLD (eds) (2023) Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching. Taylor & Francis.
36.
MillsCW (1959) The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press.
37.
Munoz-del-CampoN (2022) The problem-based learning as a pedagogical framework for teaching master of public policy and master of public administration programs in Latin America. Teaching Public Administration41(3): 408–426.
38.
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks (2011) The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (Authorized Edition). WW Norton & Company.
39.
PetersRA (2015) Anchored learning and the development of creative, critical thinking and life-long learning skills. Teaching Public Administration33(3): 221–240.
40.
ProninELinDYRossL (2002) The bias blind spot: perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28(3): 369–381.
41.
PuryearCKubinEScheinC, et al. (2024) People believe political opponents accept blatant moral wrongs, fueling partisan divides. PNAS Nexus3(7): 244.
42.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
43.
RobertsonCEShariffAVan BavelJJ (2024) Morality in the anthropocene: the perversion of compassion and punishment in the online world. PNAS Nexus3(6): 193.
44.
SantoroEBroockmanDE (2022) The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization: evidence from randomized experiments. Science Advances8(25): eabn5515.
45.
SchneiderSL (2001) In search of realistic optimism: meaning, knowledge, and warm fuzziness. American Psychologist56(3): 250–263.
46.
SchröterERöberM (2022) Understanding the case method: teaching public administration case by case. Teaching Public Administration40(2): 258–275.
47.
SeligmanME (1990) Learned Optimism: How to Change your Mind and your Life. Free Press.
Van LoonAGoldbergASrivastavaSB (2024) Imagined otherness fuels blatant dehumanization of outgroups. Communications Psychology2(1): 39.
55.
WaltersJKettlD (2005) The Katrina breakdown. Governing19(3): 20–25.
56.
ZakiJ (2024) Hope for Cynics: The Surprising Science of Human Goodness. Grand Central Publishing.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
