Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

With the twin threats of warming climate and energy shortage, achieving the dual carbon goal has become a global urgent task, and promoting enterprise energy transition, especially for the oil companies. Multi-energy complementary technology facilitates the comprehensive utilization of distributed and renewable energy, acting as a cornerstone for corporate energy transition. This approach is significant for increasing the penetration of renewable energy and improving overall energy efficiency. This paper begins by elucidating the background and significance of multi-energy complementarity. It then provides an overview of multi-energy complementary systems, covering their definition, operational models, and related policies. Subsequently, the paper details the key technologies and evaluation metrics for multi-energy complementary development, with a focus on planning and design, coordinated control, energy management, and energy storage technologies. Finally, the paper identifies current challenges in multi-energy complementary development and discusses future trends.

Keywords

Carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals energy transition renewable energy multi-energy complementary evaluation indicators

Introduction

With the rapid development of industrial production and social economy, energy consumption has increased year by year. The production equipment in oilfields, which serve as major energy suppliers, is typically highly dependent on traditional fossil energy. Consequently, the oilfields often face challenges such as low utilization rate of renewable energy, high energy consumption and high comprehensive energy cost (Zhang et al., 2023). These challenges have emerged as a key factor that severely affects the efficiency of oilfield enterprises and restricts their development. Under the background of global warming and energy shortage, the energy transition of oilfield enterprises is imminent. The multi-energy complementary technologies can effectively integrate traditional fossil energy, wind energy, solar energy and other energy forms, solve the problem of independent operation of different energy systems, and realize the collaborative optimization of multiple energy sources (Li et al., 2018), which include planning and design, coordination and optimization control, energy management, and energy storage, etc. (Amir et al., 2023; Gulraiz et al., 2025; Zhong et al., 2018). Therefore, the study of multi-energy complementary technology is of great significance, which is not only a key step for oilfield enterprises to move towards energy modernization, but also an important breakthrough in building a clean, low-carbon, safe and efficient energy system.

Based on the above background and incentive, it is necessary to summarize relevant researches. In terms of the direction for multi-energy complementary development, different countries have different development priorities and make different plans according to national conditions and resource allocation. The United States has promoted multi-energy complementary technology from the construction of smart grid, and focused on the development of nuclear renewable energy hybrid energy system (Congress of United States, 2007; United States Department of Energy, 2015, 2016). Germany is also actively exploring system solutions for high proportion of renewable energy integration, strengthening the collaborative integration of energy systems and a series of research new works have been carried out (Bartholdsen et al., 2019; Federal Ministry of Education and Research, 2015; Rogge et al., 2020). Canada has issued a series of bills on multi-energy complementary distributed energy technology construction (Bahn and Vaillancourt, 2020). Japan is a country lacking in energy resources and heavily dependent on imports. With the help of artificial intelligence, Internet of Things and other technologies, Japan has built a diversified and flexible energy supply and demand network to achieve more intelligent and flexible energy management (Gao et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2016; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, 2014, 2016, 2018). Since the 1980s, China has begun to formulate new energy development plans. In recent years, China has placed significant emphasis on the development of multi-energy complementary distributed energy supply technology, deploying multi energy complementary integrated optimization demonstration projects, and realizing the optimization, complementarity and stable supply of multiple energy sources (National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Administration, 2017; National Energy Administration, 2016, 2017; Ting, 2021; Xie et al., 2020). Beyond the above studies, the currently existing reviews are listed in Table 1, and their contributions and limitations are discussed. Compared with the existing reviews, this work presents a comprehensive review for multi-energy complementary from the key technologies, policies, evaluation indicators and the prospects, and provides a useful reference for the future research.

Table 1.

Existing reviews on multi-energy complementary technology.

Ref.	Description and contribution	Limitations
(Yu, 2020)	The status of China's multi-energy complementary development is summarized. The development policy environment and the development prospects of multi-energy complementary are explored and analyzed.	The summary is not enough. The multi-energy complementary technologies are not discussed.
(Li et al., 2020b)	The technical advantages of renewable energy complementary hydrogen production and the complementary system energy coordination forms are summarized. The key technologies of multi-energy complementation of hydrogen energy system are elaborated.	Focus on China's multi-energy complementary of hydrogen energy system. Other forms of energy are not covered. Also, the policies for multi-energy complementary are no discussed.
(Wang et al., 2024)	A comprehensive review of multi-energy hybrid power systems based on solar energy is presented. Relevant issues of seven different kinds of solar hybrid power systems are introduced and discussed.	The multi-energy complementary technologies are not discussed. Also, the policies for multi-energy complementary are no discussed. Other forms of energy are not talked.
(Shi et al., 2023)	Multi-energy complementary power systems with a high proportion of renewable energy are reviewed. The connection modes of power grids and economic system analysis are summarized and discussed.	Other forms of energy are not talked. The policies for multi-energy complementary are no discussed. Evaluation indicators for it are not discussed.
(Yang et al., 2025)	The research status and challenges of basic research for the multi-energy complementary distributed energy system are analyzed. The future research directions of multi-energy complementary distributed energy system are provided	No section talks about the technologies of multi-energy complementary system. Evaluation indicators for it are not discussed. Also, the policies for multi-energy complementary are no discussed.

However, with the continuous development of research, some previous reviews could not provide a complete summary on multi-energy complementary technology. To this end, the focus and the contribution of this work is as follows: (1) this paper provides a comprehensive review of multi-energy complementary, which reflects new research directions and trends. (2) Through investigating and summarizing the points of different literatures, this paper helps readers better understand the current challenges in the development of multi-energy complementarity.

Overview of multi-energy complementary system

Definition of multi-energy complementary

Multi-energy complementarity involves integrating various energy sources based on specific resource availability and user needs, aiming to balance energy supply and demand, utilize natural resources efficiently, and deliver positive environmental outcomes (Zhang and Chen, 2018). Its advantages are specifically reflected in the following aspects, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Advantages of multi-energy complementary systems.

Advantage	Concrete content
Energy efficiency	By integrating different forms of energy such as wind, solar, and geothermal, the comprehensive utilization rate of natural resources has been improved.
System Stability	By balancing the intermittency and volatility of renewable energy, the stability of the energy supply system has been enhanced.
Environmental Impact	Optimizing the use of clean energy to achieve environmentally friendly energy supply.
Economic aspects	Reduce overall operating costs by optimizing energy allocation and reducing reliance on expensive fossil fuels.

Multi-energy complementary mode

Multi-energy complementary systems are divided into two modes in the implementation opinions on promoting the construction of demonstration projects for multi-energy complementary integration optimization, namely terminal integration and comprehensive energy base (National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Administration, 2017). The former is achieved by developing integrated and complementary systems of traditional and new energy sources that are suitable for local conditions, to meet the different energy needs of end-users (such as electricity, heating, cooling, and natural gas). The goal is to optimize the layout of energy infrastructure, achieve synergistic multi-energy coordinated supply and energy cascade utilization. The latter is to utilize the combined advantages of wind, solar, hydro, coal, natural gas and other resources in large-scale integrated energy bases to promote the construction and operation of multi-energy complementary systems for wind, solar, water, fire and storage.

(1) Terminal integrated energy supply system

The system focuses on the overall planning and integrated construction of the terminal energy supply system in parks, towns, large-scale public facilities and other areas according to the energy consumption needs of end-users such as cold, heat, electricity and gas. The primary objective under this model is to maximize the overall supply and utilization efficiency of the integrated energy system.

(2) Multi-energy complementary system of integrated energy base

The system integrates traditional primary energy such as coal and natural gas, as well as secondary energy such as wind, light and water energy. By leveraging the synergistic and complementary advantages of these diverse resources, it realizes the integrated operation of multi energy such as wind-solar-hydro-thermal-storage. This approach helps mitigate the intermittency issues associated with wind and photovoltaic power generation, thereby improving the stability of the power output.

Multi-energy complementary policies

Multi-energy complementary technology plays an important role in promoting the sustainable development of social economy and attracts attention from various countries. Various countries have issued a series of policies and documents for the development of multi - energy complementary technology. The policies for Europe and America can be found in introduction, which will not be repeated here. Here, the relevant important policies of China during the 13th Five-Year Plan and the 14th Five-Year Plan are mainly introduced (Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, 2022; National Development and Reform Commission, 2023; National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Administration, 2021, 2024; National Energy Administration, 2016, 2017; The State Council, 2018, 2020; The State Grid Corporation of China, 2019) as shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Policy support documents for multi-energy complementary.

Year	Policy support documents	Important content
2016	The 13th Five-Year Plan for Energy Development	Promote the integration and optimization of energy production and supply, and build a smart energy system with multi energy complementation and supply and demand coordination.
2017	Notice on the First Batch of Multi-energy Complementary Integration and Optimization Demonstration Projects	Announce the first batch of 23 multi energy complementary integration and optimization demonstration projects, including 17 terminal-integrated energy supply systems and 6 wind, water and fire storage multi energy complementary systems.
2018	The 13th Five-Year Plan for the Development of National Strategic Emerging Industries	Promote the comprehensive utilization of various forms of new energy, and vigorously promote the construction of multi energy complementary integration and optimization demonstration projects
2019	The Action Plan for Promoting the Development of integrated Energy Service Business	Promote comprehensive utilization of multiple energy sources and provide multi-energy services for cooling, power supply and heating.
2020	White Paper: China's Energy Development in the New Era	Promote a new mode of comprehensive energy services to achieve multi energy complementarity, synergy and efficiency of terminal energy.
2021	Guiding Opinions on Accelerating the Development of New Energy Storage	Give full play to the role of large-scale new energy storage, promote the complementary development of multi energy, and plan to build a large-scale clean energy base for trans regional transmission.
2022	Implementation Plan for Carbon Peaking in the Industrial Sector	Enhance the coordinated mobilization of load and storage in the source network, guide and accelerate the utilization of photovoltaic, efficient heat pump and residual heat and pressure, and promote the efficient and complementary utilization of multiple energy sources.
2023	Notice on Promoting the Sustainable and Healthy Development of the Coal Power Sector	Promote the integrated development of coal-fired power and new energy, and support coal-fired power enterprises to carry out the pilot construction of multi energy complementation and source network load storage integration projects, as well as the construction of load wind power and photovoltaic projects.
2024	Anchoring the ‘Dual Carbon’ Goals to Promote the High-Quality Development of Renewable Energy	Promote high-quality and leapfrog development of renewable energy by adhering to the principle of land and sea development, distribution and distribution, multi energy complementation and integrated development

Multi-energy complementary technologies

The energy forms of multi-energy complementary system include not only renewable energy such as wind energy, solar energy, hydro energy, biomass energy and hydrogen energy, but also traditional energy such as coal, natural gas and so on. Through the efficient integration of different forms of energy on the energy supply side, the phenomena of water, wind, light and power curtailment are reduced, the energy efficiency of the whole system is improved, the reliability of energy supply is improved, and the utilization rate of resources is improved. In the development and application of integrated energy multi energy complementary system, the key technologies to be solved include planning and design technology, coordination and optimization control technology, energy storage technology and energy management technology, and the relationship is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Multi-energy complementary key technologies diagram.

Plan and design technology

The plan and design are the prerequisite procedure of multi-energy complementary energy technology. In the traditional energy utilization mode, when designing and planning, only a single energy form, such as heat, electricity, gas, etc., is considered for independent analysis and planning, or only a single equipment is modeled and simulated to optimize its operation mode, without carrying out comprehensive research on collaborative and complementary optimization among various energy systems. In addition, the traditional modeling method could not meet the modeling requirements of multi energy complementary system due to the large differences in the equipment and equipment characteristics of each system.

To optimize the integration of an energy station's subsystems within a multi-energy complementary system, a detailed and rational analysis of energy and material flows is essential. This ensures the optimal allocation of the energy structure and a stable, reliable energy supply. Concurrently, during the calculation process, the system load is often assumed to be dynamic, supported by inputs for fluctuating resources like wind and solar to effectively design and plan the integrated energy system.

Typically, before modeling, calculating, and analyzing the multi-energy system, researchers must predefine constraints, objective functions, and optimization variables. Subsequently, planning and optimization algorithms are employed to design the system and derive the optimal values for its optimization variables. Broadly, cost and load considerations typically serve as constraints, while economic or environmental optimality is often set as the objective function. The types and capacities of energy supply and storage equipment are designated as optimization variables for refining the system's planning scheme.

Coordination and optimization control technology

In a multi-energy complementary system, internal coordination and optimization are fundamental to achieve high energy efficiency and economic viability, which can be accomplished through control technologies that optimally schedule distributed energy sources based on real-time inputs, including electric loads, thermal demands, and renewable energy availability. By intelligently managing these diverse resources, the system ensures its components work in concert, maximizing performance and minimizing costs. Coordination and optimization control technology can be divided into two categories: cooperative control management and optimization scheduling management.

The core of cooperative control management is the distributed cooperative control of a multi-agent system, facilitated by the energy internet. Its essence is to utilize information and communication technologies to realize the collaborative operation of all node equipment and to perform cooperative scheduling between the supply and demand sides of the system. There are two primary implementation approaches for this type of control. One is to design a multi-agent distributed system according to the topology, power-saving equipment functions and load characteristics of the multi-energy complementary system. This system leverages agent properties such as autonomy, initiative, and sociality to manage the switching states of each node device, thereby maintaining operational stability. The other is to design multi-agent consistency protocols according to the operation status and energy supply, storage and consumption characteristics of each equipment in the multi-energy complementary system. It utilizes behavioral characteristics of the agents, like reactivity and evolution, to adjust key operating parameters, ensuring both energy balance and quality within the system. Hua et al. (2020) studied regional integrated energy system which is centered around the distribution network, and the topology relationship, hardware and software structure of the cooperative control system are proposed.

The optimization scheduling management can be broadly categorized into two approaches. One is steady-state oriented optimal scheduling model, which includes algorithms and benefit analyses, etc. The other is coordinated scheduling model, which considers specific grid constraints and dynamic characteristics. The literatures reflect various efforts in this area. For example, Wang et al. (2015) investigated the optimal scheduling of a combined cooling, heating and power system, aiming to maximize its average effective output while minimizing the total heat transfer area. Liu et al. (2011) studied the coordinated scheduling of security-constrained electricity and natural gas infrastructures, accounting for the transient characteristics of natural gas flow. Aiming at the uncertainties of load demand and renewable energy, Yuan et al. (2019) established an economic optimization model and employed an improved genetic algorithm for its solution, successfully enhancing the system's coordinated power generation capability while reducing operational costs. Liu (2022) constructed collaborative optimization control model of multi-energy complementary system according to the demand for electricity, heat, and gas loads on the demand side during the scheduling period, as well as the output constraints of various equipment. Focusing on regional integrated energy systems, Si et al. (2024) proposed a research framework for aggregating diversified flexible resources based on the balance of local multi-energy supply and demand, which achieves several key objectives, including the verifiable modeling of key indicators, optimized active regulation capabilities, adaptability to uncertain environments, and coordinated energy sharing among multiple stakeholders.

Currently, research on cooperative optimization control for multi-energy complementary systems is predominantly concentrated on electric power systems, and distributed cooperative control strategies for these systems are still in their nascent stages. Although oil and gas production in oilfields similarly involves multi-level and multi-cycle energy allocation, this specific area remains significantly under-researched. Consequently, developing coordinated scheduling strategies for diverse energy forms across multiple temporal and hierarchical levels within oil and gas production represents a critical direction for future research.

Energy management technology

For the multi-energy complementary system, the energy management system mainly utilizes information flow to regulate energy flow, ensuring its safe, stable, economic and efficient operation (Wu et al., 2016). At present, most researches take microgrid as the research object, which have the function of primary energy management and can carry out basic optimal scheduling. However, these systems generally lack the capacity for the advanced analysis and decision-making required by more complex, multi-energy flow coupled systems.

For effective management of complex multi-energy systems, a dedicated system platform for analysis, processing and global optimization management can be established, which organically combines the power grid, renewable energy, non-renewable energy, energy storage system, various energy loads, etc., formulating reasonable conversion plans for different energy output and different forms of energy at the energy supply end, and making multidimensional comprehensive decisions (Wang et al., 2017). The framework for such a system is illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Framework of energy management system.

Currently, global research into integrated energy management is still in a nascent stage, lacking systematic basic theory and mature system application. Through the research on the operation control and energy management technology of the micro grid with multi voltage source micro source network, the results show that different management strategies are adopted to realize the safe and economic operation of the system in the optimal start-up and shutdown stage, the economic optimal dispatch stage and the real-time adjustment stage of the dispatch plan (Bao, 2014). Another concept is the self-regulated cooperative smart grid energy management system, which integrates distributed and centralized subsystems through bidirectional communication to enable the coordinated optimization and control of multiple energy flows (Sun et al., 2016). Future research in this field is expected to concentrate on several key areas: real-time modeling and state estimation of multi-energy flows, multi-timescale security analysis and control, and mixed-timescale optimized scheduling, etc.

Energy storage technology

Energy storage technology plays a pivotal role in multi-energy complementary systems, which is used to addressing the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and serves as an important guarantee to realize the stable output of electric energy. For instance, wind turbine power generation fluctuates with wind speed, exhibiting strong randomness and intermittency that render its output non-dispatchable. Similarly, photovoltaic power generation is subject to the variability of solar irradiance and weather changes, resulting in random, intermittent, and volatile output (Mari et al., 2025). However, the production of oil and gas in oil fields needs continuous, reliable and stable power output. Therefore, integrating energy storage devices into the energy supply system is necessary, which can smooth the output fluctuations from renewable power, reduce the difficulty of connecting to the power grid, and greatly promote the large-scale application of new energy.

According to the storage medium, the energy storage technologies can be broadly classified into mechanical energy storage, electrochemical energy storage, electromagnetic energy storage, thermal energy storage, and hydrogen energy storage, as illustrated in Figure 3. Mechanical energy storage mainly includes pumped storage, compressed air energy storage and flywheel energy storage. Electrochemical storage encompasses technologies such as lead-acid batteries, sodium-sulfur batteries, lithium-ion batteries, and flow batteries. Electromagnetic energy storage includes super capacitor energy storage and superconducting magnetic energy storage. Heat storage technology mainly uses heat storage tanks, and the commonly used media are water, solid or phase change materials. Hydrogen storage technology mainly uses high-pressure or low-temperature liquefaction and solid materials to store hydrogen.

Figure 3.

Classification of energy storage technology.

From the perspectives of basic research, key technologies, and integrated demonstration, various storage technologies are further categorized into four echelons in China (Chen et al., 2024), as illustrated in Figure 4. The first echelon comprises pumped hydro storage, which accounts for 59.4% of the national installed energy storage capacity. The second echelon includes lithium-ion batteries, compressed air energy storage, liquid flow batteries, lead-acid batteries and heat and cold storage technologies, of which lithium-ion batteries have the most installed capacity. The third echelon is sodium ion battery, flywheel energy storage and super capacitor, in which sodium ion is widely concerned. The fourth echelon features gravity energy storage, heat pump storage, and liquid metal energy storage.

Figure 4.

China's energy storage integration demonstration and industrialization echelon in 2024.

In the multi energy complementary system, different energy storage technologies have their own characteristics. For instance, the pumped and compressed air energy storage are noted for their long lifespans and large-scale capacity, whereas lithium batteries and flywheel energy storage have fast response time and high efficiency (Wang, 2019; Zou et al., 2025). Therefore, in practical applications, the selection of an appropriate energy storage method must be based on a careful evaluation of specific economic and capacity requirements.

Evaluation indicators

To assess the performance of multi-energy complementary technologies, a set of evaluation indicators is established, encompassing three primary categories: technical, economic, and social indicators (Huang et al., 2024; Li et al., 2020a).

Technical indicators

Technical indicators are primarily used to evaluate key performance aspects of a multi-energy complementary system, including its energy utilization efficiency, renewable energy penetration rate, and key equipment utilization rate.

(1) Energy utilization

The comprehensive energy utilization indicator represents the utilization efficiency level of multi energy system for multi energy. It is defined as the ratio of total input energy to total output energy:

η = \frac{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} E_{i}^{o u t}}{\sum_{j = 1}^{n} E_{j}^{i n}}

(1)

where

E_{i}^{o u t}

is the output energy of category i and

E_{j}^{i n}

is the input energy of category j.

(2) Penetration rate of renewable energy

The penetration rate of renewable energy is an indicator that measures the degree of use of new energy and the development of renewable energy in the energy structure of a country or region. It is defined as the proportion of new energy input to the total energy consumption:

\begin{matrix} ϕ = \frac{\sum_{i = 1}^{p} E_{i}^{i n}}{\sum_{j = 1}^{n} E_{j}^{i n}} \end{matrix}

(2)

where

E_{i}^{i n}

denotes the input clean energy of category

i

(3) Utilization rate of key equipment

The utilization efficiency of equipment is calculated as the percentage ratio of its actual operating time ( $Q$ ) to its planned operating time ( $Q_{0}$ ) for each year. When assessing the utilization rate for multiple pieces of equipment, the power weighting of each device relative to the system's total output power should be considered. The utilization rate of a single device is computed as:

\begin{matrix} ξ_{i} = \frac{Q}{Q_{0}} * 100 % \end{matrix}

(3)

Economic indicator

For multi energy complementary systems, economic indicators are an important component of whether they can be established and how to establish them reasonably. Two commonly used economic indicators are presented below.

(1) Initial investment

The initial investment of a system refers to the total cost of purchasing various equipment, which to some extent determines the difficulty of system construction, applicable regions, and economic benefits. It is calculated as follows:

\begin{matrix} C_{i n} = \sum_{i = 1}^{K} N_{i} C_{i} \end{matrix}

(4)

where

C_{i n}

represents the total investment amount,

N_{i}

represents the capacity of the

i

th device, and

C_{i}

represents the unit investment cost for the

i

th device.

(2) Annual operating costs of complementary systems

The annual operating cost of the system mainly includes the cost of purchasing electricity, natural gas, and fuel, as described in the following equation.

\begin{matrix} C_{o} = \sum_{i = 1}^{365} \sum_{t = 1}^{24} (E_{i, t, g r i d} u_{i, t, e} + F_{i, t, g a s} u_{i, t, g} + F_{i, t, o i l} u_{i, t, o i l}) \end{matrix}

(5)

where

E_{i, t, g r i d}

denotes the amount of electricity purchased from the grid at hour t of day

i

and

u_{i, t, e}

denotes the price of electricity.

F_{i, t, g a s}

denotes the amount of natural gas consumed at hour t of day

i

and

u_{i, t, g}

denotes the price of natural gas.

F_{i, t, o i l}

denotes the amount of oil consumed at hour t of day i and

u_{i, t, o i l}

denotes the price of oil.

Social indicators

To comprehensively evaluate the social impact of multi-energy complementary technologies, two primary factors are considered.

The first factor is stakeholder satisfaction, which considers government, energy supply units, users, etc. It is quantified by calculating the average social satisfaction:

\begin{matrix} N_{s} = \frac{\sum_{i = 1}^{p} N_{p}}{p} \end{matrix}

(6)

where

N_{s}

is the average social satisfaction, p is the number of system stakeholders; and

N_{p}

is the satisfaction of each stakeholder derived from survey data.

The second factor is CO2 emission reduction, a key metric for quantifying ecological benefits and environmental progress, which can be calculated as follows:

\begin{matrix} E_{c o_{2}} = W_{n e w} m_{c, e} + \sum_{k} W_{c, k} (m_{c, e} - m_{c, k}) \end{matrix}

(7)

where

W_{n e w}

and

W_{c, k}

respectively denote the power generation from new energy and the

k

th type of power unit. Similarly,

m_{c, e}

and

m_{c, k}

respectively denote the carbon emission coefficient of the power grid and the

k

th type of power unit.

Current challenges and future research directions

Challenges

Although the research on multi energy complementary technology has made some progress, there are still many challenges to be solved.

Coordination control. Current researches are focused on the specific environment, lacking the research on the randomness and suddenness of the operation. Furthermore, further research is needed to explore the applicability of generalized coordinated control methods and equipment for integrated energy systems.

Reliability of energy supply. The intricate control strategies governing the integrated management of storage, transfer, and load regulation present significant challenges to assess the power supply reliability of such systems.

Control devices. Different energy control devices typically operate in isolation, and there is no universal control device with uniformity and compatibility.

Future research directions

The multi-energy complementary technologies have broad application prospects, which are of great significance in promoting the development and utilization of renewable energy, achieving maximum utilization of renewable energy, improving energy utilization efficiency, and building a clean, low-carbon, safe and efficient energy system. Future developments in multi-energy complementary technologies are expected to focus on the following aspects.

To move beyond the simple integration of standalone energy systems, it is necessary to develop a comprehensive theory for multi-energy flow coupling, energy potential matching, and cascade utilization, explore the efficient transformation and coupling mechanism of multi energy complementarity, and establish a multi-objective and multi scenario collaborative planning research method. A further priority is to develop comprehensive performance evaluation methods considering the efficiency, safety, stability, economy and flexibility, which will guide the equipment selection and capacity matching of multi energy flow system, and realize the efficient and coordinated operation of each part of the source network load storage.

With considering the fluctuation of renewable energy and the uncertainty of user energy consumption, to reveal the full operating characteristics of the multi energy flow system at different time and space scales, and realize the real-time monitoring and optimal regulation of the multi energy flow system, it is necessary to further study real-time modeling and state estimation technology of multi-energy flow, and establish the active regulation mechanism of the multi energy flow system.

By applying advanced technologies like digital twins and virtual power plants to multi-energy flow systems, the potential of the energy internet is expected to be fully utilized, driving the evolution of comprehensive energy systems toward greater digitalization and intelligence.

At present, the energy storage technology can only ensure a certain capacity and time limit for the storage of electric energy. Furthermore, there are a lot of abandoned wind, water and light due to the imbalance between power generation and power consumption, which result in insufficient power during peak hours. With the development of research, the super storage technology of electric energy will be developed. Which will be used to store a large amount of electric energy during the low power consumption period, and release electric energy during the peak power consumption period to relieve the pressure of power consumption.

Conclusion

To achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, the multi-energy complementary technology of integrated energy is the strategic demand for the transformation and upgrading of the energy system. This paper has provided a systematic overview of this critical field. It began with the multi-energy complementary system from the definition, mode and policies of multi-energy complementary. Subsequently, it combs the research status of key technologies of multi-energy complementary, which focuses on the development and application of plan and design technology, coordination and optimization control technology, energy management technology and energy storage technology. Furthermore, the evaluation indicators of multi-energy complementary technology are briefly introduced. Finally, the challenges faced by the development of multi-energy complementary technology and the future development trend are analyzed and discussed. Although the multi-energy complementary technology has made some progress in the field of energy development in various countries, it is still in its infancy and has a long way to go.

Footnotes

ORCID iD

Wei Guan

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was financially supported by the China National Petroleum Corporation scientific research and technological development item “Development of multi-energy collaborative complementary software for oil-gas and new energy based on blockchain + AI” (Grant No. 2023DJ8205).

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Amir

Deshmukh

Khalid

, et al. (2023) Energy storage technologies: an integrated survey of developments, global economical/environmental effects, optimal scheduling model, and sustainable adaption policies. Journal of Energy Storage 72: 108694.

Bahn

Vaillancourt

(2020) Implications of EMF 34 scenarios on renewable deployment and carbon abatement in Canada: insights from a regionalized energy model. Energy Policy 142: 111518.

Bao

(2014) Research on control and energy management strategy of micro-grid composed of multi voltage source type micro-sources. Doctoral Dissertation. China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing, China.

Bartholdsen

Eidens

Löffler

, et al. (2019) Pathways for Germany’s low-carbon energy transformation towards 2050. Energies 12(15): 2988.

Chen

, et al. (2024) Research progress on energy storage technologies of China in 2023. Energy Storage Science and Technology 13(5): 1359–1397.

Congress of United States . (2007) Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007: a summary of major provisions.

Federal Ministry of Education and Research . (2015) Kopernikus-Project: ENSURE.

Gao

Hiruta

Ashina

(2020) Promoting renewable energy through willingness to pay for transition to a low carbon society in Japan. Renewable Energy 162: 818–830.

Gulraiz

Al Bastaki

Magamal

, et al. (2025) Energy advancements and integration strategies in hydrogen and battery storage for renewable energy systems. iScience 28(3): 111945.

10.

Zhou

Yang

, et al. (2016) Research on policy system and development priorities of smart grid in Japan. Electric Power 49(03): 110–114.

11.

Hua

Jing

, et al. (2020) Coordinated control technology for regional integrated energy. Electric Power 53(12): 110–118.

12.

Huang

Zou

Liang

, et al. (2024) Comprehensive evaluation of multi-energy complementary ecosystem based on improved multicriteria decision-making method. Clean Energy 8(1): 226–236.

13.

Liu

Shahidehpour

, et al. (2018) Optimal operation strategy for integrated natural gas generating unit and power-to-gas conversion facilities. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 9(4): 1870–1879.

14.

Zhang

Xiu

, et al. (2020a) Policy analysis and technical evaluation index of multi-energy complementary projects in China. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 467(1): 012188.

15.

Zhang

, et al. (2020b) Development of renewable energy multi-energy complementary hydrogen energy system (A case study in China): a review. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 38(6): 2099–2127.

16.

Liu

Shahidehpour

Wang

(2011) Coordinated scheduling of electricity and natural gas infrastructures with a transient model for natural gas flow. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 21(2): 025102.

17.

Liu

(2022) Research on Multi-energy Cooperative Control Technology Orienting to Energy Internet. Jiangsu: Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications.

18.

Mari

Lucheroni

Sinha

, et al. (2025) Power system portfolio selection and CO2 emission management under uncertainty driven by a DNN-based stochastic model. Mathematics 13(9): 1477.

19.

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry . (2014) The fourth energy basic plan of Japan.

20.

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry . (2016) Energy innovation strategy.

21.

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry . (2018) The fifth energy basic plan of Japan.

22.

Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Ecology and Environment . (2022) Implementation plan for carbon peaking in the industrial sector.

23.

National Development and Reform Commission . (2023) Notice on promoting the sustainable and healthy development of the coal power sector.

24.

National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Administration . (2017) Implementation opinions on promoting the construction of demonstration projects for multi-energy complementary integration optimization. Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Guowuyuan Gongbao 07: 92–95.

25.

National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Administration . (2021) Guiding opinions on accelerating the development of new energy storage.

26.

National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Administration . (2024) Anchoring the ‘dual carbon’ goals to promote the high-quality development of renewable energy.

27.

National Energy Administration . (2016) The 13th Five-Year Plan for Energy Development.

28.

National Energy Administration . (2017) Notice on the first batch of multi-energy complementary integration and optimization demonstration projects.

29.

Rogge

Pfluger

Geels

(2020) Transformative policy mixes in socio-technical scenarios: the case of the low-carbon transition of the German electricity system (2010–2050). Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151: 119259.

30.

Shi

Zhang

Kong

, et al. (2023) A review on research and application of multi-energy complementary system containing high proportion of renewable energy based on different attributes. Archives of Thermodynamics 44(4): 3–41.

31.

Zang

Han

, et al. (2024) Fundamental problems and research framework for assessment and optimization of the functional regulation capacity of the regional integrated energy system under the aggregation of diversified and flexible resources. Proceedings of the CSEE 44(06): 2097–2119.

32.

Sun

Pan

Guo

(2016) Energy management for multi-energy flow: challenges and prospects. Automation of Electric Power Systems 40(15): 1–8+16.

33.

The State Council . (2018) The 13th Five-Year Plan for the Development of National Strategic Emerging Industries.

34.

The State Council . (2020) White paper: China's energy development in the new era.

35.

The State Grid Corporation of China . (2019) The action plan for promoting the development of integrated energy service business (2019-2020).

36.

Ting

(2021) Constructing tradable green certificate schemes from the perspective of comparative law. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Social Sciences) 2(4): 30–39.

37.

United States Department of Energy . (2015) Grid modernization multi-year program plan.

38.

United States Department of Energy . (2016) Nuclear-renewable hybrid energy systems: 2016 technology development program plan.

39.

Wang

Zhang

Lin

(2024) Multi-energy complementary power systems based on solar energy: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 199: 114464.

40.

Wang

Zhong

, et al. (2017) Review and prospect of integrated demand response in the multi-energy system. Applied Energy 202: 772–782.

41.

Wang

Zhao

, et al. (2015) Multi-objective optimization of a combined cooling, heating and power system driven by solar energy. Energy Conversion and Management 89: 289–297.

42.

Wang

(2019) Development on large-scale energy storage technology. In: International conference on informatics, control and robotics, pp.304.

43.

Huang

, et al. (2016) Research on the collaborative optimization of multi-energy flow microgrids. Energy Procedia 103: 345–350.

44.

Xie

, et al. (2020) Comprehensive report on China's long term low carbon development strategy and transformation path. China Population Resources and Environment 30: 1–25.

45.

Yang

Duan

Liu

, et al. (2025) Progress and prospects of fundamental research on multi-energy complementary distributed energy system. Science China Technological Sciences 68(9): 1900103.

46.

(2020) Analysis of the development status and prospect of multi-energy complementary technology. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 546(2): 022047.

47.

Yuan

Dong

Wei

, et al. (2019) Optimal scheduling of combined cooling heating and power microgrid based on demand response and multi-energy coordination. Electric Power Construction 40(9): 64–72.

48.

Zhang

Chen

(2018) The development and application of “multiple complementary”. Science, Technology and Industry 18(11): 92–99.

49.

Zhang

, et al. (2023) Optimal operation regulation strategy of multi-energy complementary system considering source load storage dynamic characteristics in oilfield well sites. Electric Power Systems Research 225: 109799.

50.

Zhong

Zhou

, et al. (2018) Research status and development trends for key technologies of multi-energy complementary comprehensive utilization system. Thermal Power Generation 47(2): 1–5.

51.

Zou

Zhang

Huang

, et al. (2025) High efficiency leaching of black powder from spent lithium-ion battery by ternary deep eutectic solvent and recovery of metals by precipitation and electrodeposition. Separation and Purification Technology 364: 132438.

Status and prospects of research on multi-energy complementary technologies for enterprise energy transition under the dual carbon goal

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Overview of multi-energy complementary system

Definition of multi-energy complementary

Multi-energy complementary mode

Multi-energy complementary policies

Multi-energy complementary technologies

Plan and design technology

Coordination and optimization control technology

Energy management technology

Energy storage technology

Evaluation indicators

Technical indicators

Economic indicator

Social indicators

Current challenges and future research directions

Challenges

Future research directions

Conclusion

Footnotes

ORCID iD

Funding

Declaration of conflicting interests

References