Comparing Canadian, German and Swedish automotive unions, this article examines why since the 1990s unions have increasingly accepted High Performance Work Systems (HPWS). ‘External’ factors such as globalization, outsourcing and state neoliberal policies are important, but drawing upon Gramsci and Burawoy, the article adopts an ‘internal’ perspective emphasizing (a) how the mystification of the wage relation is a basis for capital’s workplace hegemony and (b) the role of union agency via ‘defend and restore’ and ‘modernize and adapt’ strategies. The article argues that by incorporating union resistance, HPWS has acted through unions as much as it has acted upon them.
AnastakisD (2005) The Auto Pact: Creating a Borderless North American Industry. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
2.
BaccaroLHowellC (2011) A common neoliberal trajectory: The transformation of industrial relations in advanced capitalism. Politics and Society39(4): 521–563.
BeckeG (2004) German works councils under pressure: Institutional learning as a pathway to enhance their capacities of action. ARTEC paper 117, University of Bremen. Available at: www.artec.uni-bremen.de (accessed 28 September 2018).
5.
BergeneA (2010) Preaching in the desert or looking at the stars? A comparative study of trade union strategies in the auto, textile and garment, and maritime industries. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo.
6.
BergeneAHansenP (2016) A historical legacy untouched by time and space? The hollowing-out of the Norwegian model of industrial relations. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies6(1): 5–24.
7.
BerggrenC (1992) Alternatives to Lean Production: Work Organization in the Swedish Auto Industry. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
8.
BielerALindbergI (2008) Swedish unions and globalization: Labour strategies in a changing global order. In: BielerALindbergIPillayD (eds) Labour and the Challenges of Globalization: What Prospects for Transnational Solidarity?London: Pluto Press, pp. 199–216.
9.
BoglindA (2013) Volvo and a Swedish organization and management model. In: SandbergA (ed.) Nordic Lights: Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. Stockholm: Scand Book, pp. 189–224.
10.
BrännmarkMHoldenR (2013) Packages of participation: Swedish employees’ experience of Lean depends on how they are involved. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors1(2): 93–108.
11.
BrinkmannUNachtweyO (2013) Industrial relations, trade unions and social conflict in German capitalism. La Nouvelle Revue Travail2: 1–19.
12.
BruhnAKjellbergASandbergA (2013) A new world of work challenging Swedish unions. In: SandbergA (ed.) Nordic Lights: Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. Stockholm: Scand Book, pp. 126–188.
13.
BurawoyM (1985) The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes Under Capitalism and Socialism. London: Verso.
14.
BurawoyM (2012) The roots of domination: Beyond Bourdieu and Gramsci. Sociology46(2): 187–206.
ChaykowskyRVermaA (1992) Industrial Relations in Canadian Industry. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
18.
CoeNJordhus-LierD (2010) Constrained agency? Re-evaluating the geographies of labour. Progress in Human Geography35(2): 211–233.
19.
DanfordARichardsonMStewartP, et al. (2008) Partnership, high performance work systems and quality of work life. New Technology, Work and Employment23(3): 151–166.
20.
DenningM (2009) Once again on the organic capacities of the working class: Antonio Gramsci as a theorist of labor. In: FranceseJ (ed.) Perspectives on Gramsci: Politics, Culture and Social Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 69–79.
21.
DoellgastVGreerI (2007) Vertical disintegration and the disorganization of German industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations45(1): 55–76.
FowlerT (2012) Does fighting back still matter? The Canadian Auto Workers, capitalist crisis and confrontation. Capital and Class36(3): 493–513.
24.
FulcherJ (1991) Labour Movements Employers and the State: Conflict and Cooperation in Britain and Sweden. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25.
GindinS (1995) The Canadian Auto Workers: The Birth and Transformation of a Union. Toronto: Lorimer.
26.
GindinS (2016) Big three bargaining: Different ways of making history. The Bullet: Socialist Project No. 1316, 17 October. Available at: https://socialistproject.ca/bullet/1316.php (accessed 12 October 2017).
27.
GodardJ (2004) A critical perspective of the high performance paradigm. British Journal of Industrial Relations42(2): 349–378.
28.
GoldM (2011) ‘Taken on board’: An evaluation of the influence of employee board level representatives on company decision-making across Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations17(1): 41–56.
29.
GoldMArtusI (2015) Employee participation in Germany: Tensions and challenges. In: JohnstonePAckersP (eds) Finding a Voice at Work? New Perspectives on Employment Regulations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 193–217.
30.
GramsciA (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, ed. SmithQNowellG. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
31.
GrimshawDRuberyJ (2005) Inter-capital relations and the network organisation: Redefining the work and employment nexus. Cambridge Journal of Economics29(6): 1027–1051.
32.
HaipeterTJurgensUWagnerK (2012) Employment relations in the banking and automotive industries in Germany. The International Journal of Human Resource Management23(10): 2016–2033.
33.
HerrigelG (2008) Roles and rules: Ambiguity, experimentation and new forms of stakeholderism in Germany. Industrielle Beziehungen15(2): 111–132.
34.
HolmesJ (2015) Labour relations and human resource management in the automotive industry: North American perspectives. In: NieuwenhuisPWellsP (eds) The Global Automotive Industry. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 67–82.
35.
HolmesJKumarP (1998) Chrysler’s Windsor assembly plant: Lean production through bargaining incremental change. In: BabsonSNunezH (eds) Confronting Change: Auto Labor and Lean Production. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, pp. 257–280.
36.
HolmesJRusonickA (1991) The break up of an international union: Uneven development in the North American auto industry and the schism in the UAW. Environment and Planning A23: 9–35.
37.
HolstH (2013) ‘Commodifying institutions’: Vertical disintegration and institutional change in German labour relations. Work, Employment and Society28(1): 201–218.
38.
HowellCKolins-GivanR (2011) Rethinking institutions and institutional change in European industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations49(2): 231–255.
39.
HuxleyC (2015) Three decades of lean production: Practice, ideology, and resistance. International Journal of Sociology45(2): 133–151.
40.
HuzzardT (2000) Labouring to Learn: Union Renewal in Swedish Manufacturing. Umea: Borea.
41.
JohanssonJAbrahamssonL (2009) The good work: A Swedish trade union vision in the shadow of lean production. Applied Ergonomics40: 775–780.
42.
JohanssonJAbrahamssonLJohanssonS (2013) If you can’t beat them, join them? The Swedish trade union movement and lean production. Journal of Industrial Relations55(3): 445–460.
43.
JurgensU (2003) Transformation and interaction: Japanese, U.S. and German production models in the 1990s. In: YamamuraKStreeckW (eds) The End of Diversity? Prospects for German and Japanese Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 212–239.
44.
KatzHDarbishireO (2000) Converging Divergencies: World Wide Changes in Employment Systems. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45.
KrzywdzinskiM (2017) Accounting for cross-country differences in employee involvement practices: Comparative case studies in Germany, Brazil and China. British Journal of Industrial Relations55(2): 321–346.
46.
LewchuckWWellsD (2007) Transforming worker representation: The Magna model in Canada and Mexico. Labour/Le Travail60(3): 109–137.
47.
LewchuckWStewartPYatesC (2001) Quality of working life in the automobile industry: A Canada–UK comparative study. New Technology, Work and Employment16(2): 72–87.
48.
LippertIHuzzardTJurgensULazonickW (2014) Corporate Governance, Employee Voice, and Work Organization: Sustaining High-Road Jobs in the Automotive Supply Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
MacDonaldIT (2014) Towards neo-liberal trade unionism: Decline, renewal and transformations in North American labour movements. British Journal of Industrial Relations52(4): 725–752.
MarkovitsA (1986) The Politics of West German Trade Unions: Strategies of Class and Interest Representation in Growth and Crisis. London: Routledge.
52.
MovitzFLevisonK (2013) Employee board representation in the Swedish private sector. In: SandbergA (ed.) Nordic Lights: Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. Stockholm: Scand Book, pp. 471–484.
53.
MovitzFSandbergA (2013) Contested models: Productive welfare and solidaristic individualism. In: SandbergA (ed.) Nordic Lights: Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. Stockholm: Scand Book, pp. 31–90.
54.
Müller-JentschW (1995) Germany: From collective voice to co-management. In: RogersJStreeckW (eds) Works Councils: Consultation, Representation and Cooperation in Industrial Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 53–78.
55.
Müller-JentschW (2008) Industrial democracy: Historical development and current challenges. Management Revue19(4): 260–273.
56.
MurnighanB (2016) Unifor and Big Three bargaining: A response to Gindin’s ‘Different Ways of Making History’. The Bullet: The Socialist Project, 31October. Available at: https://socialistproject.ca/bullet/1322.php (accessed 15 September 2017).
57.
NeirottiP (2018) Work intensification and employee involvement in lean production: New light on a classic dilemma. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. Epub ahead of print 11 January 2018. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2018.1424016
58.
OECD (Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development) (1994) Collective bargaining: Levels and coverage. Available at: www.oecd.org/els/emp/2409993.pdf (accessed 10 August 2017).
59.
PilFFuijimotoT (2006) Lean and reflective production: The dynamic nature of production. Models Industry Studies Association Working Papers WP-2006-05 Available at: http://isapapers.pitt.edu/ (accessed 8 July 2018).
60.
PontussonJ (1990) The politics of new technology and job redesign: A comparison of Volvo and British Leyland. Economic and Industrial Democracy11(3): 311–336.
61.
RinehartJHuxleyCRobertsonD (1997) Just Another Car Factory? Lean Production and its Discontents. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
RosenfeldH (2016a) Viewpoint: UNIFOR’s focus on investment lets down GM workers. Labor Notes, 16September. Available at: http://labornotes.org/2016/09/viewpoint-uni (accessed 11 September 2017).
64.
RosenfeldH (2016b) Ford UNIFOR agreement ratified: Voted down at Oakville Unit, Local 707. The Bullet: Socialist Project, 11November. Available at: https://socialistproject.ca/2016/11/b1329/ (accessed 10 December 2017).
65.
RosenfeldH (2017) CAMI strike: After another set back can UNIFOR move on?The Bullet: Socialist Project, 24October. Available at: https://socialistproject.ca/2017/10/b1500/ (accessed 12 March 2018).
SchillingGVanselowA (2012) Inside the German miracle: How trade unions shape the future of industrial working conditions. Revista Internacional de Organizaciones, 9diciembre: 69–90 Available at: www.revista-rio.org (accessed 15 August 2018).
68.
SiemiatyckiE (2012) Forced to concede: Permanent restructuring and labour’s place in the North American auto industry. Antipode44(2): 453–473.
69.
SorgeAStreeckW (2016) Diversified quality production revisited: The transformation of production systems and regulatory regimes in Germany. MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/13, Max Planck Institute, Cologne. Available at: www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp16-13.pdf (accessed 10 August 2017).
70.
StoreyJ (1983) Managerial Prerogative and the Question of Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
71.
SweeneyBMordueG (2017) The restructuring of Canada’s automotive industry, 2005–2014. Canadian Public Policy43(1): 1–15.
72.
ThelenK (2009) Institutional change in advanced political economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations47(3): 471–498.
73.
ThomsenSRoseCKronbergD (2013) Employee representation and board size in the Nordic countries. DBJ Discussion Paper Series 1301, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark. Available at: www.dbj.jp/ricf/pdf/research/DBJ_DP_1301.pdf (accessed 14 October 2018).
74.
TurnerL (2009) Institutions and activism: Crisis and opportunity for a German labor movement in decline. Industrial and Labor Relations Review63(3): 294–312.
75.
TurnerLAuerP (1994) A diversity of new work organization: Human-centred, lean, and in-between. Industrielle Bezeiehungen1(1): 39–61.
76.
UpchurchMTaylorGMatherA (2009) The Crisis of Social Democratic Trade Unionism in Western Europe: The Search for Alternatives. Farnham: Ashgate.
77.
WaddingtonJ (2015) Workplace representation, its impact on trade union members and its capacity to compete with management in the European workplace. Transfer20(4): 537–558.
78.
WellsD (1994) Origins of Canada’s Wagner Model of industrial relations: The United Auto Workers in Canada and the suppression of ‘rank-and-file’ unionism, 1936–1953. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie20(2): 193–225.
79.
WellsD (1997) When push comes to shove: Competitiveness, job insecurity and labour–management cooperation in Canada. Economic and Industrial Democracy18(2): 167–200.
80.
WentenF (2017) Does it matter what workers do? The role of workers’ relational agency in the hybridization of TNC subsidiaries in China and Mexico. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management17(2): 190–204.
81.
WilliamsR (1977) Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82.
YatesC (1993) From Plant to Politics: The Autoworkers Union in Postwar Canada. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
83.
YatesCLewchukWStewartP (2001) Empowerment as a Trojan horse: New systems of work organization in the North American automobile industry. Economic and Industrial Democracy22(4): 517–541.
