Investments in human capital can create a hold-up problem whereby both employers and employees exploit the bargaining weaknesses of the other. Employee share ownership (ESO) can mitigate this hold-up problem because it can align interests, develop loyalty, signal good-will and lock in employees. Previous studies have shown positive relationships between company investments in human capital and the use of ESO consistent with this argument but have been unable to identify the direction of causality. Using panel data from the French REPONSE survey, the findings indicate that significant and continuous investments in human capital take place prior to the implementation of ESO.
AcemogluDPischkeJ (1998) Why do firms train? Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics113(1): 78–118.
2.
AddisonJBelfieldC (2000) The impact of financial participation and employee involvement on financial performance: A re-estimation using the 1998 WERS. Scottish Journal of Political Economy47(5): 571–583.
3.
BarneyJ (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management17(1): 99–120.
4.
BeckerG (1964) Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
5.
Ben-NerAAllen BurnsWDowGPuttermanL (2000) Employee ownership: An empirical exploration. In: BlairMKochanT (eds) The New Relationship: Human Capital in the American Corporation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6.
BlairM (1995) Ownership and Control: Corporate Governance for the 21st Century. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
7.
BlairM (1999) Firm-specific human capital and theories of the firm. In: BlairMRoeM (eds) Employees and Corporate Governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
8.
BuchkoA (1993) The effects of employee ownership on employee attitudes: An integrated causal model and path analysis. Journal of Management Studies30(4): 633–657.
9.
CaramelliMBrioleA (2007) Employee stock ownership and job attitudes: Does culture matter?Human Resource Management Review17(3): 290–304.
10.
CarstensenVGerlachKHublerO (1995) Profit sharing in German firms. In: ButtlerFFranzWSchettkattRSoskiceD (eds) Institutional Frameworks and Labour Market Performance: Comparative Views on US and German Economies. London: Routledge.
11.
CoaseR (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica4(16): 386–405.
12.
CombsJLiuYHallAKetchenD (2006) How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology59(3): 501–528.
13.
ConwayNDeakinSKonzelmannS. (2008) The influence of stock market listing on human resource management: Evidence for France and Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations46(4): 631–673.
14.
FakhfakhF (2004) The effects of profit sharing and employee share ownership on quits: Evidence from a panel of French firms. In: PerotinVRobinsonA (eds) Employee Participation, Firm Performance and Survival. Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms, Vol. 8. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 129–147.
15.
FangTLongR (2012) Do employees profit from profit sharing? Evidence from Canadian panel data. Industrial and Labor Relations Review65(4): 899–927.
16.
FrenchLRosensteinJ (1984) Employee ownership, work attitudes, and power relationships. Academy of Management Journal27(4): 861–869.
17.
GinglingerEMegginsonWWaxinT (2011) Employee ownership, board representation, and corporate financial policiesJournal of Corporate Finance17(4): 868–887.
18.
GrossmanSHartO (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy94(4): 691–719.
19.
HittMBiermantLShimizuKKochharR (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal44(1): 13–28.
20.
HuselidM (1995) The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal38(3): 635–672.
21.
KatzEZidermanA (1990) Investments in training: The role of information and mobility. Economic Journal100(400): 1147–1158.
22.
KruseD (1996) Why do firms adopt profit-sharing and employee ownership plans?British Journal of Industrial Relations34(4): 515–538.
23.
KruseDFreemanRBlasiJ (eds) (2010) Shared Capitalism at Work: Employee Ownership, Profit and Gain Sharing, and Broad-based Stock Options. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
LongR (1980) Job attitudes and organizational performance under employee ownership. Academy of Management Journal23(4): 726–737.
25.
McNabbRWhitfieldK (1998) The impact of financial participation and employee involvement on financial performance. Scottish Journal of Political Economy45(2): 171–187.
26.
MitchellTJamesL (2001) Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review26(4): 530–547.
27.
NelsonRWinterS (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
PendletonA (1997) Stakeholders as shareholders: The role of employee share ownership. In: KellyGKellyDGambleA (eds) Stakeholder Capitalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
30.
PendletonARobinsonA (2011) Employee share ownership and human capital development: Complementarity in theory and practice. Economic and Industrial Democracy32(3): 439–457.
31.
PendletonAPoutsmaEVan OmmerenJBrewsterC (2001) Profit Sharing and Employee Share Ownership in Europe. Luxembourg and Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement in Living and Working Conditions.
32.
PendletonAWilsonNWrightM (1998) The perception and effects of share ownership: Empirical evidence from employee buy-outs. British Journal of Industrial Relations36(1): 99–123.
33.
PfefferJSalancikG (1978) The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row.
34.
PierceJRubenfeldSMorganS (1991) Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management Review16(1): 121–144.
35.
PilFMacduffieJ (1996) The adoption of high-involvement work practices. Industrial Relations35(3): 423–455.
36.
PooleM (1988) Factors affecting the development of employee financial participation in contemporary Britain: Evidence from a national survey. British Journal of Industrial Relations26(1): 21–36.
37.
PoutsmaEBlasiJKruseD (2012) Employee share ownership and profit sharing in different institutional contexts. International Journal of Human Resource Management23(8): 1513–1518.
38.
RobinsonAZhangH (2005) Employee share ownership: Safeguarding investments in human capital. British Journal of Industrial Relations43(3): 469–488.
39.
RousseauDShperlingZ (2003) Pieces of the action: Ownership and the changing employment relationship. Academy of Management Review28: 553–570.
40.
SenguptaSWhitfieldKMcNabbR (2007) Employee share ownership and performance: Golden path or golden handcuffs?The International Journal of Human Resource Management18(8): 1507–1538.
41.
TomerJF (1987) Organizational Capital: The Path to Higher Productivity and Well-being. New York: Praeger.
42.
WallTWoodS (2005) The romance of human resource management and business performance and the case for big science. Human Relations58: 1–34.
43.
WilliamsonO (1975) Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
44.
WilliamsonO (1979) Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics22(2): 233–261.
45.
WilsonNPeelM (1991) The impact on absenteeism and quits of profit-sharing and other forms of employee participation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review44(3): 454–468.
