The article tests the prevalence and antecedent of employee stock ownership (ESO) companies in Denmark. Based on a survey among the top 500 Danish companies, the article finds that the financial crisis has affected non-managerial workers’ willingness to invest in their company. While narrow-based schemes covering only top management have increased since 2000, the prevalence of broad-based schemes has declined. The article also finds that the antecedents of ESO companies are highly dependent on the type of ESOP. While companies with narrow-based schemes are smaller companies with a traditional view on strategy and planning and reluctance toward employee involvement, companies with broad-based schemes are large, listed companies with a focus on employee involvement. Additionally the findings indicate that non-managerial workers are more reluctant to invest in their company if the company has volatile or low financial performance.
AldrichHEAusterE (1986) Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behavior8: 165–198.
2.
AndersenTJ (2004) Integrating decentralized strategy making and strategic planning processes in dynamic environments. Journal of Management Studies41: 1271–1299.
3.
AndersenTJNielsenBB (2009) Adaptive strategy-making: The performance effects of emergent and intended strategy modes. European Management Review6: 94–106.
BaimanS (1990) Agency research in managerial accounting: A second look. Accounting, Organization and Society15: 341–371.
6.
Ben-NerAAllen BurnsWDowGPuttermanL (2000) Employee ownership: An empirical explanation. In: BlairMKochanT (eds) The New Relationship: Human Capital in the American Corporation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
7.
BlasiJKroumovaMKruseD (1997) Kremlin Capitalism: Privatizing the Russian Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
BlasiJKruseDBernsteinA (2003a) In the Company of Owners: The Truth about Stock Options (And Why Every Employee Should Have Them). New York: Basic Books.
9.
BlasiJKruseDSesilJKroumovaM (2003b) An assessment of employee ownership in the United States with implications for the EU. International Journal of Human Resource Management14: 893–919.
10.
BucheleRKruseDRodgersLScharfA (2009) Show me the money: Does shared capitalism share the wealth? NBER Working Paper No. 14830.
11.
CheadleA (1989) Explaining patterns of profit-sharing activity. Industrial Relations28: 387–400.
12.
ChenSSHennartJ (2002) Japanese investors’ choice of joint ventures versus wholly-owned subsidiaries in the US: The role of market barriers and firm capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies33(1): 1–18.
13.
ChoiJN (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal16: 187–199.
14.
CongerJAKanungoRN (1988) The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review13: 471–482.
15.
D’ArtDTurnerT (2006) Profit sharing and employee share ownership in Ireland: A new departure?Economic and Industrial Democracy27: 543–564.
16.
Del BocaAKruseDPendletonA (1999) Decentralisation of bargaining systems and financial participation: A comparative analysis of Italy, UK and the US. Lavoro e Relazioni IndustrialiSummer.
17.
EisenhardtK (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review14: 57–74.
18.
FamaE (1991) Time, salary and incentive pay-offs. Journal of Labour Economics9: 25–44.
19.
FestingMGroeningYKabstRWeberW (1999) Financial participation in Europe: Determinants and outcomes. Economic and Industrial Democracy20: 295–329.
20.
FitzroyFRKraftK (1987) Cooperation, productivity and profit-sharing, The Quarterly Journal of Economics102: 23–35.
21.
FreemanRRogersJ (1999) What Workers Want. New York: Russell Sage and Cornell University Press.
22.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis. Harlow: Pearson Educational International.
23.
HammerTHSternRN (1980) Employee ownership: Implications for the organizational distribution of power. Academy of Management Journal23(1): 78–100.
24.
JonesDKatoT (1995) The productivity effects of employee stock-ownership plans and bonuses: Evidence from Japanese panel data. American Economic Review85: 391–414.
25.
JonesDPliskinJ (1997) Determinants of the incidence of group incentives: Evidence from Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics30: 1027–1045.
26.
JonesDCKalmiPMäkinenM (2010) The productivity effects of stock option schemes: Evidence from Finnish panel data. Journal of Productivity Analysis33: 67–80.
27.
JonesDKatoTPliskinJ (1997) Profit sharing and gain sharing: A review of theory, incidence and effects. In: LewinDMitchellDZaidiM (eds) The Human Resource Management Handbook, Part 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 153–173.
28.
KabstRMatiaskeWSchmelterA (2006) Financial participation in British, French and German organizations: A neoinstitutionalist perspective. Economic and Industrial Democracy27: 565–585.
29.
KalmiPPendletonAPoutsmaE (2005) Financial participation and performance in Europe. Human Resource Management Journal15: 54–67.
30.
KaplanRNortonD (1996) The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
31.
KramerB (2010) Employee ownership and participation effects on outcomes in firms majority employee-owned through employee stock ownership plans in the US. Economic and Industrial Democracy31: 449–476.
32.
KruseD (1996) Why do firms adopt profit-sharing and employee ownership plans?British Journal of Industrial Relations34: 515–538.
33.
KruseD (1998) Profit sharing and the demand for low-skill workers. In: FreemanRGottschalkP (eds) Generating Jobs: Increasing the Demand for Low-Skill Workers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 105–153.
34.
KruseDBlasiJParkR (2008) Shared capitalism in the U.S. economy: Prevalence, characteristics, and employee views of financial participation in enterprises. NBER Working paper.
35.
LambertRA (2001) Contracting theory and accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics32: 3–87.
36.
McCarthyDReevesETurnerT (2010) Can employee share-ownership improve employee attitudes and behaviour?Employee Relations32: 382–395.
37.
MarkowitzHMBlasiJRKruseDL (2010) Employee stock ownership and diversification. Annals of Operations Research176: 95–107.
38.
MathieuM (2009) Annual economic survey of employee ownership in European countries 2008. European Federation of Employee Share Ownership. Available at: www.efesonline.org.
39.
PendletonA (1997) Characteristics of workplaces with financial participation: Evidence from the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey. Industrial Relations Journal28: 103–119.
40.
PendletonA (2006) Incentives, monitoring and employee stock ownership plans: Evidence and interpretations. Industrial Relations45: 753–777.
41.
PendletonA (2010a) Employee participation in employee share ownership: An evaluation of the factors associated with participation and contributions in Save As You Earn Plans. British Journal of Management21: 555–570.
42.
PendletonA (2010b) Employee share ownership and investment concentration: Which employee shareholders fail to diversify?Human Resource Management Journal20: 157–174.
43.
PendletonAPoutsmaEOmmerenJBrewsterC (2001) Employee Share Ownership and Profit-sharing in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
44.
PEPPER I (1991) The Promotion of Employee Participation in Profits and Enterprise Results. Social Europe, Supplement 3/91. Commission of the European Communities. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
45.
PEPPER II (1996) Promotion of Participation by Employed Persons in Profits and Enterprise Results (including Equity Participation) in Member States. Report from the Commission. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 08.01.1997/COM(96)697 final. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
46.
PEPPER III (2006) Promotion of Employee Participation in Profits and Enterprise Results in the New Member and Candidate Countries in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
47.
PérotinVFakhfakhF (1993) The effects of profit-sharing on firm performance in France. In: EALE Conference, Maastricht, September 1993.
48.
PierceJLKostovaTDirksKT (2001) Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review26: 298–310.
49.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88: 879–903.
50.
PooleM (1989) The Origins of Economic Democracy. London: Routledge.
51.
PooleMJenkinsG (1990) The Impact of Economic Democracy: Profit-sharing and Employee-shareholding Schemes. London: Routledge.
52.
PoutsmaEHuijgenF (1999) European diversity in the use of participation schemes. Economic and Industrial Democracy20: 197–223.
53.
PoutsmaEDe NijsWDoorewaardH (1999) Promotion of employee ownership and profit sharing in Europe. Economic and Industrial Democracy20: 171–196.
54.
PoutsmaEKalmiPPendletonA (2006) The relationship between financial participation and other forms of employee participation: New survey evidence from Europe. Economic and Industrial Democracy27: 637–667.
55.
PrendergastC (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature37: 7–63.
56.
RobinsonAWilsonN (2006) Financial participation and productivity: Insights from stochastic frontier estimation. Economic and Industrial Democracy27: 609–635.
57.
RobinsonAZhangH (2005) Employee share ownership: Safeguarding investments in human capital. British Journal of Industrial Relations43: 469–488.
58.
SauserWI (2009) Sustaining employee owned companies: Seven recommendations. Journal of Business Ethics84: 151–164.
59.
SeibertSESilverSRRandolphWA (2004) Taking empowerment to the next level: A multi-level model of empowerment, performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal47: 332–349.
60.
SenguptaSWhitfieldKMcNabbB (2007) Employee share ownership and performance: Golden path or golden handcuffs. The International Journal of Human Resource Management18: 1507–1538.
61.
TseoG (1996) Economic restructuring: Enterprise development through employee ownership. Economic and Industrial Democracy17: 243–279.
62.
WooldridgeBSchmidTFloydSW (2008) The middle management perspective on strategy process: Contributions, synthesis and future research. Journal of Management34: 1190–1221.
