For the most part, the extensive literature produced on joint labour—management safety committees since the 1970s has neglected historical antecedents. To provide insights from the past, this article focuses on America's early 20th-century Safety First Movement, which sought to reduce accidents through the adoption of non-union safety committees and re-engineering techniques, based on various aspects of scientific management. By assessing the relationship between these `soft' and `hard' dimensions of Safety First, this article demonstrates that the two were united in practical terms not only in the US but also in Britain and Australia. This fusion, it is argued, provided a means of obtaining workers' consent for organizational and workplace changes and overcoming prevailing resistance to the methods associated with scientific management. In doing so, it emphasizes the value of focusing on management goals and anticipated consequences of employee participation and representation.
Aitkin, H.G.J. (1960) Taylorism at Watertown Arsenal. London: Oxford University Press.
2.
Aldrich, M. (1997) Safety First: Technology, Labor and Business in the Building of American Work Safety, 1870-1939. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
Alexander, M.W. (1926) `Need of Safety from the Employer's Point of View' , Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science123: 6-8.
4.
Barba, W.P. (1915) `Industrial Safety and Principles of Management', Transactions, American Society of Mechanical Engineers37: 9111-17.
5.
Beyer, D.S. (1919) `Mechanical Safeguards', in US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions Boston, August 21-25, 1917, Bulletin 248. Washington: Government Printing Office.
6.
Brody, D. (1980) Workers in Industrial America: Essays on the Twentieth Century Struggle. New York: Oxford University Press
7.
Cameron, W.H. (1915) `The Attitude of the Employer Towards Accident Prevention and Workmen's Compensation', Transactions, American Society of Mechanical Engineers37: 900-7.
8.
Carlton, F.T. (1912) `Scientific Management and the Wage-Earner', The Journal of Political Economy20(8): 834-45.
9.
Cooke, M.L. (1913) `The Spirit and Social Significance of Scientific Management', The Journal of Political Economy21(6): 481-93.
10.
Copley, F.B. (1969a) F.W. Taylor: Father of Scientific Management, Vol. 1. New York: Augustus M. Kelly Publishers. (Orig. pub. 1923).
11.
Copley, F.B. (1969b) F.W. Taylor: Father of Scientific Management, Vol. 2. New York: Augustus M. Kelly Publishers. (Orig. pub. 1923).
12.
Coxe, C.B. (1926) `Putting Safety across to the Worker', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science123: 191-6.
13.
Derickson, A. (1994) `Physiological Science and Scientific Management in the Progressive Era: Frederic S. Lee and the Committee on Industrial Fatigue' , The Business History Review68(4): 483-514.
14.
Downie, B.M. (1978) `Review: Thomas A. Kochan; Lee Dyer; David B. Lipsky', The Effectiveness of Union-Management Safety and Health Committees', Industrial and Labor Relations Review32(1): 109-10.
15.
Drury, H.B. (1922) Scientific Management: A History and Criticism . New York: Columbia University Press. (Orig. pub. 1915).
16.
Edwards, R. (1979) Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Fairris, P. (1995) `From Exit to Voice in Shopfloor Government: The Case of Company Unions', Business History Review69(4): 493-529.
18.
Fry, L.W. (1976) `The Maligned F.W. Taylor: A Reply to His Many Critics', The Academy of Management Review1(3): 124-9.
19.
Gantt, H.L. (1919) Work, Wages and Profits. New York: The Engineering Magazine Company. (Orig. pub. 1913).
20.
Gilbreth, F.B. (1973) Primer of Scientific Management. Easton, PA: Hive Publishing Company. (Orig. pub. 1914).
21.
Goldmark, J. (1912) Fatigue and Efficiency. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
Gollan, P. (forthcoming) `Non-Union Employee Representation: A Review of Existing Research from an Anglo-American Perspective', International Journal of Management Reviews.
23.
Green, W. (1926) `The Need for Safety from the Worker's Point of View', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science123: 4-5.
24.
Haber, S. (1964) Efficiency and Uplift: Scientific Management in the Progressive Era 1890-1920. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Hansen, C.M. (1915) `Standardization of Safety Principles', Transactions , American Society of Mechanical Engineers37: 881-91.
26.
Holman, M.L. (1908) Presidential Address: `The Conservation Idea as Applied to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers', Transactions, American Society of Mechanical Engineers30: 577-617.
27.
Jacoby, S.M. (1983) `Union-Management Cooperation in the United States: Lessons from the 1920s', Industrial and Labor Relations Review37(1): 18-33.
28.
Klein, J. (2004) `Review: John Fabian Witt, The Accidental Republic: Crippled Workingmen, Destitute Widows, and the Remaking of American Law', Business History Review78(3): 542-4.
29.
Kochan, T.A., L. Dyer and D.B. Lipsky (1977) The Effectiveness of Union-Management Safety and Health Committees. Kalamazoo, MI: The W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
30.
Kraines, O. (1960) `Brandeis' Philosophy of Scientific Management' , The Western Political Quarterly13(1): 191-201.
31.
Levenbach, M.G. (1926) `Joint Industrial Councils of Great Britain', Social Forces4(3): 613-20.
32.
Levine, A.L. (1967) Industrial Retardation in Britain 1880-1914. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
33.
Littler, C.R. (1982) The Development of the Labour Process in Capitalist Societies: A Comparative Study of the Transformation of Work Organization in Britain, Japan, and the USA. London: Heinemann.
34.
Meeker, R. (1919) Welfare Work for Employees in Industrial Establishments in the United States, US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bulletin No. 250. Washington : Government Printing Office.
35.
Meeker, R. (1920) `Employees' Representation in Management of Industry' , The American Economic Review10(1): 89-102.
36.
Merkle, J.A. (1980) Management and Ideology The Legacy of the International Scientific Management Movement. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
Milgate, N., E. Innes and K. O'Loughllin (2002) `Examining the Effectiveness of Health and Safety Committees and Representatives: A Review', Work19: 281-90.
38.
Nadworny, M. (1955) Scientific Management and the Unions 1900-1932: A Historical Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Nelson, D. (1975) Managers and Workers: Origins of the New Factory System in the United States 1880-1920. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
40.
Nelson, D. (1992) A Mental Revolution - Scientific Management Since Taylor. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
41.
NSW Department of Labour and Industry (1920 ) Report, with an Historical Review on the Operations of the Department of Labour and Industry During the Year, 1918. Sydney: Government Printer.
42.
Otey, E.L. (1913) Employers' Welfare Work, US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bulletin 123. Washington: Government Printing Office.
43.
Palmer, L.R. (1919) `Shop Safety Committees', in US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions Boston, August 21-25, 1917, Bulletin 248. Washington: Government Printing Office.
44.
Palmer, L.R. (1926) `History of the Safety Movement', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science123: 9-19.
45.
Patmore, G.A. (1985) `A History of Industrial Relations in the NSW Government Railways: 1855-1929', unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
46.
Patmore, G. (2006) `Employee Representation Plans in the United States, Canada and Australia: An Employer Response to Workplace Democracy', Labor3: 41-65.
47.
Ramsay, H. (1977) `Cycles of Control: Workers' Participation in Sociological and Historical Perspective', Sociology11(3): 481-506.
48.
Rinefort, F.C. and D.D. van Fleet (2000) `The United States Safety Movement and Howard Pyle' , Journal of Management History6(3): 127-37.
49.
Stabile, D.R. (1987) `The Du Pont Experiments in Scientific Management: Efficiency and Safety, 1911-1919', The Business History Review61(3): 365-86.
50.
Taksa, L. (1992) `Scientific Management: Technique or Cultural Ideology?' , Journal of Industrial Relations34(3): 365-95.
51.
Taksa, L. (1993) `All a Matter of Timing: The Diffusion of Scientific Management in New South Wales Prior to 1921', unpublished PhD thesis, The University of New South Wales.
52.
Taksa, L. (1997) `Scientific Management and the General Strike of 1917: Workplace Restructuring in the New South Wales Railways and Tramways Department', Historical Studies in Industrial Relations4: 37-64.
53.
Taksa, L. (2007) `Uniting Management and Education in Pursuit of Efficiency: F.W. Taylor's Training Reform Legacy', Economic and Labour Relations Review17(2): 129-56.
54.
Taras, D.G. and B.E. Kaufman (1999) `What do Nonunions Do? What Should We Do About Them?', MIT Task Force Working Paper #WP14, presented at conference `Symposium on Changing Employment Relations and new Institutions of Representation', Washington DC, 25-26 May; at: mitsloan.mit.edu/iwer/taskforce.html
55.
Taras, D.G. and B.E. Kaufman (2006) `Non-Union Employee Representation in North America: Diversity, Controversy and Uncertain Future', Industrial Relations Journal37(5): 513-42.
56.
Taylor, F.W. (1911a) The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers
57.
Taylor, F.W. (1911b) `The Principles of Scientific Management', in Dartmouth College Conferences, First Tuck School Conference - Addresses and Discussions at the Conference on Scientific Management Held October 12, 13, 14, Nineteen Hundred and Eleven. Easton, PA: Hive Publishing Company.
58.
Taylor, F.W. (1947) `Taylor's Testimony Before the Special House Committee', Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers. (Orig. pub. 1912).
59.
Taylor, F.W. (1947) `Shop Management', Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers. (Orig. pub. 1903).
60.
Urwick, L. (1956) The Golden Book of Management: A Historical Record of the Life and Work of Seventy Pioneers. London: Newman, Neame Ltd.
61.
Urwick, L. and E.F.L. Brech (1957) The Making of Scientific Management, Vol. 2. London: Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons.
62.
US Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics (1919) Industrial Health and Efficiency: Final Report of the British Health of Munition Workers' Committee, Bulletin No. 249. Washington: Government Printing Office.
63.
Walters, D. and T. Nichols (2007) Worker Representation and Workplace Health and Safety. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
64.
Weinstein, J. (1975) `It's Good for Business', in A. Mann (ed.) The Progressive Era. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.
65.
Whitston, K. (1997) `The Reception of Scientific Management by British Engineers, 1890-1914', Business History Review71(2): 207-29.
66.
Witt, J.F. (2003) `Speedy Fred Taylor and the Ironies of Enterprise Liability', Columbia Law Review103(1): 1-49.
67.
Witt, J.F. (2004) The Accidental Republic: Crippled Workmen, Destitute Widows, and the Remaking of American Law. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
