This article examines means to improve the ability of work organization development
programmes to create and disseminate good practices. The article states that there
is a growing need for strategies that understand good practices more as generative
ideas than ‘ready-made’ objects, and in which the focus of
attention is on the creation of interactive contexts between various players already
at the project planning and implementation stage. The ‘modules’
of the Norwegian Enterprise Development 2000 Programme (1994–2001) and the
‘network projects’ and ‘learning networks’
of the Finnish Workplace Development Programme (1996–2009) are used as
examples of the principles of the new strategy in practice.
Alasoini, T. (2003) Projekteista oppimisverkostoiksi: paradigman muutos
tyoörganisaatioiden ohjelmallisessa kehittämisessä?
Helsinki: Ministry of Labour, Finnish Workplace-Development Programme.
2.
Alasoini, T.
(2004)
‘The New Finnish Workplace Development Program (TYKESFWDP) as an
Approach to Innovation’
, Concepts and Transformation9(3):
279–295
.
3.
Antila, J.
and
P. Ylöstalo
(1999) Functional Flexibility and Workplace Success in
Finland.
Helsinki: Ministry of Labour
.
4.
Appelbaum, E.
,
T. Bailey
,
P. Berg
and
A.L. Kalleberg
(2000) Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work
Systems Pay Off.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
5.
Arnkil, R.
(2004)
‘The Finnish Workplace Development Programme: A Small Giant?’
, Concepts and Transformation9(3):
249–278
.
6.
Arnkil, R.
,
P. Rissanen
,
S. Pitkänen
,
T. Piirainen
,
P. Koski
,
P. Berg
,
M. Vartiainen
,
B. Gustavsen
,
M. Ekman Philips
,
H. Finne
and
C. Riegler
(2003) The Finnish Workplace Development Programme: A Small Giant?Helsinki: Ministry of Labour, Finnish Workplace
Development Programme
.
7.
Bacon, N.
and
P. Blyton
(2000)
‘High Road and Low Road Teamworking: Perceptions of Management
Rationales and Organizational and Human Resource Outcomes’
, Human Relations53(11):
1425–1458
.
8.
Benders, J.
,
F. Huijgen
,
U. Pekruhl
and
K.P. O'Kelly
(1999) Useful But Unused – Group Work in
Europe.
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of
the European Communities
.
9.
Bessant, J.
and
G. Tsekouras
(2001)
‘Developing Learning Networks’
, AI and Society15(1/2):
82–98
.
10.
Boxall, P.
and
J. Purcell
(2003) Strategy and Human Resource Management.
Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan
.
11.
Brodner, P.
and
E. Latniak
(2002) ‘Will They Ever Take the
‘‘High Road’’? Recent Findings on
Organisational Changes in German industry’, pp.
119–130 in
R. Smeds
(ed.) Continuous Improvement in Business Processes and Networks.
Espoo: Helsinki University of Technology
.
12.
Brodner, P.
and
E. Latniak
(2003)
‘Sources of Innovation and Competitiveness: National Programmes
Supporting the Development of Work Organisation’
, Concepts and Transformation8(2):
179–211
.
13.
Business Decisions Limited
(2002) New Forms of Work Organisation: The Obstacles to Wider
Diffusion.
Brussels: European Commission,
Directorate-General for Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs
.
14.
Cully, M.
,
S. Woodland
,
A. O'Reilly
and
G. Dix
(1999) Britain at Work: As Depicted by the 1998 Workplace
Employee Relations Survey.
London and New York: Routledge
.
15.
Delery, J.E.
and
H.D. Doty
(1996)
‘Modes of Theorising in Strategic Human Resource Management:
Tests of Universalistic, Contingency and Configurational Performance Predictions’
, Academy of Management Journal39(4):
802–835
.
16.
Edwards, P.
and
M. Wright
(2001)
‘High-Involvement Work Systems and Performance Outcomes: The
Strength of Variable, Contingent and Context-Bound Relationships’
, International Journal of Human Resource Management12(4):
568–585
.
17.
Engestrom, Y.
(2005) Developmental Work Research: Expanding Activity Theory
in Practice.
Berlin: Lehmanns Media
.
18.
Ennals, R.
and
B. Gustavsen
(1999) Work Organization and Europe as a Development
Coalition.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
.
19.
Fricke, W.
(1994) ‘Scientific Knowledge, Social Change and
Action Research’, pp. 47–69
in
T. Kauppinen
and
M. Lahtonen
(eds) National Action Research Programmes in the 1990s.
Helsinki: Ministry of Labour
.
20.
Fricke, W.
(2003)
‘Thirty Years of Work Life Programmes in Germany’
, Concepts and Transformation8(1):
43–68
.
21.
Gallagher, M.
(2001)
‘A Review of Government Support for New Forms of Working’
, AI and Society15(2):
149–159
.
22.
Godard, J.
(2004)
‘A Critical Assessment of the High-Performance Paradigm’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations42(2):
349–378
.
23.
Gustavsen, B.
(2001)
‘Towards Social Partnership: Trends in Norwegian Workplace
Development Programs’
, Concepts and Transformation6(2):
195–208
.
24.
Gustavsen, B.
(2002) ‘Creating a Framework for Enterprise
R&D’, pp. 15–28 in
M. Levin
(ed.) Researching Enterprise Development: Action Research on the
Cooperation between Management and Labour in Norway.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
.
25.
Gustavsen, B.
,
B. Hofmaier
,
M. Ekman Philips
and
A. Wikman
(1996) Concept-Driven Development and the Organization of the
Process of Change: An Evaluation of the Swedish Working Life Fund.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
.
26.
Gustavsen, B.
,
T. Colbjørnsen
and
Ø. Palshaugen
, eds (1998) Development Coalitions in Working Life: The
‘Enterprise Development 2000’ Program in Norway.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
.
27.
Gustavsen, B.
,
H. Finne
and
B. Oscarsson
(2001) Creating Connectedness: The Role of Social Research in
Innovation Policy.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
.
28.
Huselid, M.A.
(1995)
‘The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover,
Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance’
, Academy of Management Journal38(3):
635–672
.
29.
Ichniowski, C.
,
K. Shaw
and
G. Prennushi
(1997)
‘The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on
Productivity: AStudy of Steel Finishing Lines’
, American Economic Review87(3):
291–313
.
30.
Javanainen, S., ed. (2003) Lohjan seudun ympäristöklusteri:
verkostoyhteistyötäympäristön hyväksi.
Helsinki: Ministry of Labour, Finnish Workplace Development Programme.
31.
Knight, L.
(2002)
‘Network Learning: Exploring Learning by Interorganizational Networks’
, Human Relations55(4):
427–454
.
32.
Koivisto, T. and R. Ahmaniemi (2001) Verkostoperustainen
yrityskäytäntöjen kehittäminen. Helsinki:
Ministry of Labour, Finnish Workplace Development Programme.
33.
Levin, M.
(2002a) ‘Enhancing Innovations: A Core Issue of
ED2000’, pp. 207–222 in
Levin, M.
(ed.) Researching Enterprise Development: Action Research on the
Cooperation between Management and Labour in Norway.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
.
34.
Levin, M.
, ed. (2002b) Researching Enterprise Development: Action
Research on the Cooperation between Management and Labour in Norway.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
.
35.
Lillrank, P.
(1995)
‘The Transfer of Management Innovations from Japan’
, Organization Studies16(6):
971–989
.
36.
Lundvall, B.-A.
and
M. Tomlinson
(2002) ‘International Benchmarking as a Policy
Learning Tool’, pp. 203–231
in
M.J. Rodrigues
(ed.) The New Knowledge Economy in Europe: A Strategy for International
Competitiveness and Social Cohesion.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
.
37.
MacDuf.e, J.P.
(1995)
‘Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance:
Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry’
, Industrial and Labor Relations Review48(2):
197–221
.
38.
Milgrom, P.
and
J. Roberts
(1995)
‘Complementarities and Fit: Strategy, Structure, and
Organizational Change in Manufacturing’
, Journal of Accounting and Economics19(2/3):
179–208
.
39.
Nieminen, M.
and
E. Kaukonen
(2001) Universities and R&D Networking in a
Knowledge-Based Economy: A Glance at Finnish Developments.
Helsinki: Sitra
.
40.
Nonaka, I.
,
R. Toyama
and
N. Konno
(2000)
‘SECI, Ba and Leadership: A United Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation’
, Long Range Planning33(4):
5–34
.
41.
NUTEK (Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth)
(1999) Flexibility Matters – Flexible Enterprises
in the Nordic Countries.
Stockholm: NUTEK
.
42.
Oscarsson, B.
, ed. (1999) Benchmarking of Enterprise Development 2000: An
Impact Evaluation and a Comparative Analysis of Programme Design.
Oslo: Research Council of Norway
.
43.
Payne, J.
and
E. Keep
(2003)
‘Re-Visiting the Nordic Approaches to Work Re-Organization and
Job Redesign: Lessons for UK Skills Policy’
, Policy Studies24(4):
205–225
.
44.
Powell, T.C.
(1995)
‘Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage: A Review and
Empirical Evidence’
, Strategic Management Journal16(1):
15–37
.
45.
Qvale, T.U.
(2002)
‘A Case of Slow Learning? Recent Trends in Social Partnership in
Norway with Particular Emphasis on Workplace Democracy’
, Concepts and Transformation7(1):
31–55
.
46.
Ramstad, E.
(2005) ‘Self-Assessment Results of the TYKE
Programme's Development Projects (1996–2003) in
Examination’, in
T. Alasoini
,
E. Ramstad
and
N. Rouhiainen
(eds) The Finnish Workplace Development Programme as an Expanding
Activity: Results, Challenges, Opportunities.
Helsinki: Ministry of Labour, Finnish Workplace
Development Programme
.
47.
Ricart, J.E.
and
C. Portales
(2001) ‘Employment Contracts, New Organizational
Forms and Competitive Advantage for Continuous Innovation’,
pp. 5–46 in
J. Gual
and
J.E. Ricart
(eds) Strategy, Organization and the Changing Nature of Work.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
.
48.
Sanchez-Runde, C.
(2001) ‘Strategic Human Resource Management and
the New Employment Relationships: A Research Review and
Agenda’, pp. 47–78 in
J. Gual
and
J.E. Ricart
(eds) Strategy, Organization and the Changing Nature of Work.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
.
49.
Schienstock, G.
(2004) ‘From Path Dependency to Path Creation: A
New Challenge to the Systems of Innovation Approach’, pp.
3–27 in
G. Schienstock
(ed.) Embracing the Knowledge Society: The Dynamic Transformation of the
Finnish Innovation System.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
.
50.
Schienstock, G.
and
T. Hamalainen
(2001) Transformation of the Finnish Innovation System: A
Network Approach.
Helsinki: Sitra
.
51.
Schuler, R.S.
(1989)
‘Strategic Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations’
, Human Relations42(2):
157–184
.
52.
Science and Technology Policy Council of Finland
(2003) Knowledge, Innovation and Internalisation.
Helsinki: Edita
.
53.
Tell, J.
(2001) Organising University-Led Learning Networks among
Small-Enterprise Managers.
Goteborg: Chalmers University of Technology,
Department of Operations Management and Work Organization
.
54.
Toiviainen, H.
(2003) Learning across Levels: Challenges of Collaboration in
a Small-Firm Network.
Helsinki: Helsinki University Press
.
55.
Totterdill, P.
,
S. Dhondt
and
S. Milsome
(2002) Partners at Work? A Report to Europe's Policy
Makers and Social Partners.
Brussels: DG Research of the European Commission
.
56.
Vesalainen, J. and M. Kempas (2002) Kehittämisen tavoitteet,
odotukset ja koetuön kehittämisohjelman verkostohankkeisiin
osallistuneiden odotuksista ja koetuista tuloksista suhteessa ohjelman
tavoitteisiin. Helsinki: Ministry of Labour, Finnish Workplace Development Programme.
57.
Vesalainen, J.
and
R. Strommer
(1999) ‘From Individual Learning to Network
Learning – Networks as Learners and as Forums for
Learning’, pp. 117–139 in
T. Alasoini
and
P. Halme
(eds) Learning Organizations, Learning Society.
Helsinki: Ministry of Labour, Finnish Workplace
Development Programme
.
58.
Wareham, J.
and
H. Gerrits
(1999)
‘De-Contextualising Competence: Can Business Best Practice Be
Bundled and Sold?’
, European Management Journal17(1):
39–49
.
59.
Whittington, R.
and
A.M. Pettigrew
(2003) ‘Complementaries
Thinking’, pp. 125–132 in
A.M. Pettigrew
,
R. Whittington
,
L. Melin
,
C. Sanchez-Runde
,
F.A.J. van den Bosch
,
W. Ruigrok
and
T. Numagami
(eds) Innovative Forms of Organizing: International Perspectives.
London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: Sage
.
60.
Whittington, R.
,
A. Pettigrew
,
S. Peck
,
E. Fenton
and
M. Conyon
(1999)
‘Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A
European Panel Study, 1992–1996’
, Organization Science10(5):
583–600
.
