This paper investigates the opportunities and barriers to business engagement in the UK domestic retrofit sector. There are approximately 28 million UK dwellings accounting for 30% of UK total energy consumption. Almost all of the existing housing stock will require some form of retrofit in order to meet the UK Government’s Net Zero emissions target by 2050. However, adoption has been much lower than required. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with industry professionals to investigate the key barriers and opportunities for businesses in the retrofit market. The results suggest that there is significant opportunity for businesses, but engagement has been suppressed by three main categories of barriers: (1) Those that cause lack of consumer demand; (2) Those that constrain retrofit projects, limiting their volume and scalability; (3) Those resulting from a lack of government will or direction. Business opportunity for retrofit was seen to extend globally, with substantial market growth possible. The paper suggests potential roles and solutions key stakeholders could take to achieve the volume of retrofit required. The findings should be of interest to all stakeholders who wish to overcome the multitude of barriers to business engagement in the retrofit sector and realise the potential opportunities.
Practical application: This study aims to understand the barriers preventing the large-scale adoption of domestic retrofit in the UK in order to identify avenues for increasing business engagement in the sector. Potential areas believed to present significant opportunity for businesses when engaging in, developing and upscaling the retrofit process and solutions are highlighted. This paper should be of interest to building industry professionals already or wanting to undertake domestic retrofit works in future. The paper also gathers the views of current building industry professionals through semi-structured interviews providing an industry centric assessment of the sector’s challenges and possible solutions.
AtanasiuBKontonasiouEMariottiniF.Alleviating fuel poverty in the EU: investing in home renovation, a sustainable and inclusive solution.
Brussels, Belgium:
Buildings Performance Institute Europe, 2014.
8.
BodenM.Paradigm shift and building services. Serv Indus J1996;
16: 491–510.
9.
FriegeJChappinE.Modelling decisions on energy-efficient renovations; a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev2014;
39: 196–208.
10.
MurtoPJalasMJouniJ, et al.
The difficult process of adopting a comprehensive energy retrofit in housing companies: barriers posed by nascent markets and complicated calculability. Energ Policy2019;
132: 955–964.
GoodingLGulM.Enabling a self-sufficient energy efficient retrofit services sector future: a qualitative study. Energ Policy2017;
156: 306–314.
13.
De WildeMSpaargarenG.Designing trust: how strategic intermediaries choreograph homeowners' low carbon retrofit experience. Build Res Inf2019;
47: 362–374.
14.
BrouwerJvan DeelenKvan EngelenburgB.Value creation in retrofitting housing stock: an analysis of business opportunities. Report no. R10904.
The Netherlands:
TNO, August 2017.
15.
BonfieldP.Each home counts – an independent review of consumer advice, protection, standards and enforcement for energy efficiency and renewable energy.
London:
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) and Department for Communities and Local Government, 2016.
16.
InceRMarvinS.Constructing domestic retrofit as a new urban infrastructure: experimentation, equitability and contested priorities. Local Environ2019;
24: 825–842.
17.
GoodingLGulM.Achieving growth within the UK's domestic energy efficiency retrofitting services sector, practitioner experiences and strategies moving forward. Energ Policy2017;
105: 173–182.
18.
KangasHLLazarevicDKivimaaP.Technical skills, disinterest and non-functional regulation: barriers to building energy efficiency in Finland viewed by energy service companies. Energ Policy2018;
114: 63–76.
19.
MahzouniA.The institutional challenges of scaling-up housing retrofit; the Swiss cities of Basel and Sio. Facilities2019;
37: 780–798.
20.
BrownD.Whole-house retrofit: the role of new business models, finance mechanisms, and their implications for policy.
Brighton:
Science Policy Research Unit, 2019.
21.
JagarajanRAsmoniMMohammedA, et al.
Green retrofitting – a review of current status, implementations and challenges. Renew Sust Energ Rev2017;
67: 1360–1368.
22.
ChanADarkoAEffahE, et al.
Barriers affecting the adoption of green building technologies. J Manage Eng201:
33:1–12.
23.
Pardo-BoschoFCerveraCYsaT.Key aspects of building retrofitting: strategizing sustainable cities. J Environ Manage2019;
248: 1–14.
BraunVClarkeV.Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006;
3: 77–101.
36.
MaguireMDelahuntB.Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland J Teach Learn Higher Educ2017;
8: 3351–33514.
KuckartzU.Qualitative text analysis: a systematic approach. In: GKaiserNPresmeg (eds) Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education.
Cham:
Springer, 2019, pp. 181–197.
39.
FylanFGlewDSmithM, et al.
Reflections on retrofits: overcoming barriers to energy efficiency among the fuel poor in the United Kingdom. Energ Res Soc Sci2016;
21: 190–198.
40.
Chartered Institute of Building. Shortage occupations in construction. Report, Chartered Institute of Building; UK, January 2019.
Ellsworth-KrebsKReidLHunterC.Home-ing in on domestic energy research: “house,” “home,” and the importance of ontology. Energ Res Soc Sci2015;
6: 100–108.
PoortingaWJiangSGreyC, et al.
Impacts of energy-efficiency investments on internal conditions in low-income households. Build Res Inf2018;
46: 653–667.
SwanWFittonRSmithL, et al.
Adoption of sustainable retrofit in UK social housing 2010-2015. Int J Build Pathol Adapt2017;
35: 456–469.
52.
HamiltonGSummerfieldAShipworthB, et al.
Energy efficiency uptake and energy savings in English houses: a cohort study. Energ Build2016;
118: 259–276.
53.
NadimWGouldingJ.Offsite production in the UK: the construction industry and academia. Architect Eng Design Manage2009;
5: 136–152.
54.
TrottaG.The determinants of energy efficient retrofit investments in the English residential sector. Energ Policy2018;
120: 175–182.
55.
WilsonCCraneLChryssochoidisD.Why do homeowners renovate energy efficiently? Contrasting perspectives and implications for policy. Energ Res Soc Sci2015;
7: 12–22.
BoardmanB.Achieving zero: delivering future-friendly buildings.
Oxford:
Environmental Change Institute, 2012.
59.
PettiforHWilsonCChryssochoidisG.The appeal of the green deal: empirical evidence for the influence of energy efficiency policy on renovating homeowners. Energ Policy2015;
79: 161–176.
