Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The problem of improving the energy behaviour of existing buildings is a current topic of interest in scientific research. In recent years, Public Administrations have made an effort to introduce norms that help to reorient the tendency toward increasing energy consumption by buildings. To do so, manufacturers have developed numerous energy efficiency measures that have become widely extended. The main problem when selecting one or various measures is to identify the ones that will provide the best trade-off between services and implementation costs. This paper presents a study focused on implementing techniques for calculating the heating and cooling energy demand, along with genetic algorithm, to optimize the process of adjusting the building’s energy efficiency rating to a determined rating for existing building. The proposed optimization approach is applied to a real case to demonstrate its validity in a real-world situation.

Practical application: This paper presents an innovative method for the building energy retrofit process. By applying a simple genetic algorithm, the aim is to optimize the cost of intervening in an existing building by fixing the energy rating obtained at a given value. The practical potential of the method presented here is quite extensive, with its greatest exponent being its use by technicians who are unfamiliar with optimization processes. The application of this calculation methodology would simplify the study of projects in the phase of selecting energy-saving measures, given that there are currently many of them, with their independent characteristics, which makes the selection process a slow and ineffective task. In addition, the method’s intuitive interface and the fact that it is programmed in MS Excel make it an innovative method with great applicability in the field of building process optimization.

Keywords

Genetic algorithm energy rating building energy retrofit measures energy saving

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Eurostat. EU25 energy consumption equivalent to more than three and a half tonnes of oil per capita. News Release 2006; 126.

European Union. Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the Energy Performance of Buildings. Official J Eur Union 2010; 153: 13–35–13–35.

European Union. Directive 2002/91/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings. Official J Eur Communities 2003; 1: 65–71–65–71.

Erlandsson

Borg

. Generic LCA – methodology applicable for building, construction and operation services – today practice and development needs. Build Environ 2003; 38: 919–938.

International Panel of Climate Change. Mitigation of climate change contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Asadi

Da Silva

Antunes

. A multi-objective optimization model for building retrofit strategies using TRNSYS simulations, GenOpt and MATLAB. Build Environ 2012; 56: 370–378.

Holm

. Service management in housing refurbishment: a theoretical approach. Constr Manage Econ 2000; 18: 525–533.

Attia

Hamdyc

O’Briend

. Assessing gaps and needs for integrating building performance optimization tools in net zero energy buildings design. Energ Build 2013; 60: 110–124.

Juan

Ha Kim

Roper

. GA-based decision support system for housing condition assessment and refurbishment strategies. Autom Constr 2009; 18: 394–401.

10.

Evins

. A review of computational optimization methods applied to sustainable building design. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 2013; 22: 230–245.

11.

Hooke

Jeeves

. Direct search solution of numerical and statistical problems. J ACM 1961; 8: 212–229.

12.

Nelder

Mead

. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 1965; 7: 308–313.

13.

Goldberg

. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, 1st ed. Boston: Addison–Wesley Professional, 1989.

14.

Fogel

. Intelligence through simulated evolution: forty years of evolutionary programming, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.

15.

Sette

Boullart

. Genetic programming: principles and applications. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2001; 14: 727–736.

16.

Hansen N and Ostermeier A. Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: the covariance matrix adaptation. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation, Nagoya, Japan, 20–22 May 1996, paper no. 0-7803-2902-3, pp. 312–317. New Jersey: IEEE.

17.

Storn

Price

. Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim 1997; 11: 341–359.

18.

Geem

Kim

Loganathan

. A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 2001; 76: 60–68.

19.

Kennedy J and Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks vol. 4, Perth, Australia, November/December 1995, paper no. 0-7803-2768-3, pp. 1942–1948. Perth: IEEE.

20.

Dorigo

Maniezzo

Colorni

. The ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. Proc IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 1996; 26: 29–41.

21.

Kirkpatrick

Gelatt

Vecchi

. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983; 220: 671–680.

22.

Machairas

Tsangrassoulis

Axarli

. Algorithms for optimization of building design: a review. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 2014; 31: 101–112.

23.

Znouda

Ghrab-Morcos

Hadj-Alouane

. Optimization of Mediterranean building design using genetic algorithms. Energ Build 2007; 39: 148–153.

24.

Rakh

Nassar

. Genetic algorithms for ceiling form optimization in response to daylight levels. Renew Energ 2011; 36: 2348–2356.

25.

Coley

Shukat

. Low-energy design: combining computer-based optimization and human judgement. Build Environ 2002; 37: 1241–1247.

26.

Manzan M and Pinto F. Genetic optimization of external shading devices. In: Eleventh international IBPSA conference, Glasgow, UK, 2009.

27.

Sahu

Bhattacharjee

Kaushik

. Thermal design of air-conditioned buildings for tropical climate using admittance method and genetic algorithm. Energ Build 2012; 53: 1–6.

28.

Jin Q and Overend M. Facade renovation for a public building based on a whole-life value approach. In: Building simulation and optimization conference, Loughborough, UK, 2012.

29.

Malatji

Zhang

Xia

. A multiple objective optimization model for building energy efficiency investment decision. Energ Build 2013; 61: 81–87.

30.

Shao

Geyer

Lang

. Integrating requirement analysis and multi-objective optimization for office building energy retrofit strategies. Energ Build 2014; 82: 356–368.

31.

Asadi

Da Silva

Antunes

. Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit strategies: a model and an application. Energ Build 2012; 44: 81–87.

32.

Microsoft Office Excel, http://blogs.office.com/2009/09/21/new-and-improved-solver/ (2014, accessed 29 March 2016).

33.

ISO 13790:2008. Energy performance of buildings – calculation of energy use for space heating and cooling.

34.

EN 15217:2012. Energy performance of buildings – methods for expressing energy performance and for the energy certification of buildings.

35.

Frontline Solvers, http://goo.gl/Fmcb8Z (accessed 29 March 2016).

36.

Diakaki

Evangelos

Kolokotsa

. Towards a multi–objective optimization approach for improving energy efficiency in building. Energ Build 2008; 40: 1747–1754.

37.

Diakaki

Evangelos

Kabelis

. A multi-objective decision model for the improvement of energy efficiency in buildings. Energy 2010; 35: 5483–5496.

38.

Spain. RD 314/2006, of 17 March 2006, Código Técnico de la Edificación. BOE 2006; 74.

39.

ISO 9001:2008. CYPE ingenieros. Software for architecture, engineering & construction.

Genetic algorithm-based approach for optimizing the energy rating on existing buildings

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References