The moderating effect of the perception of cyber violence on the influence of exposure to violent online media on cyber offending in Korean adolescents
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2021
The moderating effect of the perception of cyber violence on the influence of exposure to violent online media on cyber offending in Korean adolescents
The aim of this study was to verify the moderating effect of the relationship between exposure to violent online media and cyber offending in adolescents. The study utilized information from the 2019 cyber violence survey; data from 3,202 adolescents (mean age = 16.56, SD = 1.71; boys = 1,800, girls = 1,402) were used for the final analysis. The moderating effect was analyzed using PROCESS Macro 3.4 (model 1), and the main results revealed that exposure to violent online media had a positive effect on cyber offending, while the perception of cyber violence had a negative influence on cyber offending. Specifically, the effect of exposure to violent online media on cyber offending was moderated by the perception of cyber violence. As a result of simple regression to verify the conditional effect according to the level of perception of cyber violence, cyber violence increased as exposure to violent online media increased in all level perceptions of violence (−1SD, M, +1SD). This study implies the need for education to raise awareness that cyber violence is dangerous and illegal along with supervision from parents and schools to reduce exposure to risky online media in order to prevent adolescents’ cyber violence.
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpret ing interactions. New York. Sage.
2.
AkersR. L.KrohnM. D.Lanza-KaduceL.RadosevichM. (1979).
Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review,
44, 636.
3.
AllenJ. J.AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2018).
The general aggression model. Current Opinion in Psychology,
19, 75–80.
4.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2002).
Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology,
53, 27–51.
5.
AndersonC. A.CarnageyN. L. (2014). The role of theory in the study of media violence: The general aggression model. In GentileD. A. (Ed.), Media violence and children: A complete guide for parents and professionals (2nd ed., pp. 103–133).
Praeger.
6.
AndersonC. A.GentileD. A.BuckleyK. E. (2007). Violent video game effects on children and adolescents: Theory, research, and public policy.
Oxford University Press.
7.
BaeS. M. (2021).
The relationship between exposure to risky online content, cyber victimization, perception of cyberbullying, and cyberbullying offending in Korean adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review,
123, 105946.
8.
BanduraA. (1977). In Social learning theory.
9.
BanduraA. (1998).
Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology & Health,
13, 623–649.
10.
BarlettC. P.KowalewskiD. A.KramerS. S.HelmstetterK. M. (2019).
Testing the relationship between media violence exposure and cyberbullying perpetration. Psychology of Popular Media Culture,
8, 280–286.
11.
BranleyD. B.CoveyJ. (2017).
Is exposure to online content depicting risky behavior related to viewers’ own risky behavior offline?Computers in Human Behavior,
75, 283–287.
12.
Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2006). Short-term and long-term effects of violent media on aggression in children and adults. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160, 348–352.
13.
CalveteE.OrueI.EstévezA.VillardónL.PadillaP. (2010).
Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior,
26, 1128–1135.
14.
GreitemeyerT.MüggeD. O. (2014).
Video games do affect social outcomes: A meta-analytic review of the effects of violent and prosocial video game play. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
40, 578–589.
15.
GrossC. D.MendozaA. T. O. (2018).
Exposure to media on perceptions of violence as a function of trait aggression and athletic status. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research,
23, 147–156.
16.
HaY. J.SeoM. K. (2014).
A study of perception and experience of dating violence. Social Science Research Review,
30, 79–103.
17.
HayesA. F. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
18.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2010).
Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research: Official Journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research,
14, 206–221.
19.
HoodM.DuffyA. L. (2018).
Understanding the relationship between cyber-victimisation and cyber-bullying on social network sites: The role of moderating factors. Personality and Individual Differences,
133, 103–108.
20.
HuesmannL. R.Moise-TitusJ.PodolskiC.-L.EronL. D. (2003).
Longitudinal relations between children’s exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood: 1977–1992. Developmental Psychology,
39, 201–221.
21.
KokkinosC. M.AntoniadouN. (2019).
Cyber-bullying and cyber-victimization among undergraduate student teachers through the lens of the general aggression model. Computers in Human Behavior,
98, 59–68.
22.
KretM. E.de GelderB. (2013).
When a smile becomes a fist: the perception of facial and bodily expressions of emotion in violent offenders. Experimental Brain Research,
228, 399–410.
23.
LamL. T.ChengZ. H.LiuX. M. (2013).
Violent online games exposure and cyberbullying/victimization among adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,
16, 159–165.
24.
LundgrenR.AminA. (2015).
Addressing intimate partner violence and sexual violence among adolescents: Emerging evidence of effectiveness. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine,
56, S42–S50.
25.
National Information Agency (2019). The 2019 cyber violence survey.
26.
NiwakoY.OstensonJ.BrownC. R. (2009).
The functions of gender role traditionality, ambivalent sexism, injury, and frequency of assault on domestic violence perception. A study between Japanese and American college students. Violence against Women,
15, 1126–1142.
27.
PalladinoB. E.MenesiniE.NocentiniA.LuikP.NaruskovK.UcanokZ.DoganA.Schultze-KrumbholzA.HessM.ScheithauerH. (2017).
Perceived severity of cyberbullying: Differences and similarities across four countries. Frontiers in Psychology,
8, 1524.
28.
ParkJ. M.ShinN. Y.ParkH. S. (2019).
A convergence study on the influence of media violence acceptance and violence perception on dating violence in university students. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society,
10, 237–246.
29.
ProtS.AndersonC. A.BarlettC. P.CoyneS. M.SaleemM. (2017). Content effects: Violence in the media. In RoesslerP.HoffnerC. A.van ZoonenL. (Eds), International encyclopedia of media effects.
Wiley-Blackwell.
30.
QiaoleiJ.XiuqinH.RanT. (2018).
Examining factors influencing internet addiction and adolescent risk behaviors among excessive internet users. Health Communication,
33, 1434–1444.
31.
RosenbloomR.WillsH. P.MasonR.HuffmanJ. M.MasonB. A. (2019).
The effects of a technology-based self-monitoring intervention on on-task, disruptive, and task-completion behaviors for adolescents with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
49, 5047–5062.
32.
SaleemM.AndersonC. A.GentileD. A. (2012).
Effects of prosocial, neutral, and violent video games on college students’ affect. Aggressive Behavior,
38, 263–271.
33.
SassonH.MeschG. (2014).
Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior,
33, 32–38.
34.
SeoB. E. (2016).
A meta-analysis of factors for juvenile cyber violence in Korea. The Korea Educational Review,
22, 211–233.
35.
SobbaK. N.PaezR. A.BenselT. T. (2017).
Perceptions of cyberbullying: An assessment of perceived severity among college students. TechTrends,
61, 570–579.
36.
SobbaK. N.ProchaskaB. F.RaduM. B.GassW. M.GliddenM. D. (2019).
College students’ perceptions of cyberbullying on a nontraditional campus: An assessment of victims and witnesses. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice,
57, 116–125.
37.
SticcaF.PerrenS. (2013).
Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
42, 739–750.
38.
TengZ.NieQ.ZhuZ.GuoC. (2020).
Violent video game exposure and (cyber)bullying perpetration among Chinese youth: The moderating role of trait aggression and moral identity.Computers in Human Behavior,
104, 106193.
39.
Tzani-PepelaziC.LoannouM.SynnottJ.FumagalliA. (2017).
Cyber-bullying and children’s unmonitored media violence exposure. Assessment & Development Matters,
9, 2–6.
40.
YeomG. W.KooS. M.KimR. E. (2020).
The effects on harassment behavior and damage behavior of perception of dating violence of male university students. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology,
10, 164–172.
41.
YuliatiR.SaptyasariA. (2019).
Cyberbullying involvement: Impacts of violence exposure in the media, family, society, and school. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia,
8, 5–11.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
