Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Best Practice in Mathematics Education project was funded by the Australian Office of the Chief Scientist, to examine promotion of students’ learning, engagement and aspirations in this core learning domain. We draw upon cross-sectional survey data from 551 students in grades three to nine to examine how students’ mathematics engagement relates to key dimensions of their learning climate (mastery or performance focused classrooms), teacher enthusiasm, and school caring. Engagement is known to be associated with positive school outcomes and influenced by environmental factors. Less known is whether, and the extent to which, students have different profiles of engagement across component dimensions (Fredricks, Blumenfeld, & Paris, 2004); and, how profiles may differ according to experienced environment dimensions. We first develop profiles of adolescents’ behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement using multilevel latent class analysis, educing three profiles of ‘engaged’, ‘compliant’, and ‘disengaged’ students, who systematically differed on experienced environmental factors. Mastery focused classrooms, enthusiastic teachers and caring school environment were experienced most by engaged, and least by disengaged students; performance focused classrooms were unrelated to engagement profiles. Identified patterns will be of particular use to teachers in understanding how class, teacher, and school influences together shape students’ own engagement in mathematics.

Keywords

engagement latent profile analysis learning environment mathematics education motivation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–136. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Anderman

E. M.

Midgley

(1997) Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology 22: 269–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0926 .

Arbuckle

J. L.

(1996) Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In: Marcoulides

G. A.

Schumacker

R. E.

(eds) Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 243–277.

Berlyne

D. E.

(1960) Conflict, arousal, and curiosity, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Buckley

(2016) Gender and sex differences in student participation, achievement and engagement in mathematics, Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/learning_processes/18.

Chubb, I., Findlay, C., Du, L., Burmester, B., & Kusa, L. (2012). Mathematics, engineering and science in the national interest. Retrieved 12.05.16 from: http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Office-of-the-Chief-Scientist-MES-Report-8-May-2012.pdf.

Crick

R. D.

(2012) Deep engagement as a complex system: Identity, learning power, and authentic enquiry. In: Christenson

S. L.

Reschly

A. L.

Wylie

(eds) Handbook of research on student engagement, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 675–694.

Crouzevialle

Butera

(2013) Performance-approach goals deplete working memory and impair cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142(3): 666–678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029632 .

10.

Eccles

J. S.

(2013) Gender and STEM: Opting in versus dropping out. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 5(3): 184–186.

11.

Eccles

J. S.

(2016) Engagement: Where to next. Learning and Instruction 43: 71–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.003 .

12.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(1995) In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21: 215–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213003 .

13.

Eccles

J. S.

Wang

(2012) Part I commentary: So what is student engagement anyway? In: Christenson

S. L.

Reschly

A. L.

Wylie

(eds) Handbook of research on student engagement, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 133–145.

14.

Fredricks

J. A.

(2011) Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A multidimensional view of engagement. Theory into Practice 50(4): 327–335.

15.

Fredricks

J. A.

Blumenfeld

P. C.

Paris

A. H.

(2004) School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 74(1): 59–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 .

16.

Fredricks

J. A.

Filsecker

Lawson

M. A.

(2016) Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction 43: 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002 .

17.

Frenzel

A. C.

Dicke

Pekrun

Goetz

(2012) Beyond quantitative decline: Conceptual shifts in adolescents’ development of interest in mathematics. Developmental Psychology 48(4): 1069–1082. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026895 .

18.

Frenzel

A. C.

Goetz

Pekrun

Watt

H. M. G.

(2010) Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence 20(2): 507–537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x .

19.

Goodenow

(1993) The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools 30: 79–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(199301)30:1%3C79 .

20.

Hulleman

C. S.

Durik

A. M.

Schweigert

S. A.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

(2008) Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 100(2): 398–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398 .

21.

Hyde

J. S.

(2005) The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist 60: 581–592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581 .

22.

Hyde

J. S.

Fennema

Lamon

S. J.

(1990) Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 107(2): 139–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139 .

23.

Jacobs

J. E.

Lanza

Osgood

D. W.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(2002) Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development 73: 509–527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00421 .

24.

Jang

(2008) Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology 100(4): 798–811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012841 .

25.

Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2002). ‘Should childhood be a journey or a race?’: A response to Harackiewicz et al. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 646–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.646.

26.

Kunter

Tsai

Klusmann

Brunner

Krauss

Baumert

(2008) Students’ and mathematics teachers’ perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learning and Instruction 18(5): 468–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.008 .

27.

Ladd

G. W.

Dinella

L. M.

(2009) Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology 101(1): 190–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013153 .

28.

Lawson

M. A.

Lawson

H. A.

(2013) New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research 83(3): 432–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891 .

29.

Lazarides

Watt

H. M. G.

(2015) Girls’ and boys’ perceived mathematics teacher beliefs, classroom learning environments and mathematical career intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 41: 51–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.005 .

30.

Lee

M.-J.

Bong

(2014) Testing interest and self-efficacy as predictors of academic self-regulation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 39(1): 86–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.002 .

31.

Litman

J. A.

(2008) Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences 44: 1585–1595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.014 .

32.

Marsh

H. W.

Trautwein

Lüdtke

Köller

Baumert

(2005) Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development 76(2): 397–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x .

33.

Meece

J. L.

Anderman

E. M.

Anderman

L. H.

(2006) Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology 57(3): 487–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258 .

34.

Midgley

Kaplan

Middleton

(2001) Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology 93(1): 77–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77 .

35.

Midgley

Maehr

M. L.

Hruda

L. Z.

Anderman

E. M.

Anderman

L. H.

Freeman

K. E.

(2000) Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

36.

Mitchell, R. M., Kensler, L., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2016). Student trust in teachers and student perceptions of safety: Positive predictors of student identification with school. International Journal of Leadership in Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1157211.

37.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

(2012) Mplus User’s Guide, (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

38.

Nagy

Watt

H. M. G.

Eccles

J. S.

Trautwein

Lüdtke

Baumert

(2010) The development of students’ mathematics self-concept in relation to gender: Different countries, different trajectories? Journal of Research on Adolescence 20: 482–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00644.x .

39.

National Research Council (2001) Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics, Washington, DC: National Academy PressRetrieved 20.5.16 from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.487.9364&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

40.

Nylund

K. L.

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling. A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling 14(4): 535–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396 .

41.

OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Retrieved 21.5.16 from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/learning-for-tomorrow-s-world_9789264006416-en.

42.

Pekrun

Elliot

A. J.

Maier

M. A.

(2009) Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 101(1): 115–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013383 .

43.

Pekrun

Linnenbrink-Garcia

(2012) Academic emotions and student engagement. In: Christenson

S. L.

Reschly

A. L.

Wylie

(eds) Handbook of research on student engagement, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 259–282.

44.

Pope

D. C.

(2003) Doing school: How we are creating a generation of stressed-out, materialistic, and miseducated students, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

45.

Pugh

K. J.

Linnenbrink-Garcia

Koskey

K. L. K.

Stewart

V. C.

Manzey

(2009) Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education 94(1): 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20344 .

46.

Rolland

(2012) Synthesizing the evidence on classroom goal structures in middle and secondary schools: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Review of Educational Research 82(4): 396–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654312464909 .

47.

Rosander

Bäskström

(2012) The unique contribution of learning approaches to academic performance, after controlling for IQ and personality: Are there gender differences? Learning and Individual Differences 22(6): 820–826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.011 .

48.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55(1): 68–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 .

49.

Schukajlow

Leiss

Pekrun

Blum

Müller

Messner

(2012) Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics 97: 215–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9341-2 .

50.

Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S. M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R. F., Sinha, S. & Abdi, B. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.003.

51.

Skinner

E. A.

Belmont

M. J.

(1993) Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behaviour and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology 85(4): 571–581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571 .

52.

te Riele

(2014) Putting the jigsaw together: Flexible learning programs in Australia. Final report, Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning.

53.

Thomson

De Bortoli

Buckley

(2013) PISA 2012: How Australia measures up, Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

54.

Thomson

Hillman

Wernert

(2012) Monitoring Australian Year 8 student achievement internationally: TIMSS 2011, Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

55.

Turner

J. C.

Meyer

D. K.

(2009) Understanding motivation in mathematics: What is happening in classrooms? In: Wentzel

K. R.

Wigfield

(eds) Handbook of motivation at school, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 527–552.

56.

Virtanen

Lerkkanen

Poikkeus

Kuorelahti

(2015) The relationship between classroom quality and students’ engagement in secondary school. Educational Psychology 3(8): 963–983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.822961 .

57.

Wang

(2012) Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

58.

Wang

Holcombe

(2010) Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal 47(3): 633–662. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831209361209 .

59.

Watt

H. M. G.

(2004) Development of adolescents’ self-perceptions, values and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th through 11th grade Australian students. Child Development 75: 1556–1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00757.x .

60.

Watt

H. M. G.

Shapka

J. D.

Morris

Z. A.

Durik

A. M.

Keating

D. P.

Eccles

J. S.

(2012) Gendered motivational processes affecting high school mathematics participation, educational aspirations, and career plans: A comparison of samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Developmental Psychology 48: 1594–1611. doi:10.1037/a0027838.

61.

Wentzel

(2009) Students’ relationships with teachers as motivational contexts. In: Wentzel

Wigfield

(eds) Handbook of motivation at school, Hoboken, NJ: Routledge, pp. 301–322.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

Students’ engagement profiles in mathematics according to learning environment dimensions: Developing an evidence base for best practice in mathematics education

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material