This paper discusses views on the nature of developmental mechanisms put forward by formal leamability theorists, by linguistis studying the logical problem of language acquisition, and by Fodor in his deliberations on the development of concepts. It is argued that the differences between the parameter-setting model of language de velopment and the hypothesis formulation and testing approach of formal learning theory are quantitative rather than qualitative, and that Fodor's views on conceptual development embrace significantly different claims on the nature of developmental mechanisms to either of these attempts to explicate the nature of syntactic development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, M. (1982). Explanations in the Study of Child Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
2.
— (1985). Mechanisms for language learning. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (eds), Child Language Seminar Papers. University of Reading.
3.
Berwick, R.C. & Wemberg, A S (1984). The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance Language Acquisition and Use (Cambridge, Mass.M I T Press)
4.
Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gteitman (eds) (See below).
5.
Carey, S. (1982). Semantic development: the state of the art In. E. Wanner & L R. Gletiman (eds).
6.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax ( Cambridge, Mass: M I T Press)
7.
— (1973). Conditions on transformations. In S. R Anderson & P Kiparsky (eds), A Festschrift for Morris Halle ( New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston).
8.
— (1980). Rules and Representations ( Oxford: Blackwell).
9.
— ( 1981a) Lectures on Government and Binding ( Dordrecht: Foris).
10.
— ( 1981b). Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In N. Hornstein & D Lightfoot (eds), Explanation in Linguistics. The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition (London: Longman).
11.
Fodor, J.A. (1975). The Language of Thought (New York: Crowell).
12.
— ( 1978). Computation and reduction. In C W. Savage (ed.), Perception and Cognition Issues in the Foundations of Psychology. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science: 9 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press)
13.
— (1980). Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 63-109
14.
— ( 1981). The present status of the innateness controversy In J A. Fodor, Representations (Hassocks: Harvester).
15.
— ( 1983). The Modularity of Mind (Cambridge, Mass.: M I T. Press).
Fodor, J.D. , Fodor, J.A. & Garrett, M.F. (1975). The psychological unreality of semantic representationsLinguistic Inquiry, 6, 515-31
18.
Gentner, D. (1981) Verb semantic structures in memory for sentences. evidence for componential representation. Cognitive Psychology , 13, 56-83.
19.
Gleitman, L.R. & Wanner, E. (1982) Language acquisition: the state of the state of the art. In E. Wanner & L R. Gleitman (eds).
20.
Gold, E.M. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10, 447-74
21.
Goodluck, H. (1986). Language acquisition and linguistic theory. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (eds), Language Acquisition (2nd edition) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
22.
Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language (Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press ).
23.
Hamburger, H. & Cram, S. (1984). The acquisition of cognitive compilingCognition17, 85-136.
24.
Hirsh-Pasek. K., Treiman, R. & Schneiderman, M. (1984). Brown & Hanlon revisited: mothers' sensitivity to ungrammatical forms'Journal of Child Language, 11, 81-88.
25.
Huang, J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar Unpublished M I T dissertation.
26.
Hyams, N. (1983) The acquisition of parameterized grammars. Unpublished CUNY dissertation. _
27.
Jackendoff, R. (1977) X-Syntax A Study of Phrase Structure ( Cambridge, MassM I T Press).
28.
Katz, J. (1981) Language and Other Abstract Objects ( Oxford: Blackwell).
29.
Landau, B. & Gleitman, L.R. (1985). Language and Experience Evidence from the Blind Child (Cambridge, Mass : Harvard University Press)
30.
Li, C. & Thompson, S A (1978). An exploration of Mandarin Chinese. In W Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic Typology (Austin : University of Texas Press).
31.
— (1981). Mandarin Chinese A Functional Reference Grammar (Berkeley: University of California Press).
32.
Lust, B. & Chien, Y.C. (1984). The structure of coordination in first language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese: evidence for a universalCognition, 17, 49-83
33.
Newport, E.L., Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L.R. (1977). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style In C E. Snow & C A Ferguson (eds), Talking to Children. Language Input and Acquisition (Cambridge - Cambridge University Press).
34.
Osherson, D.A. , Stob, M. & Wemstem, S. (1984) Learning theory and natural languageCognition, 17, 1-28.
35.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M (ed ) (1980). Language and Learning The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (LondonRoutledge & Kegan Paul )
36.
Randall, J.H. (1985) Positive evidence from negative In P Fletcher & M Garman (eds). Child Language Seminar Papers. University of Reading
37.
Roeper, T. (1981a). Introduction. In J. Pustejovsky & V. Burke (eds), Markedness and Learnability. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics: Volume 6.
38.
— ( 1981b). On the deductive model and the acquisition of productive morphology. In C. L. Baker & J. J. McCarthy (eds), The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press).
39.
— ( 1982). The role of universals in the acquisition of gerunds In E Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (eds).
40.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M. & Boyes-Braem, P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories . Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439
41.
Slobin, D.I. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In E Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (eds).
42.
Stowell, T. (1981). The origins of phrase structure Unpublished M I T. dissertation. Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R (eds) (1982). Language Acquisition. The State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
43.
Wexler, K. (1982). A principle theory for language acquisition In E. Wanner & L R Gleitman (eds).
44.
Wexler, K. & Culicover, P.W. (1980) Formal Principles of Language Acquisition (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press).
45.
Wexler, K. & Manzini, R. (1986). Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory . Paper presented to Workshop on Acquiring Language and Learning Languages, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor Great Park.
46.
White, L. (1981). The responsibility of grammatical theory to acquisitional data In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (eds), Explanation in Lingustics- The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition (London. Longman).
