We investigate the development of text reconstruction abilities in Hebrew-speaking children, with a particular focus on verbal passive constructions. The acquisition of verbal passives in Hebrew is a late developmental milestone, closely tied to the expression of event semantics. The current study explores how narrative and informative text genres influence (a) written textual retelling and (b) the reconstruction of verbal passives within texts. The study sample consisted of 90 native Hebrew-speaking participants, spanning 5 age/schooling groups from 4th grade to adulthood. The retell tasks included (a) a narrative text describing episodic events and (b) an informative text structured as an encyclopedic entry. Each participant produced 2 written texts – 1 narrative and 1 informative – resulting in a total of 180 written texts. We analysed these texts in comparison to the source material in terms of (a) text length, (b) content unit reconstruction and (c) the reconstruction of passive verbs, both familiar and novel. Results indicated that the reconstruction of both textual content and passive verbs was primarily influenced by the text genre. Narrative text reconstruction and the use of passive forms improved with age and schooling, with narratives proving easier to reconstruct than informative texts. Our findings suggest that the ability to reconstruct Hebrew verbal passives begins in early adolescence and is linked to the later-emerging ability to express different perspectives on events. These results underscore the importance of considering genre as a discourse-based factor in both school instruction and remedial interventions for school-aged children. Therefore, Hebrew-speaking children must gain experience in textual comprehension and production throughout their schooling years to facilitate the acquisition and use of passive constructions.
AboudK. S.BaileyS. K.Del-TufoS. N.BarqueroL. A.CuttingL. E. (2019). Fairy tales versus facts: Genre matters to the developing brain. Cerebral Cortex, 29(11), 4877–4888. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz025
2.
AbrahamW.LeisiöE. (Eds.). (2006). Passivization and typology: Form and function. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.68
3.
AltmanC.Armon-LotemS.FichmanS.WaltersJ. (2016). Macrostructure, microstructure, and mental state terms in the narratives of English-Hebrew bilingual preschool children with and without specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(1), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000466
4.
AmbridgeB.BidgoodA.PineJ. M.RowlandC. F.FreudenthalD. (2016). Is passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from adult grammaticality judgment and comprehension studies. Cognitive Science, 40(6), 1435–1459. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12277
5.
AnglinJ. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10), 1–66.
6.
ApariciM.RosadoE.PereraJ. (2016). Later development of relative clauses across discourse genres and modalities of production. In PereraJ.ApariciM.RosadoE.SalasN. (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan (pp. 201–225). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21136-7_13
7.
AshkenaziO.RavidD. (1998). Children’s understanding of linguistic humor: An aspect of metalinguistic awareness. Current Psychology of Cognition, 17, 367–387.
BarberS. J.MatherM. (2014). How retellings shape younger and older adults’ memories. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.892494
10.
Bar-OnA.RavidD. (2011). Morphological decoding in Hebrew pseudowords: A developmental study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 553–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641100021X
11.
BeersF. B.NagyW. E. (2011). Writing development in four genres from grades three to seven: Syntactic complexity and genre differentiation. Reading and Writing, 24, 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9264-9
12.
BeitchmanJ. H.JiangH.KoyamaE.JohnsonC. J.EscobarM.AtkinsonL.BrownlieE. B.VidaR. (2008). Models and determinants of vocabulary growth from kindergarten to adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01878.x
13.
Ben-ZviG.LevieR. (2016). Development of Hebrew derivational morphology from preschool to adolescence. In BermanR. A. (Ed.), Acquisition and development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence (pp. 135–173). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.19.05ben
14.
BermanR. A. (1980). The case of an (S)VO language: Subjectless constructions in Modern Hebrew. Language, 56, 759–766. https://doi.org/10.2307/413487
15.
BermanR. A. (1985). Acquisition of Hebrew. Lawrence Erlbaum.
BermanR. A. (1994). Formal, lexical, and semantic factors in the acquisition of Hebrew resultative particles. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, UC Berkeley (pp. 82–92).
19.
BermanR. A. (1995). Narrative competence and storytelling performance: How children tell stories in different contexts. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5(4), 285–313. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.5.4.01nar
20.
BermanR. A. (2005). Introduction: Developing discourse stance in different text types and languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(04)00189-4
21.
BermanR. A. (2007). Developing language knowledge and language use across adolescence. In HoffE.ShatzM. (Eds.), Handbook of language development (pp. 346–367). Blackwell.
BermanR. A.KatzenbergerI. (2004). Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 57–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3801_3
24.
BermanR. A.NayditzR.RavidD. (2011). Linguistic diagnostics of written texts in two school-age populations. Written Language & Literacy, 14, 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.01ber
25.
BermanR. A.Nir-SagivB. (2007). Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 79–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336894
26.
BermanR. A.Nir-SagivB. (2009). Clause-packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In GuoJ.LievenE.BudwigN.Ervin-TrippS.NakamuraK.OzcaliskanS. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan I. Slobin (pp. 149–162). Taylor & Francis.
27.
BermanR. A.SlobinD. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Erlbaum.
28.
BermanR. A.VerhoevenL. (2002). Developing text production abilities in speech and writing: Aims and methodology. Written Languages and Literacy, 5, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.5.1.02ber
29.
BerningerV.AbbottR.CookC. R.NagyW. (2017). Relationships of attention and executive functions to oral language, reading, and writing skills and systems in middle childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(4), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415617167
30.
BestR. M.FloydR. G.McNamaraD. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801963951
31.
BiberD. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language, 62, 384–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/414678
32.
BrimoD.Hall-MillsS. (2019). Adolescents’ production of complex syntax in spoken and written expository and persuasive genres. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33(3), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2018.1504987
33.
BrittonB. K. (1994). Understanding expository text: Building mental structure to induce insights. In GemsbacherM. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 641–674). Academic Press.
34.
BybeeJ. L.NoonanM. (Eds.). (2002). Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson. Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.110
35.
CleaveP. L.GirolamettoL. E.ChenX.JohnsonC. J. (2010). Narrative abilities in monolingual and dual language learning children with specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.05.005
36.
CollinsA. A.ComptonD. L.LindströmE. R.GilbertJ. K. (2020). Performance variations across reading comprehension assessments: Examining the unique contributions of text, activity, and reader. Reading and Writing, 33, 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09972-5
37.
CollinsA. A.LindströmE. R.ComptonD. L. (2018). Comparing students with and without reading difficulties on reading comprehension assessments: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51, 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417704636
38.
ColstonH. L. (2020). Figurative language development/acquisition research: Status and ways forward. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.002
39.
CrossleyS. A.WestonJ. L.McLain SullivanS. T.McNamaraD. S. (2011). The development of writing proficiency as a function of grade level: A linguistic analysis. Written Communication, 28, 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311410188
DąbrowskaE.StreetJ. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and nonnative English speakers. Language Sciences, 28, 604–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2005.11.014
42.
DavidiO.BermanR. A. (2014). Writing abilities of pre-adolescents with and without language/learning impairment in reconstructing an informative text. In ArféB.DockrellJ.BerningerV. (Eds.), Handbook of writing development and instruction in children with hearing, speech and oral language difficulties. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199827282.003.0011
43.
DawsonN.RastleK.RickettsJ. (2018). Morphological effects in visual word recognition: Children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(4), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000485
44.
DromiE.BermanR. A. (1986). Language-general and language-specific in developing syntax. Journal of Child Language, 14, 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900008114
DudukovicN. M.MarshE. J.TverskyB. (2004). Telling a story or telling it straight: The effects of entertaining versus accurate retellings on memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.953
47.
EasonS. H.GoldbergL. F.YoungK. M.GeistM. C.CuttingL. E. (2012). Reader-text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027182
48.
EbertS. (2020). Theory of mind, language, and reading: Developmental relations from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 191, 104739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104739
49.
EisenbeissS. (2009). Contrast is the name of the game: Contrast-based semi-structured elicitation techniques for studies on children’s language acquisition (Essex Research Reports in Linguistics), 57(7). Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex.
FoleyW. A. (2007). A typology of information packaging in the clause. In ShopenT. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol. II, clause structure (pp. 362–446). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619427.007
53.
FriedmannN.ReznickJ. (2021). Stages rather than ages in the acquisition of movement structures: Data from sentence repetition and 27696 spontaneous clauses. Glossa, 6(1), 1–69. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5716
54.
GambrellL. B.KoskinenP. S.KapinusB. A. (1991). Retelling and the reading comprehension of proficient and less-proficient readers. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1991.9941816
55.
GámezP. B.ShimpiP. M.WaterfallH. R.HuttenlocherJ. (2009). Priming a perspective in Spanish monolingual children: The use of syntactic alternatives. Journal of Child Language, 36(2), 269–290. https://doi:10.1017/S0305000908008945
Gutiérrez-ClellenV. F. (2002). Narratives in two languages: Assessing performance of bilingual children. Linguistics and Education, 13, 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00061-4
60.
HaimL.RavidD. (2022). The language of school writing: A developmental comparison of genres across the school years. Stem-, Spraak-en Taalpathologie, 27, 93–134. https://doi.org/10.21827/32.8310/2022-SG-93
IrwinP. A.MitchellJ. N. (1983). A procedure for assessing the richness of retellings. Journal of Reading, 26, 391–396.
63.
JeongH. (2017). Narrative and expository genre effects on students, raters, and performance criteria. Assessing Writing, 31, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.006
64.
JisaH.TolchinskyL. (2009). Developing a depersonalized stance through linguistic means in typologically different languages: Written expository discourse. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.01jis
65.
KaderavekJ. N.SulzbyE. (2000). Narrative production by children with and without specific language impairment: Oral narratives and emergent readings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4301.34
66.
KamberelisG.BovinoT. D. (1999). Cultural artifacts as scaffolds for genre development. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 138–170. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.2.2
67.
KilfordE. J.GarrettE.BlakemoreS. J. (2016). The development of social cognition in adolescence: An integrated perspective. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 70, 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.016
68.
KimY. S. G. (2023). Oral discourse skills: Dimensionality of comprehension and retell of narrative and expository texts, and the relations of language and cognitive skills to identified dimensions. Child Development, 94(5), e246–e263. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13935
69.
KunnariS.VälimaaT.Laukkanen-NevalaP. (2016). Macrostructure in the narratives of monolingual Finnish and bilingual Finnish-Swedish children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(1), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000442
70.
LarsenB.LunaB. (2018). Adolescence as a neurobiological critical period for the development of higher-order cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 94, 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.005
71.
LarsenJ. A.NippoldM. A. (2007). Morphological analysis in school-age children: Dynamic assessment of a word-learning strategy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2007/021)
72.
LawJ.RushR.SchoonI.ParsonsS. (2009). Modeling developmental language difficulties from school entry into adulthood: Literacy, mental health, and employment outcomes. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52, 1401–1416. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0142)
73.
LeverR.SénéchalM. (2011). Discussing stories: On how a dialogic reading intervention improves kindergartners’ oral narrative construction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.002
74.
LevieR.AshkenaziO.StanzasS. E.ZwillingR.RazE.HershkovitzL.RavidD. (2020). The route to the derivational verb family in Hebrew: A psycholinguistic study of acquisition and development. Morphology, 30(1), 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09348-4
75.
LevieR.Ben-ZviG.RavidD. (2017). Morpho-lexical development in language-impaired and typically developing Hebrew-speaking children from two SES backgrounds. Reading and Writing, 30, 1035–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9711-3
76.
MalvernD.RichardsB.ChipereN.DuránP. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511804
77.
MarshE. J. (2007). Retelling is not the same as recalling: Implications for memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(1), 16–20.
78.
Mavişİ.TunçerM.GagarinaN. (2016). Macrostructure components in narrations of Turkish-German bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000429
79.
McNamaraD. S.CrossleyS. A.McCarthyP. M. (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27, 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547
80.
McNamaraD. S.GraesserA. C.LouwerseM. M. (2012). Sources of text difficulty: Across genres and grades. Measuring up: Advances in how we assess reading ability, 89–116.
81.
MessengerK.BraniganH. P.McLeanJ. F. (2012). Is children’s acquisition of the passive a staged process? Evidence from six- and nine-year-olds’ production of passives. Journal of Child Language, 39, 991–1016. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000377
82.
MitkovskaL.BužarovskaE. (2012). An alternative analysis of the English get-past participle constructions: Is get all that passive?Journal of English Linguistics, 40(2), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424211418978
83.
MorrowL. M. (1985). Retelling stories: A strategy for improving young children’s comprehension, concept of story structure, and oral language complexity. The Elementary School Journal, 85(5), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1086/461427
NippoldM. A. (2016). Later language development: School-age children, adolescents, and young adults. PRO-ED.
86.
NippoldM. A.SunL. (2008). Knowledge of morphologically complex words: A developmental study of older children and young adolescents. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/034)
87.
NirB.Bar-IlanL.BermanR. A. (2008). Vocabulary development across adolescence: Text-based analyses. In StavansA.KupferbergI. (Eds.), Studies in language and language education (pp. 47–74). Magnes Press.
OlinghouseN. G.WilsonJ. (2013). The relationship between vocabulary and writing quality in three genres. Reading and Writing, 26, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9392-5
90.
O’NeillD. K.PearceM. J.PickJ. L. (2004). Preschool children’s narratives and performance on the Peabody Individualized Achievement Test Revised: Evidence of a relation between early narrative and later mathematical ability. First Language, 24, 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723704043529
91.
PaolazziC. L.GrilloN.AlexiadouA.SantiA. (2019). Passives are not hard to interpret but hard to remember: Evidence from online and offline studies. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(8), 991–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1602733
92.
Prat-SalaM.ShillcockR.SoraceA. (2000). Animacy effects on the production of object dislocated descriptions by Catalan-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 27, 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000999004031
93.
PuranikC. S.LombardinoL. J.AltmannL. J. (2007). Writing through retellings: An exploratory study of language-impaired and dyslexic populations. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9030-1
94.
RathertM. (2006). Simple preterit and composite perfect tense: The role of the adjectival passive. Typological Studies in Language, 68, 518.
95.
RavidD. (2004). Later lexical development in Hebrew: Derivational morphology revisited. In BermanR. A. (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence: Psycholinguistic and crosslinguistic perspectives (pp. 53–82). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.3.07rav
96.
RavidD. (2005). Emergence of linguistic complexity in written expository texts: Evidence from later language acquisition. In RavidD.ShyldkrotH. Bat-Zeev (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development (pp. 337–355). Kluwer.
97.
RavidD. (2012). Spelling morphology: the psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling. Springer.
RavidD.Epel MashrakiY. (2007). Prosodic reading, reading comprehension and language skills in Hebrew-speaking 4th graders. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(2), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00340.x
100.
RavidD.HershkovitzL. (2017). The development of Hebrew conjunct constructions in narration. In SegersE.van den BroekP. (Eds.), Developmental perspectives in written language and literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven (pp. 119–135). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.206.08rav
101.
RavidD.LandauH.LovetskiM. (2003). Passive morphology in the school years: An example of later language acquisition. Script, 5, 129–158. [in Hebrew]
102.
RavidD.LevieR. (2010). Adjectives in the development of text production: Lexical, morphological and syntactic analyses. First Language, 30(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723709350529
103.
RavidD.NaoumD.NasserS. (2014). Narrative development in Palestinian Arabic. In Saiegh-HaddadE.JoshiM. (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 153–170). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8545-7_7
104.
RavidD.TolchinskyL. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model. Journal of Child Language, 29, 419–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902005111
105.
RavidD.VeredL. (2017). Hebrew verbal passives in later language development: The interface of register and verb morphology. Journal of Child Language, 44(6), 1309–1336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000544
RileyJ.BurrellA. (2007). Assessing children’s oral storytelling in their first year of school. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760701289136
108.
RothmanJ.LongD.IversonM.JudyT.LingwallA.ChakravartyT. (2016). Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: Evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives. Journal of Child Language, 43, 662–686. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000549
109.
SchneiderP. (1996). Effects of pictures versus orally presented stories on story retellings by children with language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0501.86
110.
SchneiderP.DubéR. V. (1997). Effect of pictorial versus oral story presentation on children’s use of referring expressions in retell. First Language, 17, 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379701705113
111.
SchneiderP.DubéR. V. (2005). Story presentation effects on children’s retell content. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2005/007)
112.
ScottC. M.BalthazarC. H. (2010). The grammar of information: Challenges for older students with language impairments. Topics in Language Disorders, 30, 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e3181f90878
SpencerT. D.SlocumT. A. (2010). The effect of a narrative intervention on story retelling and personal story generation skills of preschoolers with risk factors and narrative language delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 32(3), 178–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815110379124
115.
SquiresK. E.Lugo-NerisM. J.PeñaE. D.BedoreL. M.BohmanT. M.GillamR. B. (2014). Story retelling by bilingual children with language impairments and typically developing controls. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49, 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12044
116.
SteinN. L.GlennC. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In FreedleR. O. (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing, 53–120. Erlbaum.
117.
SutterJ.JohnsonC. (1995). Advanced verb form production in story re-telling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1067–1081. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3805.1067
118.
TowerC. (2003). Genre development and elementary students’ informational writing: A review of the literature. Literacy Research and Instruction, 42(4), 14–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070309558394
119.
TsimpliI.PeristeriE.AndreouM. (2016). Narrative production in monolingual and bilingual children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(1), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000478
120.
VainioS.PajunenA.HäikiöT. (2018). Acquisition of Finnish derivational morphology: School-age children and young adults. First Language, 39(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723718805185
121.
VulchanovaM.MilburnE.VulchanovV.BaggioG. (2019). Boon or burden? The role of compositional meaning in figurative language processing and acquisition. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 28(2), 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-019-09282-7
122.
WestbyC. E. (1982). Cognitive and linguistic aspects of children’s narrative development. Communication Disorders, 7, 1–16.
123.
Winkler-DahanN. (2023). Passive voice development in perspective of socio-economic status [Unpublished MA dissertation, Tel Aviv University].
124.
ZwillingR. (in preparation). The development of language and socio-cognitive skills during the school years: A peer talk study. Tel Aviv University.
