This study investigated how animacy cues and executive functions (i.e., working memory [WM], inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility) influence 4- to 5-year-old Mandarin-speaking children’s processing of subject relative clauses and object relative clauses (ORCs). Using a self-paced listening task combined with a picture selection task, two experiments tested distinct animacy configurations. Experiment 1 employed relative clauses (RCs) with animate embedded nouns and manipulated the head noun animacy (animate vs. inanimate), revealing a facilitation effect for inanimate head nouns. Experiment 2 used RCs with inanimate embedded nouns and the same head noun animacy manipulation but found the opposite pattern: a facilitation effect for animate head nouns. The reverse animacy effects support the similarity-based interference processing account. Both experiments showed an ORC preference in accuracy, modulated by head noun animacy, and critically, WM played a prominent role in children’s comprehension of RCs. The study underscores the multifaceted nature of RC comprehension, which is influenced by syntactic complexity, animacy cues, and cognitive resources.
ArosioF.GuastiM. T.StucchiN. (2011). Disambiguating information and memory resources in children’s processing of Italian relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40(2), 137–154.
2.
BatesE.MacWhinneyB. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinneyB.BatesE. (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–76). Cambridge University Press.
3.
BenteaA.DurrlemanS.RizziL. (2016). Refining intervention: The acquisition of featural relations in object A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 169, 21–41.
4.
BlomE.ParadisJ. (2015). Sources of individual differences in the acquisition of tense inflection by English second language learners with and without specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(4), 953–976.
5.
ChatterjeeS.HadiA. S. (2012). Regression analysis by example. John Wiley & Sons.
6.
DiamondA. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.
7.
DryerM. S. (2013). Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of relative clause and noun. In DryerM. S.HaspelmathM. (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online (pp. 390–391). Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
8.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186–204.
9.
GennariS. P.MacDonaldM. C. (2008). Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 161–187.
10.
GerstadtC. L.HongY. J.DiamondA. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 3½–7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53(2), 129–153.
11.
GongY.CaiT. (1994). 中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表 [The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Revised in China (C-WISC)]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2(1), 1–6. [in Chinese].
12.
GordonP. C.HendrickR.JohnsonM. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1411–1423.
13.
GordonP. C.HendrickR.JohnsonM. (2004). Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 97–114.
14.
HaleJ. (2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 159–166). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
15.
HeW.BiX. (2020). Perspective-shifting are helpful for children in Mandarin passive sentence comprehension. Acta Psychologica, 205, 103059.
16.
HeW.ChenB. (2013). The role of animacy in Mandarin relative clause processing. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 145–153.
17.
HeW.YangX. (2022). 汉语学龄前儿童主、宾关系从句认知特点及语义因素效应的研究 [A study about Mandarin relative clause processing and the effects of animacy for preschool children]. Psychological Development and Education, 38(5), 667–674. (in Chinese).
18.
HsiaoF.GibsonE. (2003). Processing relative clauses in Mandarin. Cognition, 90(1), 3–27.
19.
HuS.GavarróA.VerniceM.GuastiM. T. (2016). The acquisition of Mandarin relative clauses: Contrasting two theoretical approaches. Journal of Child Language, 43(1), 1–21.
20.
HuS.ToneattoC.PozziS.GuastiM. T. (2022). Processing Mandarin relative clauses in context by Italian L3 learners. Second Language Research, 38(4), 893–912.
21.
HumphreysG. F.MirkovićJ.GennariS. P. (2016). Similarity-based competition in relative clause production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 200–221.
22.
JacquesS.ZelazoP. D. (2001). The flexible item selection task (FIST): A measure of executive function in preschoolers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20(3), 573–591.
23.
JägerL.ChenZ.LiQ.LinC.-J. C.VasishthS. (2015). The subject-relative advantage in Mandarin: Evidence for expectation-based processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 79, 97–120.
24.
KiddE.BrandtS.LievenE.TomaselloM. (2007). Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children’s processing of relative clauses. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6), 860–897.
25.
KingJ.JustM. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 580–602.
LewisR. L.VasishthS.Van DykeJ. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 447–454.
28.
LiP.BatesE.MacWhinneyB. (1993). Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Mandarin. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(2), 169–192.
29.
LinY.GarnseyS. M. (2011). Animacy and the resolution of temporary ambiguity in relative clause comprehension in Mandarin. In YamashitaH.HiroseY.PackardJ. L. (Eds.), Processing and producing head-final structures (pp. 241–275). Springer.
30.
MacdonaldR.BrandtS.TheakstonA.LievenE.SerratriceL. (2020). The role of animacy in children’s interpretation of relative clauses in English: Evidence from sentence–picture matching and eye movements. Cognitive Science, 44(8), 1–35.
31.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
MacWhinneyB.PléhC. (1988). The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition, 29(2), 95–141.
33.
MakW. M.VonkW.SchriefersH. (2002). The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 50–68.
34.
MännelC.SchipkeC. S.FriedericiA. D. (2013). The role of pause as a prosodic boundary marker: Language ERP studies in German 3- and 6-year-olds. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 86–94.
35.
MarinisT.SaddyD. (2013). Parsing the passive: Comparing children with specific language impairment to sequential bilingual children. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 155–179.
36.
NilsenE. S.GrahamS. A. (2009). The relations between children’s communicative perspective-taking and executive functioning. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 220–249.
37.
PeristeriE.KamonaX.VarlokostaS. (2024). The acquisition of relative clauses in autism: The role of executive functions and language. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54, 4394–4407.
38.
QiZ.LoveJ.FisherC.Brown-SchmidtS. (2020). Referential context and executive functioning influence children’s resolution of syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 46(10), 1922–1947.
39.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
40.
RavenJ.RavenJ. C.CourtJ. H. (1998). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford Psychologists Press.
41.
SangB.MiaoX. (1990). 皮博迪图片词汇测验修订版 (PPVT-R) 上海市区适用常模的修订 [The revision of trail norm of Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Revised (PPVT-R) in Shanghai proper]. Information on Psychological Sciences, 5, 20–25. [in Chinese].
42.
SarsourK.SheridanM.JutteD.Nuru-JeterA.HinshawS.BoyceW. T. (2011). Family socioeconomic status and child executive functions: The roles of language, home environment, and single parenthood. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(1), 120–132.
43.
SungY. T.ChaJ. H.TuJ. Y.WuM. D.LinW. C. (2016). Investigating the processing of relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from eye-movement data. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45, 1089–1113.
44.
TanakaN.LauE.LeeA. L. F. (2024). On the universality of the subject preference in the acquisition of relative clauses across languages. First Language, 44(3), 219–243.
45.
TonérS.GerholmT. N. (2020). Links between language and executive functions in Swedish preschool children: A pilot study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(1), 207–241.
46.
TraxlerM. J.MorrisR. K.SeelyR. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 69–90.
47.
TraxlerM. J.WilliamsR. S.BlozisS. A.MorrisR. K. (2005). Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(2), 204–224.
48.
VolpatoF. (2020). Verbal working memory resources and comprehension of relative clauses in children with cochlear implants. First Language, 40(4), 390–410.
49.
WoodardK.PozzanL.TrueswellJ. C. (2016). Taking your own path: Individual differences in executive function and language processing skills in child learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 187–209.
50.
WuF.KaiserE.AndersenE. (2012). Animacy effects in Mandarin relative clause processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(10), 1489–1524.
51.
WuS. H.HendersonL. M.GennariS. P. (2022). Animacy-induced conflict in sentence production and comprehension from late childhood to adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 217, 105350.
52.
ZhongL.HuS. (2021). 汉英关系从句儿童语言习得的语料库对比研究 [A corpus-based comparison of relative clause acquisition in Chinese and English children]. Modern Foreign Languages, 44(2), 208–220. [in Chinese].
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
