This article explores the role of the reportative BIN in Yucatec Maya language acquisition and socialization among children aged 4 years and above, focusing on their interactions during pretend play. Building upon prior research on caregivers’ strategic use of BIN, the study aims to elucidate the nuanced meanings and functions of the reportative in children’s language. Through a theoretical framework rooted in the theory of engagement, the article posits that BIN serves not only as a linguistic form but also as an interactive device conveying contextual and imaginative speech. Divided into six sections, the article progresses from theoretical underpinnings to interpreting children’s language in pretend play. By analyzing spontaneous speech data, the study uncovers novel insights into the dynamic nature of reportatives, emphasizing the creative ways children employ BIN to engage in games. The findings contribute to a broader understanding of reportatives and underscore the dynamic nature of children’s language usage and development.
AghaA. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge University Press.
2.
AikhenvaldA. Y. (2002). Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford University Press.
3.
AikhenvaldA.Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.
4.
Aksu-KoçA. (1988). The acquisition of aspect and modality: The case of past reference in Turkish. Cambridge University Press.
5.
AnderBoisS. (2014). On the exceptional status of reportative evidentials. Proceedings of SALT, 24, 234–254.
6.
AnderBoisS. (2017). An illocutionary account of reportative evidentials in imperatives. Proceedings of SALT, 27, 459–479.
7.
AnderBoisS. (2019). Reportatives and quotatives in Maya languages. Proceedings of Form and Analysis in Mayan Linguistics, 5, 1–16. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2rf3727m
8.
AndersonL. B. (1986). Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymetries. In ChafeW.NicholsJ. (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 273–312). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
9.
AustinJ. L. (1975). How to do things with words (UrmsonJ.O.SbisàM., Eds.). Oxford University Press.(Original work published 1962)
10.
BrugmanC. M.MacaulayM. (2015). Characterizing evidentiality. Linguistic Typology, 19(2), 201–237.
11.
ChoiS. (1991). Early acquisition of epistemic meanings in Korean: A study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children.First Language, 11, 93–119.
12.
De LeónL. (2002, November22). Soldiers and curers: Mayan children play in contemporary Chiapas [Paper presentation]. Meetings of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans, USA.
13.
De LeónL. (2005). La llegada del alma: lenguaje, infancia y socialización entre los mayas de Zinacantán [The arrival of the soul: language, childhood and socialization among the Mayans of Zinacantán]. CIESAS.
14.
De LeónL. (2010). Hacia espacios de interculturalidad [Towards intercultural spaces]. In De LeónL. (Ed.), Socialización, lenguajes y culturas infantiles: estudios interdisciplinarios [Child socialization, languages and cultures: interdisciplinary studies] (pp. 13–33). CIESAS: Publicaciones de la Casa Chata.
15.
Dzidz YamE. (2020). El uso del habla reportada (HR) en el habla infantil del maya yucateco: una aproximación hacia el desarrollo [The use of reported speech (HR) in Yucatecan Mayan children’s speech: a developmental approach] [Master thesis]. CIESAS.
16.
EvansN.BergqvistH.San RoqueL. (2018a). The grammar of engagement I: Framework and initial exemplification.Language and Cognition, 10(1), 110–140.
17.
EvansN.BergqvistH.San RoqueL. (2018b). The grammar of engagement II: Typology and diachrony.Language and Cognition, 10(1), 141–170.
18.
FitnevaS. A. (2009). Evidentiality and trust: The effect of informational goals. In FitnevaS. A.MatsuiT. (Eds.), Evidentiality: A window into language and cognitive development, new directions for child and adolescent development, 125 (pp. 49–61). Jossey-Bass.
19.
FitnevaS. A. (2018). The acquisition of evidentiality. In AikhenvaldA. Y. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality (pp. 185–868). Oxford University Press.
20.
GaskinsS. (2010). Las vidas cotidianas de los niños de un pueblo maya: un estudio monográfico de los roles y actividades construidos culturalmente [The daily lives of children in a Mayan village: a monographic study of culturally constructed roles and activities]. In De LeónL. (Ed.), Socialización, lenguajes y culturas infantiles: estudios interdisciplinarios [Child socialization, languages and cultures: interdisciplinary studies] (pp. 33–77). Publicaciones de la Casa Chata.
21.
GaskinsS.MillerP. J. (2009). The cultural roles of emotions in pretend play. In ClarkC. D. (Ed.), Transactions at play (pp. 5–21). University of America.
22.
GaskinsS.ParadiseR. (2010). Learning through observation in daily life. In LancyD. F.BockJ.GaskinsS. (Eds.), The anthropology of learning in childhood (pp. 85–117). AltaMira Press.
23.
HanksW. F. (1990). Referential practice, language and lived space among the Maya. University of Chicago Press.
24.
HanksW. F. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Westview Press, Inc.
25.
HanksW. F. (1999). Indexicality. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1/2), 124–126.
26.
HillJ. H.IrvineJ. T. (1993). Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge Press.
27.
HowardR. (2018). ‘Evidence and evidentiality in Quechua narrative discourse’. In AikhenvaldA. Y. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality (pp. 222–242). Oxford University Press.
28.
KuipersJ. C. (1993). Obligations to the word: Ritual speech, performance, and responsibility among the Weyewa. In HillJ. H.IrvineJ. T. (Eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse (pp. 88–104). Cambridge University Press.
29.
LandaburuJ. (2007). La modalisation du savoir en langue andoke (Amazonie colombienne) [The modalization of knowledge in the Andoke language (Colombian Amazon)]. In GuentchévaZ.LandaburuJ. (Eds.), L’énonciation médiatisée II: Le traitement épistémologique de l’information: Illustrations amérindiennes et caucasiennes [Mediated enunciation II: The epistemological processing of information: Amerindian and Caucasian illustrations] (pp. 23–47). Peeters.
30.
Le GuenO. (2018). Managing epistemicity among the Yucatec Mayas (Mexico). In ProustJ.FortierM. (Eds.), Metacognitive diversity: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 193–222). Oxford University Press.
31.
LucyJ. (1983). Direct report of speech in Yucatec Maya [Conference session on November 20]. 82nd Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Chicago, IL.
32.
LucyJ. (1993). Metapragmatic presentationals: Reporting speech with quotatives in Yucatec Maya. In LucyJ. (Ed.), Reflexive language: reported speech and metapragmatics (pp. 91–126). Cambridge University Press.
33.
MaierE. (2019). On the exceptionality of reported speech. Linguistic Typology, 23(1), 197–205.
34.
MichaelL. (2012). Nanti self-quotation: Implications for the pragmatics of reported speech and evidentiality.Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 1–33.
35.
NuchollsJ. B. (2018). The interactional and cultural pragmatics of evidentiality in Pastaza Quichua. In AikhenvaldA. Y. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality (pp. 202–221). Oxford University Press.
36.
Petatillo ChanR. (2017). Los géneros discursivos en maya yucateco. Una aproximación a través de datos colectados en Kopchem, Quintana Roo [Discourse genres in Yucatec Maya. An approach through data collected in Kopchem, Quintana Roo] [BA thesis]. José María Morelos.
37.
PfeilerB. (2007). ‘Lo oye, lo repite y lo piensa’. The contribution of prompting to socialization and language acquisition in Yukatek Maya toddlers in Yucatan, Mexico. In PfeilerB. (Ed.), Learning indigenous languages: Child language acquisition in Mesoamerica (pp. 183–202). De Gruyter Mouton.
38.
PfeilerB. (2012). Creencias parentales y la interacción verbal en el desarrollo de los niños mayas de Yucatán [Parental beliefs and verbal interaction in the development of Mayan children from Yucatan]. Ketzalcalli, 2/212, 3–19.
39.
PfeilerB.CurielA. (2021). The acquisition of evidentiality in two Mayan languages, Yukatek and Tojolabal. In StephanyU.Aksu KoçA.VoeikovaM. (Eds.), Development of modality in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective (studies on language acquisition) (pp. 525–554). De Gruyter Mouton.
40.
PyeC. (1986). Quiché Mayan speech to children. Journal of Child Language, 13, 85–100.
41.
RuleW. M. (1977). A comparative study of the Foe, Huli, and Pole languages of Papua New Guinea. University of Sydney.
42.
SearleJ. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
43.
SillitoeP. (2010). Trust in development: Some implications of knowing in indigenous language.Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, 16(1), 12–30.
44.
SilversteinM. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In LucyJ. A. (Ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics (pp. 33–58). Cambridge University Press.
45.
SpronckS.NikitinaT. (2019). Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology, 23(1), 119–159.
46.
TannenD. (2007). Talking voices: repetition, dialogue, and imagery (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
47.
VoloshinovV. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language (MatejkaL.TitunikI., Trans.). Seminar Press, INC.
48.
WilletT. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12(1), 51–97.
49.
ZariquieyR. (2015). The encoding of addressee’s perspective in Kakataibo (Panoan, Peru). STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 68(2), 143–164.
