Previous research indicates that preschoolers’ knowledge of routine events, or scripts, benefits their communication during pretend play enactments of those events. This study examined preschoolers’ establishment of mutual knowledge, which may contribute to the success of their script-based interactions. Script-based play sessions of dyads of 4- to 5-year-olds were analyzed. When discourse partners held equal levels of script knowledge they used mutual knowledge strategies most at the beginning of the interaction, when the need was greatest. Older preschoolers were more skilled at this than were younger preschoolers. Moreover, use of mutual knowledge strategies enhanced some dimensions of children’s communication on subsequent turns.
Abbeduto, L., & Short-Meyerson, K. (2002). Linguistic influences on social interaction. In H. Goldstein, L. Kaczmarek, & K. M. English (Eds.), Promoting Social Communication (Vol. 10). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
2.
Ackerman, B.P., & Silver, D. ( 1990). Children’s understanding of private keys in referential communication. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 217-242.
3.
Ackerman, B.P., Szymanski, J., & Silver, D. ( 1990). Children’s use of the common ground in interpreting ambiguous referential utterances. Developmental Psychology , 26, 234-245.
4.
Allison, P.D., & Liker, J.K. ( 1982). Analyzing sequential categorical data on dyadic interaction . A comment on Gottman. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 393-403.
5.
Anderson, A.H., Clark, A., & Mullin, J. ( 1994). Interactive communication between children: Learning how to make language work in dialogue. Journal of Child Language , 21, 439-463.
6.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J.M. ( 1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Blank, M., & Franklin, E. ( 1980). Dialogue with preschoolers: A cognitively-based system of assessment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 127-150.
8.
Brinton, B., & Fujiki, M. ( 1984). Development of topic manipulation skills in discourse . Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 350-358.
9.
Clark, H.H. ( 1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Clark, H.H., & Carlson, T.B. ( 1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Clark, H.H., & Krych, M.A. ( 2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding . Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 62-81.
Clark, H.H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S. ( 1983). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 22, 245-258.
14.
Cohen, J. ( 1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
15.
Cohen, P.R., & Perrault, C.R. (1979). Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 3, 197-212.
16.
Delaney, H.D., & Maxwell, S.E. ( 1981). On using analysis of covariance in repeated measures designs. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 105-124.
17.
Dorval, B., & Eckerman, C.O. (1984). Developmental trends in the quality of conversation achieved by small groups of acquainted peers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 49, No. 2.
18.
Furman, L.N., & Walden, T.A. ( 1990). Effects of script knowledge on preschool children’s communicative interactions. Developmental Psychology, 26, 227-233.
19.
Hickman, M., Kail, M., & Roland, F. ( 1995). Cohesive anaphoric relations in French children’s narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language , 15, 277-300.
20.
Isaacs, E.A., & Clark, H.H. ( 1987). References in conversation between experts and novices . Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 116, 26-37.
21.
Kail, M., & Hickmann, M. ( 1992). French children’s ability to introduce referents in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language , 12, 73-94.
22.
Kail, M., & Lopez, I.S.Y. ( 1997). Referent introductions in Spanish narratives as a function of contextual constraints: A crosslinguistic perspective. First Language, 17, 103-130.
23.
Keenan, E.O., & Schieffelin, B.B. (1983). Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topic in the conversations of children and adults. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Acquiring conversational competence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24.
Krauss, R.M. ( 1987). The role of the listener: Addressee influences on message formulation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 81-98.
25.
Lee, B.P.H. ( 2001). Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: Their roles in establishing common ground. Journal of Pragmatics , 33, 21-44.
26.
Lewis, D.K. ( 1969). Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Menig-Peterson, C.L. ( 1975). The modification of communicative behavior in preschool-aged children as a function of the listener’s perspective. Child Development, 46, 1015-1018.
28.
Miller, J., & Chapman, R. ( 1990). SALT: Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts [Computer software]. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
29.
Moffett, J. ( 1968). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
30.
Nadig, A.S., & Sedivy, J.C. ( 2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children’s on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13, 329-336.
31.
Nayer, S.L., & Graham, S.A. ( 2006). Children’s communicative strategies in novel and familiar word situations. First Language, 26, 403-420.
32.
Nelson, K., & Gruendel, J.M. (1979). At morning it’s lunchtime: A scriptal view of children’s dialogues. Discourse Processes , 2, 73-94.
Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H. ( 1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289-327.
35.
Schiffer, S.R. ( 1972). Meaning. London: Oxford University Press.
36.
Schober, M.F., & Clark, H.H. ( 1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
37.
Serlin, R.C. ( 1981). Statistical procedures in lag sequential analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Los Angeles, CA, April.
38.
Short-Meyerson, K.J., & Abbeduto, L.J. (1997). Preschoolers’ communication during scripted interactions. Journal of Child Language, 24, 469-493.
39.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. , Jr. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
Sonnenschein, S. ( 1986). Development of referential communication skills: How familiarity with a listener affects a speaker’s production of redundant messages. Developmental Psychology, 22, 549-552.
41.
Sonnenschein, S. ( 1988). The development of referential communication: Speaking to different listeners. Child Development, 59, 694-702.
42.
Yoder, P.J., & Davies, B. ( 1990). Do parental questions and topic continuations elicit replies from developmentally delayed children? A sequential analysis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 563-573.
43.
Yoder, P.J., Short-Meyerson, K., & Tapp, J. ( 2004). Measurement of behavior with a special emphasis on sequential analysis of behavior. In E. Emerson, C. Hatton, T. Thomson, & T. Parmenter (Eds.), The international handbook of applied research in intellectual disabilities. Chichester: Wiley.
