Kidd and Garcia remind us of the urgency of gathering comparable child language data across languages and cultures. They provide useful guidelines, and more are suggested here. Languages used for comparative analysis should be picked with regard to precise typological contrasts, pinpointing structures that promise to reveal processes of acquisition. Our knowledge gap may not be as severe as it seems to the authors; nevertheless, we are faced with daunting tasks of collecting data and preparing them for detailed analysis.
D.BittnerW. U.DresslerM.Kilani-Schoch (Eds.). (2003). Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Mouton de Gruyter.
2.
M.BowermanP.Brown (Eds.). (2008). Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability. Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
BrownP. (2008). Verb specificity and argument realization in Tzeltal child language. In BowermanM.BrownP. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 167–189). Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
HellwigB.DefinaR.KiddE.AllenS. E. M.DavidsonL.KellyB. F. (2021). Child language documentation: The sketch acquisition project. In HaigG.SchnellS.SeifartF. (Eds.), Doing corpus-based typology with spoken language data: State of the art (pp. 29–58). University of Hawai’i Press.
D. I.Slobin (Ed.). (1967). A field manual for cross-cultural study of the acquisition of communicative competence. Language-Behavior Research Laboratory, University of California.
8.
SlobinD. I. (1971). Developmental psycholinguistics. In DingwallW. O. (Ed.), A survey of linguistic science (pp. 298–411). University of Maryland Linguistics Program.
9.
SlobinD. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In FergusonC. A.SlobinD. I. (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175–208). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10.
D. I.Slobin (Ed.). (1985). The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: The data (Vol. 1). Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
SlobinD. I. (1997). The universal, the typological, and the particular in acquisition. In: SlobinD. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Expanding the contexts (Vol. 5, pp. 1–39). Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
StollS. (2015). Crosslinguistic approaches to language acquisition. In BavinE. L.NaiglesL. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (2nd ed., pp. 107–134). Cambridge University Press.
13.
StollS.BickelB. (2013). Capturing diversity in language acquisition research. In BickelB.GrenobleL. A.PetersonD. A.TimberlakeA. (Eds.), Language typology and historical contingency (pp. 195–216). Benjamins.
14.
StollS.BickelB.LievenE.PaudyalN. P.BanjadeG.BhattaT. N.GaenszleM.PettigrewJ.RaiI. P.RaiM.RaiN. K. (2012). Nouns and verbs in Chintang: Children’s usage and surrounding adult speech. Journal of Child Language, 39, 284–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000080
15.
TalmyL. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring (Vol. II). MIT Press.
