Kidd and Garcia demonstrate a dire lack of diversity in language acquisition research. We present a concrete proposal to improve language and area coverage in the field. Our approach outlines key questions in an understudied area, that is, prosody, methods for collecting and analyzing data, resources for training and tools, and a means to foster research collaboration and publication of crosslinguistic findings. The proposal, if implemented on a publicly accessible website, will facilitate crosslinguistic research on prosody acquisition.
BoersmaP. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.
2.
ChenA. (2018). Get the focus right across languages: Acquisition of prosodic focus-marking in production. In PrietoP.Esteve-GibertN. (Eds.), Prosodic development in first language acquisition (pp. 295–314). John Benjamins.
3.
ChenA.Esteve-GibertN.PrietoP.RedfordM. (2020). Development of phrase-level prosody from infancy to late childhood. In GussenhovenC.ChenA. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language prosody (pp. 553–562). Oxford University Press.
4.
ColeJ. (2015). Language, cognition and neuroscience prosody in context: A review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(1–2), 1–31.
5.
Elvira-GarcíaW.RoseanoP.Fernández-PlanasA. M.Martinez-CeldranE. (2016). A tool for automatic transcription of intonation: Eti_ToBI a ToBI transcriber for Spanish and Catalan. Language Resources and Evaluation, 50(4), 767–792.
6.
FrankM. C.BergelsonE.BergmannC.CristiaA.FlocciaC.GervainJ.Kiley HamlinJ.HannonE. E.KlineM.LeveltC.Lew-WilliamsC.NazziT.PannetonR.RabagliatiH.SoderstromM.SullivanJ.WaxmanS.YurovskyE. (2017). A collaborative approach to infant research: Promoting reproducibility, best practices, and theory-building. Infancy, 22, 421–435.
7.
GervainJ. (2018). The role of prenatal experience in language development. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 62–67.
8.
GervainJ.ChristopheA.MazukaR. (2020). Prosodic bootstrapping. In GussenhovenC.ChenA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language prosody (pp. 563–573). Oxford University Press.
9.
GussenhovenC.ChenA. (Eds.). (2020). The Oxford handbook of language prosody. Oxford University Press.
10.
HuN.JanssenB.HanssenJ.GussenhovenC.ChenA. (2020). Automatic analysis of speech prosody in Dutch. Proc. Interspeech 2020 (pp. 155–159). https://doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2020-2142
11.
JunS.-A. (Ed.). (2005). Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford University Press.
12.
JunS.-A. (Ed.). (2014). Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford University Press.
KüglerF.CalhounS. (2020). Prosodic encoding of information structure: A typological perspective. In GussenhovenC.ChenA. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of language prosody (pp. 454–467). Oxford University Press.
15.
LeeY. C.WangB.ChenS.Adda-DeckerM.AmelotA.NambuS.LibermanM. (2015). A crosslinguistic study of prosodic focus. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2015, 4754–4758.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178873
TurcoG.GubianM.SchertzJ. (2011). A quantitative investigation of the prosody of Verum Focus in Italian. Proceedings Interspeech, 2011, 961–964. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2011-393
18.
XuY. (2013). ProsodyPro — A Tool for Large-scale Systematic Prosody Analysis. In Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013) (pp. 7–10). France: Aix-en-Provene.
