This study investigates the effects of early second-language (L2) acquisition on introduction of characters in narrative discourse by comparing 5- and 7-year-old monolingual (first-language [L1] = Turkish) and bilingual (L1 = Turkish, L2 = English) children. Turkish does not have a grammaticalized article system like English which enables to investigate specific influences. The findings revealed that monolingual and bilingual children used similar forms while introducing characters; however, for the Frog character, bilingual children used more appropriate referencing compared to monolinguals. These findings were discussed within the effects of L2 on L1 in terms of introducing characters as well as the amount of exposure to L2.
Aksu-KoçA.NicolopoulouA. (2015). Character reference in young children’s narratives: A crosslinguistic comparison of English, Greek, and Turkish. Lingua, 155, 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.006
2.
ÁlvarezE. (2003). Character introduction in two languages: Its development in the stories of a Spanish-English bilingual child age 6;11–10;11. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001159
3.
AndreouM.KnoppE.BongartzC.TsimpliI. M. (2015). Character reference in Greek-German bilingual children’s narratives. EUROSLA Yearbook, 15, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.15.01
4.
AndreouM.PeristeriE.TsimpliI. M. (2020). Reference maintenance in the narratives of Albanian–Greek and Russian–Greek children with developmental language disorder: A study on crosslinguistic effects. First Language. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723720948312
5.
AndreouM.TorregrossaJ.BongartzC. M. (2020). The sharing of reference strategies across two languages: The production and comprehension of referring expressions by Greek-Italian bilingual children. Discours. [Online], 26, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.10709
6.
ArnoldJ. E.GriffinZ. M. (2007). The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JML.2006.09.007
7.
BarnesA. E.KimY. S.PhillipsB. M. (2014). The relations of proper character introduction to narrative quality and listening comprehension for young children from high poverty schools. Reading and Writing, 27, 1189–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9481-0
8.
BerumentS. K.GuvenA. G. (2010). Turkish expressive and receptive language test: Receptive vocabulary sub-scale (TİFALDİ-RT). Turkish Psychological Society.
9.
ChenL.LeiJ. (2013). The production of referring expressions in oral narratives of Chinese–English bilingual speakers and monolingual peers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659012459527
10.
ChenL.PanN. (2009). Development of English referring expressions in the narratives of Chinese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990216
11.
CumminsJ. (2001). Bilingual children’s mother tongue: Why is it important for education?Sprogforum, 7, 15–20.
12.
DasingerL.KüntayA. (1998, July14–19). Introducing referents in elicited discourse: Finnish vs. Turkish. In Aksu-KocA.Erguvanli-TaylanE.Sumru OzsoyA.KüntayA. (Eds.), Perspectives on language acquisition: Selected papers from the international congress for the study of child language (pp. 14–19). International Congress for the Study of Child Language.
13.
DedeM. (1986). Definiteness and referentiality in Turkish verbal sentences. In SlobinD. I.ZimmerK. (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (pp. 147–163). John Benjamins.
Erguvanlı-TaylanE. E. (1984). The function of word order in Turkish grammar. University of California Press.
16.
Erguvanlı-TaylanE. E.ZimmerK. (1994). Case marking in Turkish indefinite object constructions. In GahlS.DolbeyA.JohnsonC. (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 547–552). Berkeley Linguistics Society.
17.
GivónT. (1989). Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
GundelJ.HedbergN.ZacharskiR. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/416535
19.
HallidayM. A. K.HasanR. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
20.
HickmannM.HendriksH. (1999). Cohesion and anaphora in children’s narratives: A comparison of English, French, German, and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 26(2), 419–452.
21.
HickmannM.HendriksH.RolandF.LiangJ. (1996). The marking of new information in children’s narratives: A comparison of English, French, German and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 23, 591–619.
22.
HickmannM.KailM.RolandF. (1995). Cohesive anaphoric relations in French children’s narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language, 15, 277–300.
23.
HickmannM.LiangJ. (1990). Clause-structure variation in Chinese narrative discourse: A developmental analysis. Linguistics, 28, 1167–1200. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1990.28.6.1167
24.
JiaR.ParadisJ. (2015). The use of referring expressions in narratives by Mandarin heritage language children and the role of language environment factors in predicting individual differences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000728
25.
KailM.HickmannM. (1992). On French children’s ability to introduce referents in discourse as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language, 12, 73–94.
26.
KüntayA. C. (2002). Development of the expression of indefiniteness: Presenting new referents in Turkish picture-series stories. Discourse Processes, 33, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3301_04
27.
KüntayA. C.KoçbaşD. (2009). Effects of lexical items and construction types in English and Turkish character introductions in elicited narrative. In GuoJ.LievenE.BudwigN.Ervin-TrippS.NakamuraK.OzcaliskanS. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language (pp. 81–92). Psychology Press; Taylor and Francis Group.
28.
MäkinenL.LoukusaS.LaukkanenP.LeinonenE.KunnariS. (2014). Linguistic and pragmatic aspects of narration in Finnish typically developing children and children with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28, 413–427.
29.
MayerM. (1969). Frog, Where Are You?Dial Press.
30.
NakamuraK. (1993). Referential structure in Japanese children’s narratives: The acquisition of wa and ga. In ChoiS. (Ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics (pp. 84–99). Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
31.
PearsonB. Z. (2002). Chapter 7: Narrative competence among monolingual and bilingual school children in Miami. In OllerD. K.EilersR. E. (Eds.), Language and literacy in bilingual children (pp. 135–174). Multilingual Matters.
32.
SerratriceL. (2007). Cross-linguistic influence in the interpretation of anaphoric and cataphoric pronouns in English–Italian bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003045
33.
TopajN. (2010). Topical referential expressions in narratives of Russian-German bilingual children. In ChiniM. (Ed.), Topic, information structure and language acquisition (pp. 59–72. Franco.
34.
ÜnlütabakB.Aksu-KoçA. (2015). Developmental relations between reference to characters in narratives and theory of mind. In ZeyrekD.Sağın-ŞimşekÇ.AtasU.RehbeinR. (Eds.), Ankara papers in Turkish and Turkic linguistics (pp. 291–304). Harrassowitz.
35.
WigglesworthG. (1990). Children’s narrative acquisition: A study of some aspects of reference and anaphora. First Language, 10, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379001002902
36.
WongA.JohnstonJ. (2004). The development of discourse referencing in Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 31, 633–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090400604X
