Polish and English differ in the surface realization of the underlying Determiner Phrase (DP): Polish lacks an article system, whereas English makes use of articles for both grammatical and pragmatic reasons. This difference has an impact on how referentiality is rendered in both languages. In this article, the authors investigate the use of referential markers by Polish–English bilingual children and Polish monolingual children. Using the LITMUS-MAIN picture stories, the authors collected speech samples of Polish–English bilinguals raised in the UK (n = 92, mean age 5;7) and compared them with matched Polish monolinguals (n = 92, mean age 5;7). The analyses revealed that the bilinguals’ mean length of utterance (MLU) in Polish was significantly higher than that of the monolinguals because the bilinguals produced significantly more referential markers (especially pronouns) which inflated their MLU. The authors posit that the non-standard referentiality used by the bilinguals in Polish is caused by cross-language transfer at the syntax–pragmatics interface. When producing narratives in Polish, Polish–English bilinguals overuse referential markers as cohesive devices in their stories, which is not ungrammatical, but pragmatically odd in Polish. Bilinguals tend to do this because they are immersed in English-language input, rich in overt pronouns. Thus, in the process of realizing the surface features of the Polish DP they partly rely on an underlying English DP structure.
AbneyS. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2.
AltmanC.Armon-LotemS.FichmanS.WaltersJ. (2016). Macrostructure, microstructure, and mental state terms in the narratives of English–Hebrew bilingual preschool children with and without specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(1), 165–193.
BalčiūnienėI. (2012). Lithuanian narrative language at preschool age. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, 8, 21–36.
5.
BambergM. G. (1987). The acquisition of narratives. Mouton de Gruyter.
6.
BedoreL. M.PeñaE. D.GillamR. B.HoT.-H. (2010). Language sample measures and language ability in Spanish-English bilingual kindergarteners. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43(6), 498–510.
7.
BermanR. A. (1988). On the ability to relate events in narrative. Discourse Processes, 11(4), 469–497.
8.
BermanR. A.SlobinD. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Psychology Press.
9.
BernardiniP.SchlyterS. (2004). Growing syntactic structure and code-mixing in the weaker language: The Ivy Hypothesis. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(1), 49–69.
10.
BernsteinD. K.Tiegerman-FarberE. (2002). Language and communication disorders in children (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
11.
BrownR. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Harvard University Press.
12.
ClancyP. M. (1997). Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean acquisition. In SohnH.HaigJ. (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics (Vol. 6, pp. 639–659). CSLI.
13.
De HouwerA.PutnickD. L. (2015, May20–24). Narrative abilities in preschoolers: A bilingual-monolingual comparison. Presented at the 10th International Symposium on Bilingualism, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
14.
de VilliersJ. G.de VilliersP. A. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(3), 267–278.
15.
DöpkeS. (1992). One parent one language: An interactional approach. Benjamins.
16.
DöpkeS. (2000). Generation of and retraction from cross-linguistically motivated structures in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 209–226.
EisenbergS. L.FerskoT. M.LundgrenC. (2001). The use of MLU for identifying language impairment in preschool children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(4), 323–342.
19.
EzeizabarrenaM.-J.Garcia FernandezI. (2018). Length of utterance, in morphemes or in words? MLU3-w, a reliable measure of language development in early Basque. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2265.
20.
FiestasC. E.PeñaE. D. (2004). Narrative discourse in bilingual children: Language and task effects. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(2), 155–168.
21.
GagarinaN. (2012). Discourse cohesion in the elicited narratives of early Russian-German sequential bilinguals. In BraunmüllerK.GabrielC. (Eds.), Multilingual individuals and multilingual societies (pp. 101–119). John Benjamins.
22.
GagarinaN.KlopD.KunnariS.TanteleK.VälimaaT.BalčiūnienėI.. . . WaltersJ. (Eds.). (2012). MAIN: Multilingual assessment instrument for narratives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 56.
GeneseeF. (2003). Rethinking bilingual acquisition. In DewaeleJ.-M. (Ed.), Bilingualism: Challenges and directions for future research (pp. 158–182). Multilingual Matters.
26.
GeneseeF. (2006). Bilingual first language acquisition in perspective. In McCardleP. D.HoffE. (Eds.), Childhood bilingualism: Research on infancy through school age (pp. 45–67). Multilingual Matters.
27.
GeneseeF.NicoladisE.ParadisJ. (1995). Language differentiation in early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 22(3), 611–631.
28.
HamanE.FronczykK. (2012). Obrazkowy Test Słownikowy – Rozumienie (OTSR) [Picture Vocabulary Test – Comprehension]. Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych i Pedagogicznych.
29.
HamanE.WodnieckaZ.MareckaM.SzewczykJ.Białecka-PikulM.OtwinowskaA.. . .Foryś-NogalaM. (2017). How does L1 and L2 exposure impact L1 performance in bilingual children? Evidence from Polish-English migrants to the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1444.
30.
HaznedarB. (2010). Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Pronominal subjects in bilingual Turkish. Second Language Research, 26(3), 355–378.
31.
HewittL. E.HammerC. S.YontK. M.TomblinJ. B. (2005). Language sampling for kindergarten children with and without SLI: Mean length of Utterance, IPSYN, and NDW. Journal of Communication Disorders, 38(3), 197–213.
32.
Hipfner-BoucherK.MilburnT.WeitzmanE.GreenbergJ.PelletierJ.GirolamettoL. (2015). Narrative abilities in subgroups of English language learners and monolingual peers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(6), 677–692.
33.
HoffE.CoreC.PlaceS.RumicheR.SeñorM.ParraM. (2012). Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 39(1), 1–27.
34.
HulkA.MüllerN. (2000). Crosslinguistic influence at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 227–244.
35.
Iluz-CohenP.WaltersJ. (2012). Telling stories in two languages: Narratives of bilingual preschool children with typical and impaired language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1), 58–74.
KupischT. (2007). Determiners in bilingual German–Italian children: What they tell us about the relation between language influence and language dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 57–78.
38.
KuśK.OtwinowskaA.BanasikN.Kiebzak-ManderaD. (2012). Kwestionariusz Rozwoju Językowego [Language Development Questionnaire]. Polish adaptation of the 1st version of PABIQ, developed within COST Action IS0804 [Unpublished material]. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw.
39.
LeonardL. B. (2014). Children with specific language impairment. MIT Press.
40.
LobanW. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. National Council of Teachers of English.
41.
LohndalT.RothmanJ.KupischT.WestergaardM. (2019). Heritage language acquisition: What it reveals and why it is important for formal linguistic theories. Language and Linguistics Compass, 13, Article e12357.
42.
LuX. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496.
43.
LubetichS.SagaeK. (2014). Data-driven measurement of child language development with simple syntactic templates. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (pp. 2151–2160). https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C14-1203
44.
LuceroA. (2015). Cross-linguistic lexical, grammatical, and discourse performance on oral narrative retells among young Spanish Speakers. Child Development, 86(5), 1419–1433.
45.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Psychology Press.
46.
MieszkowskaK.ŁuniewskaM.KołakJ.KacprzakA.WodnieckaZ.HamanE. (2017). Home language will not take care of itself: Vocabulary knowledge in trilingual children in the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1358.
47.
MigdalskiK. (2001). A determiner phrase approach to the structure of Polish nominals. In PrzepiórkowskiA.BańskiP. (Eds.), Generative linguistics in Poland: Syntax and morphosyntax (pp. 135–148). Instytut Podstaw Informatyki PAN.
48.
MillerJ. F.ChapmanR. (1981). The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24(2), 154–161.
49.
NicoladisE. (2006). Cross-linguistic transfer in Adjective–Noun strings by preschool bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 15–32.
50.
OpackiM. (2017). Reconsidering early bilingualism. A corpus-based study of polish migrant children in the United Kingdom. Peter Lang.
51.
OtwinowskaA.MieszkowskaK.Białecka-PikulM.OpackiM.HamanE. (2020). Retelling a model story improves the narratives of Polish-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23, 1083–1107.
52.
ParadisJ.CragoM.GeneseeF.RiceM. (2003). French-English bilingual children with SLI: How do they compare with their monolingual peers?Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(1), 113–127.
53.
ParadisJ.GeneseeF. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 1–25.
54.
ParkerM. D.BrorsonK. (2005). A comparative study between mean length of utterance in morphemes (MLUm) and mean length of utterance in words (MLUw). First Language, 25(3), 365–376.
55.
PearsonB. Z. (2002). Language and mind in the stories of bilingual children. In VerhoevenL.StrömqvistS. (Eds.), Narrative development in a multilingual context (pp. 135–174). Benjamins.
56.
PescoD.Kay-Raining BirdE. (2016). Perspectives on bilingual children’s narratives elicited with the multilingual assessment instrument for narratives. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(1), 1–9.
57.
PolinskyM.ScontrasG. (2020). Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 4–20.
58.
PrzepiórkowskiA.HajniczE.PatejukA.WolińskiM. (2014). Extended phraseological information in a valence dictionary for NLP applications. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Lexical and Grammatical Resources for Language Processing (pp. 83–91). Association for Computational Linguistics and Dublin City University.
59.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/
60.
RavenJ. C. (2003). Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices (CPM). Pearson Publishing.
61.
RiceM. L.RedmondS. M.HoffmanL. (2006). Mean length of utterance in children with specific language impairment and in younger control children shows concurrent validity and stable and parallel growth trajectories. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(4), 793–808.
62.
RiceM. L.SmolikF.PerpicD.ThompsonT.RyttingN.BlossomM. (2010). Mean length of utterance levels in 6-month intervals for children 3 to 9 years with and without language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(2), 333–349.
63.
RodinaY. (2016). Narrative abilities of preschool bilingual Norwegian-Russian children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(5), 617–635.
64.
RutkowskiP. (2002). Noun/pronoun asymmetries: Evidence in support of the DP hypothesis in Polish. Jezikoslovlje, 3(1+2), 159–170.
65.
SerratriceL. (2007). Referential cohesion in the narratives of bilingual English-Italian children and monolingual peers. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(6), 1058–1087.
66.
Silva-CorvalánC.Treffers-DallerJ. (2016). Digging into dominance: A closer look at language dominance in bilinguals. In Silva-CorvalánC.Treffers-DallerJ. (Eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 1–14). Cambridge University Press.
67.
SoraceA. (2016). Referring expressions and executive functions in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(5), 669–684.
68.
TilstraJ.McMasterK. (2007). Productivity, fluency, and grammaticality measures from narratives: Potential indicators of language proficiency?Communication Disorders Quarterly, 29(1), 43–53.
69.
TullerL. (2015). Clinical use of parental questionnaires in multilingual contexts. In Armon-LotemS.de JongJ.MeirN. (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 301–330). Multilingual Matters.
70.
UnsworthS. (2016). Early child L2 acquisition: Age or input effects? Neither, or both?Journal of Child Language, 43(3), 608–634.
71.
Van EyndeF. (2006). NP-internal agreement and the structure of the noun phrase. Journal of Linguistics, 42(1), 139–186.
72.
WolnaA.DurlikJ.SzewczykJ.RemiszewskiM.WodnieckaZ. (2018). Null pronoun is always better than overt. Behavioral and eye-tracking evidence on anaphora resolution in Polish. Presented at AMLAP, Berlin, Germany. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327545813
73.
YagmurK.Nap-KolhoffE. (2010). Aspects of acquisition in Turkish-Dutch bilingual children. In TopbaşS.YavaşM. (Eds.), Communication disorders in Turkish (pp. 267–287). Multilingual Matters.
74.
YipV.MatthewsS. (2006). Assessing language dominance in bilingual acquisition: A case for mean length utterance differentials. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(2), 97–116.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
