Students in South East Asia often struggle with English /l/ and /r/. This study therefore set out to examine how Taiwanese pupils’ perception of these sounds is influenced by cross-language effects. Most Taiwanese students have Mandarin as L1 and Taiwanese as L2 or vice versa, and English as L3. A same–different discrimination experiment was conducted to measure pupils’ ability to discriminate between phonetically close English /r/ and /l/ and Mandarin /ʐ / and /l/. The results show that L1-Mandarin pupils discriminate both the English consonant contrast and the Mandarin consonant contrast better than L1-Taiwanese pupils. Discrimination difficulty may be higher if two members of a contrast are perceived as belonging to a single L1 category.
BestC.TylerM. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In BohnO.-S.MunroM. J. (Eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
2.
BradlowA. R.PisoniD. B.Akahane-YamadaR.TohkuraY. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2299–2310.
3.
BrownC. A. (1998). The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. Second Language Research, 14, 136–193.
4.
BrownC. A. (2000). The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. In ArchibaldJ. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 4–63). London, UK: Blackwell.
5.
ChungK. S. (2006). Hypercorrection in Taiwan Mandarin. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 16, 197–214.
6.
ChungR. F. (2006). Introduction to modern linguistics. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book Inc.
7.
DuanmuS. (2000). The phonology of standard Chinese. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
EscuderoP. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition. Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization (Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
9.
FlegeJ. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
10.
GuionS. G.FlegeJ. E.Akahane-YamadaR.PruittJ. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711–2724.
11.
HuaZ.DoddB. (2000). The phonological acquisition of Putonghua (Modern Standard Chinese). Journal of Child Language, 27, 3–42.
12.
IngR. O. (1998). The teaching of English pronunciation. Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane Publishing Co.
13.
KomakiR.Akahane-YamadaR.ChoiY. (1999). Effects of native language on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/: Cross-language comparison between Korean and Japanese (Report No. SP99-45, pp. 39–46). Tokyo, Japan: IEICE (Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers).
14.
KomakiR.ChoiY. (1999). Effects of native language on the perception of American English /r/and /l/: A comparison between Korean and Japanese. In OhalaJ. J.HasegawaY.OhalaM.GranvilleD.BaileyA. C. (Eds.), Proceeding of 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1429–1432). San Francisco, CA: University of California.
15.
KuhlP. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 93–107.
16.
KuhlP. K. (2000). Language, mind, and brain: Experience alters perception. The New Cognitive Neurosciences, 2, 99–115.
17.
LaverJ. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
LockeJ. L. (1983). Phonological acquisition and change. New York, NY: Academic Press.
19.
O’ConnorJ. D.GerstmanL. J.LibermanA. M.DelattreP. C.CooperF. (1957). Acoustic cues for the perception of initial /w,y,r,l/. Word, 13, 24–43.
20.
SheldonA.StrangeW. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243–261.
21.
ShimizuK.DantsujiM. (1983). A study on the perception of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthetic speech sounds. Studia Phonologica, 17, 1–14.
22.
TrehubS. E. (1976). The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults. Child Development, 47, 466–472.
23.
WrembelM. (2010). L2-accented speech in L3 production. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 19–38.
24.
XuL.ThompsonC.PfingstB. (2005). Relative contribution of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 3255–3267.
