The perception of voice onset time (VOT) in word-initial stops has been widely studied in the second language, although it remains underexplored from a multilingual perspective. Previous limited research on multilingual VOT perception offers inconsistent results, with studies suggesting either cross-linguistic interactions or language-specific VOT patterns. This study aims to consolidate these findings by investigating VOT perception in trilingual speakers of L1 Polish, L2 English, and L3 Norwegian, as well as examining whether perceptual boundary locations between voiced and voiceless stops in L3 learners differ from those of native speakers and are influenced by L1, L2, and L3 interactions. To this end, VOT continua were created for three places of articulation (labial, coronal, velar) and three languages (Polish, English, Norwegian). Participants completed a two-alternative forced-choice task separately for each language. The results indicate that trilingual speakers experience cross-linguistic interactions, particularly based on the place of articulation, highlighting the complex nature of VOT perception in multilingual acquisition.
Aliaga-GarcíaC.MoraJ. C. (2009). Assessing the effects of phonetic training on L2 sound perception and production. In WatkinsM. A.RauberA. S.BaptistaB. O. (Eds.), Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology (pp. 2–31). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
2.
AlvesU. K.ZimmerM. C. (2015). Perception and production of English VOT patterns by Brazilian learners: The role of multiple acoustic cues in a DST perspective. Alfa: Revista de Linguística, 59(1), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5794-1502-7
3.
AntoniouM.LiangE.EttlingerM.WongP. (2015). The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000777
4.
AntoniouM.TylerM. D.BestC. T. (2012). Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode?Journal of Phonetics, 40(4), 582–594.
5.
BalasA. (2018). Non-native vowel perception: The interplay of categories and features. Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
6.
BalasA.KopečkováR.WrembelM. (2019). Perception of rhotics by multilingual children. In CalhounS.EscuderoP.TabainM.WarrenP. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPHS), Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 3725–3729). International Phonetic Association.
7.
BestC. T.TylerM. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In MunroM.BohnO.-S. (Eds.), Second language speech learning (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins.
8.
BürknerP.-C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
9.
Cabreli AmaroJ. (2017). Testing the phonological permeability hypothesis: L3 phonological effects on L1 versus L2 systems. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916637287
10.
CalZ.WrembelM. (2023). Perception of voicing distinction in syllable-initial stops by multilingual speakers. In SkarnitzlR.VolínJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences–ICPhS 2023 (pp. 451–455). International Phonetic Association.
11.
DmitrievaO.LlanosF.ShultzA. A.FrancisA. L. (2015). Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.12.002
12.
DochertyG. J. (1992). The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. De Gruyter Mouton.
13.
DukiewiczL.SawickaI. (1995). Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego: Fonetyka i fonologia [Grammar of the contemporary Polish language: Phonetics and phonology] (WróbelH., Ed.). Wydawnictwo Instytutu Języka Polskiego PAN.
EnomotoK. (1994). L2 perceptual acquisition: The effect of multilingual linguistic experience on the perception of a “less novel” contrast. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 15–29.
16.
EscuderoP. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization [Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University]. LOT Dissertation Series.
17.
FlegeJ. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issue in cross-language research (pp. 229–273). York Press .
18.
FlegeJ. E.BohnO.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In WaylandR. (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002
19.
FlegeJ. E.EeftingW. (1987). The production and perception of English stops by Spanish speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30538-8.
20.
García-SierraA.SchifanoE.DuncanG. M.FishM. S. (2021). An analysis of the perception of stop consonants in bilinguals and monolinguals in different phonetic contexts: A range-based language cueing approach. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83, 1878–1896. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02183-z
21.
GorbaC. (2019). Bidirectional influence on L1 Spanish and L2 English stop perception: The role of L2 experience. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(6), EL587–EL592. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5113808
22.
GorbaC.CebrianJ. (2021). The role of L2 experience in L1 and L2 perception and production of voiceless stops by English learners of Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 88, Article 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101094
23.
GutU. (2010). Cross-linguistic influence in L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710902972248
24.
GutU.KopečkováR.NelsonC. (2023). Phonetics and phonology in multilingual language development. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108992527
25.
HalvorsenB. (1998). Timing relations in Norwegian stops [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Bergen.
KeatingP.MikosM.GanongW. F.III. (1981). A cross-language study of range of VOT in the perception of stop consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70(5), 1260–1271.
28.
KelloggJ.ChangC. B. (2023). Exploring the onset of phonetic drift in voice onset time perception. Languages, 8(1), Article 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010078
29.
KopečkováR. (2015). Differences in the perception of English vowel sounds by child L2 and L3 learners. In GutU.FuchsR.WunderE.-M. (Eds.), Universal or diverse paths to English phonology (pp. 71–90). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346084-005
30.
KristoffersenG. (2000). The phonology of Norwegian. Oxford University Press.
LiP.ZhangF.YuA.ZhaoX. (2020). Language History Questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 938–944. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001153
33.
LinaresD.López-MolinerJ. (2016). Quickpsy: An R package to fit psychometric functions for multiple groups. The R Journal, 8(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-008
34.
LiskerL.AbramsonA. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops. Word, 20(3), 384–422.
LiuJ.ZengT.LuX. (2019). Challenges in multi-language pronunciation teaching: A cross-linguistic study of Chinese students’ perception of voiced and voiceless stops. In ZhengY.GaoX. (Eds.), Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación (Vol. 79, pp. 99–118). https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.65652
37.
LiuZ. (2016). Exploring cross-linguistic influence: Perception and production of L1, L2 and L3 bilabial stops by Mandarin Chinese speakers [Master’s thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona]. Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/167902
38.
McKelvie-SebileauP.DavisC. (2014). Discrimination of foreign language speech contrasts by English monolinguals and French/English bilinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(5), 3025–3035. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4870701
39.
MontanariS.SteffmanJ.MayrR.FloresP.FeeneyC. (2023). Differential perception of vowels and stop consonants in Spanish-English bilingual preschoolers. In SkarnitzlR.VolínJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 42–46). Article 86 Guarant International. https://guarant.cz/icphs2023/86.pdf
40.
PanL.KeH.StylesS. J. (2022). Early linguistic experience shapes bilingual adults’ hearing for phonemes in both languages. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 4703. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08557-7
41.
PatihisL.OhJ. S.MogilnerT. (2013). Phoneme discrimination of an unrelated language: Evidence for a narrow transfer but not a broad-based bilingual advantage. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913476768
42.
PeirceJ. W.GrayJ. R.SimpsonS.MacAskillM.HöchenbergerR.SogoH.KastmanE.LindeløvJ. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
RoachP. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
45.
RojczykA. (2010). Temporal and spectral parameters in perception of the voicing contrast in English and Polish. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
46.
RStudio Team. (2019). RStudio: Integrated development for R [Computer software]. RStudio, Inc. http://www.rstudio.com/
47.
StanI. (2024). A cross-linguistic study of L3 speech perception of voiced and voiceless stops. Journal of Experimental Phonetics, 33, 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1344/efe-2024-33-137-152
48.
StöltenK. (2013). The effects of age of onset on VOT in L2 acquisition and L1 attrition: A study of the speech production and perception of advanced Spanish-Swedish bilinguals [Doctoral dissertation]. Stockholm University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:657142/fulltext01.pdf
49.
SypiańskaJ. (2021). Production of voice onset time (VOT) by senior Polish learners of English. Open Linguistics, 7, 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0016
50.
SypiańskaJ.CalZ. (2022). Perceptual drift in L1 phonetic categories in multilinguals. In JaroszA.SardegnaA. A. (Eds.), Theoretical and practical developments in English speech assessment, research, and training (pp. 299–313). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98218-8_17
51.
SypiańskaJ.CalZ. (2023). Perception-production mismatch in L1 drift. In SkarnitzlR.VolínJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences–ICPhS 2023 (pp. 2855–2859). International Phonetic Association.
52.
TremblayM.-C.SabourinL. (2012). Comparing behavioral discrimination and learning abilities in monolinguals, bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 3465–3474. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4756955
53.
WestburyJ. R. (1979). Aspects of the temporal control of voicing in consonant clusters in English [Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin].
54.
WilliamsL. S. (1977). The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 289–297. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199477.
55.
WinnM. B. (2020). Manipulation of voice onset time in speech stimuli: A tutorial and flexible Praat script. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(2), 852. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000692
56.
WrembelM.GutU.KopečkováR.BalasA. (2022). The relationship between the perception and production of L2 and L3 rhotics in young multilinguals; an exploratory cross-linguistic study. International Journal of Multilingualism, 21(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2022.2036158
57.
WrembelM.MareckaM.KopečkováR. (2019). Extending perceptual assimilation model to L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1583233
58.
ZengM. (2024, May17–19). Mandarin trilinguals’ perception of L3 Japanese stops [Poster presentation]. L3 Workshop: Multilingual Language Acquisition, Processing and Use, Tokyo, Japan.
