Scholars of pseudepigraphal letters have recognized that pseudepigraphy troubles the identification of the alleged addressee with the historical addressee. This means that the rhetorical addressee is a matter of choice. Building on Benjamin Fiore’s work on exemplarity, I argue that Timothy as addressee of 1 Timothy helps the Pastor articulate specific aspects of his program. Timothy, like Paul, is an example and serves as a link between Paul’s exemplarity and this letter’s readers. Through Timothy’s exemplarity, the Pastor legitimates young leadership, addressing a second-century controversy in the Jesus movement. Finally, the Pastor reframes Timothy’s reputation, distancing him from Jewish law.
BroxNorbert1969 ‘Historische und theologische Probleme der Pastoralbriefe’, Kairos11: 81–94.
7.
BroxNorbert1970 ‘Pseudo-Paulus und Pseudo-Ignaitus: Einige Topoi Altchristlicher Pseudepigraphie’, VC30: 181–88.
8.
CampbellDouglas A.2014Framing Paul: An Epistolary Biography (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
9.
CohenShaye J.D.1999 ‘Appendix D: Was Timothy Jewish?’, in The Beginnings of Jewishness: Boundaries, Varieties, Uncertainties (Berkeley: University of California Press): 363–77.
EhrmanBart2013Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
12.
FioreBenjamin1986The Function of Personal Example in the Socratic and Pastoral Epistles (AnBib 105; Rome: Biblical Institute Press).
13.
FioreBenjamin, revised by BlantonThomasIV2016 ‘Paul, Exemplification, and Imitation’, in SampleyPaul (ed.), Paul in the Greco-Roman World: A Handbook, (2 vols.; London: Bloomsbury): 1.169–82.
14.
FunkRobert W.1967 ‘The Apostolic Parousia: Form and Significance’, in FarmerW. R.MouleC. F. D.NiebuhrR. R. (eds.), Christian History and Interpretation: Studies Present to John Knox (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 249–69.
15.
GregoryAndrew F.2003The Reception of Luke and Acts in the Period Before Irenaeus (WUNT 169; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
16.
GregoryAndrew F.2010 ‘The Reception of Luke and Acts and the Unity of Luke-Acts’, in GregoryAndrew F.RoweC. Kavin (eds.), Rethinking the Unity and Reception of Luke and Acts (repr.; Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press [2007]): 82–93.
17.
GregoryAndrew F.RoweC. Kavin (eds.) 2010Rethinking the Unity and Reception of Luke and Acts (Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press).
18.
HerzerJens2018 ‘Rearranging the ‘House of God’: A New Perspective on the Pastoral Epistles’, in HoutmanAlberdinade JongAlbertde WegMagda Misset-van (eds.), Empsychoi Logoi—Religious Innovations in Antiquity: Studies in Honor of Pieter Willem van der Horst (Leiden: Brill): 547–66.
19.
HerzerJens2022 ‘Das Geheimnis der Frömmigkeit (1 Tim 3,16): Sprache und Stil der Pastoralbreife im Kontext hellenistich-römishcer Popularphilosophie – eine Problemanzeige’, in Die Pastoralbriefe und das Vermächtnis des Paulus: Studien zu den Briefen an Timotheus und Titus (repr.; WUNT 476; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck [2007]): 381–405.
20.
HoklotubbeChristopher2017Civilized Piety: The Rhetoric of Pietas in the Pastoral Epistles and the Roman Empire (Waco: Baylor University Press).
21.
HustonChristopher1997 ‘Was Timothy Timid? On the Rhetoric of Fearlessness (1 Corinthians 16:10–11) and Cowardice (2 Timothy 1:7)’, Biblical Research42: 58–73.
22.
HylenSusan E.2019 ‘Women διάκονοι and Gendered Norms of Leadership’, JBL138: 687–702.
23.
JohnsonLuke Timothy2010 ‘Literary Criticism of Luke-Acts: Is Reception History Pertinent?’, in GregoryAndrew F.RoweC. Kavin (eds.), Rethinking the Unity and Reception of Luke and Acts (repr.; Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press [2005]): 66–69.
24.
KaestliJean-Daniel1995 ‘Luke-Acts and the Pastoral Epistles: The Thesis of a Common Authorship’, in TuckettChristopher (ed.), Luke’s Literary Achievement: Collected Essays (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic): 110–26.
25.
KingKaren2016 ‘What Is an Author? Ancient Author-Function in the Apocryphon of John and the Apocalypse of John’, in ArnalWilliam E.et al. (eds.), Scribal Practices and Social Structures Among Jesus Adherents: Essays in Honour of John S. Kloppenborg (Leuven: Peeters): 15–42.
26.
LanglandsRebecca2018Exemplary Ethics in Ancient Rome (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
27.
LieuJudith2014 ‘The Audience of the Johannine Epistles’, in CulpepperR. AlanAndersonPaul N. (eds.), Communities in Disputes: Current Scholarship on the Johannine Epistles (Atlanta: SBL): 123–40.
28.
LincicumDavid2017 ‘Mirror-Reading a Pseudepigraphal Letter’, NovT59: 171–93.
MarshallI. Howard, in collaboration with TownerPhilip H.1999The Pastoral Epistles (ICC; London: T&T Clark).
31.
MarshallJohn W.2008 ‘I Left You in Crete: Narrative Deception and Social Hierarchy in the Letter to Titus’, JBL127: 781–803.
32.
MeeksWayneFitzgeraldJohn T.2007 ‘Introduction’, in MeeksWayneFitzgeraldJohn T. (eds.), The Writings of St. Paul: A Norton Critical Edition (New York: Norton): xiii–xxviii.
33.
MéndezHugo2020 ‘Did the Johannine Community Exist?’, JSNT42: 350–74.
34.
MitchellMargaret M.1992 ‘New Testament Envoys in the Context of Greco-Roman Diplomatic and Epistolary Conventions: The Example of Timothy and Titus’, JBL111: 641–62.
35.
MossCandida2010The Other Christs: Imitating Jesus in Ancient Christian Ideologies of Martyrdom (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
36.
MouleC.F.D.1965 ‘The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles’, BJRL47: 430–53.
37.
Murphy-O’ConnorJerome1996Paul: A Critical Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
38.
Murphy-O’ConnorJerome2010Keys to Second Corinthians: Revisiting the Major Issues (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
39.
OverstreetR. Larry2009 ‘The Greek Concept of “Seven Stages of Life” and Its New Testament Significance’, BBR19: 537–63.
40.
ParkinTim G.2003Old Age in the Roman World: A Cultural and Social History (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press).
41.
PriorMichael1989Paul the Letter-Writer and the Second Letter to Timothy (JSNTSup 23; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic).
42.
RollerMatthew B.2018Models from the Past in Roman Culture: A World of Exempla (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
43.
RosenmeyerPatricia2006Ancient Greek Literary Letters: Selections in Translation (London: Routledge).
44.
SallerRichard1994Patriarchy, Property, and Death in the Roman Family (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
45.
StengerWerner1974 ‘Timotheus und Titus als literarische Gestalten: Beobachtungen zur Form und Funktion der Pastoralbriefe’, Kairos16: 252–67.
46.
ThompsonTrevor2009 ‘As if Genuine: Interpreting the Pseudepigrpahic Second Thessalonians’, in FreyJörget al. (eds.), Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen (WUNT 246; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 471–88.
47.
TsujiManabu2010 ‘Persönliche Korrespondenz des Paulus: Strategie der Pastoralbriefe als Pseudepigrapha’, NTS56: 253–72.
48.
VanderKamJames C.2018Jubilees 1: A Commentary on the Book of Jubilees Chapters 1–21 (ed. CrawfordS.; Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress).
49.
WelbornL.L.2018The Young Against the Old: Generational Conflict in First Clement (Landham, MA: Lexington Books).
50.
WilsonS.G.1979Luke and the Pastoral Epistles (London: SPCK).
51.
ZamfirKorinna2013Men and Women in the Household of God: A Contextual Approach to the Roles of Ministries in the Pastoral Epistles (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
52.
ZamfirKorinna2017 ‘Elusive Opponents in the Pastoral Epistles’, in JosephVerheydenTobiasNicklasElisabethHernitscheck (eds.), Shadowy Characters and Fragmentary Evidence (WUNT 388; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 27–48.
