There has been wide speculation regarding the meaning of two Greek words in 2 Cor. 5.13: ἐξίστημι and σωφρονέω. Interpreters of this verse have struggled to assess these terms in their literary and historical contexts. While the majority of commentators view these terms as referring to Paul’s ecstatic experiences, others have interpreted the verse as referring to Paul’s erratic behavior. A third group of scholars have tried to demonstrate that Paul is in fact responding to accusations that he lacked rhetorical sophistication. Building on the work of scholars belonging to the third category, I propose in this article that Paul is not only being accused of poor rhetorical skills, he is also being accused of all the connotations of a weak and inarticulate leader. By examining ἐξίστημι and σωφρονέω in their rhetorical contexts I will demonstrate that these two terms are often used in descriptions of ineffectual and unqualified civic leaders. Thus, Paul has been accused of lacking all the necessary qualities of a successful leader in the ancient world.
BarrettC.K.1973The Second Epistle to the Corinthians (New York: Harper and Row).
5.
BauerWalter2000A Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (ed. DankerF.W.; Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
6.
BetzHans Dieter1972Der Apostel Paulus und die sokratische Tradition: Eine exegetische Unter-suchung zu seiner ‘Apologie’ 2 Korinther 10–13 (BZHT, 45; Tübingen. Mohr Siebeck).
7.
BetzHans Dieter19852 Corinthians 8 and 9: Commentary on Two Administrative Letters of the Apostle Paul (Hermeneia: Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
8.
BornkammGünther1961 ‘Die Vorgeschichte des sogenannten Zweiten Korintherbriefes’, Sitzungs-berichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse: 7-36.
9.
BoussetWilhelm1908Der zweite Brief an die Korinther (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
10.
BowersockGlen Warren1969Greek Sophists in the Roman World (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
11.
BruceF.F.1980I & II Corinthians (New Century Bible Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
12.
BultmannRudolf1985The Second Letter to the Corinthians (trans. HarrisvilleRoy A.; Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing).
13.
BultmannRudolf1999 ‘πείθω’, in KittelG. (ed.), Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, VI (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans): 1-11.
14.
BuxtonR.G.A.1982Persuasion in Greek Tragedy: A Study of Peitho (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
DenneyJames1894The Second Epistle to the Corinthians (Expositor’s Bible; London: Hodder & Stoughton).
17.
DunnJames D.G.1997Jesus and the Spirit: A Study of the Religious and Charismatic Experience of Jesus and the First Christians as Reflected in the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
18.
FurnishVictor P.2005II Corinthians (Anchor Bible, 32A; New Haven: Yale University Press).
19.
GarlandDavid L.19992 Corinthians (New American Commentary; Nashville: Broadman & Holman).
20.
GeorgiDieter1986The Opponents of Paul in Second Corinthians (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
21.
GeorgiDieter1991Theocracy in Paul’s Praxis and Theology (trans. GreenDavil L.; Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
22.
HafemannScott J.20002 Corinthians (NIVAC; Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan).
23.
HarrillJ. Albert2006Slaves in the New Testament: Literary, Social, and Moral Dimensions (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press).
24.
HarrisMurray J.2005The Second Epistle to the Corinthians (NIGTC; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
25.
HubbardMoyer V.1998 ‘Was Paul out of his Mind? Re-reading 2 Corinthians 5.13’, JSNT70: 39-64.
26.
KäsemannErnst1942 ‘Die Legitimität des Apostels: Eine Untersuchung zu II Korinther 10-13’, ZNW41: 33-71.
27.
KennedyGeorge A.1984New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).
28.
KennedyGeorge A.1994A New History of Classical Rhetoric (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
29.
LambrechtJan1999Second Corinthians (Sacra Pagina; Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press).
30.
LampePeter2010 ‘Rhetorical Analysis of Pauline Texts—Quo Vadit?’, in SampleyJ.P.LampeP. (eds.), Paul and Rhetoric (New York: Continuum): 3-24.
31.
MarshallPeter1987Enmity in Corinth: Social Conventions in Paul’s Relations with the Corinthians (WUNT, 2.23; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
MitchellMargaret M.1991Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation: An Exegetical Investigation of the Language and Composition of 1 Corinthians (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press).
34.
NorthHelen F.1948 ‘The Concept of “Sophrosyne” in Greek Literary Criticism’, Classical Philology43: 1-17.
35.
OepkeAlbrecht1999 ‘ἐξίστημι’, in KittelG. (ed.) Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, II (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans): 459-60.
36.
PapillonTerry L.2004Isocrates II (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press).
37.
PlummerAlfred1915A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
38.
SchlatterAdolf1969Paulus der Bote Jesus: Eine Deutung seiner Briefe an die Korinther (Stuttgart: Calwer).
39.
SchmithalsWalter1971Gnosticism in Corinth: An Investigation of the Letters to the Corinthians (trans. SteelyJohn E.; Nashville: Abingdon Press).
40.
StrachanR.H.1935The Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians (Moffatt New Testament Commentary; Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock).
41.
ThrallMargaret E.1994The Second Epistle to the Corinthians, I (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
42.
ThrallMargaret E.2000The Second Epistle to the Corinthians, II (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
