It is generally agreed that one key factor in the deterioration of Paul’s relationship with the Corinthian assembly was his refusal to accept an offer of material support. In fact, however, there is no solid textual basis for this putative datum. None of the three passages taken as evidence (1 Cor. 9.1-18; 2 Cor. 11.5-15; 12.11-18) makes explicit reference to such an offer. In each case, interpreters have inferred from Paul’s heated rhetorical questions that he is defending his decision to reject Corinthian support. But a closer look at both the syntax and the context of these questions, and at the logic of rhetorical questions more generally, shows this inference to be unlikely. When Paul boasts that he has not burdened the Corinthians, what he means is not that he has refused to accept their support, but that he has refrained from demanding it. Reconstructions of his relationship with the Corinthian assembly must be modified accordingly.
AejmelaeusLars2000Schwachheit als Waffe: Die Argumentation des Paulus im Tränenbrief (2. Kor. 10–13) (SESJ, 78; Helsinki: Finnish Exegetical Society).
2.
AlloE.-B.1956a Saint Paul: Première épître aux Corinthiens (2nd edn; EBib; Paris: Gabalda).
3.
AlloE.-B.1956b Saint Paul: Seconde épître aux Corinthiens (2nd edn; EBib; Paris: Gabalda).
4.
BachmannPhilip1922Der zweite Brief des Paulus an die Korinther (4th edn; ZKNT, 8; Leipzig: Deichert).
5.
BarrettC.K.1968A Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians (HNTC; New York: Harper & Row).
6.
BarrettC.K.1973A Commentary on the Second Epistle to the Corinthians (HNTC; New York: Harper & Row).
7.
BetzHans Dieter1972Der Apostel Paulus und die sokratische Tradition: Eine exegetische Untersuchung zu seiner ‘Apologie’ 2 Korinther 10–13 (BHT, 45; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
8.
BetzHans Dieter19852 Corinthians 8 and 9: A Commentary on Two Administrative Letters of the Apostle Paul (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
BultmannRudolf1985[1976] The Second Letter to the Corinthians (ed.
DinklerErich; trans. HarrisvilleRoy A.; Minneapolis: Augsburg).
11.
CalvinJohn1848[1546] Commentary on the Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians (trans. PringleJohn; 2 vols.; Edinburgh: Calvin Translation Society).
12.
ChowJohn K.1992Patronage and Power: A Study of Social Networks in Corinth (JSNTSup, 75; Sheffield: JSOT Press).
13.
ClinesDavid J.A.2003 ‘Paul, the Invisible Man’, in MooreStephen D.AndersonJanice Capel (eds.), New Testament Masculinities (SemeiaSt, 45; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature): 181-92.
14.
DautzenbergGerhard1969 ‘Der Verzicht auf das apostolische Unterhaltsrecht: Eine exegetische Untersuchung zu 1 Kor 9’, Bib50: 212-32.
15.
DeweyArthur J.1985 ‘A Matter of Honor: A Social-Historical Analysis of 2 Corinthians 10’, HTR78: 209-17.
16.
DonfriedKarl P.2000 ‘The Epistolary and Rhetorical Context of 1 Thessalonians 2:1-12’, in DonfriedKarl P.BeutlerJohannes (eds.), The Thessalonians Debate: Methodological Discord or Methodological Synthesis? (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans): 31-60.
DuffPaul B.2015Moses in Corinth: The Apologetic Context of 2 Corinthians 3 (NovTSup, 159; Leiden: Brill).
19.
DunganDavid L.1971The Sayings of Jesus in the Churches of Paul: The Use of the Synoptic Tradition in the Regulation of Early Church Life (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
20.
FeeGordon D.2014The First Epistle to the Corinthians (rev. edn; NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
21.
FitzmyerJoseph A.2008First Corinthians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB, 32; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
22.
FurnishVictor Paul1984II Corinthians (AB, 32A; Garden City, NY: Doubleday).
23.
GeorgiDieter1986[1964] The Opponents of Paul in Second Corinthians: A Study of Religious Propaganda in Late Antiquity (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
24.
GerberChristine2006 ‘Der fröhliche Geber: Gütertausch und Unterhaltsverzicht in Metaphern der Paulusbriefe’, Jarhbuch für Biblische Theologie21: 111-29.
25.
GlancyJennifer A.2004 ‘Boasting of Beatings (2 Corinthians 11:23-25)’, JBL123: 99-135.
26.
GuttenbergerGudrun2005 ‘Klugheit, Besonnenheit, Gerechtigkeit und Tapferkeit: Zum Hintergrund der Vorwürfe gegen Paulus nach 2Kor 10-13’, ZNW96: 78-98.
27.
HarrillJ. Albert2001 ‘Invective against Paul (2 Cor 10:10), the Physiognomics of the Ancient Slave Body, and the Greco-Roman Rhetoric of Manhood’, in CollinsAdela YarbroMitchellMargaret M. (eds.), Antiquity and Humanity: Essays on Ancient Religion and Philosophy (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 189-213.
28.
HarrisMurray J.2005The Second Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text (NIGTC; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
29.
HeinriciC.F. Georg1896Der erste Brief an die Korinther (8th edn; KEK, 5; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
30.
HeinriciC.F. Georg1900Der zweite Brief an die Korinther: Mit einem Anhang, Zum Hellenismus des Paulus (8th edn; KEK, 6; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
31.
HockRonald F.1980The Social Context of Paul’s Ministry: Tentmaking and Apostleship (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
32.
HolmbergAnders2016The Syntax of Yes and No (Oxford Linguistics; Oxford: Oxford University Press).
33.
HolmbergBengt1978Paul and Power: The Structure of Authority in the Primitive Church as Reflected in the Pauline Epistles (ConBNT, 11; Lund: Gleerup).
34.
HorrellDavid G.1996The Social Ethos of the Corinthian Correspondence: Interests and Ideology from 1 Corinthians to 1 Clement (SNTW; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
35.
HorrellDavid G.1997 ‘“The Lord Commanded … But I Have Not Used …”: Exegetical and Hermeneutical Reflections on 1 Cor 9.14-15’, NTS43: 587-603.
36.
HurdJohn C.1965The Origin of 1 Corinthians (New York: Seabury).
37.
HurdJohn C.2005 ‘Reflections Concerning Paul’s “Opponents” in Galatia’, in PorterStanley E. (ed.), Paul and his Opponents (Pauline Studies, 2; Leiden: Brill): 129-48.
38.
JonesCatherine M.2013 ‘Theatre of Shame: The Impact of Paul’s Manual Labour on his Apostleship in Corinth’ (PhD thesis, University of St. Michael’s College).
39.
KäsemannErnst1942 ‘Die Legitimität des Apostels: Eine Untersuchung zu II Korinther 10–13’, ZNW41: 33-71.
40.
KloppenborgJohn S.2017a ‘Associations, Christ Groups, and their Place in the Polis’, ZNW108: 1-56.
41.
KloppenborgJohn S.2017b ‘Fiscal Aspects of Paul’s Collection for Jerusalem’, Early Christianity8: 153-98.
42.
KoshikIrene2005Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction (Studies in Discourse and Grammar, 16; Amsterdam: Benjamins).
43.
KotrositsMaia2011 ‘The Rhetoric of Intimate Spaces: Affect and Performance in the Corinthian Correspondence’, USQR62: 134-51.
44.
LambrechtJan2001 ‘The Fool’s Speech and its Context: Paul’s Particular Way of Arguing in 2 Cor 10–13’, Bib82: 305-24.
45.
LandChristopher D.2015The Integrity of 2 Corinthians and Paul’s Aggravating Absence (New Testament Monographs, 36; Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix).
MeyerH.A.W.1879Critical and Exegetical Handbook to the Epistles to the Corinthians (ed. DicksonWilliam P.StewartWilliam ; KEK, 5–6; 2 vols.; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
56.
MitchellMargaret M.1991Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation: An Exegetical Investigation of the Language and Composition of 1 Corinthians (HUT, 28; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
57.
MitchellMargaret M.2003 ‘The Corinthian Correspondence and the Birth of Pauline Hermeneutics’, in BurkeTrevor J.ElliottJ.K. (eds.), Paul and the Corinthians: Studies on a Community in Conflict (NovTSup, 109; Leiden: Brill): 17-53.
58.
MitchellMargaret M.2005 ‘Paul’s Letters to Corinth: The Interpretive Intertwining of Literary and Historical Reconstruction’, in SchowalterDaniel N.FriesenSteven J. (eds.), Urban Religion in Roman Corinth: Interdisciplinary Approaches (HTS, 53; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press): 307-38.
59.
NickelKeith1974 ‘A Parenthetical Apologia: 1 Corinthians 9:1-3’, CurTM1: 68-70.
60.
PetermanG.W.1997Paul’s Gift from Philippi: Conventions of Gift-Exchange and Christian Giving (SNTSMS, 92; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
61.
PhuaRichard Liong-Seng2005Idolatry and Authority: A Study of 1 Corinthians 8.1–11.1 in the Light of the Jewish Diaspora (LNTS, 299; London: T&T Clark).
62.
PittsAndrew W.2016 ‘Paul in Tarsus: Historical Factors in Assessing Paul’s Early Education’, in PorterStanley E.DyerBryan R. (eds.), Paul and Ancient Rhetoric: Theory and Practice in the Hellenistic Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 41-67.
63.
PlummerAlfred1915A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
64.
PosterCarol2007 ‘A Conversation Halved: Epistolary Theory in Greco-Roman Antiquity’, in PosterCarolMitchellLinda C. (eds.), Letter-Writing Manuals and Instruction from Antiquity to the Present: Historical and Bibliographic Studies (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press): 21-51.
65.
PratscherWilhelm1979 ‘Der Verzicht des Paulus auf finanziellen Unterhalt durch seine Gemeinden: Ein Aspekt seiner Missionsweise’, NTS25: 284-98.
66.
QuirkRandolphGreebaumSidneyLeechGeoffreyet al. (eds.) 1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (London: Longman).
67.
RijksbaronAlbert2012 ‘Does Ancient Greek Have a Word for “No”? The Evidence from οὐκοῦν … οὐ Questions’, Journal of Greek Linguistics12: 140-60.
68.
RobertsonA.T.1914A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research (New York: Hodder & Stoughton).
69.
RobertsonA.T.PlummerAlfred1911A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the First Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
70.
SavageTimothy B.1996Power through Weakness: Paul’s Understanding of the Christian Ministry in 2 Corinthians (SNTSMS, 86; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
71.
SchellenbergRyan S.2013Rethinking Paul’s Rhetorical Education: Comparative Rhetoric and 2 Corinthians 10–13 (ECL, 10; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
72.
SchellenbergRyan S.2016 ‘Paul, Samson Occom, and the Constraints of Boasting: A Comparative Rereading of 2 Corinthians 10–13’, HTR109: 512-35.
73.
SchmellerThomas2010Der zweite Brief an die Korinther (2Kor 1,1–7,4) (EKKNT, 7/1; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag).
74.
SchmellerThomas2015Der zweite Brief an die Korinther (2Kor 7,5–13,13) (EKKNT, 7/2; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag).
75.
SchmithalsWalter1973 ‘Die Korintherbriefe als Briefsammlung’, ZNW64: 263-88.
76.
SchrageWolfgang1995Der erste Brief an die Korinther (1Kor 6,12–11,16) (EKKNT, 7/2; Zürich: Benziger Verlag).
77.
StaabKarl (ed.) 1984Pauluskommentare aus der griechischen Kirche (2nd edn; Münster: Aschendorff).
78.
TheissenGerd1982The Social Setting of Pauline Christianity: Essays on Corinth (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
79.
ThrallMargaret E.1994A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle to the Corinthians (II Corinthians I–VII) (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
80.
ThrallMargaret E.2000A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle to the Corinthians (II Corinthians VIII–XIII) (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
81.
VaageLeif E.2006 ‘El cuerpo paulino: Un débil fuerte y el poder debilitante’, RIBLA55: 7-11.
82.
WaltonSteve2011 ‘Paul, Patronage, and Pay: What Do we Know about the Apostle’s Financial Support?’, in BurkeTrevor J.RosnerBrian S. (eds.), Paul as Missionary: Identity, Activity, Theology, and Practice (LNTS, 420; London: T&T Clark): 220-33.
WelbornL.L.2009 ‘Paul’s Caricature of his Chief Rival as a Pompous Parasite in 2 Corinthians 11.20’, JSNT32: 39-56.
85.
WelbornL.L.2011An End to Enmity: Paul and the ‘Wrongdoer’ of Second Corinthians (BZNW, 185; Berlin: de Gruyter).
86.
WendtHeidi2016At the Temple Gates: The Religion of Freelance Experts in the Roman Empire (New York: Oxford University Press)
87.
WhiteJoel R.2013 ‘Meals in Pagan Temples and Apostolic Finances: How Effective is Paul’s Argument in 1 Corinthians 9:1-23 in the Context of 1 Corinthians 8–10?’, BBR23: 531-46.
88.
WillisWendell1985 ‘An Apostolic Apologia? The Form and Function of 1 Corinthians 9’, JSNT24: 33-48.
ZellerDieter2010Der erste Brief an die Korinther (KEK, 5; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
91.
ZmijewskiJosef1978Der Stil der paulinischen ‘Narrenrede’: Analyse der Sprachgestaltung in 2Kor 11,1–12,10 als Beitrag zur Methodik von Stiluntersuchungen neutestamentlicher Texte (BBB, 52; Cologne: Hanstein).
