This article addresses the debate over Paul’s use of self-commendation in 2 Corinthians. The diversity of instances in which Paul promotes himself within this text – whereby he in some cases commends himself explicitly (2 Cor. 1.12; 4.2; 6.4), denies that he is doing so in others (3.1; 5.12; 12.19) and elsewhere claims that he is compelled to boast (11.1–12.13) – raises the question of whether Paul’s practice regarding self-commendation is guided by a coherent set of principles, or is simply self-contradictory. Beginning with an analysis of a representative sample of each ‘species’ of self-commendation, this study argues that, although Paul does have certain principles regarding self-commendation that he attempts to apply with a measure of consistency, he is more than willing to bend or suspend his own ‘rules’ in order to suit his more pressing rhetorical concerns.
BarrettC.K.1973A Commentary on the Second Epistle to the Corinthians (BNTC; London: Adam & Charles Black).
2.
BellevilleLinda L.1989 ‘A Letter of Apologetic Self-Commendation: 2 Cor. 1:8–7:16’, NovT31.2: 142-63.
3.
BetzHans Dieter1972Der Apostel Paulus und die sokratische Tradition: Eine exegetische Untersuchung zu seiner »Apologie« 2 Korinther 10–13 (BHT, 45; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
4.
BetzHans Dieter1978 ‘De Laude Ipsius (Moralia 539A-547F)’, in BetzHans Dieter (ed.), Plutarch’s Ethical Writings and Early Christian Literature (SCHNT, 4; Leiden: Brill): 367-93.
5.
BultmannRudolf1985The Second Letter to the Corinthians (ed. DinklerErich; Minneapolis: Augsburg).
6.
CallanTerrance1986 ‘Competition and Boasting: Toward a Psychological Portrait of Paul’, Nordic Journal of Theology40.1: 137-56.
7.
CranfieldC.E.B.1975A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans (6th edn; ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
8.
DavisGeorge Brown1999 ‘True and False Boasting in 2 Cor. 10–13’ (PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge).
9.
De LacyPhillip H.EinarsonBenedict (trans.) 1959Plutarch’s Moralia, VII (LCL; London: William Heinemann).
DunnJames D.G.1988Romans 1–8; Romans 9–16 (WBC; Dallas: Word Books).
12.
EslerPhilip F.2003Conflict and Identity in Romans: The Social Setting of Paul’s Letter (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
13.
FitzmyerJoseph A.1993Romans: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB; London: Doubleday).
14.
ForbesChristopher1986 ‘Comparison, Self-Praise and Irony: Paul’s Boasting and the Conventions of Hellenistic Rhetoric’, NTS32.1: 1-30.
15.
FurnishVictor P.1984II Corinthians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB; Garden City, NY: Doubleday).
16.
GathercoleSimon J.2002Where is Boasting: Early Jewish Soteriology and Paul’s Response in Romans 1–5 (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
17.
GlancyJennifer A.2004 ‘Boasting of Beatings (2 Corinthians 11:23-25)’, JBL123.1: 99-135.
18.
HafemannScott1990 ‘“Self-Commendation” and Apostolic Legitimacy in 2 Corinthians: A Pauline Dialectic?’, NTS36: 66-88.
19.
HarrisMurray J.2005The Second Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text (NIGTC; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
20.
HodgsonRobert2009 ‘Paul the Apostle and First Century Tribulation Lists’, ZNW74.1-2: 59-80.
21.
JewettRobert2007Romans: A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
22.
JudgeEdwin A.2008 ‘Paul’s Boasting in Relation to Contemporary Professional Practice’, in ScholerDavid M. (ed.), Social Distinctiveness of the Christians in the First Century (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson): 57-71.
23.
KäsemannErnst1942 ‘Die Legitimität des Apostels: Eine Untersuchung zu II Korinther 10–13’, ZNW41: 33-71.
24.
LambrechtJan1996 ‘Dangerous Boasting: Paul’s Self-Commendation in 2 Corinthians 10–13’, in BieringerReimund (ed.), The Corinthian Correspondence (BETL, 125; Leuven: Leuven University Press): 325-46.
25.
LambrechtJan2001 ‘The Fool’s Speech and its Context: Paul’s Particular Way of Arguing in 2 Cor 10–13’, Bib82.3: 305-24.
26.
LeeMason2014 ‘“Now is the Acceptable Time; Now is the Day of Salvation”: Reading 2 Corinthians 5:11–6:2 in Light of its Narrative Substructure’, ResQ56.1: 1-13.
27.
LyonsGeorge1982Pauline Autobiography: Toward a New Understanding (SBLDS, 73; Atlanta: Scholars Press).
28.
MarshallPeter1987Enmity in Corinth: Social Conventions in Paul’s Relations with the Corinthians (WUNT, 2/23; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
29.
MateraFrank J.2003II Corinthians: A Commentary (NTL; London: Westminster John Knox).
30.
MichelOtto1978Der Brief an die Römer (KKNT; 5th edn; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
31.
MooDouglas J.1996The Epistle to the Romans (NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
32.
MoxnesHalvor1988 ‘Honour and Righteousness in Romans’, JSNT10.32: 61-78.
33.
MurrayJohn1967The Epistle to the Romans: The English Text with Introduction, Exposition and Notes (LCNT; London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott).
34.
OlsonStanley N.1984 ‘Epistolary Uses of Expressions of Self-Confidence’, JBL103(4): 585-97.
35.
PlummerAlfred1915A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
36.
SavageTimothy B.1996Power through Weakness: Paul’s Understanding of the Christian Ministry in 2 Corinthians (SNTSMS, 86; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
SchützJohn Howard1975Paul and the Anatomy of Apostolic Authority (SNTSMS, 26; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
40.
StowersStanley1981The Diatribe and Paul’s Letter to the Romans (SBLDS, 57; Chico, CA: Scholars Press).
41.
SundermannHans-Georg1996Der schwache Apostel und die Kraft der Rede: Eine rhetorische Analyse von 2 Kor 10–13 (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang).
42.
ThrallMargaret E.1994The Second Epistle to the Corinthians: A Critical and Exegetical Commentary (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
43.
WatsonDuane F.2002 ‘Paul’s Boasting in 2 Corinthians 10–13 as Defense of his Honor: A Socio-Rhetorical Analysis’, in ErikssonAndersOlbrichtThomas H.ÜbelackerWalter G. (eds.), Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the 2000 Lund Conference (ESEC, 8; Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International): 260-75.
44.
WatsonDuane F.2003 ‘Paul and Boasting’, in J. PaulSampley (ed.), Paul in the Greco-Roman World: A Handbook, I (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International): 77-100.
45.
WatsonNigel M.1996 ‘“Physician, Heal Thyself”: Paul’s Character as Revealed in 2 Corinthians, and the Congruence between Word and Deed’, in BieringerReimund (ed.), The Corinthian Correspondence (BETL, 125; Leuven: Leuven University Press): 671-78.
46.
WelbornLaurence L.2009 ‘Paul’s Caricature of his Chief Rival as a Pompous Parasite in 2 Corinthians 11.20’, JSNT32.1: 39-56.
47.
WilckensUlrich1978Der Brief an die Römer (EKK, 6; Zürich: Benziger Verlag).
48.
WinberyC.1989 ‘Ministry in Tribulation: II Corinthians 4:1–5:10’, Theological Educator40: 84-95.
