Personlig egenhet;— et kvalifikasjonskrav i sykepleie — hvordan sykepleiens innholds- og handlingsaspekt kan danne grunnlag for beslutninger om egnethet
Free accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2005
Personlig egenhet;— et kvalifikasjonskrav i sykepleie — hvordan sykepleiens innholds- og handlingsaspekt kan danne grunnlag for beslutninger om egnethet
The article debates how the aspect of content and action in nursing forms the basis of decisions about personal suitability as a requirement of qualification in nursing. The purpose is to procure useful knowledge for reflection about the jurisdiction of nursing in a market-oriented society, for help for nurse-managers in the recruiting- and selectionprocess. Through a descriptive embedded multiple case design with a qualitative approach, four recruiting- and selection contexts was studied. By means of a theoretical framework based on Human Resource Management theory and Herbert Simons propositions about bounded rationality, the data were analysed by Kvales ad hoc generation of meaning. Personal suitability is a requirement of qualification in nursing when aspects of content and action in nursing are well defined through a ward-specific job-analysis. The results of the analysis have to be used by the nurse-manager with right to nominate, as preferences in assessment of the applicants in the recruiting- and selectionprocess. Further, the formal authorisation criteria and the medical speciality at the ward, most not be the only preferences in assessment of the applicants. If so, the jurisdiction of professional skills in nursing will still remain subordinate the profession of medicine
BaklundI., Personlig egnethet — et sykepleiefaglig utvelgelseskriterium?Norsk Tidsskrift for Sykepleieforskning, 1999. 1 (2),: P. 84–97.
2.
BaklundI., Personlig egnethet — et rekrutteringsgrunnlag i sykepleie. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sykepleieforskning, 2001. 3 (2): P. 81–94.
3.
BaklundI., Hør hva du sier, se hva du gjør … Grunnlaget for beslutninger om personlig egnethet som kvalifikasjon i sykepleie. En deskriptiv multiple casestudie, in Medisinsk fakultet, Institutt for sykepleievitenskap. 2002, Universitetet i Oslo.
4.
MartinsenØ.Kompetanseendring, in Ledelse, kompetanse og omstilling, BergM.E.MartinsenØ., and ThompsonG.. Editors. 1998, Universitetsforlaget: Oslo. p. 123–168.
5.
MarquisB. and HustonC.J., Management Decision Making for Nurses. 1994, Philadelphia: J.B.Lippincott Company.
6.
MarquisB. and HustonC.J., Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nursing. 1996, Philadelphia. New York: J.B. Lippincott Company.
WellsR.W. and MuellerJ.F., Revisioning the Recruitment of Talented Professionals. Journal of Nursing Administration, 1996. 26(1): P. 21–30.
10.
MunceyT., Selection and retention of nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1998. 8(3): P. 25–29.
11.
NIPA, Rekruttering og intervjuteknikk. NIPAs arbeidsbok til bruk i kompetanse-utvikling for ledere og personalansvarlige. 1999, Oslo: NIPA.
12.
AikenL., Nurses for the future: Breaking the shortage cycles. American Journal of Nursing, 1987. 87(12): P. 1616–20.
13.
AikenL.H.HavensD.S., and SloaneD.M., The Magnet Nursing Services Recognition Program: A comparison of two groups of magnet hospitals. American Journal of Nursing, 2000. 100(3): P. 26–36.
14.
HavensD.S. and AikenL.H., Shaping systems to promote desired outcomes: The magnet hospital model. Journal of Nursing Administration, 1999. 29(2): P. 14–20.
15.
HavensD.S., Comparing Nursing Infrastructure and Outcomes: ANCC Magnet and Nonmagnet CNEs Report. Nursing Economic, 2001. 19(6): P. 258–266.
16.
HuertaS., Recruitment and retention: The magnet perspective. Chart, 2003. 100(4): P. 4–6.
17.
ScottJ.G.SochalskiJ., and AikenL., Review of magnet hospital research: Findings and implications for professional nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 1999. 29(1): P. 9–19.
18.
AikenL.H., Nurses' reports on hospital care in five countries. Health Affairs, 2001. 20: P. 43–53.
19.
AdamsA.BondS., and HaleC.A., Nursing organizational practice and its relationship with other features of ward organization and job satisfaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1998. 27(6): P. 1212–22.
20.
CowinL. and JacobssonD., Addressing Australia's nursing shortage: Is the gap widening between workforce recommendations and the workplace?Collegian, 2003. 10(4): P. 20–2, 23–4.
21.
FinlaysonM.P., Hospital restructuring: Identifying the impact on patients and nurses. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand, 2002. 18(1): P. 27–35.
22.
HardingT. and LerdalA., Konsekvenser av helsereformen — en advarsel fra New Zealand. Sykepleien, 2005. 93(1): P. 48–49.
23.
AikenL., Trends in internastional nurse migration. Health Affairs, 2004. 23(3): P. 69–77.
24.
HoffmanK.DuffieldC., and DonoghueJ., Barriers to clinical decision-making in nurses in Australia. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2004. 21(3): P. 8–13.
25.
AdamsA. and BondS., Staffing in acute hospital wards: Part 1. The relationship between number of nurses and ward organizational environment. Journal of Nursing Management, 2003. 11(5): P. 287–292.
26.
AdamsA. and BondS., Staffing in acute hospital wards: Part 2. Relationships between grade mix, staff stability and features of ward organizational environment. Journal of Nursing Management, 2003. 11(5): P. 293–8.
27.
AikenL.H.SmithH.L., and LakeE.T., Lower Medicaer mortality amomg a set of hospitals known for good nursing care. Medical Care, 1994. 32(8): P. 771–787.
28.
AikenL.H.SochalskiJ., and LakeE.T., Studying outcomes of organizational change in health services. Medical Care, 1997. 35(11 suppl): P. 6–8.
29.
American-Nurses-Association, Nurse staffing and patient outcomes in the inpatient hospital setting. 2000, American Nurses Publishing: Washington DC.
30.
BrownS.J., Research evidence linking staffing and patient outcomes. Orthopaedic Nursing, 2001. 20(1): P. 67–68.
31.
YinR.K., Applications of Case study research. 1993, Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications, Ins.
32.
YinR.K., Case study research. Design and Methodes. 1994, LondonThousand Oaks. New Dehli: SAGE Publications.
33.
PegramA., What is case study research?Nurse Researcher, 1999. 7(2): P. 5–16.
34.
KruuseE., Case-studier. kap. 6, in Kvalitative forskningsmetoder i pykologi og beslægtede fag, KruuseE., Editor. 1999, Dansk psykologisk Forlag: København:. p. 59–79.
35.
StakeR.E., The art of case study research. 1995, USA: Sage Publications, Ins.
36.
GrimsøR.E., Rekruttering og utvalg av medarbeidere — og arbeidssøkers valg av arbeidsgiver. 2004, Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
37.
Grimsø, R.E. and 30., Personaladministrasjon. Teori og praksis. 2000, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
38.
BjøroK., Yrkesregulering — en viktig form for kvalitetssikring. Sykepleien Fagtidsskriftet, 1991. 79(6): P. 2–6.
39.
ICN, Report on «the Regulation of Nursing» based on a project reported by Margretta Styles for the Professional Services Committe of the ICN, and accepted as polocy by CNR, june 1985. 1986, International Council of Nurses: Geneva.
BuschT. and VaneboJ.O., Organisasjon, ledelse og motivasjon. 2003, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
42.
FlaaP., Innføring i organisasjonsteori. 1995, Oslo.: Universitetsforlaget.
43.
LaiL., The Norwegian banking crisis: Managerial escalation of decline and crisis. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1994. 10: P. 397–408.
44.
SpradleyJ., Participant Observation. 1980, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
45.
KvaleS., Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. 1998, Oslo: ad Notam. Gyldendal.
46.
SandelowskiM., Triangles and crystals: On the geometry on qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 1995. 18: P. 569–573.
47.
SandelowskiM., Focus on qualitative methods. One is the liveliest number: The case orientation of qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 1996. 19(6): P. 525–529.
