Peer leader programs train students in supporting introductory learners in traditional classrooms via instructional sessions of peer-to-peer learning. Assessments of these programs typically focus on benefits to learners rather than leaders, with any gains for leaders shown via self-reported growth measures. This study examined benefits to leaders using additional indexes such as standardized scores of content knowledge and grade point average. Participants were high-achieving psychology students who underwent a pedagogical training program and led instructional sessions for learners weekly. We found evidence that peer leaders experience gains in content knowledge, academic success, and career readiness. Peer leader programs serve as useful additions to academic programs by aiding learning in classrooms and improving leadership abilities and content knowledge in advanced students.
BryantL.ClementD. (2015). Coping strategies of female peer leaders participating in college club sports. Recreational Sports Journal, 39, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1123/rsj.2013-0032
6.
BuskistW.DavisS. F. (2008). Handbook of the teaching of psychology. Blackwell.
7.
DavisB. G. (2009). Tools for teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
8.
DeyoZ. M.HuynhD.RochesterC.SturpeD. A.KiserK. (2011). Readiness for self-directed learning and academic performance in an abilities laboratory course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75, 25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073099/
GosserD. K.JrKampmeierJ. A.Varma-NelsonP. (2010). Peer-led team learning: 2008 James Flack Norris award address. Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed800132w
11.
HughesK. S. (2011). Peer-assisted learning strategies in human anatomy & physiology. The American Biology Teacher, 73, 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2011.73.3.5
KwanP. P.SussmanS.ValenteT. W. (2015). Peer leaders and substance use among high-risk adolescents. Substance Use & Misuse, 50, 283–291. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.977395
MurrayJ. D. (2011). Peer learning and its applications to undergraduate psychology instruction. In MillerR. L.AmselE.KowalewskiB. M.BeinsB.KeithK.PedenB. (Eds.), Promoting student engagement: Programs, techniques and opportunities (Vol. 1, pp. 166–169). Society for the Teaching of Psychology.
17.
ParsellG.BlighJ. (2002). The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Medical Education, 33, 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00298.x
18.
RamirezG. M. (1997). Supplemental instruction: The long-term impact. Journal of Developmental Education, 21(1), 2–28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ580199
19.
SavickasM.PorfeliE. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011
20.
ShookJ. LKeupJ. R. (2012). The benefits of peer leader programs: An overview from the literature. New Directions for Higher Education, 157, 5–16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ975502
21.
SnyderJ. J.SloaneJ. D.DunkR. D. P.WilesJ. R. (2016). Peer-led team learning helps minority students succeed. PLoS Biology, 14(3), e1002398. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002398
SvinickiM.McKeachieW. J. (2012). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (14th ed.). Wadsworth.
24.
University of Missouri. (2005). The SI leader’s guide to supplemental instruction. Curators of the University of Missouri.
25.
WilsonS. B.Varma-NelsonP. (2016). Small groups, significant impact: A review of peer-led team learning research with implications for STEM education researchers and faculty. Journal of Chemical Education, 93, 1686–1702. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00862
