Learning From Teaching: Benefits of Peer Leadership for Peer Leaders in Psychology

Abstract

Peer leader programs train students in supporting introductory learners in traditional classrooms via instructional sessions of peer-to-peer learning. Assessments of these programs typically focus on benefits to learners rather than leaders, with any gains for leaders shown via self-reported growth measures. This study examined benefits to leaders using additional indexes such as standardized scores of content knowledge and grade point average. Participants were high-achieving psychology students who underwent a pedagogical training program and led instructional sessions for learners weekly. We found evidence that peer leaders experience gains in content knowledge, academic success, and career readiness. Peer leader programs serve as useful additions to academic programs by aiding learning in classrooms and improving leadership abilities and content knowledge in advanced students.

Keywords

peer leaders pedagogy leadership

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angelo

T. A.

Cross

K. P.

(1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. Jossey-Bass.

Barkley

(2009). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass.

Blackwell

Katzen

Patel

Sun

Emenike

(2017). Developing the preparation in STEM leadership programs for undergraduate academic peer leaders. The Learning Assistance Review, 22, 49–84. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1142581

Bowles

T. J.

McCoy

A. C.

Bates

(2008). The effect of supplemental instruction on timely graduation. College Student Journal, 42, 853–859. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/psych_facpub/104/

Bryant

Clement

(2015). Coping strategies of female peer leaders participating in college club sports. Recreational Sports Journal, 39, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1123/rsj.2013-0032

Buskist

Davis

S. F.

(2008). Handbook of the teaching of psychology. Blackwell.

Davis

B. G.

(2009). Tools for teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Deyo

Z. M.

Huynh

Rochester

Sturpe

D. A.

Kiser

(2011). Readiness for self-directed learning and academic performance in an abilities laboratory course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75, 25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073099/

EAB. (2018). EAB. https://www.eab.com/

10.

Gosser

D. K.

Jr Kampmeier

J. A.

Varma-Nelson

(2010). Peer-led team learning: 2008 James Flack Norris award address. Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed800132w

11.

Hughes

K. S.

(2011). Peer-assisted learning strategies in human anatomy & physiology. The American Biology Teacher, 73, 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2011.73.3.5

12.

Johnson

Robbins

Loui

(2015). What do students experience as peer leaders of learning teams? Advances in Engineering Education, 4, 1–21. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1011&context=enepubs

13.

Kuh

(2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://provost.tufts.edu/celt/files/High-Impact-Ed-Practices1.pdf

14.

Kwan

P. P.

Sussman

Valente

T. W.

(2015). Peer leaders and substance use among high-risk adolescents. Substance Use & Misuse, 50, 283–291. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.977395

15.

Major Field Tests: Psychology. (2019). https://www.ets.org/mft/about/content/psychology

16.

Murray

J. D.

(2011). Peer learning and its applications to undergraduate psychology instruction. In Miller

R. L.

Amsel

Kowalewski

B. M.

Beins

Keith

Peden

(Eds.), Promoting student engagement: Programs, techniques and opportunities (Vol. 1, pp. 166–169). Society for the Teaching of Psychology.

17.

Parsell

Bligh

(2002). The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Medical Education, 33, 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00298.x

18.

Ramirez

G. M.

(1997). Supplemental instruction: The long-term impact. Journal of Developmental Education, 21(1), 2–28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ580199

19.

Savickas

Porfeli

(2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011

20.

Shook

J. L

Keup

J. R.

(2012). The benefits of peer leader programs: An overview from the literature. New Directions for Higher Education, 157, 5–16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ975502

21.

Snyder

J. J.

Sloane

J. D.

Dunk

R. D. P.

Wiles

J. R.

(2016). Peer-led team learning helps minority students succeed. PLoS Biology, 14(3), e1002398. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002398

22.

Sona Systems, Ltd. (2018). Sona systems: Cloud-based participant management software. https://www.sona-systems.com/default.aspx

23.

Svinicki

McKeachie

W. J.

(2012). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (14th ed.). Wadsworth.

24.

University of Missouri. (2005). The SI leader’s guide to supplemental instruction. Curators of the University of Missouri.

25.

Wilson

S. B.

Varma-Nelson

(2016). Small groups, significant impact: A review of peer-led team learning research with implications for STEM education researchers and faculty. Journal of Chemical Education, 93, 1686–1702. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00862