Flipped pedagogy has become a popular approach in education. While preliminary research suggests that the flipped classroom has a positive effect on learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics and quantitative courses, the research on the flipped classroom in a content heavy social science course is minimal and contradictory. We flipped four class topics in an introduction to psychology course, evaluated resulting student attitudes, and compared students’ performance on the flipped units to their performance on traditionally delivered content. We found mixed results for the effectiveness of the flipped classroom that were moderated by student characteristics and experiences with previous online or flipped courses. Students reported an overall preference for traditional classroom delivery but suggested retaining the flipped approach for some class periods.
ArbaughJ. B.GodfreyM. R.JohnsonM.PollackB. L.NiendorfW. W.WreschW. (2009). Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 71–87. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.006
2.
BergmannJ.SamsA. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Alexandria, VA: International Society for Technology in Education.
3.
BowenJ. A. (2012). Teaching naked: How moving technology out of your classroom will improve student learning. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
4.
ButtA. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation. 6, 33–43.
5.
ChandraV.FisherD. L. (2009). Students’ perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment. Learning Environment Research, 12, 31–41. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9051-6
6.
ChickeringA. W.GamsonZ. F. (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New directions for teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
ChristiansenM. A. (2014). Inverted teaching: Applying a new pedagogy to a university organic chemistry class. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1845–1850. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed400530z
DanielD. B.WoodyW. D. (2010). They hear, but they do not listen: Retention for podcasted material in a classroom context. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 199–203. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00986283.2010.488542
10.
DanielF.BraaschJ. L. G. (2013). Application exercises improve transfer of statistical knowledge in real-world situations. Teaching of Psychology, 40, 200–207. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628313487462
11.
DaviesR. S.DeanD. L.BallN. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 563–580. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
12.
DeslauriersL.SchelewE.WiemanC. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332, 862–864. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783
13.
DunningD.JohnsonK.EhrlingerJ.KrugerJ. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83–87. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01235
FoertschJ.MosesG.StrikwerdaJ.LitzkowM. (2002). Reversing the lecture/homework paradigm using eTEACH web-based streaming video software. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 261–274.
16.
ForseyM.LowM.GlanceD. (2013). Flipping the sociology classroom: Towards a practice of online pedagogy. Journal of Sociology, 49, 471–485. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1440783313504059
17.
FreemanS.EddyS. L.McDonoughM.SmithM. K.OkoraforN.JordtH.WenderothM. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410–8415.
18.
GilboyM. B.HeinerichsS.PazzagliaG. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutritional Education and Behavior, 47, 109–114. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008
19.
GoodwinB.MillerK. (2013). Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Educational Leadership, 70, 78–80.
20.
HarringtonD. (1999). Teaching statistics: A comparison of traditional classroom and programmed instruction/distance learning approaches. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 343–352.
21.
JensenS. S. (2011). In-class versus online video lectures: Similar learning outcomes, but a preference for in-class. Teaching of Psychology, 38, 298–302. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628311421336
22.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
KarpiakC. P. (2011). Assessment of problem-based learning in the undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 251–254.
24.
LageM. J.PlattG. J.TregliaM. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30–43. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1183338
25.
LavelleJ. P.StimpsonM. T.BrillE. D. (2013). Flipped out engineering economy: Converting a traditional class to an inverted model. In KrishnamurthyA.ChanW. K. V (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2013 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference (pp. 397–406). Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).
26.
LewisJ. S.HarrisonM. A. (2012). Online delivery as a course adjunct promotes active learning and student success. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 72–76. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628311430641
McLaughlinJ. E.RothM. T.GlattD. M.GharkholonareheN.DavidsonC. A.GriffinL. M.…MumperR. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89, 1–8.
30.
MoravecM.WilliamsA.Aguilar-RocaN.O’DowdD. K. (2010). Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9, 473–481.
31.
O’BannonB. W.LubkeJ. K.BeardJ. L.BrittV. G. (2011). Using podcasts to replace lecture: Effects of student achievement. Computers & Education, 57, 1885–1892. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.001
32.
PetersonD. J. (2016). The flipped classroom improves student achievement and course satisfaction in a statistics course: A quasi-experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 43, 10–15. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628315620063
33.
PhillipsC. R.TrainorJ. E. (2014). Millennial students and the flipped classroom. Journal of Business and Educational Leadership, 5, 102–112.
SchniederjansM. J.KimE. B. (2005). Relationship of student undergraduate achievement and personality characteristics in a total web-based environment: An empirical study. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3, 205–221.
36.
StelzerT.BrookesD. T.GladdingG.MestreJ. P. (2010). Impact of multimedia learning modules on an introductory course on electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 78, 755–759. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.3369920
37.
TalleyC. P.SchererS. (2013). The enhanced flipped classroom: Increasing academic performance with student-recorded lectures and practice testing in a flipped STEM course. The Journal of Negro Education, 82, 339–357.
38.
WanZ.FangY.NeufeldD. J. (2007). The role of information technology in technology-mediated learning: A review of the past for the future. Journal of Information Systems Education, 18, 183–191.
39.
WilsonS. G. (2013). The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an Undergraduate Statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 40, 193–199. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628313487461
