Research in social psychology has the potential to address real-world issues involving racial stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. Literature on confrontation suggests that addressing racism can be seen as a persuasive act that will allow for more effective interpersonal interactions. In this article, we explore the persuasive communication literature in the context of classroom education on the pervasiveness of racial bias. We examine some of the challenges instructors might face from students. Finally, we suggest strategies that might allow for a more effective classroom experience.
AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (2005). The handbook of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
AllportG. W. (1935). Attitudes. In MurchisonC. M. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (p. 810). Winchester, MA: Clark University Press.
3.
Ashburn-NardoL.MorrisK. A.GoodwinS. A. (2008). The confronting prejudiced responses (CPR) model: Applying CPR in organizations. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 332–342. doi:http://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2008.34251671
4.
BeckerJ. C.SwimJ. K. (2012). Reducing endorsement of benevolent and modern sexist beliefs: Differential effects of addressing harm versus pervasiveness of benevolent sexism. Social Psychology, 43, 127–137. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000091
5.
BrewerM. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situations: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.
6.
CadieuxJ.ChasteenA. L. (2015). You gay bro? Social costs faced by male confronters of antigay prejudice. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2, 436–446.
7.
CzoppA. M.Ashburn-NardoL. (2012). Interpersonal confrontations. In RussellD. W.RussellC. A. (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: Interdisciplinary perspectives on contemporary issues (pp. 175–201). New York, NY: Nova Science.
8.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 532–544. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250923
9.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J.MarkA. Y. (2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 784–803. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.784
10.
DevineP. G.MonteithM. J.ZuwerinkJ. R.ElliotA. J. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 817–830. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.817
11.
DickterC. L. (2012). Confronting hate: Heterosexuals’ responses to anti-gay comments. Journal of Homosexuality, 59, 1113–1130. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.712817
12.
DickterC. L.KittelJ. A.GyurovskiI. I. (2012). Perceptions of non-target confronters in response to racist and heterosexist remarks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 112–119. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.855
13.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
14.
EliezerD.MajorB. (2011). It’s not your fault: The social costs of claiming discrimination on behalf of someone else. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 487–502. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211432894
15.
FocellaE. S.BeanM. G.StoneJ. (2015). Confrontation and beyond: Examining a stigmatized target’s use of a prejudice reduction strategy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 100–114. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12153
16.
GervaisS. J.HillardA. L. (2014). Confronting sexism as persuasion: Effects of a confrontation’s recipient, source, message, and context. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 653–667. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12084
17.
GoodJ. J.Moss-RacusinC. A.SanchezD. T. (2012). When do we confront?: Perceptions of costs and benefits predict confronting discrimination on behalf of the self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 210–226. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312440958
18.
GulkerJ. E.MarkA. Y.MonteithM. J. (2013). Confronting prejudice: The who, what, and why of confrontation effectiveness. Social Influence, 8, 280–293.
19.
HillardA. L.RyanC. S.GervaisS. J. (2013). Reactions to the implicit association test as an educational tool: A mixed methods study. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 495–516. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9219-5
20.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2001). Stop complaining!: The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254–263. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272010
21.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2003). Derogating the victim: The interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 227–237. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/13684302030063001
22.
KroeperK. M.SanchezD. T.HimmelsteinM. S. (2014). Heterosexual men’s confrontation of sexual prejudice: The role of precarious manhood. Sex Roles, 70, 1–13. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0306-z
23.
LaPiereR. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13, 230–237.
24.
MacNellL.DriscollA.HuntA. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 291–303.
25.
MonteithM. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 469–485.
26.
NierJ. A.GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.BankerB. S.WardC. M.RustM. C. (2001). Changing interracial evaluations and behavior: The effects of a common group identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 299–316.
27.
NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 215–218. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406922
28.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
29.
PettyR. E.FlemingM. A.PriesterJ. R.FeinsteinA. H. (2001). Individual versus group interest violation: Surprise as a determinant of argument scrutiny and persuasion. Social Cognition, 19, 418–442. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.4.418.20758
30.
PettyR. E.FlemingM. A.WhiteP. H. (1999). Stigmatized sources and persuasion: Prejudice as a determinant of argument scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 19–34. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.19
31.
RasinskiH. M.GeersA. L.CzoppA. M. (2013). “I guess what he said wasn’t that bad”: Dissonance in nonconfronting targets of prejudice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 856–869. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213484769
32.
RokeachM. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
RokeachM.CochraneR. (1972). Self-confrontation and confrontation with another as determinants of long-term value change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2, 283–292. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1972.tb01280.x
34.
RokeachM.McLellanD. D. (1972). Feedback of information about the values and attitudes of self and others as determinants of long-term cognitive and behavioral change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2, 236–251. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1972.tb01275.x
35.
SchmaderT.CroftA.WhiteheadJ.StoneJ. (2013). A peek inside the targets’ toolbox: How stigmatized targets deflect discrimination by invoking a common identity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 141–149.
36.
SchultzJ. R.MaddoxK. B. (2013). Shooting the messenger to spite the message? Exploring reactions to claims of racial bias. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 346–358. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212475223
37.
SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A.SalvatoreJ.HillD. M. (2006). Silence is not golden: The intrapersonal consequences of not confronting prejudice. In LevinS.Van LaarC. (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 65–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617057
38.
SheltonJ. N.StewartR. E. (2004). Confronting perpretators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 215–223. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00138.x
39.
SmithG.AndersonK. J. (2005). Students’ ratings of professors: The teaching style contingency for Latino/a professors. Journal of Latinos and Education, 4, 115–136.
40.
SnyderT. D.DillowS. A. (2015). Digest of Education Statistics 2013 (NCES 2015-011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
41.
Son HingL. S.LiW.ZannaM. P. (2002). Inducing hypocrisy to reduce prejudicial responses among aversive racists. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 71–78. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1484
42.
StoneJ.WhiteheadJ.SchmaderT.FocellaE. (2011). Thanks for asking: Self-affirming questions reduce backlash when stigmatized targets confront prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 589–598. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.016
43.
SwimJ. K.GervaisS. J.PearsonN.StangorC. (2009). Managing the message: Using social influence and attitude change strategies to confront interpersonal discrimination. In ButeraF.LevineJ. M. (Eds.), Coping with minority status: Responses to exclusion and inclusion (pp. 55–81). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804465.004
44.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
45.
ToddA. R.BodenhausenG. V.RichesonJ. A.GalinskyA. D. (2011). Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1027–1042.
46.
ToddA. R.GalinskyA. D. (2014). Perspective-taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 374–387.
47.
WilkinsC. L.KaiserC. R. (2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25, 439–446. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508412
48.
ZouL. X.DickterC. L. (2013). Perceptions of racial confrontation: The role of color blindness and comment ambiguity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19, 92–96. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031115
