Abstract
Policy failure is often explained post-hoc through isolated theoretical lenses. This article proposes a unified meta-framework: the Administrative Friction Model. It posits that policy efficacy is inversely proportional to the cumulative resistance encountered across three dimensions: (1) informational friction (limited knowledge), (2) motivational friction (misaligned incentives), and (3) operational friction (implementation complexity). By synthesizing foundational theories, this framework provides a holistic diagnostic tool for predicting vulnerabilities during policy design. Its utility is demonstrated by analyzing Ostrom’s polycentric governance as a system designed to minimize all three frictions. I argue that architecting low-friction systems is critical for improving policy outcomes.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
