Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examines the impact of COVID-19 on the interaction between citizens and local governments through Twitter and conducts sentiment analysis within the accountability process guided by dialogical theory. An open-source intelligence tool extracted 1,224,725 tweets from 126 Hispanic–American municipalities during the first wave. Statistical methods identified tweet publication factors, and the NRC Emotion Lexicon was used for natural language processing. The results demonstrate that Twitter activity increased during the crisis, both reflecting changes in accountability dynamics and heightened dialogue between citizens and local governments and highlighting negative tones and emotions such as trust and anticipation.

Keywords

accountability dialogic communication theory Hispanic–American emotions sentiment analysis Twitter

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abd-Alrazaq

Alhuwail

Househ

Hamdi

Shah

(2020). Top concerns of tweeters during the COVID-19 pandemic: Infoveillance study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(4), e19016. https://doi.org/10.2196/19016

Adwan

O. Y.

Al-Tawil

Huneiti

A. M.

Shahin

R. A.

Abu Zayed

A. A.

Al-Dibsi

R. H.

(2020). Twitter sentiment analysis approaches: A survey. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(15), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i15.14467

Alharbi

A. S. M.

de Doncker

(2019). Twitter sentiment analysis with a deep neural network: An enhanced approach using user behavioral information. Cognitive Systems Research, 54, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.001

Amnesty International. (2021). Silenced and misinformed. Freedom of expression in danger during COVID-19. https://www.amnesty.org/es/documents/pol30/4751/2021/es/#:~:text=Silenciamiento%20y%20desinformaci%C3%B3n%3A%20La%20libertad%20de%20expresi%C3%B3n%2C%20en,Number%3A%20POL%2030%2F4751%2F2021%20Censura%20y%20libertad%20de%20expresi%C3%B3n

Antipova

(2021). Analysis of the COVID-19 impacts on employment and unemployment across the multi-dimensional social disadvantaged areas. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), Article 100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSAHO.2021.100224

Arpaci

Alshehabi

Al-Emran

Khasawneh

Mahariq

Abdeljawad

Hassanien

A. E.

(2020). Analysis of Twitter data using evolutionary clustering during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers, Materials and Continua, 65(1), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2020.011489

Arunachalam

Sarkar

(2013, October). The new eye of government: Citizen sentiment analysis in social media [Conference session]. Proceedings of the IJCNLP 2013 Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media (SocialNLP), Nagoya, Japan (pp. 23–28).

Bandeira

Carranza

(2020). Reactions to the pandemic in Latin America and Brazil: Are religions essential services? International Journal of Latin American Religions, 4(2), 170–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41603-020-00116-0

Bellucci

Manetti

(2017). Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting? Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(4), 874–905. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2122

10.

Bertot

Jaeger

P. T.

Grimes

J. M.

Bertot

J. C.

Jaeger

P. T.

Grimes

J. M.

(2012). Promoting transparency and Accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161211214831

11.

Bonsón

Perea

Bednárová

(2019). Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.001

12.

Bonsón

Torres

Royo

Flores

(2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001

13.

Boon-Itt

Skunkan

(2020). Public perception of the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter: Sentiment analysis and topic modeling study. JMIR Public Health Surveillance, 6(4), E21978. https://doi.org/10.2196/21978

14.

Bosco

Patti

Bolioli

(2013). Developing corpora for sentiment analysis: The case of irony and senti-TUT. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(2), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2013.28

15.

Bovens

(2005). Public accountability. In Ferlie

Lynn

L.E.

Pollitt

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 182–208). Oxford University Press.

16.

Bovens

(2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

17.

Bovens

(2010). Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a Mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486119

18.

Brooks

S. K.

Webster

R. K.

Smith

L. E.

Woodland

Wessely

Greenberg

Rubin

G. J.

(2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8

19.

Chen

H. M.

Franks

P. C.

Evans

(2016). Exploring government uses of social media through Twitter sentiment analysis. Journal of Digital Information Management, 14(5), 290–301. http://dline.info/fpaper/jdim/v14i5/jdimv14i5_2.pdf

20.

Chen

Min

Zhang

Wang

Evans

(2020). Unpacking the black box: How to promote citizen engagement through government social media during the COVID-19 crisis. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, Article 106380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106380

21.

Christensen

Lægreid

(2015). Performance and accountability: A theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment. Public Organization Review, 15(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0267-2

22.

Cinelli

Quattrociocchi

Galeazzi

Valensise

C. M.

Brugnoli

Schmidt

A. L.

Zola

Zollo

Scala

(2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 16598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5

23.

Cortis

Davis

(2021). Over a decade of social opinion mining: A systematic review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(7), 4873–4965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10030-2

24.

Djankov

Panizza

(2020). Developing economies after COVID-19: An introduction. In Djankov

Panizza

(Eds.), COVID-19 in developing economies (pp. 8–23). Centre for Economic Policy Research.

25.

Dubey

Biswas

Ghosh

Chatterjee

Dubey

M. J.

Chatterjee

Lahiri

Lavie

C. J.

(2020). Psychosocial impact of COVID-19. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, 14(5), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.035

26.

Dubnick

(2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the Mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 376–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/3381159

27.

Ekman

(1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068

28.

Farias

D. I. H.

Rosso

(2017). Irony, sarcasm, and sentiment analysis. In Pozzi

F. A.

Fersini

Messina

Lio

(Eds.), Sentiment analysis in social networks (pp. 113–128). Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804412-4.00007-3

29.

Gálvez-Rodríguez

del

Sáez-Martín

García-Tabuyo

Caba-Pérez

(2018). Exploring dialogic strategies in social media for fostering citizens’ interactions with Latin American local governments. Public Relations Review, 44(2), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.03.003

30.

Gandía

J. L.

Huguet

(2021). Textual analysis and sentiment analysis in accounting. Spanish Accounting Review, 24(2), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.6018/RCSAR.386541

31.

Garcia

Berton

(2021). Topic detection and sentiment analysis in Twitter content related to COVID-19 from Brazil and the USA. Applied Soft Computing, 101, Article 107057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107057

32.

Greiling

Spraul

(2010). Accountability and the challenges of information disclosure. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 338–377.

33.

Haro-De-Rosario

Sáez-Martin

Gálvez-Rodríguez

(2017). Facebook as a dialogic strategic tool for European Local Governments. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 50, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.2017.000

34.

Haro-de-Rosario

Sáez-Martín

Caba-Pérez

(2018). Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook? New Media & Society, 20(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816645652

35.

Hernández-Farías

Benedí

J. M.

Rosso

(2015). Applying basic features from sentiment analysis for automatic irony detection. In Paredes

Cardoso

Pardo

(Eds.), Pattern recognition and image analysis. IbPRIA 2015. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 337–344). Springer.

36.

Hevia

Neumeyer

(2020). A perfect storm: COVID-19 in emerging economies. In Djankov

Panizza

(Eds.), COVID-19 in developing economies (pp. 25–37). Centre for Economic Policy Research.

37.

Hoffmann

(2018). Too many Americans are trapped in fear, violence and poverty: A psychology-informed sentiment analysis of campaign speeches from the 2016 US presidential election. Linguistics Vanguard, 4(1), 20170008. https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGVAN-2017-0008/PDF

38.

Hong

Kim

S. H.

(2016). Political polarisation on Twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007

39.

Joshi

Deshpande

(2018). Twitter sentiment analysis with a deep neural network: An enhanced approach using user behavioral information. International Journal of Computer Applications, 180(47), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3360001

40.

Karakiza

(2015). The impact of social media in the public sector. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1214

41.

Kent

M. L.

Taylor

(1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X

42.

Kruspe

Häberle

Kuhn

Zhu

X. X.

(2020). Cross-language sentiment analysis of European Twitter messages during the COVID-19 pandemic. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2008.12172. http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.12172

43.

Kumar

Garg

(2020). Systematic literature review on context-based sentiment analysis in social multimedia. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79, 15349–15380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7346-5

44.

Kumar

Jaiswal

(2020). Systematic literature review of sentiment analysis on Twitter using soft computing techniques. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 32(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.5107

45.

Landi

Costantini

Fasan

Bonazzi

(2022). Public engagement and dialogic accounting through social media during COVID-19 crisis: A missed opportunity? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 35(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2020-4884

46.

Leon-Silva

J. M.

Perea-Khalifi

(2024). Crisis management through citizen engagement on Twitter: The case of the covid-19 pandemic in Latin American municipalities. International Public Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2024.2382733

47.

Lindberg

S. I.

(2013). Mapping accountability: Core concept and subtypes. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313477761

48.

Lindsay

B. R.

(2011). Social media and disasters: Current uses, future options, and policy considerations. US Congressional Research Service Report on Homeland Security.

49.

Malecki

K. M.

Keating

J. A.

Safdar

(2021). Crisis communication and public perception of COVID-19 risk in the era of social media. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 72(4), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa758

50.

Manetti

Bellucci

(2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 29(6), 985–1011. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1797

51.

Manetti

Bellucci

Oliva

(2021). Unpacking dialogic accounting: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9), 250–283.https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2020-4736

52.

Manguri

N. Ramadhan

R. Mohammed Amin

. (2020). Twitter sentiment analysis on worldwide COVID-19 outbreaks. Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research, 5, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.24017/COVID.8

53.

Mergel

(2013). A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015

54.

Mohammad

S. M.

Turney

P. D.

(2010, June 5). Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: Using mechanical turk to create an emotion lexicon [Conference session]. Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, Los Angeles, United States (pp. 26–34).

55.

Mohammad

S. M.

Turney

P. D.

(2013). Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3), 436–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x

56.

Mori

Barabaschi

Cantoni

Virtuani

(2021). Local governments’ communication through Facebook. Evidences from COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Journal of Public Affairs, 21, e2551. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2551

57.

Nacher

Rousseau

Succo

Andrieu

Gaillet

Michaud

Servas

Douine

Schaub

Adenis

Demar

Abboud

Epelboin

Djossou

(2021). The epidemiology of COVID 19 in the Amazon and the Guianas: Similarities, differences, and international comparisons. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 586299. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2021.586299

58.

Norris

(2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Canadian Journal of Communication, 28(1), 1352. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2003v28n1a1352

59.

Oprisor

Tiron-Tudor

Nistor

C. S.

(2016). The integrated reporting system: A new tool for strategic management in the public sector. Audit Financiar, 14(7), 749–762. https://doi.org/10.20869/AUDITF/2016/139/749

60.

Padeiro

Bueno-Larraz

Freitas

. (2021). Local governments’ use of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Portugal. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), Article 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101620

61.

Palen

Liu

S. B.

(2007, April 28–May 3). Citizen communications in crisis: Anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation [Conference session]. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA (pp. 727–736). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240735

62.

Plutchik

(1982). A psychoevolutionary theory of emotions. Social Science Information, 21(4–5), 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901882021004003

63.

Plutchik

(1994). The psychology and biology of emotion. HarperCollins College Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-98997-000

64.

Plutchik

(2001). The Nature of Emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientist, 89(4), 344–350. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27857503

65.

Rajput

N. K.

Grover

B. A.

Rathi

V. K.

(2020). Word frequency and sentiment analysis of Twitter messages during Coronavirus pandemic. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv, February. http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.03925

66.

Rocca

Giacomini

Zola

(2020). Environmental disclosure and sentiment analysis: State of the art and opportunities for public-sector organisations. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 617–646. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2019-0563

67.

Roy

Ghosh

(2020). Factors affecting COVID-19 infected and death rates inform lockdown-related policymaking. PLoS ONE, 15(10), e0241165. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0241165

68.

Ruz

G. A.

Henríquez

P. A.

Mascareño

(2020). Sentiment analysis of Twitter data during critical events through Bayesian networks classifiers. Future Generation Computer Systems, 106, 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.01.005

69.

Sáez Martín

Haro de Rosario

Caba Pérez

M. D. C

. (2015). Using Twitter for dialogic communication: Local government strategies in the European Union. Local Government Studies, 41(3), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2014.991866

70.

Sarlan

Nadam

Basri

(2014). Twitter sentiment analysis system [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Technology and Multimedia, Putrajaya, Malaysia (pp. 212–216). IEEE.

71.

Saxton

G. D.

Guo

(2011). Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organisations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009341086

72.

Schillemans

Van Twist

Vanhommerig

(2013). Innovations in accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(3), 407–435. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360302

73.

Shaynn-Ly Kwan

Hui Lim

. (2020, December 7–10). Understanding public sentiments, opinions and topics about COVID-19 using Twitter [Conference session]. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2020, The Hague, Netherlands (pp. 623–626). IEEE.

74.

Smyth

(2007). Public accountability: A critical approach. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 6(2), 27–45.

75.

Soriano

C. R.

Roldan

M. D. G.

Cheng

Oco

(2016). Social media and civic engagement during calamities: The case of Twitter use during typhoon Yolanda. Philippine Political Science Journal, 37(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2016.1146486

76.

Stieglitz

Dang-Xuan

(2013). Emotions and information diffusion in social media - Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217–248. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408

77.

Stojkoski

Utkovski

Jolakoski

Tevdovski

Kocarev

(2022). Correlates of the country differences in the infection and mortality rates during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Bayesian model averaging. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10894-6

78.

Stone

J. A.

Can

S. H.

(2020). Linguistic analysis of municipal twitter feeds: Factors influencing frequency and engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 37, Artilc e101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101468

79.

Suárez-Rico

Y. M.

Gómez-Villegas

García-Benau

M. A.

(2018). Exploring Twitter for CSR disclosure: Influence of CEO and firm characteristics in Latin American Companies. Sustainability, 10(8), 2617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082617

80.

Sykora

Elayan

Jackson

T. W.

(2020). A qualitative analysis of sarcasm, irony and related #hashtags on Twitter. Big Data & Society, 7(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720972735

81.

Torruella

(2007). The insular cases: The establishment of a regime of political apartheid. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 29(2), 283. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jil/vol29/iss2/1

82.

Tsao

S. F.

Chen

Tisseverasinghe

Yang

Butt

Z. A.

(2021). What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: A scoping review. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(3), e175–e194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30315-0

83.

Van de Walle

Cornelissen

(2014). Performance reporting. In Bovens

Goodin

Schillemans

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook on public accountability (pp. 441–455). Oxford University Press.

84.

Vanderweele

T. J.

(2020). Challenges estimating total lives lost in COVID-19 decisions: Consideration of mortality related to unemployment, social isolation, and depression. JAMA, 324(5), 445–446. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2020.12187

85.

Wang

Kim

Xiao

Jung

Y. J.

(2017). Networked narratives on Humans of New York: A content analysis of social media engagement on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.042

86.

Wang

Yang

(2020). Dialogic communication on social media: How organisations use Twitter to build dialogic relationships with their publics. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, Article 106183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106183

87.

Watkins

B. A.

(2017). Experimenting with dialogue on Twitter: An examination of the influence of the dialogic principles on engagement, interaction, and attitude. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.002

88.

Weitzel

Freire

R. A.

Quaresma

Gonçalves

Prati

(2015). How does irony affect sentiment analysis tools? In Pereira

Machado

Costa

Cardoso

(Eds.), Progress in artificial intelligence. EPIA 2015. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 803–808). Springer.

89.

Willems

Van Dooren

(2012). Coming to terms with accountability: Combining multiple forums and functions. Public Management Review, 14(7), 1011–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.662446

90.

Wirtz

J. G.

Zimbres

T. M.

(2018). A systematic analysis of research applying ‘principles of dialogic communication’ to organisational websites, blogs, and social media: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(1–2), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1455146

91.

Yang

Deng

Zhang

Mao

(2021). Promoting public engagement during the COVID-19 crisis: How effective is the Wuhan local government’s information release? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010118

92.

Yaqub

Chun

S. A.

Atluri

Vaidya

(2017). Analysis of political discourse on Twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.001

93.

Zacharias

Poldi

(2018). TWINT-Twitter intelligence tool (Python). GitHub. https://github.com/twintproject/twint

94.

Zad

Jimenez

Finlayson

(2021, August). Hell hath no fury? Correcting bias in the NRC emotion lexicon [Conference session]. Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH 2021) (pp. 102–113).

95.

Zavattaro

S. M.

French

P. E.

Mohanty

S. D.

(2015). A sentiment analysis of US local government tweets: The connection between tone and citizen involvement. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.003

96.

Zhang

Chan

Rosso

(2019). Irony detection via sentiment-based transfer learning. Information Processing & Management, 56(5), 1633–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IPM.2019.04.006

97.

Zimbra

Abbasi

Zeng

Chen

(2018). The state-of-the-art in twitter sentiment analysis. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 9(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185045

Local Government Accountability to Citizens as COVID-19 Took Hold: Sentiment Analysis of Tweets in Hispanic–American Countries

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References