Managerial sciences are generally considered to be the art of efficiently running business. Their influence, though, extends far beyond the corporate sphere, and they play an important part in public administration and in particular in its dialog with society at large. Here, from the viewpoint of historical institutionalism, we document one of the earliest successful examples of the wider application of management science: the 1914 antitrust rules (the Clayton Antitrust and Federal Trade Commission Acts) from the perspectives of economic scholars as technical experts, the early years of the Wilson administration, and the spheres of business and society. The societal debate about business and efficiency and the successive implementation of scientific managerial ideas in the administrative sphere, saw management science permeate the whole of American society and become an almost irrefutable aspect of everyday life and representations, thereby enabling it to spread well beyond the boundaries of the firm.
AggerE. E. (1913). Monopoly and competitive prices. American Economic Review, 3(3), 589–597.
2.
BergerP.LuckmannT (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
3.
BrandeisL. (1911). Scientific management and the railroads. The Engineering Magazine.
4.
ClarkJ. B. (1914). Recent Trust decisions and business—discussion. American Economic Review, 4, 192–193.
5.
ClarkM. J. (1911). Rates for public utilities. The American Economic Review, 1(3), 473–487.
6.
ClarkM. J. (1913). Frontiers of regulation and what lies beyond. The American Economic Review, 3(1), 114–125.
7.
CookeM. L. (1913). The Spirit and social significance of scientific management. Journal of Political Economy, 21(6), 481–493.
8.
CummingsS.BridgmanT.HassardJ.RowlinsonM. (2017). A new history of management. Cambridge University Press.
9.
De RozarioP.PesqueuxY. (2018). Théorie des organisations. Pearson.
10.
DurandE. D.RawlesW. A.Le RossignolJ. E.PutnamG. E.BuellC. J.CustisV.ClarkJ. M.FolwellW. W.HotchkissW. E. (1914). Recent trust decisions and business–discussion. The American Economic Review, 4(1), 173–195.
11.
FioritoL. (2013). When economics faces the Economy: John Bates Clark and the 1914 antitrust legislation. Review of Political Economy, 25(1), 139–163.
12.
FollettM. P. (1918). The new state: Group organization the solution of popular government. Longmans.
13.
FrancoM. P. V.GaspardM.MuellerT. (2019). Time discounting in Harold Hotelling’s approach to natural resource economics: The unsolved ethical question. Ecological Economics, 163, 52–60.
14.
FreyJ. P. (1913). The relationship of scientific management to labor. Journal of Political Economy, 21(5), 400–411.
15.
GilbrethF. B. (1913). Units, methods, and devices of measurement under scientific management. Journal of Political Economy, 21(7), 618–629.
16.
GilmanC. P. (1913). The waste of private housekeeping. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 48(1), 91–95.
17.
GrayJ. H. (1914). The regulation of public service corporations: The vagaries of valuation. The American Economic Review, 4(1), 18–44.
18.
HaberS. (1964). Efficiency and uplift: Scientific management in the progressive era 1890-1920. University of Chicago Press.
19.
HaysS. P. (1999). Conservation and the gospel of efficiency: The progressive conservation movement, 1890-1920. University of Pittsburgh Press.
20.
Henry Ford’s Mirror of America. (1964). National Archives and records administration.
21.
HotchkinsW. E. (1914). Recent Trust decisions and business. The American Economic Review, 4(1), 158–172.
22.
HowellH. (2012). Coping with competition: Cooperation and collusion in the US stove industry, c.1870–1930. Business History Review, 86(4), 657–692.
23.
JenksJ. W. (1912). Economic aspect of the recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court on Trusts. Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 346–357.
24.
JonesE. D. (1915). The relation of Education to Industrial Efficiency: The Study of the general principles of administration. The American Economic Review, 5(1), 209–226.
25.
KendallH. P. (1913). Systematized and Scientific Management. Journal of Political Economy, 21(7), 593–617.
26.
KinleyD. (1914). The renewed extension off government control of Economic Life: Annual Annual Address of the President. The American Economic Review, 4(1), 3–17.
27.
Le GoffJ. (2014). L’inconscient managérial à La lumière des Médias. Marshall McLuhan, La Mariée Mécanique : Folklore de l’homme Industriel. Économies et Sociétés, 48(1), 97–111.
28.
LeonardT. C. (2017). Illiberal Reformers: Race, eugenics, & American economics in the progressive era. Princeton University Press.
29.
MahoneyJ.ThelenK. (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press.
30.
MartyF.KiratT. (2021). The late emerging consensus among American economists on antitrust laws in the Second New Deal (1935-1941). History of Economic Ideas, 29(1), 11–51.
31.
MeadeE. S. (1912). The economies of combination. Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 358–372.
32.
RaadscheldersJ. C. N. (2002). Woodrow Wilson on the history of government. passing fad or constitutive framework for his philosophy of governance?Administration & Society, 34(5), 579–598.
33.
RaadscheldersJ. C. N.FryB. R. (2023). Mastering public administration, from Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. Waveland Press.
34.
RosserC. (2010). Woodrow Wilson’s administrative thought and German political theory. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 547–556.
35.
RowlinsonM.HassardJ. (2014). History and the cultural turn in organization studies. In MarceloB.WadhwaniD. (Eds.), Organizations in time, history, theory, methods (pp. 147–165). Oxford University Press.
36.
SagerF.RosserC. (2009). Weber, Wilson, and Hegel: Theories of modern bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1136–1147.
37.
SchumpeterJ.YoungA. A.DewsnupE. R.DixonF. H.BoyntonA. J.HaneyL. H. (1914). Railway rate making: Discussion. The American Economic Review, 4(1), 81–100.
38.
SelznickP. (1957). Leadership in administration: Sociological interpretation. Harper & Row.
39.
SteinmoS. (2008). What is historical institutionalism? In Della PortaD.MichaelK. (Eds.), Approaches in the social sciences (pp.150–178). Cambridge University Press.
40.
StevensW. H. S. (1914). The Trade Commission Act. The American Economic Review, 4(4), 840–855.
41.
SuddabyR.FosterW.MillsA. (2014). Historical institutionalism. In BucheliM.WadhwaniD. (Eds.), Organizations in time, history, theory, methods (pp. 100–123). Oxford University Press.
42.
TaussigF. W.JonesE.GrayJ. H.SpragueO. M. W.CarverT. N.RipleyW. Z.StanleyF. E. (1913). The economics of Governmental Price Regulation–discussion. The American Economic Review, 3(1), 132–142.
43.
TaylorF. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers Publishers.
44.
TaylorC. (2003). Modern Social Imaginaries. Duke University Press.
45.
ThompsonC. B. (1913). The relation of scientific management to the wage problem. Journal of Political Economy, 21(7), 630–642.
46.
TichiC. (1987). Shifting gears: Technology, literature, culture in Modernist America. University Of North Carolina Press.
47.
ÜsdikenB.KippingM. (2014). History and organization studies: A long-term view. In BucheliM.WadhwaniD. (Eds.), Organizations in time. History, theory, methods (pp. 32–55). Oxford University Press.
48.
WillisH. P. (1912). Political obstacles to anti-trust legislation. Journal of Political Economy, 20(6), 588–598.
49.
WilsonW. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222.
50.
WinermanM. (2003). The origins of the FTC: Concentration, cooperation, control, and competition. Antitrust Law Journal, 71(1), 1–97.
51.
WrenD.BedeianA. G. (2008). The evolution of management thought. John Wiley & Sons.
52.
WrenD. A.GreenwoodR. G. (1998). Management innovators: The people and ideas that have shaped modern business. Oxford University Press.
53.
WrightC. W. (1912). The Trust Problem: Prevention versus alleviation. Journal of Political Economy, 20(6), 574–587.
54.
YoungA. A. (1915a). The Sherman Act and the new anti-trust legislation: I. Journal of Political Economy, 23(3), 201–220.
55.
YoungA. A. (1915b). The Sherman Act and the new anti-trust legislation: II. Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 305–326.
56.
YoungA. A. (1915c). “The Sherman Act and the new anti-trust legislation: III. Journal of Political Economy, 23(5), 417–436.
