This article reviews Deil Wright’s textbook, Understanding Intergovernmental Relations, and assesses its current relevance to its field of coverage. Wright’s last edition of this book was published in 1988. This article, after describing significant lessons from the textbook, summarizes Wright’s related research and commentary from the following two decades, and also analyzes three current intergovernmental topics based on four of Wright’s most important metaphors and historical observations. The 1988 book remains relevant to intergovernmental relations today, though it only tangentially informs the more cross-sectoral turn that the field has taken in recent years.
AgranoffRobert. 2007. Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2.
BanovetzJames M.1979. Understanding intergovernmental relations by Deil S. Wright (book review). Publius: The Journal of Federalism9:140–42.
3.
BrudneyJeffrey L. 2009. In memory of Deil S. Wright: It was never “Dullsville.”Public Administration Review70:184–5.
4.
BrudneyJeffrey L.Ted HebertF.WrightDeil S.. 1999. Reinventing government in the American states: Measuring and explaining administrative reform. Public Administration Review59:19–30.
5.
BrudneyJeffrey L.WrightDeil S.. 2002. Revisiting administrative reform in the American states: The status of reinventing government during the 1990s. Public Administration Review62:353–61.
6.
BrudneyJeffrey L.WrightDeil S.. 2009. The “revolt in dullsville” revisited: Lessons for theory, practice, and research from the American State Administrators Project, 1964-2008. Public Administration Review70:25–37.
7.
BurkeBrendan F.ChoChung-laeWrightDeil S.. 2008. Continuity and change in executive leadership: Insights from the perspectives of state agency administrators. In press, Public Administration Review68:29–37.
8.
BurkeBrendanFergusonMargaret. 2010. Going alone or moving together: Canadian and American middle tier strategies on climate change. Publius: The Journal of Federalism40:436–59.
9.
ChoiYoo-sungChoChung-laeWrightDeil S.BrudneyJeffrey L.. 2005. Dimensions of contracting for service delivery by American state administrative agencies: Exploring linkages between intergovernmental relations and intersectoral administration. Public Performance & Management Review29:46–66.
10.
ConlanTim. 2006. From cooperative to opportunistic federalism: Reflections on the half-century anniversary of the Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Public Administration Review66:663–76.
11.
DometriusNelson C.BowlingCynthia J.BrudneyJeffrey L.ChoChung-laeFergusonMargaret R.LightAlfred R.RyuJay Eungha. 2009. Deil S. Wright. PS: Political Science and Politics42:790–92.
12.
GazleyBeth. 2010. Why not partner with local government? Nonprofit managerial perceptions of collaborative disadvantage. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly39:51–76.
13.
HandschuhLeighRiversNicole. 2013. Boston’s Higher Ground: A stabilizing force in the aftermath of the Roxbury Comprehensive Health Center (Roxcomp) closure. Boston, MA: Moakley Center for Public Management.
14.
HoogheLiesbetMarksGary. 2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multilevel governance. American Political Science Review97:233–44.
15.
HoriuchiCatherine. 2007. One policy makes no difference?Administrative Theory & Praxis29:432–49.
16.
KraneDaleWrightDeil S.. 1997. Intergovernmental management. In The International Encyclopedia of Policy and Administration, ed. ShafritzJay M.. Boulder, 1161–69. CO: Westview Press.
17.
LazarusRichard J.2009. Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review94:1153–233.
18.
McGuireMichael. 2006. Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review66:33–43.
19.
MooreMark H.1995. Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
O’LearyRosemaryVijNidhi. 2012. Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going?American Review of Public Administration42:507–22.
21.
O’TooleLaurence JJrChristensonRobert K., eds. 2013. American intergovernmental relations: Foundations, perspectives, and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
22.
RabeBarry G.2004. Statehouse and greenhouse: The emerging politics of American climate change policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
23.
RabeBarry G., ed. 2010. Greenhouse governance: Addressing climate change in America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
24.
RittelHorstWebberM.. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences4:155–69.
25.
RobertsNancy. 2000. Wicked problems and approaches to their resolution. International Public Management Review1(January):1–19.
26.
RosenbaumSara. 2013. National Foundation of Independent Business v Sebelius and the Medicaid aftermath. Public Administration Review73:S21–S23.
27.
SalamonLester M.2003. The resilient sector: The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
28.
SchafritzJay M.HydeAlbert C.. 1997. Classics of public administration. 4th Ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
29.
ScheberleDenise. 2004. Federalism and environmental policy: Trust and the politics of implementation. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
30.
SchonDonald A.1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
31.
StephensG. RossWikstromNelson. 2007. American intergovernmental relations: A fragmented federal polity. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
ThompsonFrank. 2002. Reinvention in the states: Ripple or tide?Public Administration Review62:362–67.
33.
WeissertCarol S. 2009. In memoriam: Samuel H. Beer and Deil S. Wright. Publius: The Journal of Federalism39:707–8.
34.
WeissertCarol S.2011. Beyond marble cakes and picket fences: What U.S. federalism scholars can learn from comparative work. Journal of Politics73:965–79.
35.
WhitakerGordonAltman-SauerLydianHendersonMargaret. 2004. Mutual accountability between governments and non-profits: Moving beyond “surveillance” to “service.”American Review of Public Administration34:115–33.
WrightDeil S.1990. Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management: Historical reflections and conceptual comparisons. Public Administration Review50:168–78.
38.
WrightDeil S.2003. Federalism and intergovernmental relations: Traumas, tensions, and trends. Spectrum: The Journal of State Government:10–13.
39.
WrightDeil S.2009. Book review of Intergovernmental management for the 21st century. State & Local Government Review39:709–11.
40.
WrightDeil S.FernandezSergio. 2004. Interview with Deil Wright. State & Local Government Review36:151–5.
41.
WrightDeil S.StenbergCarl W.ChoChung-lae. 2009. American federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management. Foundations of Public Administration. Washington, DC: ASPA.
