Little is known about public perceptions of how FOI laws influence government operations or impact citizens’ daily lives. A large representative sample of U.S. adults was surveyed for support of FOI laws and perceptions of FOI efficacy. Findings showed advanced education and higher perceptions of general government efficacy to be strongly significant in predicting both support for FOI and greater FOI efficacy. Males and liberal respondents also demonstrated significance in predicting support for FOI and higher FOI efficacy, while individuals identifying as Black race was a significant negative predictor in support for FOI and whether FOI improved government operations and accountability.
AbramsonP. R.AldrichJ. H. (1982). The decline of electoral participation in America. American Political Science Review, 76(3), 502–521.
2.
AndersonJ.PritchardD.CarmodyC. (2022). Policy liberalism and public records laws in the American states. Communication Law and Policy, 27(1), 30–48.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
4.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
5.
BannisterF.ConnollyR. (2011). Trust and transformational government: A proposed framework for research. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 137–147.
6.
BauhrM.GrimesM. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications off transparency for social accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–320.
7.
BoxallB. (1998, October3). California and the West; Government secrecy seen as a problem; poll: Majority of voters back release of more information. Los Angeles Times, A3.
8.
CampbellA.GurinG.MillerW. E. (1954). The voter decides. Row, Peterson and Co.
9.
CicatielloL.De SimoneE.GaetaG. L. (2018). Cross-country heterogeneity in government transparency and citizens’ political efficacy: A multilevel empirical analysis. Administration & Society, 50(4), 595–623.
CordisA. S.WarrenP. L. (2014). Sunshine as disinfectant: The effect of state Freedom of Information Act laws on corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 115, 18–36.
12.
CuccinielloM.PorumbescuG. A.GrimmelikhuijsenS. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44.
13.
CuillierD. (2004). The public’s concern for privacy invasion and its relationship to support or access to government records. Newspaper Research Journal, 25(4), 95–103.
14.
CuillierD. (2008). Access attitudes: A social learning approach to examining community engagement and support for press access to government records. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(3), 549–576.
15.
CuillierD.PinkletonB. E. (2011). Suspicion and secrecy: Political attitudes and their relationship to support for freedom of information. Communication Law and Policy, 16(3), 227–254.
16.
CuillierD.PiotrowskiS. J. (2009). Internet information-seeking and its relation to support for access to government records. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 441–449.
17.
de Fine LichtJ. (2014). Policy area as a potential moderator of transparency effects: An experiment. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 361–371.
18.
de Fine LichtJ.NaurinD.EsaiassonP.GilljamM. (2014). When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context-bound relationship. Governance, 27(1), 111–134.
DriscollP. D.SplichalS. L.SalwenM. B.GarrisonB. (2000). Public support for access to government records: A national survey. In. DavisC. N.SplichalS. L. (Eds.), Access Denied: Freedom of Information in the Information Age (pp. 23–36). Iowa State University Press.
22.
FensterM. (2017). The transparency fix: Secrets, leaks, and uncontrollable government information. Stanford University Press.
23.
FensterM. (2021). Populism and transparency: The political core of an administrative norm. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 89(2), 286–343.
24.
FinkK. (2018). State FOI laws: More journalist-friendly, or less? In PozenD. E.SchudsonM. (Eds.), Troubling transparency: The history and future of freedom of information (pp. 91–115). Columbia University Press.
25.
FishS. (2019). The first: How to think about hate speech, campus speech, religious speech, fake news, post-truth, and Donald Trump. One Signal Publishers Atria.
26.
FOIA is broken: A report. (2016). U.S. house of representatives, 114th congress, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Gil de ZunigaH.DiehlT.Ardévol-AbreauA. (2017). Internal, external, and government political efficacy: Effects on news use, discussion, and political participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(3), 574–596.
29.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. G. (2012). Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences78(1), 50–73.
30.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. GJohnP.MeijerA.WorthyB. (2018). Do freedom of information laws increase transparency of government? A replication of a field experiment. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(1), 1–10.
31.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. G.MeijerA. J. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 24(1), 137–157.
32.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. G.PiotrowskiS. J.Van RyzinG. G. (2020). Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments. Government Information Quarterly, 37, 1–10.
33.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. G.PorumbescuG.HongB.ImT. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 575–586.
34.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. G.WeskeU.BouwmanR.TummersL. (2017). Public sector transparency. In JamesO.JilkeS.Van RyzinG. (Eds.), Experiments in public management research: Challenges and contributions (pp. 291–312). Cambridge University Press.
35.
HoodC. (2006). Transparency in historical perspective. In HoodC.HealdD. (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 1–24). Oxford University Press.
36.
IvenC. (1997, February13). Public shuns forum on open-records proposals; Access/RI wants to expand the state’s freedom-of-information laws. Providence Journal, 1D.
37.
KimS.LeeJ. (2012). E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 819–828.
38.
KwokaM. B. (2016). FOIA, Inc. Duke Law Journal, 65(7), 1361–1438.
39.
KwokaM. B.DuPeyB. (2021). Targeted transparency as regulation. Florida State University Law Review, 48(2), 389–446.
40.
LagunesP.PocasangreO. (2018). Dynamic transparency: An audit of Mexico’s Freedom of Information Act. Public Administration, 97(1), 162–176.
NyeJ. S. (1997). Introduction: The decline of confidence in government. In NyeJ. S.ZelikowP. D.KingD. C. (Eds.), Why people don’t trust government (pp. 1–18). Harvard University Press.
44.
PetersJ. (2021). Reimagining access rights. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 65(1), 135–150.
45.
PhelpsJ. E.BunkerM. D. (2001). Direct marketers’ use of public records: Current legal environment and outlook for the future. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(1), 22–48.
46.
PiotrowskiS. J.Van RyzinG. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration37(3), 306–323.
47.
PorumbescuG.LindemanM. I.CekaE.CuccinielloM. (2017). Can transparency foster more understanding and compliant citizens?Public Administration Review, 77(6), 840–850.
48.
PozenD. E. (2017). Freedom of information beyond the Freedom of Information Act. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(5), 1097–1158.
49.
PozenD. E. (2018). Transparency’s ideological drift. Yale Law Journal, 128(1), 100–165.
50.
PozenD. E. (2020). Seeing transparency more clearly. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 326–331.
RobertsA. (2006). Dashed expectations: Governmental adaption to transparency rules. In HoodC.HealdD. (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 107–127). Oxford University Press.
54.
SchnellS. (2017). Cheap talk or incredible commitment? (Mis)calculating transparency and anti-corruption. Governance, 31(3), 415–430.
55.
SpacP.VodaP.ZagrapanJ. (2018). Does the freedom of information law increase transparency at the local level? Evidence from a field experiment. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 408–417.
56.
StewartD. R.DavisC. N. (2016). Bringing back full disclosure: A call for dismantling FOIA. Communication Law and Policy, 21(4), 515–537.
57.
Tejedo-RomeroF.de AraujoJ. F. F. E. (2018). Determinants of local governments transparency in times of crisis: Evidence from municipality-level panel data. Administration & Society, 50(4), 527–554.
58.
ThomasC. W. (1998). Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Administration & Society, 30(2), 166–193.
59.
TolbertC. J.MossbergerK. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–369.
WagnerA. J. (2021a). Pandering, priority or political weapon: Presidencies, political parties & the Freedom of Information Act. Communication Law and Policy, 26(1), 53–102.
62.
WagnerA. J. (2021b). Piercing the veil: Examining demographic and political variables in state FOI law administration. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101541.
63.
WelchE. W.HinnantC. C.MoonM. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371–391.
64.
WorthyB.JohnP.VannoniM. (2017). Transparency at the parish pump: A field experiment to measure the effectiveness of freedom of information requests in England. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 485–500.
65.
WuW.MaL.YuW. (2017). Government transparency and perceived social equity: Assessing the moderating effect of citizen trust in China. Administration & Society, 49(6), 882–906.
66.
ZuffovaM. (2020). Do FOI laws and open government data deliver as anti-corruption policies? Evidence from a cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101480.
