Cross-Country Heterogeneity in Government Transparency and Citizens’ Political Efficacy: A Multilevel Empirical Analysis

Abstract

Using cross-country data from the Citizenship database of the 2004 International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) and relying on multilevel mixed-effects modeling, we investigate the link between government transparency and citizens’ external political efficacy. Results indicate that transparency enhances the perception of institutions’ responsiveness to citizens’ actions, but also highlight that this effect is mediated by citizens’ level of education. In particular, while for better educated people the magnitude of government transparency’s effect on citizens’ external efficacy is substantial, the same effect is negligible for less educated citizens who appear to be “lost in transparency.”

Keywords

government transparency accountability political efficacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramson

P. R.

Aldrich

J. H.

(1982). The decline of electoral participation in America. American Political Science Review, 76, 502-521.

Aguinis

Gottfredson

R. K.

Culpepper

S. A.

(2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39, 1490-1528.

Almond

Verba

(1963). The civic culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Alt

J. E.

Lassen

D.D.

Rose

(2006). The Causes of Fiscal Transparency: Evidence from the US States, Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 53 (special issue), pp. 30–57.

Armingeon

Careja

Weisstanner

Engler

Potolidis

Gerber

(2012). Comparative political data set III 1990-2010. Switzerland: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.

Bannister

Connolly

(2011). The trouble with transparency: A critical review of openness in e-government. Policy & Internet, 3, 1-30.

Bauhr

Grimes

(2012). What is Government Transparency? New Measures and Relevance for Quality of Government. QoG Working Paper Series n. 16, December.

Bauhr

Grimes

(2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27, 291-320.

Bowler

Donovan

(2002). Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on government. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 371-390.

10.

Brambor

Clark

W. R.

Golder

(2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14, 63-82.

11.

Browne

Di Battista

Geiger

Gutknecht

(2014). The executive opinion survey: The voice of the business community, The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015, pp. 69-78.

12.

Campbell

Gurin

Miller

(1954). The voter decides. Oxford, UK: Row, Peterson & Company.

13.

Carlitz

(2010). Annex 2: Budget processes—Review of impact and effectiveness of transparency and accountability initiatives. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2188152

14.

Coglianese

Kilmartin

Mendelson

(2009). Transparency and public participation in the federal rulemaking process: Recommendations for the new administration. George Washington Law Review, 77, 924-933.

15.

Coleman

K. M.

Davis

C. L.

(1976). The structural context of politics and dimensions of regime performance: Their importance for the comparative study of political efficacy. Comparative Political Studies, 9, 189-206.

16.

Coleman

Morrison

D. E.

Svennevig

(2008). New media and political efficacy. International Journal of Communication, 2, 771-791.

17.

Converse

P. E.

(1972). Change in the American electorate. In Campbell

Converse

P. E.

(Eds.), The human meaning of social change (pp. 263-337). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

18.

Corrigall-Brown

Wilkes

(2014). Media exposure and the engaged citizen: How the media shape political participation. The Social Science Journal, 51, 408-421.

19.

Craig

S. C.

Maggiotto

M. A.

(1982). Measuring political efficacy. Political Methodology, 8, 85-109.

20.

Dalton

R. J.

(2013). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

21.

de Fine Licht

. (2014). Transparency actually: How transparency affects public perceptions of political decision-making. European Political Science Review, 6, 309-330.

22.

de Moor

Kern

Marien

Hooghe

. (2013). The effect of institutional and electoral structures on external political efficacy. A comparative investigation of 33 countries, paper presented at the 4th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference, 4-7 September 2013, Bordeaux, France

23.

Denemark

Niemi

R. G.

(2012). Political trust, efficacy and engagement in challenging times: An introduction. Australian Journal of Political Science, 47, 1-9.

24.

Di Gennaro

Dutton

. (2006). The Internet and the public: Online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom. Parliamentary Affairs, 59, 299-313.

25.

Dyck

J. J.

Lascher

E. L.

Jr. (2009). Direct democracy and political efficacy reconsidered. Political Behavior, 31, 401-427.

26.

Erber

Lau

R. R.

(1990). Political cynicism revisited: An information-processing reconciliation of policy-based and incumbency-based interpretations of changes in trust in government. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 236-253.

27.

Forssbaeck

Oxelheim

(2014). The multi-faceted concept of transparency. In Forssbaeck

Oxelheim

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic and institutional transparency (pp. 3-30). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

28.

Fung

Graham

Weil

(2007). Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

29.

Gimpel

J. G.

Lay

J. C.

Schuknecht

J. E.

(2003). Cultivating democracy: Civic environments and political socialization in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

30.

Grimmelikhuijsen

S. G.

(2012). Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78, 50-73.

31.

Grimmelikhuijsen

S. G.

Meijer

A. J.

(2014). The effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 137-157.

32.

Grimmelikhuijsen

S. G.

Porumbescu

Hong

(2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73, 575-586.

33.

Heald

D. A.

(2006). Varieties of transparency. In Hood

Heald

D. A.

(Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? Proceedings of the British Academy 135, pp. 25-43. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

34.

Hollyer

J. R.

Rosendorff

B. P.

Vreeland

J. R.

(2011). Democracy and transparency. The Journal of Politics, 73, 1191-1205.

35.

Hood

(2001). Entry on transparency. In Clarke

P. A. B.

Foweraker

(Eds.), Encyclopaedia of democratic thought (pp. 700-704). London, England: Routledge.

36.

Jaeger

P. T.

Bertot

J. C.

(2010). Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 371-376.

37.

Justice

J. B.

Dülger

(2009). Fiscal transparency and authentic citizen participation in public budgeting: The role of third-party intermediation. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 21, 254.

38.

Karp

J. A.

Banducci

S. A.

(2008). Political efficacy and participation in twenty-seven democracies: How electoral systems shape political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 311-334.

39.

Kenski

Stroud

N. J.

(2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 173-192.

40.

Khagram

Fung

De Renzio

(2013). Open budgets: The political economy of transparency, participation, and accountability. New York, NY: Brookings Institution Press.

41.

Kim

Lee

(2012). E-Participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72, 819-828.

42.

King

C. S.

(2007). Citizens, citizenship and democratic governance. In Box

R. C.

(Ed.), Democracy and public administration (pp. 64-83). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

43.

Kopits

M. G.

Craig

M. J.

(1998). Transparency in government operations, International Monetary Fund.

44.

Lee

Johnston

E. W.

(2013). How to embed transparency into collaborative governance. Retrieved from http://patimes.org/embed-transparency-collaborative-governancee/

45.

Levy

(2007). Decision-making procedures for committees of careerist experts. The American Economic Review, 97, 306-310.

46.

Lijphart

(2012). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

47.

Meijer

(2013). Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public Administration Review, 73, 429-439.

48.

Michener

(2015). How cabinet size and legislative control shape the strength of transparency laws. Governance, 28, 77-94.

49.

Morrell

M. E.

(2003). Survey and experimental evidence for a reliable and valid measure of internal political efficacy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 589-602.

50.

Nam

(2012). Citizens’ attitudes toward open government and government 2.0. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78, 346-368.

51.

Newhagen

J. E.

(1994). Media use and political efficacy: The suburbanization of race and class. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 386-394.

52.

Niemi

R. G.

Craig

S. C.

Mattei

(1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review, 85, 1407-1413.

53.

Parent

Vandebeek

C. A.

Gemino

A. C.

(2005). Building citizen trust through e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 720-736.

54.

Powell

G. B.

Jr. Whitten

G. D.

(1993). A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 391-414.

55.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

(2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: STATA Press.

56.

Roberts

(2006). Blacked out: Government secrecy in the information age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

57.

Salmon

Wolfelsperger

(2007). Acquiescence to opacity. In Breton

(Ed.), The economics of transparency in politics (pp. 11-35). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

58.

Sharoni

(2012). E-citizenship: Trust in government, political efficacy, and political participation in the internet era. Electronic Media & Politics, 1, 119-135.

59.

Stiglitz

(2002). Transparency in government. In Islam

(Ed.), The right to tell: The role of mass media in economic development (pp. 27-44). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

60.

Sullivan

J. L.

Riedel

(2001). Efficacy: Political. In Whitney

Smelser

N. J.

Baltes

(Eds.), International encyclopedia of social & behavioral sciences (pp. 4353-4356). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

61.

Tolbert

C. J.

Mossberger

(2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66, 354-369.

62.

Welch

E. W.

Hinnant

C. C.

Moon

M. J.

(2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 371-391.