Western governments increasingly use public-private partnerships (PPPs) to solve complex social problems. This article examines how public managers handle conflicting demands for classical project management and collaborative process management in PPPs for preventing negative social control. Building on theories of public governance, PPP management, and paradox management, it develops an analytical framework for studying managerial tensions in PPPs. Applying the framework in a case study of three Danish PPPs, it shows how partnership managers handle managerial tensions through strategies of opposition, separation, and synthesis. The study demonstrates a promising path of integrating paradox management theory in public governance hybridity research.
AlamQ.KabirM. H.ChaudhriV. (2014). Managing infrastructure projects in Australia: A shift from a contractual to a collaborative public management strategy. Administration & Society, 46(4), 422–449.
2.
AndrewsR.EntwistleT. (2010). Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver? an empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 679–701.
3.
AnsellC.GashA. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32.
4.
AnsellC.SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2020). The social embedding of generic governance instruments. In MeekJ. W. (Ed.), Handbook of collaborative public management (pp. 421–440). Edward Elgar.
5.
BentzenT. Ø.SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2020). Strengthening public service production, administrative problem solving, and political leadership through co-creation of innovative public value outcomes?Innovation Journal, 25(1), 1–28.
6.
BrinkerhoffD.BrinkerhoffJ. (2011). Public-private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 2–14.
7.
BrogaardL. (2021). Innovative outcomes in public-private innovation partnerships: A systematic review of empirical evidence and current challenges. Public Management Review, 23(1), 135–157.
8.
BromleyP.PowellW. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530.
9.
BrymanJ. (2016). Social Research Methods. (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
10.
ChristensenT.LægreidP. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration: Theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407–423.
11.
CrawfordA.CunninghamM. (2015). Working in partnerships: The challenges of working across organizational boundaries, cultures, and practices. In FlemmingJ. (ed.), Police leadership: rising to the top (pp. 71–94). Oxford University Press.
12.
CrosbyB. C.BrysonJ. M.StoneM. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663.
13.
DenisJ. L.FerlieE.Van GestelN. (2015). Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 273–289.
14.
EdelenbosJ.KlijnE. (2009). Project versus process management in public-private partnership: Relation between management style and outcomes. International Public Management Journal, 12(3), 310–331.
15.
EmersonK.NabatchiT. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
16.
EshareturiC.LyleC.MorganA. (2014). Policy responses to honor-based violence: A cultural or national problem?Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma, 23(4), 369–382.
17.
FerlieE.AshburnerL.FitzgeraldL.PettigrewA. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford University Press.
18.
HeadB. W.AlfordJ. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739.
19.
HoodC. (1991). A public administration for all seasons?Public Administration, 69(1), 1–19.
20.
HoodC.DixonR. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less?Oxford University Press.
21.
HuxhamC. (1996). Collaboration and collaborative advantage. In HuxhamC. (Ed.), Creating collaborative advantage (pp. 1–18). SAGE.
22.
JoosteS. F.ScottW. R. (2012). The public-private partnership enabling field: Evidence from three cases. Administration & Society, 44(2), 149–182.
23.
KeskinenS. (2011). Troublesome differences; dealing with gendered violence, ethnicity, and ‘race’ in the finnish welfare state. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 12(2), 153–172.
24.
KoppenjanJ.KlijnE. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks. Routledge.
25.
KoppenjanJ. F. M.KarréP. M.TermeerK. (2019). New governance arrangements: Towards hybrid and smarter government? In KoppenjanJ. F. M.KarréP. M.TermeerK. (Eds.), Smart hybridity: Potentials and challenges of new governance arrangements (pp. 11–28). Eleven International Publishing.
26.
KroghA. H. (2022). Facilitating collaboration in publicly mandated governance networks. Public Management Review, 24(4), 631–653.
27.
KroghA. H.TorfingJ. (2015). Leading collaborative innovation: Developing innovative solutions to wicked gang problems. In AggerA.DamgaardB.KroghA. H.SørensenE. (Eds.), Public innovation and collaborative governance in Northern Europe (pp. 91–111). Bentham Science Publishers.
28.
LewisM. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a morecomprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.
29.
LovedayB. (2005). The challenge of police reform in england and wales. Public Money & Management, 25(5), 275–281.
30.
MayedaD. T.VijaykumarR. (2016). A review of the literature on honor-based violence. Sociology Compass, 10(5), 353–363.
31.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
32.
Ministry of Immigration and Integration. (2019). Application guidelines [Collected document]. Author.
33.
NederhandJ.KlijnE. H. (2019). Stakeholder involvement in public–private partnerships: Its influence on the innovative character of projects and on project performance. Administration & Society, 51(8), 1200–1226.
34.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley.
35.
O’TooleL. J.MeierK. J. (2004). Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4), 469–494.
36.
PageS. (2010). Integrative leadership for collaborative governance: Civic engagement in Seattle. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 246–263.
37.
PetersenO. H. (2010). Regulation of public–private partnerships: The Danish case. Public Money and Management, 30(3), 175–182.
38.
PollittC.BouckaertG. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – New public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
39.
PooleM. S.Van de VenA. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578.
40.
ProvanK. G.MilwardB. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33.
41.
RangelT.GelendeJ. (2010). Innovation in public–private partnerships (PPPs): The Spanish case of highway concessions. Public Money & Management, 30(1), 49–54.
42.
RittelH. W. J.WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
43.
SkiltonP. F.DooleyK. (2010). The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 118–134.
44.
TeddlieC.YuF. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.
45.
TerpstraJ. (2005). Models of local security networks: On the diversity of local security networks in the Netherlands. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, 7(4), 37–46.
46.
TorfingJ.AndersenL. B.GreveC.KlausenK. K. (2020). Public governance paradigms: Competing and co-existing. Edward Elgar.
47.
TorfingJ.KroghA. H.EjrnæsA. (2020). Measuring and assessing the effects of collaborative innovation in crime prevention. Policy and Politics, 48(3), 397–423.
48.
TorfingJ.SørensenE.RøiselandA. (2016). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825.
49.
Van den HurkM.BrogaardL.LemberV.PetersenO. H.WitzP. (2016). National varieties of public–private partnerships (PPPs): A comparative analysis of PPP-supporting units in 19 European countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(1), 1–20.
50.
VerhageA.TerpstraJ.DeelmanP.MuylaertE.Van ParysP (Eds.). (2010). Policing in Europe. Maklu.
51.
VerhoestK.PetersenO. H.ScherrerW.SoeciptoR. M. (2015). How do governments support the development of public private partnerships? Measuring and comparing PPP governmental support in 20 European countries. Transport Reviews, 35(2), 118–139.
52.
WebsterJ. (2015). Effective third-party policing partnerships or missed opportunities?An International Journal of Research and Policy, 25(1), 97–114.
53.
WeiheG. (2008). Ordering disorder - on the perplexities of the partnership literature. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(4), 430–442.
54.
YinR. K. (2018). Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19(3), 321–323.
