Existing studies assume that the value of political connections is homogeneous to different types of nonprofits and seldom consider their interplay with other accountability mechanisms. Based on a multilevel analysis of 2,085 foundations in China, this study builds and tests a theoretical framework of the contingent value of political connections to nonprofits, treating transparency as a moderator for the relationship between political connections and donations. Our findings suggest that while transparency is positively associated with the amount of donations obtained by foundations, political connections can help foundations obtain more donations only when their transparency score is higher than a certain threshold.
AlexanderJ.NankR. (2009). Public-nonprofit partnership: Realizing the new public service. Administration & Society, 41(3), 364–386.
2.
Anti-Corruption and Governance Research Center of Tsinghua University, & China Foundation Center (2015). Annual Report on The Development and Research of the China’s Foundations Transparency. Beijing, China: Social Sciences Academic Press.
3.
AtanR.ZainonS.WahY. B. (2012). The extent of charitable organizations’ disclosures of information and its relationship with donations. Malaysian Accounting Review, 11(2), 15–38.
4.
BrinkerhoffJ. M.BrinkerhoffD. W. (2002). Government-nonprofit relations in comparative perspective: Evolution, themes and new directions. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 22(1), 3–18.
5.
BrooksA. C. (2000). Is there a dark side to government support for nonprofits?Public Administration Review, 60(3), 211–218.
6.
ChengY. (2019a). Exploring the role of nonprofits in public service provision: Moving from coproduction to cogovernance. Public Administration Review, 79, 203–214.
7.
ChengY. (2019b). Governing public-nonprofit partnerships: Linking governance mechanisms to collaboration stages. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(1), 190–212.
8.
ChengY. (2019c). Nonprofit spending and government provision of public services: Testing theories of government-nonprofit relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(2), 238–254.
DengG.LuS.HuangC. C. (2015). Transparency of grassroots human service organizations in China: Does transparency affect donation and grants?Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(5), 475–491.
11.
de WitA.BekkersR. (2016). Government support and charitable donations: A meta-analysis of the crowding-out hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(2), 301–319.
12.
EbrahimA. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.
13.
GazleyB.BrudneyJ. L. (2007). The purpose (and perils) of government-nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 389–415.
14.
GrønbjergK. A. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations. Jossey-Bass.
15.
GuoC. (2007). When government becomes the principal philanthropist: The effects of public funding on patterns of nonprofit governance. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 458–473.
16.
HansmannH. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89, 835–898.
17.
HillmanA. J. (2005). Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line?Journal of Management, 31(3), 464–481.
18.
JingY.ChenB. (2012). Is competitive contracting really competitive? Exploring government–nonprofit collaboration in China. International Public Management Journal, 15(4), 405–428.
19.
JohnsonJ. M.NiN. (2015). The impact of political connections on donations to Chinese NGOs. International Public Management Journal, 18(4), 514–535.
20.
KingG.PanJ.RobertsM. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343.
21.
LeRouxK. (2009). Managing stakeholder demands: Balancing responsiveness to clients and funding agents in nonprofit social service organizations. Administration & Society, 41(2), 158–184.
22.
MaJ.DeDeoS. (2018). State power and elite autonomy in a networked civil society: The board interlocking of Chinese non-profits. Social Networks, 54, 291–302.
23.
MaJ.WangQ.DongC.LiH. (2017). The Research Infrastructure of Chinese Foundations, a database for Chinese civil society studies. Scientific Data, 4, Article 170094.
24.
MaQ. (2006). Non-governmental organizations in contemporary China: Paving the way to civil society?Routledge.
25.
MalatestaD.SmithC. R. (2014). Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 14–25.
26.
MitchellG. E. (2018). Modalities of managerialism: The “double bind” of normative and instrumental nonprofit management imperatives. Administration & Society, 50(7), 1037–1068.
27.
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2014). China statistical yearbook 2014. Beijing, China: National Bureau of Statistics of China.
28.
NiN.ZhanX. (2017). Embedded government control and nonprofit revenue growth. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 730–742.
29.
ParsonsL. M. (2007). The impact of financial information and voluntary disclosures on contributions to not-for-profit organizations. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19(1), 179–196.
30.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
31.
SalamonL. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government, A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press.
32.
SaxtonG. D.NeelyD. G.GuoC. (2014). Web disclosure and the market for charitable contributions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(2), 127–144.
33.
SelznickP. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization (Vol. 3). University of California Press.
34.
SidelM. (2005). The guardians guarding themselves: A comparative perspective on nonprofit self-regulation. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 80, 803–835.
35.
SmithS. R.GrønbjergK. A. (2018). Introduction to special issue of NVSQ: Nonprofits and public policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4 Suppl.), 5S–10S.
36.
SpiresA. J. (2011). Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 1–45.
37.
SteinbergR. (1991). Does government spending crowd out donations?Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62(4), 591–612.
38.
StoneM. M. (1996). Competing contexts: The evolution of a nonprofit organization’s governance system in multiple environments. Administration & Society, 28(1), 61–89.
39.
SuárezD. F. (2010). Collaboration and professionalization: The contours of public sector funding for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 307–326.
40.
SunP.MellahiK.WrightM. (2012). The contingent value of corporate political ties. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 68–82.
41.
TeetsJ. C. (2013). Let many civil societies bloom: The rise of consultative authoritarianism in China. The China Quarterly, 213, 19–38.
42.
TeetsJ. C. (2014). Civil society under authoritarianism: The China model. Cambridge University Press.
43.
Van SlykeD. M. (2003). The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 296–315.
44.
WangX.FanG.YuJ. (2017). Marketization index of China’s provinces: NERI report 2016. Social Sciences Academic Press.
45.
WeiQ. (2017). From direct involvement to indirect control? A multilevel analysis of factors influencing Chinese foundations’ capacity for resource mobilization. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9924-3
46.
YanK.LuoO. (2016). Can political connections improve foundation’s acquisition of resources? An empirical study of 305 Chinese foundations. The China Nonprofit Review, 8(2), 140–162.
47.
ZhanX.TangS. Y. (2016). Understanding the implications of nonprofit political connections for nonprofit operations and functions. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 589–600.
48.
ZhaoR.WuZ.TaoC. (2016). Understanding service contracting and its impact on NGO development in China. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(5), 2229–2251.
49.
ZhouH.YeS. (2019). Fundraising in the digital era: Legitimacy, social network, and political ties matter in China. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00112-9
