Since 1978, the government has been implementing programs to combat the underrepresentation of minorities in federal employment. However, representative bureaucracy literature has done little to examine the impact these initiatives are having on the workplace. This article examines the relationship between changes in representation and discrimination complaints. Increases in the ratio of minority and female employees predict an increase in the rates of race and sex-discrimination complaints, respectively. Increases in the ratio of Black/African American and Asian employees predict an increase in race-discrimination complaints. However, the ratio of employees ages 40 or above did not predict changes in age discrimination.
AlteriA. (2020). Data compatibility issues: How to prevent miscoding and dropped observations when using U.S. office of personnel management data sets. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20904998
2.
AlteriA.RubinE. (2018). Two wrongs do not make a right: Understanding retaliation for filing discrimination complaints in the U.S. Federal Government. Unpublished article.
3.
AndrewsR.AshworthR.MeierK. (2014). Representative bureaucracy and fire service performance. International Public Management Journal, 17(1), 1–24.
4.
BradburyM.KelloughJ. E. (2011). Representative bureaucracy: Assessing the evidence on active representation. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010367823
5.
ChaneyP. (2006). Critical mass, deliberation and the substantive representation of women: Evidence from the UK’s devolution programme. Political Studies, 54(4), 691–714.
6.
ChengC. (1997). Are Asian American employees a model minority or just a minority?The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33(3), 277–290.
7.
Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. 7201 (1978).
8.
EllisonC.PowersD. (1994). The contact hypothesis and racial attitudes among black Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 75, 385–400.
9.
EtzkowitzH.KemelgorC.NeuschatzM.UzziB.AlonzoJ. (1994). The paradox of critical mass for women in science. Science, 266(5182), 51–54.
10.
Executive Order No. 13078, 63 FR 13111 (1998, March18).
11.
Executive Order No. 13163, 65 FR 46563 (2000, July28).
12.
Executive Order No. 13171. 65 F.R. 200 (2000, October12).
13.
Executive Order No. 13548, 75 FR 45039 (2010, July30).
14.
Executive Order No. 13583, 76 FR 52845 (2011, August18).
15.
FaveroN.MolinaA. L.Jr. (2018). Is active representation an organizational-level process? The indirect effect of bureaucrats on clients they don’t directly serve. American Review of Public Administration, 48, 3–17.
16.
GilesM. W. (1977). Percent black and racial hostility: An old assumption reexamined. Social Science Quarterly, 58, 412–417.
17.
GilesM. W.BucknerM. A. (1993). David duke and black threat: An old hypothesis revisited. Journal of Politics, 55, 702–713.
18.
GlaserJ. M. (1994). Back to the black belt: Racial attitudes in the south. Journal of Politics, 56, 21–41.
19.
GrissomJ. A.KeiserL. (2011). A supervisor like me: Race, representation, and the satisfaction and turnover decisions of public sector employees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 557–580.
20.
GrissomJ. A.Nicholson-CrottyJ.KeiserL. (2012). Does my boss’s gender matter? Explaining job satisfaction and employee turnover in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 649–673.
21.
HendersonL. J. (1979). Administrative advocacy: Black administrators in urban bureaucracies. R&E Research Associates.
22.
KeiserL. R. (2010). Representative bureaucracy. In DurantR. F. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 714–737). Oxford University Press.
23.
KimP.LewisG. (1994). Asian Americans in the public service: Success, diversity, and discrimination. Public Administration Review, 54(3), 285–290.
24.
LimH.-H. (2006). Representative bureaucracy: Rethinking substantive effects and active representation. Public Administration Review, 66, 193–204.
25.
MarvelJ. D.ReshW. (2015). Bureaucratic discretion, client demographics, and representative bureaucracy. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(3), 281–310.
26.
MeierK. J. (1993). Latinos and representative bureaucracy testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(4), 393–414.
27.
MeierK. J.Nicholson-CrottyJ. (2006). Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review, 66, 850–860.
28.
MeierK. J.WrinkleR. D.PolinardJ. (1999). Representative bureaucracy and distributional equity: Addressing the hard question. The Journal of Politics, 61, 1025–1039.
29.
MillikenF. J.MorrisonE. W.HewlinP. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453–1476.
30.
MosherF. C. (1968). Democracy and the public service. Oxford University Press.
31.
Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (No FEAR Act), Pub. L. No. 107-174, 116 Stat. 566 (2002).
32.
ReadW. (1962). Upward communication in industrial hierarchies. Human Relations, 15, 2–16.
33.
RobertsK. H.O’ReillyC. A. (1974). Failures in upward communication in organizations: Three possible culprits. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 205–215.
34.
RochaR. R.HawesD. P. (2009). Racial diversity, representative bureaucracy, and equity in multiracial school districts. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00620.x
35.
RubinE.AlteriA. (2019). Discrimination complaints in the U.S. Federal Government: Reviewing progress under the No FEAR Act. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(4), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17744864
36.
SeldenS. C. (1997a). The promise of representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. M.E. Sharpe.
37.
SeldenS. C. (1997b). Representative bureaucracy examining the linkage between passive and active representation in the farmers home administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 27(1), 22–42.
38.
SigelmanL.WelchS. (1993). The contact hypothesis revisited: Black-white interaction and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces, 71, 781–796.
39.
TheobaldN. A.Haider-MarkelD. P. (2009). Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: Interactions between citizens and police. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun006
40.
TolbertC. J.GrummelJ. A. (2003). Revisiting the racial threat hypothesis: White voter support for California’s proposition 209. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 3, 183–202.
WelchS.SigelmanL. (2000). Getting to know you? Latino-Anglo social contact. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 67–83.
45.
YuH. H.LeeD. (2019). Women and public organization: An examination of mentorship and its effect on reporting workplace discrimination. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19880578
