Participatory budgeting is described as a direct-democracy approach to resource allocation decision making. Theories assume it changes how public resources are spent by moving decisions from elected officials to citizens. The literature does not consider how earmarking—in which legislators direct parts of public budgets directly—might affect the impact of such policy devices. New York City’s participatory budgeting process which uses earmarks is analyzed to determine spending changes. Officials involved fund more projects at lower average amounts than those not involved but do not change the areas of funding, all of which is expected in systems of budgetary earmarks controlled by legislators.
BassoliM. (2012). Participatory budgeting in Italy: An analysis of (almost democratic) participatory governance arrangements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(6), 1183–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01023.x
4.
BhalotraS.Clots-FiguerasI. (2014). Health and the political agency of women. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(2), 164–197.
5.
BouldingC.WamplerB. (2010). Voice, votes, and resources: Evaluating the effect of participatory democracy on well-being. World Development, 38(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.002
6.
CarnesN.LupuN. (2015). Rethinking the comparative perspective on class and representation: Evidence from Latin America. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 1–18.
7.
CorvalanA.QuerubinP.VicenteS. (2016). The political class and redistributive policies. Journal of the European Economic Association, 18, 1–48.
8.
de Sousa SantosB. (1998). Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a redistributive democracy. Politics and Society, 26(4), 461–510.
9.
FungA. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75.
10.
GanuzaE.BaiocchiG. (2012). The power of ambiguity: How participatory budgeting travels the globe. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), Article 8.
11.
GilmanH. R. (2016). Democracy reinvented: Participatory budgeting and civic innovation in America. Brookings Institution Press.
GonçalvesS. (2014). The effects of participatory budgeting on municipal expenditures and infant mortality in Brazil. World Development, 53, 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.009
14.
GrillosT. (2017). Participatory budgeting and the poor: Tracing bias in a multi-staged process in Solo, Indonesia. World Development, 96, 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.019
15.
HongS.ChoB. S. (2018). Citizen participation and the redistribution of public goods. Public Administration, 96(3), 481–496.
16.
Jabola-CarolusI. (2017). Growing grassroots democracy: Dynamic outcomes in building New York City’s participatory budgeting program. New Political Science, 39(1), 109–125.
MarwellN. P. (2004). Privatizing the welfare state: Nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 265–291.
20.
MillerS. A.HildrethR. W.StewartL. M. (2017). The modes of participation: A revised frame for identifying and analyzing participatory budgeting practices. Administration & Society, 51, 1254–1281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399717718325
PandeR. (2003). Can mandated political representation increase policy influence for disadvantaged minorities? Theory and evidence from India. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1132–1151.
24.
RothbartM. W. (2016). The financial consequences of education and food safety policies on local budgets [Doctoral dissertation]. New York University.
25.
RueschM. A.WagnerM. (2014). Participatory budgeting in Germany: Citizens as consultants (an overview). In DiasN. (Ed.), Esperanca democrática (pp. 287–300). Litográfis – Artes Gráficas.
ShybalkinaI.BifulcoR. (2019). Does participatory budgeting change the share of public funding to low income neighborhoods?Public Budgeting & Finance, 39(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12212
28.
SintomerY.HerzbergC.RöckeA. (2008). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x
29.
SouzaC. (2001). Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: Limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions. Environment and Urbanization, 13(1), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780101300112
SuC. (2018). Managed participation: City agencies and micropolitics in participatory budgeting. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4), 76S–96S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018757029
WuY.WilliamsD. W. (2015). State legislative earmarks: Counterparts of congressional earmarks?State & Local Government Review, 47(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X15581056
36.
WuY.WilliamsD. W. (2017). The determinants of success in local earmarking: The case of New York City council discretionary expense funds. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, 29(3), 319–345.
