Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-9
How a participatory process with inclusive structural design allocates resources toward poor neighborhoods: the case of participatory budgeting in Seoul,South Korea
This study examines the relationship between inclusiveness with respect to the structural design of the participatory process and resource allocation outcomes in participatory budgeting. Empirically, this article examines the case of participatory budgeting in Seoul, South Korea, where redistribution is not an explicit goal. Findings suggest that creating organizational structures that enable and encourage public participation has led Seoul’s participatory budgeting to distribute public funds toward poor neighborhoods.
Points for practitioners
Participatory budgeting is an exemplar practice of public participation in the government decision-making process. It is a local budgeting practice that allows the public to participate, discuss, deliberate, and decide where and how to spend public money. This study highlights the importance of designing inclusive organizational structures in participatory budgeting to encourage public participation. Empirical results underscore the link between inclusive organizational structures and more equitable allocation outcomes.
BeckettJKingCS (2002)
The challenge to improve citizen participation in public budgeting: A discussion. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management14(3): 463–485.
2.
BeuermannDWAmelinaM (2014) Does Participatory Budgeting Improve Decentralized Public Service Delivery. IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-547.
Washington, DC:
Inter-American Development Bank.
3.
BrysonJQuickKSSlotterbackCS, et al. (2012)
Designing public participation process. Public Administration Review73(1): 23–34.
4.
CallahanK (2002)
The utilization and effectiveness of citizen advisory committees in the budget process of local governments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management14(2): 295–319.
5.
ChoJ (2015)
A comparative study on the standard operating model of participation budgeting: Comparisons of Buk-gu, Gwangju, and Wonju, Gangwon-do. Korean Journal of Local Government Studies27(4): 79–102.
6.
City of Seoul (2017) Seoul metropolitan city participation budget management ordinance. Available at: http://www.law.go.kr/%EC%9E%90%EC%B9%98%EB%B2%95%EA%B7%9C/%EC%84%9C%EC%9A%B8%ED%8A%B9%EB%B3%84%EC%8B%9C%20%EC%8B%9C%EB%AF%BC%EC%B0%B8%EC%97%AC%EC%98%88%EC%82%B0%EC%A0%9C%20%EC%9A%B4%EC%98%81%EC%A1%B0%EB%A1%80
7.
CohenJ (1989) Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: HamlinAPettitP (eds) The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State.
Oxford:
Blackwell, pp. 17–34.
8.
De Sousa SantosB (1998)
Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a redistributive democracy. Politics & Society26(4): 461–510.
9.
EdbonCFranklinAL (2006)
Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review66(3): 437–447.
10.
ElsterJ (1998) Introduction. In: ElsterJ (ed.) Deliberative Democracy.
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–18.
11.
FeldmanMSKhademianAM (2007)
The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation. Governance20(2): 305–324.
12.
FishkinJS (1995) The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
FungA (2006)
Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review66(Special Issue): 66–75.
15.
FungA (2015)
Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review75(4): 513–522.
16.
FungAWrightEO (2003) Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance.
New York, NY:
Verso.
17.
GanuzaEFrancésF (2012)
The deliberative turn in participation: the problem of inclusion and deliberative opportunities in participatory budgeting. European Political Science Review4(2): 283–302.
18.
GastilJ (2000)
Is face-to-face citizen deliberation a luxury or a necessity?Political Communication17(4): 357–361.
19.
GoodenSMyersSL (2004)
Social equity in public affairs education. Journal of Public Affairs Education10(2): 91–97.
20.
Hartz-KarpJ (2012)
Laying the groundwork for participatory budgeting: Developing a deliberative community and collaborative governance: Greater Geraldton, Western Australia. Journal of Public Deliberation8(2): Article 6.
21.
HongS (2015)
Citizen participation in budgeting: A trade-off between knowledge and inclusiveness?Public Administration Review75(4): 572–582.
22.
HongSChoBS (2018)
Citizen participation and the redistribution of public goods. Public Administration96(3): 481–496.
JusticeJBDülgerC (2009)
Fiscal transparency and authentic citizen participation in public budgeting: The role of third-party intermediation. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management21(2): 254–288.
25.
KimSLeeJ (2016) Participatory budgeting adoption and diffusion in Korea. In: Kim S (ed) Participatory Governance and Policy Diffusion in Local Governments in Korea: Implementation of Participatory Budgeting. Research Monograph 2016–01. Sejong, Korea: Korea Development Institute, pp. 6–39.
26.
KimSSchachterHL (2013)
Citizen participation in the budget process and local government accountability: Case studies of organizational learning from the United States and South Korea. Public Performance & Management Review36(3): 456–471.
27.
KingCSStiversCM (1998) Government Is Us: Public Administration in an Anti-Government Era.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Krueger S and Park H (2020) Pathway to citizen participation: Participatory budgeting policy choice by local governments. Chinese Public Administration Review 11(1): 46--59.
30.
LeeSK (2017)
Policy formulation and implementation on participatory budgeting in Seoul,South Korea. Policy & Governance Review1(2): 125–137.
31.
MarquettiA (2009) The redistributive effects of the participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre. In: SilvaPCleurenH (eds) Widening Democracy: Citizens and Participatory Schemes in Brazil and Chile.
Leiden, The Netherlands:
Koninklijke Brill NV, pp. 99–114.
32.
MarquettiASchonerwald da SilvaCE, andCampbellA (2012)
Participatory economic democracy in action: Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, 1989–2004. Review of Radical Political Economics44(1): 62–81.
33.
McNultyS (2012)
An unlikely success: Peru’s top-down PB experience. Journal of Public Deliberation8(2): Article 4.
34.
MichelsA (2011)
Innovations in democratic governance: How does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy?International Review of Administrative Sciences77(2): 275–293.
35.
MichelsA (2019)
Participation in citizens’ summits and public engagement. International Review of Administrative Sciences85(2): 211–227.
36.
MillerSAHildrethRW, andStewartLM (2019)
The modes of participation: A revised frame for identifying and analyzing participatory budgeting practices. Administration & Society51(8): 1254--1281.
37.
NamSKwonY (2013)
A study on the factors of the types of the civil participatory budget system in local government. Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies27(2): 91–112.
PurdyJM (2012)
A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review72(3): 409–417.
40.
Rabe-HeskethSSkrondalA (2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata (2nd edn).College Station, TX:
A Stata Press Publication.
41.
RobertsN (2010)
Book review: Addressing democracy’s flaws. Reviewed work: Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly by Warren M. E. and Pearse, H. Public Administration Review70(5): 830–832.
42.
RossmannDShanahanEA (2012)
Defining and achieving normative democratic values in participatory budgeting processes. Public Administration Review72(1): 56–66.
43.
RoweI (2015)
Deliberation 2.0: Comparing the deliberative quality of online news user comments across platforms. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media59(4): 539–555.
44.
ShybalkinaIBifulcoR (2019)
Does participatory budgeting change the share of public funding to low income neighborhoods?Public Budgeting & Finance39(1): 45–66.
45.
SintomerYHerzbergCRöckeA, et al. (2012)
Transnational models of citizen participation: The case of participatory budgeting. Journal of Public Deliberation8(2): Article 9.
46.
SnijdersTABBoskerRJ (2012) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling.
London:
Sage Publishers.
47.
SteenbergenMRBächtigerASpörndliM, et al. (2003)
Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics1(1): 21–48.
48.
StiversC (1990)
The public agency as polis: Active citizenship in the administrative state. Administration & Society22(1): 86–105.
49.
UddinSMoriY, andAdhikariP (2019)
Participatory budgeting in a local government in a vertical society: A Japanese story. International Review of Administrative Sciences85(3): 490–505.
50.
WamplerB (2012)
Participatory budgeting: Core principles and key impacts. Journal of Public Deliberation8(2): 1–13.
51.
WeeksEC (2000)
The practice of deliberative democracy: Results from four large-scale trials. Public Administration Review60(4): 360–372.
52.
WelchEW (2012)
The relationship between transparent and participative government: A study of local governments in the United States. International Review of Administrative Sciences78(1): 93–115.
53.
WuYWangW (2012)
Does participatory budgeting improve the legitimacy of the local government? A comparative case study of two cities in China. Australian Journal of Public Administration71(2): 122–135.
54.
YoonS-ILimD-W (2016)
Participatory budgeting’s types and policy implications by participatory institutions and participatory levels. Journal of the Korea Contents Association16(6): 40–53.
