Determinants of Local Governments’ Transparency in Times of Crisis: Evidence From Municipality-Level Panel Data

Abstract

The global financial crisis has had an impact on Local Government forcing it to be more transparent in management of public resources. This article examines theoretically and empirically the determinants of the levels of transparency in Local Governments based on the agency and legitimacy theories. For the purpose of this study, the analysis is based on the Spanish municipalities over a period of 4 years, between 2008 and 2012. Running a random effect panel data model, our results showed that transparency is associated with economic and political factors. Unemployment rate, gender, electoral turnout, and political strength have a significant effect on the level of transparency. For other variables like investment and fiscal pressure, we did not find significant evidence of their effect on the level of transparency. We conclude that the factors that best explain the variation in the level of transparency in the period of crisis are associated with political factors.

Keywords

transparency local government municipalities panel data Spain

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acock

A. C.

(2008). A gentle introduction to Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.

Albalate

(2013). The institutional, economic and social determinants of local government transparency. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16, 90-107.

Alcaraz-Quiles

F. J.

Navarro-Galera

Ortiz-Rodríguez

(2014). Factors influencing the transparency of sustainability information in regional governments: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 82, 179-191.

Alcaraz-Quiles

F. J.

Navarro-Galera

Ortiz-Rodríguez

(2015). Factors determining online sustainability reporting by local governments. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81, 79-109.

Alonso-Villar

del Río

Toharia

(2009). Un análisis espacial del desempleo por municipios [A spatial analysis of unemployment by municipalities]. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 49(XVII), 47-80.

Alt

Lassen

Shanna

(2006). The causes of fiscal transparency: Evidence from the U.S. states. IMF Staff Papers, 53, 30-57.

Araújo

(2013). Da Nova Gestão Pública à Nova Governaçaõ Pública: Pressões emergentes da fragmentação das estruturas da Administração Pública [From New Public Management to New Public Governance: emergent pressures from estrutural fragmentation of Public Administration]. In Silvestre

Araújo

(Eds.), Coletânea em Administração Pública [Handbook of Public Administration] (pp. 25-61). Lisboa, Portugal: Escolar Editora.

Armstrong

(2011). Providing a clearer view: An examination of transparency on local government websites. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 11-16.

Ball

(2009). What is transparency? Public Integrity, 11, 293-308.

10.

Baltagi

(2014). Econometric analysis of panel data. London, England: Wiley.

11.

Barreiro

Sánchez-Cuenca

(2012). In the whirlwind of the economic crisis: Local and regional elections in Spain, May 2011. South European Society and Politics, 17, 281-294.

12.

Baum

C. F.

(2006). An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

13.

Birkinshaw

(2006). Freedom of information and openness: Fundamental human rights? Administrative Law Review, 58, 177-218.

14.

Caamaño-Alegre

Lago-Peñas

Reyes-Santias

Santiago-Boubeta

(2013). Budget transparency in local governments: An empirical analysis. Local Government Studies, 9, 182-207.

15.

Caba Pérez

Rodríguez Bolívar

López Hernández

(2014). The determinants of government financial reports online. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 42, 5-31.

16.

Cárcaba-García

García-García

(2010). Determinants of online reporting of accounting information by Spanish local government authorities. Local Government Studies, 36, 679-695.

17.

Cooper

Yoder

(2002). Public management ethics standards in a transnational world. Public Integrity, 4, 333-352.

18.

Cuadrado-Ballesteros

(2014). The impact of functional decentralization and externalization on local government transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 265-277.

19.

Eisenhardt

(1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74.

20.

Ellis

Fender

(2006). Corruption and transparency in a growth model. International Tax and Public Finance, 13, 115-149.

21.

Esteller-Moré

Polo Otero

(2012). Fiscal transparency: (Why) does your local government respond? Public Management Review, 14, 1153-1173.

22.

European Union. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for corporate social responsibility. Brussels, Belgium: Author.

23.

Ferejohn

(1999). Accountability and authority: Towards a model of political accountability. In Przeworski

Stokes

S. C.

Manin

(Eds.), Democracy, accountability and representation (pp. 131-153). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Finel

Lord

(1999). The surprising logic of transparency international. Studies Quarterly, 43, 325-339.

25.

Fung

(2013). Infotopia: Unleashing the democratic power of transparency. Politics & Society, 41, 183-212.

26.

García-Sánchez

Frías-Aceituno

J. V.

Rodríguez-Domínguez

(2013). Determinants of corporate social disclosure in Spanish local governments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 60-72.

27.

Greco

Sciulli

D’Onza

(2012). From Tuscany to Victoria: Some determinants of sustainability reporting by local councils. Local Government Studies, 38, 681-705.

28.

Guillamón

M. D.

Bastida

Benito

(2011). The determinants of local government’s financial transparency. Local Government Studies, 37, 391-406.

29.

Guillamón

M. D.

Ríos

A. M.

Vicente

(2011). Trasparencia financiera de los municipios españoles. Utilidad y factores relacionados [Financial transparency of the Spanish municipalities. Utility and related factors]. Auditoría Pública, 11(55), 109-116.

30.

Gujarati

D. N.

(1995). Basic econometrics (3rd international ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

31.

Hair

J. F.

(2004). Análisis multivariante [Multivariate Analysis]. . Madrid, Spain: Prentice Hall.

32.

Hameed

(2005). Fiscal transparency and economic outcomes. IMF Working Paper No. 05/225. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

33.

Hirsch

W. Z.

Osborne

(2000). Privatization of government services: Pressure-group resistance and service transparency. Journal of Labor Research, 21, 315-326.

34.

Hollyer

J. R.

Rosendorff

B. P.

Vreeland

J. R.

(2011). Democracy and transparency. The Journal of Politics, 73, 1191-1205.

35.

Hood

(1991). A public administration for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3-19.

36.

Hood

(2006). Transparency in historical perspective. In Hood

Heald

(Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 3-23). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

37.

Hsiao

(2003). Analysis of panel data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

38.

Ingram

R. W.

(1984). Economic incentives and the choice of state government accounting practices. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 126-144.

39.

Ittonen

Miettinen

Vähämaa

(2010). Does female representation in audit committees affect audit fees? Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 49, 113-139.

40.

Kaufmann

Kraay

(2002). Growth without governance (Policy Research Working Paper No. 2928). Washington, DC: World Bank.

41.

Khazanchi

(1995). Unethical behavior in information systems: The gender factor. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 741-749.

42.

Kickert

(2012). State responses to the fiscal crisis in Britain, Germany and the Netherlands. Public Management Review, 14, 299-309.

43.

Lane

J. E.

(2005). Public administration and public management: The principal-agent perspective. London, England: Taylor & Francis.

44.

Lassen

D. D.

(2001). Political accountability and the size of government: Theory and cross-country evidence. Retrieved form http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/81957/1/wp-00-20.pdf.

45.

Laswad

Fisher

Oyelere

(2005). Determinants of voluntary Internet financial reporting by local government authorities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 101-121.

46.

Lee

Kwak

Y. H.

(2012). An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 492-503.

47.

Lee

(2008). Preparing performance information in the public sector: An Australian perspective. Financial Accountability & Management, 24, 117-149.

48.

Longest

K. C.

(2015). Using Stata for quantitative analysis (2nd ed.). Singapore: Sage.

49.

Navarro Galera

de los Ríos Berjillos

Ruiz Lozano

Tirado Valencia

(2014). Transparency of sustainability information in local governments: English-speaking and Nordic cross-country analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 495-504.

50.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014a). Economic outlook, No. 1. Paris, France: Author.

51.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014b). Factbook 2014: Economic, environmental and social statistics. Paris, France: Author.

52.

Osborne

S. P.

(2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8, 377-387.

53.

Patten

D. M.

(1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 471-475.

54.

Pérez López

Plata Díaz

A. M.

Zafra Gómez

J. L.

López Hernández

A. M.

(2013). Deuda viva municipal en un contexto de crisis económica: Análisis de los factores determinantes y de las formas de gestión [Municipal outstanding debt in a context of economic crisis: analysis of the determinants and management forms]. Revista de Contabilidad, 16(2), 83-93.

55.

Petersen

M. A.

(2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435-480.

56.

Pina

Torres

Royo

(2010). Is E-government promoting convergence towards more accountable local governments? International Public Management Journal, 13, 350-380.

57.

Piotrowski

S. J.

(2007). Governmental transparency in the path of administrative reform. Albany: State University of New York Press.

58.

Piotrowski

S. J.

Bertelli

(2010, April). Measuring municipal transparency. 14th IRSPM Conference, Bern, Switzerland.

59.

Piotrowski

S. J.

Van Ryzin

G. G.

(2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 306-323.

60.

Roberts

(2006). Blacked out: Government secrecy in the information age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

61.

Rodríguez Bolívar

M. P.

Alcaide Muñoz

López Hernández

A. M.

(2013). Determinants of financial transparency in government. International Public Management Journal, 16, 557-602.

62.

Ruegger

King

E. W.

(1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 179-186.

63.

Serrano-Cinca

Rueda-Tomás

Portillo-Tarragona

(2009). Factors influencing e-disclosure in local public administrations. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, 355-378.

64.

Silvestre

H. C.

(2010). Gestão pública: modelos de prestação no serviço público [Public Management: models of public service delivery]. Lisboa, Portugal: Escolar.

65.

Stiglitz

(2000). The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1441-1478.

66.

Suchman

M. C.

(1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.

67.

Traunmuller

(2001). Relevance of portals in e-government. 14th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, June 25-26. Slovenia.

68.

United States Agency for International Development. (2011). Fundamentals of NGO financial sustainability. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.

69.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

70.

Zimmerman

J. L.

(1977). The municipal accounting maze: An analysis of political incentives. Journal of Accounting Research, 15(Suppl.), 107-144.