This article investigates trust in Honduran Municipal Governments and shows that transparency and municipal services quality impact on trust. We posit the Theory of Effective Transparency: relevant information should be reported; transparency should be based on unbiased information; and municipal data should be comparable with other municipal governments. Municipalities where one political party has an overall majority are trusted more, and audited financial statements generate a positive impact on trust. Engagement and participation also affect trust. As a practical implication, municipal governments should increase trust by involving citizens in municipal issues. Finally, quality of democracy is connected with greater trust.
AltJ. E.LassenD. D.RoseS. (2006). The causes of fiscal transparency: Evidence from the U.S. states. IMF Staff Paper, 53, 30-57.
2.
AraujoJ. F. F. E.Tejedo-RomeroF. (2016). Women’s political representation and transparency in local governance. Local Government Studies, 42, 885-906. doi:10.1080/03003930.2016.1194266
BauhrM. (2012). Need or greed corruption. In S. Holmberg & B. Rothstein (Eds.), Good government: The relevance of political science (pp. 68-86). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
5.
BauhrM. (2017). Need or greed? Conditions for collective action against corruption. Governance, 30, 561-581. doi:10.1111/gove.12232
6.
BauhrM.GrimesM. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27, 291-320. doi:10.1111/gove.12033
7.
BouckaertG.van de WalleS. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of “good governance”: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69, 329-343. doi:10.1177/00208523030693003
8.
BrehmJ.RahnW. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999-1023. doi:10.2307/2111684
9.
BuehnA.Dell’AnnoR.SchneiderF. (2017). Exploring the dark side of tax policy: An analysis of the interactions between fiscal illusion and the shadow economy. Empirical Economics, 54, 1609-1630. doi:10.1007/s00181-017-1277-7
10.
CanacheD.AllisonM. E. (2005). Perceptions of political corruption in Latin American democracies. Latin American Politics and Society, 47, 91-111. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2005.tb00320.x
11.
CookF. L.JacobsL. R.KimD. (2010). Trusting what you know: Information, knowledge, and confidence in social security. The Journal of Politics, 72, 397-412. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000034
12.
CookT. E.GronkeP. (2005). The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. The Journal of Politics, 67, 784-803. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00339.x
13.
CooperT. L.YoderD. E. (2002). Public management ethics standards in a transnational world. Public Integrity, 4, 333-352. doi:10.1080/15580989.2002.11770926
14.
CorbachoA.PhilippJ.Ruiz-VegaM. (2015). Crime and erosion of trust: Evidence for Latin America. World Development, 70, 400-415.
15.
CórdovaA.LaytonM. L. (2016). When is “delivering the goods” not good enough?World Politics, 68, 74-110. doi:10.1017/S0043887115000441
16.
CuccinielloM.PorumbescuG. A.GrimmelikhuijsenS. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77, 32-44. doi:10.1111/puar.12685
17.
de Fine LichtJ. (2014). Policy area as a potential moderator of transparency effects: An experiment. Public Administration Review, 74, 361-371. doi:10.1111/puar.12194
18.
EmigA. G.HesseM. B.FisherS. H.III. (1996). Black-white differences in political efficacy, trust, and sociopolitical participation: A critique of the empowerment hypothesis. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 264-276. doi:10.1177/107808749603200206
19.
EspinalR.HartlynJ.KellyJ. M. (2006). Performance still matters: Explaining trust in government in the Dominican Republic. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 200-223. doi:10.1177/0010414005281933
20.
GodefroidtA.LangerA.MeulemanB. (2017). Developing political trust in a developing country: The impact of institutional and cultural factors on political trust in Ghana. Democratization, 24, 906-928. doi:10.1080/13510347.2016.1248416
21.
GordonM. T. (2000). Public trust in government: The US media as an agent of accountability?International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, 297-310. doi:10.1177/0020852300662006
22.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. G.MeijerA. J. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 137-157. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus048
23.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. G.PorumbescuG.HongB.ImT. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73, 575-586. doi:10.1111/puar.12047
24.
HealdD. A. (2006). Varieties of transparency. In HoodC.HealdD. A. (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? Proceedings of the British academy 135 (pp. 25-43). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
HealdD. A. (2012). Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive?International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78, 30-49.
26.
HowellS. E.FaganD. (1988). Race and trust in government: Testing the political reality model. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 343-350.
27.
IntawanC.NicholsonS. P. (2018). My trust in government is implicit: Automatic trust in government and system support. The Journal of Politics, 80, 601-614. doi:10.1086/694785
28.
LeeJ. (2017). Why have policies often remained symbolic? Understanding the reasons for decoupling between policy and practice. Review of Policy Research, 34, 617-635. doi:10.1111/ropr.12241
29.
LiuC.MikesellJ. L. (2014). The impact of public officials’ corruption on the size and allocation of U.S. state spending. Public Administration Review, 74, 346-359. doi:10.1111/puar.12212
30.
López-ArceizF. J.Bellostas PérezgruesoA. J.Rivera TorresM. P. (2017). Accessibility and transparency: Impact on social economy. Online Information Review, 41, 35-52. doi:10.1108/OIR-09-2015-0296
31.
MarloweJ. (2004). Part of the solution or cogs in the system? The origins and consequences of trust in public administrators. Public Integrity, 6, 93-113. doi:10.1080/10999922.2004.11051251
32.
MauroP. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69, 263-279. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00025-5
33.
MaxwellR. (2010). Trust in government among British Muslims: The importance of migration status. Political Behavior, 32, 89-109. doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9093-1
34.
MichenerG. (2015). Assessing freedom of information in Latin America a decade later: Illuminating a transparency causal mechanism. Latin American Politics and Society, 57(3), 77-99. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00275.x
MorrisS. D.KlesnerJ. L. (2010). Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 1258-1285. doi:10.1177/0010414010369072
37.
ParkH.BlenkinsoppJ. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77, 254-274. doi:10.1177/0020852311399230
38.
ParkM. J.ChoiH.KimS. K.RhoJ. J. (2015). Trust in government’s social media service and citizen’s patronage behavior. Telematics and Informatics, 32, 629-641. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.006
39.
PérezM. D. C. C.BolívarM. P. R.HernándezA. M. L. (2010). Transparency and e-government in developing countries: The case of Latin-American municipalities. In Citizens and e-government: Evaluating policy and management (pp. 158-183). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-931-6.ch009
40.
PiotrowskiS. J.van RyzinG. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 306-323. doi:10.1177/0275074006296777
41.
Pop-ElechesG. (2007). Historical legacies and post-communist regime change. The Journal of Politics, 69, 908-926. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00598.x
42.
PorumbescuG. A. (2015). Using transparency to enhance responsiveness and trust in local government. State and Local Government Review, 47, 205-213. doi:10.1177/0160323X15599427
43.
PorumbescuG. A. (2016). Placing the effect? Gleaning Insights into the relationship between citizens’ use of e-government and trust in government. Public Management Review, 18, 1504-1535. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1122827
44.
RudolphT. J.EvansJ. (2005). Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 660-671. doi:10.2307/3647738
45.
SeligsonM. A. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. The Journal of Politics, 64, 408-433. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00132
46.
SønderskovK. M.DinesenP. T. (2016). Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust. Political Behavior, 38, 179-202. doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8
47.
StevesF. (2001). Regional integration and democratic consolidation in the Southern Cone of Latin America. Democratization, 8(3), 75-100. doi:10.1080/714000210
48.
StoyanA. T.NiedzwieckiS.MorganJ.HartlynJ.EspinalR. (2016). Trust in government institutions: The effects of performance and participation in the Dominican Republic and Haiti. International Political Science Review, 37, 18-35. doi:10.1177/0192512114534703
49.
van de WalleS.BouckaertG. (2003). Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26, 891-913. doi:10.1081/PAD-120019352
50.
WangC.-H. (2016). Government performance, corruption, and political trust in East Asia. Social Science Quarterly, 97, 211-231. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12223
51.
WasikeB. (2016). FoIA in the age of “Open. Gov”: An analysis of the performance of the Freedom of Information Act under the Obama and Bush administrations. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 417-426. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.001
52.
WelchE. W.HinnantC. C.MoonJ. M. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 371-391. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui021
53.
WhiteleyP.ClarkeH. D.SandersD.StewartM. (2016). Why do voters lose trust in governments? Public perceptions of government honesty and trustworthiness in Britain 2000-2013. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18, 234-254. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.12073
54.
WilkesR. (2015). We trust in government, just not in yours: Race, partisanship, and political trust, 1958-2012. Social Science Research, 49, 356-371. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.08.008
55.
WorthyB. (2010). More open but not more trusted? The effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom central government. Governance, 23, 561-582. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x
56.
WuW.MaL.YuW. (2017). Government transparency and perceived social equity: Assessing the moderating effect of citizen trust in China. Administration & Society, 49, 882-906. doi:10.1177/0095399716685799
57.
YangK.HolzerM. (2006). The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66, 114-126. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00560.x
58.
ZhaoD.HuW. (2017). Determinants of public trust in government: Empirical evidence from urban China. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83, 358-377. doi:10.1177/0020852315582136
