This article places the Obama administration’s open government initiative within the context of evolution of the U.S. information society. It examines the concept of openness along the three dimensions of Daniel Bell’s social analysis of the postindustrial society: structure, polity, and culture. Four “missing questions” raise the challenge of the compatibility of public service values with the culture of openness, address the right balance between postindustrial information management practices and the capacity of public organizations to accomplish their missions, and ask to reconsider the idea that greater structural openness of public organizations will necessarily increase their democratic legitimacy.
AbbateJ. (1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
BellD. (1976). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York, NY: Basic Books.
3.
BellD. (1999). The axial age of technology, foreword: 1999. In The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting (Special anniversary ed., pp. ix-lxxxv). New York, NY: Basic Books.
4.
BinghamL. B.O’LearyR. (Eds.). (2008). Big ideas in collaborative public management. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
5.
BlockF. (2008). Swimming against the current: The rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics & Society, 36, 169-206.
6.
BonvillianW. (2006). Power play. The American Interest, 2, 39-48.
7.
BozemanB. (1984). Dimensions of publicness: An approach to public organization theory. In BozemanB.StraussmanJ. (Eds.), New directions in public administration (pp. 46-62). Belmont, CA: Crooks/Cole.
8.
BrewerG. A.NeubauerB. J.GeiselhartK. (2006). Designing and implementing e-government systems: Critical implications for public administration and democracy. Administration & Society, 38, 472-499.
CaldwellL. K. (1975). Managing the transition to post-modern society. Public Administration Review, 35, 567-572.
11.
ChesbroughH. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 35-41.
12.
ColemanE. G. (2012). Coding freedom: The ethics and aesthetics of hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
DawesS. S. (2009). Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 257-264.
DemilB.LecocqX. (2006). Neither market nor hierarchy nor network: The emergence of bazaar governance. Organization Studies, 27, 1447-1466.
17.
FellerJ.FitzgeraldB.HissamS. A.LakhaniK. R. (Eds.). (2005). Perspectives on free and open source software. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
FountainJ. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
19.
FuchsE. R. H. (2010). Rethinking the role of the state in technology development: DARPA and the case for embedded network governance. Research Policy, 39, 1133-1147.
20.
HarrisonT. M.GuerreroS.BurkeG. B.CookM. E.CresswellA. M.HelbigN.. . . PardoT. A. (2011). Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 245-253). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
LessigL. (2005). Open code and open societies. In FellerJ.FitzgeraldB.HissamS. A.LakhaniK. R. (Eds.), Perspectives on free and open source software (pp. 349-360). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
LevyS. (2010). Hackers: Heroes of the computer revolution (25th anniversary ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
29.
LindersD.WilsonS. C. (2011). What is open government? One year after the directive. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 262-271). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
30.
LukensmeyerC. J.GoldmanJ. P.SternD. (2011). Assessing public participation in an open government era: A review of federal agency plans. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
31.
ManninenJ. (2006). Anders Chydenius and the origins of world’s first freedom of information act. In MustonenJ. (Ed.), The world’s first freedom of information act (pp. 18-53). Kokkola, Finland: Anders Chydenius Foundation.
32.
Mayer-SchönbergerV.CukierK. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
33.
Mayer-SchönbergerV.LazerD. (2007). From electronic government to information government. In Mayer-SchönbergerV.LazerD. (Eds.), Governance and information technology (pp. 1-14). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
MergelI. (2012). Social media in the public sector: A guide to participation, collaboration and transparency in the networked world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
MorganG. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
NoveckB. S. (2009). Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
O’ReillyT. (2005). The open source paradigm shift. In FellerJ.FitzgeraldB.HissamS. A.LakhaniK. R. (Eds.), Perspectives on free and open source software (pp. 461-481). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
O’ReillyT. (2010). Government as a platform. In LathropD.RumaL. (Eds.), Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice (pp. 11-40). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
PardoT. A.Gil-GarciaJ. R.Luna-ReyesL. F. (2010). Collaborative governance and cross-boundary information-sharing: Envisioning a networked and IT-enabled public administration. In O’LearyR.VanSlykeD. M.SoonheeK. (Eds.), The future of public administration around the world: The Minnowbrook perspective (pp. 129-139). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
RaymondE. S. (2001). The cathedral & the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary (Rev. ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
RobertsA. (2006). Blacked out: Government secrecy in the information age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
RobertsN. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration, 34, 315-353.
52.
RogersJ. D.KingsleyG. (2004). Denying public value: The role of the public sector in account of the development of the Internet. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 371-393.
53.
RosenzweigR. (1998). Wizards, bureaucrats, warriors, and hackers: Writing the history of the Internet. The American Historical Review, 103, 1530-1552.
StallmanR. (2002). Free software, free society: Selected essays of Richard M. Stallman. Boston, MA: GNU Press.
58.
StowskyJ. (2004). Secrets to shield or share? New dilemmas for military R&D policy in the digital age. Research Policy, 33, 257-269.
59.
SzczepanskaA. M.BergquistM.LjungbergJ. (2005). High noon at OS corral: Duels and shoot-outs in open source discourse. In FellerJ.FitzgeraldB.HissamS. A.LakhaniK. R. (Eds.), Perspectives on free and open source software (pp. 431-446). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60.
ThomasD. (2003). Hacker culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
61.
ToavsD. V. (2004). Pixelating policy: Visualizing issue transformation in real and virtual worlds (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
62.
TofflerA. (1980). The third wave. New York, NY: Morrow.
63.
TurnerF. (2006). From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
