Public employees are confronted with various pressures, such as increased work demands and the need to implement controversial policies. This study uses work alienation and policy alienation models to analyze work and policy pressures. Based on a survey of 790 respondents, it was first found that work alienation results in less work effort and more intention to leave. Second, policy alienation negatively affects behavioral support for a policy and the intention to implement it. These results suggest that work alienation and policy alienation have different—but both important—effects on (intended) behavior on the job.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
BerkovichI. (2011). No we won’t! Teachers’ resistance to educational reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 563-578.
3.
BlaunerR. (1964). Alienation and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BotteryM. (2012). Leadership, the logic of sufficiency, and the sustainability of education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36, 183-189.
5.
BozemanD. P.PerrewéP. L. (2001). The effect of item content overlap on organizational commitment questionnaire-turnover cognitions relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 161-173.
6.
BrandsenT.HoninghM. (2013). Professionals and shifts in governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 36, 876-883.
7.
BrodkinE. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 2), i253-i277.
8.
ChristiaensW.NieuwenhuijzeM. J.de VriesR. (2013). Trends in the medicalisation of childbirth in Flanders and the Netherlands. Midwifery, 29, e1-e8.
9.
CowdenT.CummingsG.Profetto-McGrathJ. (2011). Leadership practices and staff nurses’ intent to stay: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management, 19, 461-477.
10.
CroonenH. F. (2010). We moeten trots zijn op de thuisbevalling [We have to be proud about home births]. Medisch Contact, 39, 1980-1983.
11.
DavisR. S. (2013). Unionization and work attitudes: How union commitment influences public sector job satisfaction. Public Administration Review, 73, 74-84.
12.
De BruijnJ. A. (2010). Managing professionals. London, England: Routledge.
13.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
14.
DiefenbachT. (2009). New public management in public sector organizations: The dark sides of managerialistic ‘enlightenment’. Public administration, 87(4), 892-909.
15.
DeHart-DavisL.PandeyS. K. (2005). Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 133-148.
16.
DeVellisR. F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
EvansT. (2011). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 368-386.
18.
FlynnN. (2007). Public sector management (5th ed.). Brighton, UK: Harvester.
19.
Gould-WilliamsJ. (2004). The effects of “high commitment” HRM practices on employee attitude: The views of public sector workers. Public Administration, 82, 63-81.
20.
GreenF. (2008). Work effort and worker well-being in the age of affluence. In BurkeR.CooperC. L. (Eds.), Effects of working hours and work addiction: Strategies for dealing with them (pp. 115-136). London, England: Elsevier.
21.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22.
HerscovitchL.MeyerJ. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 474-487.
23.
HingstmanL.KenensR. J. (2011). Cijfers uit de registratie van verloskundigen: Peiling 2011[Numbers from the registration of midwives: Measurement 2011]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Nivel.
24.
HomP. W.MitchellT. R.LeeT. W.GriffethR. W. (2012). Reviewing employee turnover: Focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 831-858.
25.
JudsonA. S. (1991). Changing behavior in organization: Minimizing resistance to change. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
26.
KanungoR. N. (1982). Work alienation: An integrative approach. New York, NY: Praeger.
27.
Klopper-KesH. A. H. J.SieslingS.MeerdinkN.WilderomC. P. M.Van HartenW. H. (2010). Quantifying culture gaps between physicians and managers in Dutch hospitals: A survey. BMC Health Services Research, 10, Article 86.
28.
KumarS.KantS.AmburgeyT. L. (2007). Public Agencies and Collaborative Management Approaches Examining Resistance Among Administrative Professionals. Administration & Society, 39(5), 569-610.
29.
LeeS. Y.WhitfordA. B. (2008). Exit, voice, loyalty, and pay: Evidence from the public workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 647-671.
30.
LoyensK. (in press). Coping with policy alienation in law enforcement. In HupeP.HillM.BuffatA. (Eds.), Understanding street-level bureaucracy. London, England: Routledge.
31.
LynchJ.ModgilC.ModgilS. (1997). Education and development: Tradition and innovation. London, England: Cassell.
32.
MarxK. (1961). Alienated labor. In MarxK. (Ed.), Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 (pp. 67-83). Moscow, Russia: Foreign Languages Publishing House. (Original work published 1844)
33.
MauR. Y. (1992). The validity and devolution of a concept: Student alienation. Adolescence, 27, 731-741.
34.
MayD. R.GilsonR. L.HarterL. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37.
35.
McAllisterD. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.
36.
McEvoyG. M.CascioW. F. (1987). Do good or poor performers leave? A meta-analysis of the relationship between performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 744-762.
37.
McGregorD. (1957). The human side of enterprise. The Management Review, 46, 22-28.
38.
McKinlayJ. B.MarceauL. (2011). New wine in an old bottle: Does alienation provide an explanation of the origins of physician discontent?International Journal of Health Services, 41, 301-335.
39.
MetselaarE. E. (1997). Assessing the willingness to change: Construction and validation of the DINAMO (Doctoral dissertation). Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
40.
MirchandaniD. A.LedererA. L. (2008). The impact of autonomy on information systems planning effectiveness. Omega, 36, 789-807.
41.
MottazC. J. (1981). Some determinants of work alienation. Sociological Quarterly, 22, 515-529.
42.
MoynihanD. P.LanduytN. (2008). Explaining turnover intention in state government: Examining the roles of gender, life cycle, and loyalty. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 120-143.
43.
NairN.VohraN. (2010). An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Management Decision, 48, 600-615.
44.
NoordegraafM. (2011). Risky business: How professionals and professional fields (must) deal with organizational issues. Organization Studies, 32, 1349-1371.
45.
NoordegraafM. (2014). Reconfiguring professional work: Changing forms of professionalism in public services. Administration & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0095399713509242
46.
NoordegraafM.SteijnA. J. (Eds.). (2014). Professionals under pressure: Perspectives on professionals and professionalism. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
47.
PalmI.LeffersF.EmonsT.Van EgmondV.ZeegersS. (2008). De GGz ontwricht: Een praktijkonderzoek naar de gevolgen van het nieuwe zorgstelsel in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg [Mental healthcare disrupted: A practical research into the effects of the bew health care system in mental health]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: SP [Socialistische Partij (Socialist Party)].
48.
PandeyS. K.KingsleyG. A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 779-800.
49.
PandeyS. K.WelchE. W. (2005). Beyond stereotypes: A multistage model of managerial perceptions of red tape. Administration & Society, 37, 542-575.
50.
PetersJ.PouwJ. (2005). Intensieve menshouderij: hoe kwaliteit oplost in rationaliteit [Intensive human organizations: how quality dissolves into rationality]. Schiedam, The Netherlands: Scriptum.
51.
PollittC.BouckaertG. (2011). Public Management Reform: A comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford University Press.
52.
RaelinJ. A. (1986). The clash of cultures: Managers and professionals. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
53.
RayceS. L. B.HolsteinB. E.KreinerS. (2008). Aspects of alienation and symptom load among adolescents. The European Journal of Public Health, 19, 79-84.
54.
SagieA.KoslowskyM. (1994). Organizational attitudes and behaviors as a function of participation in strategic and tactical change decisions: An application of path-goal theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 37-47.
55.
SarrosJ. C.TanewskiG. A.WinterR. P.SantoraJ. C.DenstenI. L. (2002). Work alienation and organizational leadership. British Journal of Management, 13, 285-304.
56.
SeemanM. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24, 783-791.
57.
ShepardJ. M. (1971). Automation and alienation: A study of office and factory workers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
58.
TaylorR. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 6, 35-39.
59.
TerhartE. (2013). Teacher resistance against school reform: Reflecting an inconvenient truth. School Leadership & Management, 33, 486-500.
60.
ThanacoodyP.NewmanA.FuchsS. (2014). Affective commitment and turnover intentions among healthcare professionals: The role of emotional exhaustion and disengagement. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 1841-1857.
61.
ThomannE. (in press). Is output performance all about the resources? A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of street-level bureaucrats in Switzerland. Public Administration. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12130
62.
ThomasR.DaviesA. (2005). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26, 683-706.
63.
TonkensE.BröerC.Van SambeekN.Van HasselD. (2013). Pretenders and performers: Professional responses to the commodification of health care. Social Theory & Health, 11, 368-387.
64.
TummersL. G. (2011). Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement new policies: A policy alienation framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77, 555-581.
65.
TummersL. G. (2012). Policy alienation of public professionals: The construct and its measurement. Public Administration Review, 72, 516-525.
66.
TummersL. G. (2013). Policy alienation and the power of professionals: Confronting new policies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
67.
TummersL. G.BekkersV. J. J. M.SteijnA. J. (2009). Policy alienation of public professionals: Application in a new public management context. Public Management Review, 11, 685-706.
68.
TummersL. G.KniesE. (2013). Leadership and meaningful work in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 73, 859-868.
69.
Van der KooyJ.PoeranJ.de GraafJ. P.BirnieE.DenktasS.SteegersE. A.BonselG. J. (2011). Planned home compared with planned hospital births in the Netherlands: Intrapartum and early neonatal death in low-risk pregnancies. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 118, 1037-1046.
70.
Van ThielS.LeeuwF. L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25, 267-281.
71.
WanbergC. R.BanasJ. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 132-142.
72.
WaxJ. R.LucasF. L.LamontM.PinetteM. G.CartinA.BlackstoneJ. (2010). Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 203(3), 243-e1.
73.
WeigelR. H.VernonD. T. A.TognacciL. N. (1974). Specificity of the attitude as a determinant of attitude-behavior congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 724-728.
